We demonstrate that mortgage loans made to Native American primary borrowers are systematically more likely to be higher-priced than other mortgage loans. This difference is pronounced for mortgage loans on reservations: 27% of mortgage loans for properties on reservation lands with Native Americans as the primary borrower are higher-priced, while only 8.7% of mortgage loans nearby reservations made to non-Native American borrowers are higher-priced. Conditional on having a higher-priced loan, the rate spread facing Native Americans is also higher than non-Native Americans. These findings come from the 2010 to 2017 Home Mortgage Disclosure Act Data which is the most comprehensive, consistent series of mortgage loan data in the USA. We discuss the factors that may drive these outcomes.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
See Community Development Financial Institutions Fund ((Community Development Financial Institutions Fund)), United States Congress House. Senate Committee on Indian Affairs ((United States Congress House. Senate Committee on Indian Affairs)), Jorgensen ((Jorgensen)), Jorgensen and Akee (2017).
We use the standard definition of “higher-priced mortgage loans,” where higher-cost loans are loans that have an annual percentage rate (APR) that is 1.5 percentage points higher than the average prime offer rate (APOR) if it is a first-lien home purchase loan (Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (Consumer Financial Protection Bureau)).
Specifically whether it is VA-guaranteed (Veteran Administration), FSA/RHS-guaranteed (Farm Service Agency/Rural Housing Service), or FHA-insured (Federal Housing Administration) mortgage.
The rate spread is effectively the difference between the annual percentage rate on the loan and the average prime offer rate in the market at the time the loan was originated.
The Section 184 program is studied bundled with the Federal Housing Administration Section 248 Mortgage Insurance Program in the work of Cyree et al. (2004).
Using HUD 184 data, Wellhausen et al. (2017) also studies the cost of mortgage loans as an outcome of interest using the interest rate as a measure, but focuses on differences in the interest rate heterogeneity across reservations rather differences on and off reservation lands.
If it is a jumbo loan, it is 2.5 percentage points or more higher, and if it is a subordinate-lien mortgage, it is higher price if the APR is 3.5 percentage points or more higher than the APOR (Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (Consumer Financial Protection Bureau)).
Less than 1% of census tracts are classified as both a “nearby tract” and a “reservation associated tract” since a smaller number of reservations boarder each other within the same state.
Since we cannot perfectly proxy for whether a loan is in reservation land, a significant coefficient on this could imply that Native peoples in census tracts are far more likely to live on tribal land and thus it is a better proxy for the relative cost of a loan on reservation lands. However, to the extent non-Native individuals live in the same locations within a given census tract, it is suggestive about the importance of race even conditional on being on reservation lands.
We follow the recommendations in Oster (2018) and assume a maximum R-squared of 1.3 times the R-squared from the controlled regression.
Excluding loans in census tracts associated with the Navajo reservation from the sample has no qualitative impact on the results. Oklahoma Tribal Statistical Areas, which are institutionally distinct from reservation areas, are also excluded from the analysis.
These specifications have a fewer number of observations because bank presence is only available up to 2016. However, the results are qualitatively and quantitatively similar to using the full sample as seen in columns (1) and (3).
Again, specifications that control for bank presence, presented in Table 6, have little impact on the results.
We discuss these issues in more detail in Section “Discussion.”
Only 21.8% of individuals in Hawaii identify as “white alone, no Hispanic or Latino” (United States Census Bureau (United States Census Bureau)).
Future research should evaluate the underlying causes of this sharp increase.
We thank an anonymous referee for this point.
This is consistent with no premium on non-Native American mortgage loans on reservation since Tribal jurisdiction largely only covers individuals identified as “Indians” in the legal sense.
This exercise showed that differences in credit histories could potentially explain differences in the probability of a loan being higher priced and the rate spread under reasonable assumptions.
We believe this classification of Native peoples also fails to recognize non-trivial migration of Native peoples to and from reservation lands (Feir and Gillezeau 2018).
This dollar amount is the average loan amount for AIAN-reservation loans.
This assumes an average rate spread of 2.5% for non-AIAN nearby loans and 5.5% for AIAN-reservation loans.
Akee, R. Land titles and dispossession: allotment on American Indian reservations. J Econ Race Policy 2019;3:1–21.
Anderson, TL, Parker DP. Sovereignty, credible commitments, and economic prosperity on American Indian reservations. J Law Econ 2008;51(4):641–66.
Baker, M, Wagner D. Minorities exploited by Warren Buffett’s mobile-home empire. The Seattle Times. 2015. https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/times-watchdog/minorities-exploited-by-warren-buffetts-mobile-home-empire-clayton-homes/. Accessed 10 July 2019.
Beeman, A, Silfen Glasberg D, Casey C. Whiteness as property: predatory lending and the reproduction of racialized inequality. Crit Sociol 2011;37(1):27–45.
Bhutta, N, Laufer S, Ringo DR. Residential mortgage lending in 2016: evidence from the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act data. Fed Reserve Bull 2017;103:1.
Bonilla-Silva, E. From bi-racial to tri-racial: towards a new system of racial stratification in the USA. Ethnic Racial Stud 2004;27(6):931–50.
Brown, JR, Cookson JA, Heimer RZ. Law and finance matter: lessons from externally imposed courts. Rev Financ Stud 2017;30(3):1019–51.
Brown, JR, Cookson JA, Heimer RZ. Growing up without finance. J Financ Econ 2019; 134(3):591–616.
Carlson, LA. Federal policy and Indian land: economic interests and the sale of Indian allotments, 1900-1934. Agric Hist 1983;57(1):33–45.
Community Development Financial Institutions Fund. The report of the Native American lending study. Technical report, U.S. Department of the Treasury. 2001. https://www.cdfifund.gov/Documents/2001_nacta_lending_study.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2019.
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. What is a “higher-priced mortgage loan?”. Technical report, United States Government. 2017. https://www.consumerfinance.gov/ask-cfpb/what-is-a-higher-priced-mortgage-loan-en-1797/. Accessed 2 July 2019.
Cyree, KB, Harvey KD, Melton MR. Bank lending to Native American applicants: an investigation of mortgage flows and government guarantee programs on Native American lands. J Financ Serv Res 2004; 26(1):29–54.
Dewees, S, Mottola G. 2017. Race and financial capability in america: understanding the Native American experience. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority: Investor Education Foundation.
Dimitrova-Grajzl, V, Grajzl P, Guse AJ, Todd RM. Consumer credit on American Indian reservations. Econ Syst 2015;39(3):518–40.
Dymski, G. 1999. The bank merger wave: the economic causes and social consequences of financial consolidation. ME Sharpe.
Dymski, GA. Discrimination in the credit and housing markets: findings and challenges. Handbook on the economics of discrimination 2006;215:220.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Fixed rate and adjustable rate mortgages. Web. 2016a. https://www.fdic.gov/consumers/assistance/protection/mortgages/looking/fixed-rate.html#Annual. Accessed 31 July 2020.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Looking for the best mortgage. Web. 2016b. https://www.fdic.gov/consumers/assistance/protection/mortgages/looking/#Points. Accessed 31 July 2020.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. 2018. FDIC consumer compliance examination manual. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Feir, D, Gillezeau R. Return to the homeland? The impact of the great recession on employment outcomes and labor mobility for Native Americans. J Econ Race Policy 2018;1(2–3):60–74.
Johnson, K, Todd RM. 2019. Coverage of home lending in rural areas under the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act. CICD Working Paper Series (4).
Jorgensen, M. Access to capital and credit in native communities. Native Nations Institute. 2016. https://nni.arizona.edu/application/files/89. Accessed 20 June 2019.
Jorgensen, M, Akee RK. Access to capital and credit in Native communities: a data review. Tucson: Native Nations Institute, The University of Arizona; 2017.
Kunesh, P. Tribal leaders handbook on homeownership. Minneapolis: The Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis; 1993.
Kunesh, P. Lending processes to optimize opportunities for homeownership. Tribal leaders handbook on homeownership, Chapter 6. In: Kunesh P, editors. Minneapolis: The Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis; 2018. p. 201–13.
Laderman, E, Reid C. Mortgage lending on Native American reservations: does a guarantee matter? J Hous Econ 2010;19(3):233–42.
Long, JE, Caudill SB. Racial differences in homeownership and housing wealth, 1970–1986. Econ Inq 1992;30(1):83–100.
Oliver, ML, Shapiro TM, Shapiro T. 2006. Black wealth, white wealth: a new perspective on racial inequality. Taylor & Francis.
Oster, E. 2018. Unobservable selection and coefficient stability: theory and evidence. J Bus Econ Stat, Forthcoming.
Parker, DP. The effects of legal institutions on access to credit: evidence from American Indian reservations. 2012. https://aae.wisc.edu/dparker/wp-content/uploads/sites/12/2018/11/CreditMarketsWP2012.pdf. Accessed 2 July 2019.
Pettit, KL, Kingsley GT, Biess J, Bertumen K, Pindus N, Narducci C, Budde A. Continuity and change: demographic, socioeconomic, and housing conditions of American Indians and Alaska natives. Technical report, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research. 2014. https://www.huduser.gov/portal//publications/pdf/housing_conditions.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2019.
Pindus, N, Kingsley T, Biess J, Levy D, Simington J, Hayes C. 2017. Housing needs of American Indians and Alaska Natives in Tribal areas: a report from the assessment of American Indian, Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian housing needs: executive summary. US Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.
RADAR. 2018. Public Home Mortgage Disclosure Act database RADAR data warehouse data dictionary. Technical report, Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council and Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
Schumacher, JB, et al. 2006. Redlining in Montana. Ph.D. thesis, Montana State University-Bozeman, College of Agriculture.
Shapiro, TM. Race, homeownership and wealth. Wash Univ J Law Policy 2006;20:53.
Shapiro, T, Meschede T, Osoro S. 2013. The roots of the widening racial wealth gap: explaining the black-white economic divide. Research and policy brief.
Shoemaker, JA. An introduction to American Indian land tenure: mapping the legal landscape. J Law Prop Soc 2020;5:1.
Sullivan, L, Meschede T, Dietrich L, Shapiro T. 2015. The racial wealth gap. Institute for Assets and Social Policy, Brandeis University. DEMOS.
Todd, RM, Burlon F. Homeownership gaps among Indian reservations prove puzzling. Community Dividend. 2009. https://www.minneapolisfed.org/publications/community-dividend/homeownership-gaps-among-indian-reservations-prove-puzzling. Accessed 2 July 2019.
Todd, R, Johnson K. Manufactured-home lending to American Indians in Indian Country remains highly concentrated. Center for Indian Country Development Blog. 2017. https://www.minneapolisfed.org/indiancountry/research-and-articles/cicd-blog/the-market-for-manufactured-home-loans-to-american-indian-and-alaska-native-borrowers-in-indian-country-remains-highly-concentrated. Accessed 10 July 2019.
Todd, R, Johnson K. Race, location, and manufactured-home loans on American Indian reservations. Center for Indian Country Development Blog. 2018. https://www.minneapolisfed.org/indiancountry/research-and-articles/cicd-blog/race-location-and-manufactured-home-loans-on-american-indian-reservations. https://www.minneapolisfed.org/indiancountry/research-and-articles/cicd-blog/race-location-and-manufactured-home-loans-on-american-indian-reservations Accessed 10 July 2019.
United States Census Bureau. Quick facts: Hawaii. Web. 2019. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/HI. Accessed 14 Aug 2019.
United States Congress House. Senate Committee on Indian Affairs. Accessing Capital in Indian Country. Hearings, June 17, 2015. One Hundred Fourteenth Congress. Government Publishing Office Internet. 2015. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-114shrg97306/html/CHRG-114shrg97306.htm. Accessed 2 July 2019.
Wellhausen, RL, et al. Sovereignty, law, and finance: evidence from American Indian reservations. Q J Political Sci 2017;12(4):405–36.
Yinger, J. Discrimination in mortgage lending: a literature review. Mortgage lending, racial discrimination and federal policy. Taylor and Francis; 2018. p. 29–73.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis or the Board of Governors.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cattaneo, L., Feir, D. The Price of Mortgage Financing for Native Americans. J Econ Race Policy 4, 302–319 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41996-020-00069-8
- Indigenous peoples
- Native American
- Mortgage financing
- Home ownership
- Capital access