Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Investigating the effect of a monovalent ion on the droplet’s size and distribution in a surfactant-free droplet generation microfluidic chip

  • Full Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Flow Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In droplet-based microfluidic reactors (microreactors), the droplet size, shape, and distribution are essential characteristics for optimum mass transfer and reaction performances. The phase’s apparent physical properties forming the droplets in microreactors control the droplet’s generation rate, size, and shape. Modifying the interfacial properties of the continuous and dispersed phases by surfactants is a common practice to control the droplets’ size, but, in many cases, it affects the reaction environment. Surfactant-free droplet generation (emulsions formation) is a new promising approach to minimize the effects of long-chained additives, like polymers and surfactants, on the liquids’ chemical and physical properties involved in the reaction emulsions creation. The effect of monovalent ions generated from NaNO3 salt on the droplets’ size and distribution will be investigated in a micro-flow system in the present work. A microfluidic chip was designed and fabricated for this work using the direct-writing soft-lithography method. The continuous phase was chosen to be Octanoic acid, while the dispersed phase was NaNO3 aqueous solutions with salt concentrations ranged between 0.0 and 1.0 M. The droplets’ size and distribution were determined by visualizing the movement of the droplets using a high-speed camera mounted on a high-precision electronic microscope. The experimental results showed a dramatic reduction in the dispersed phase droplet size when monovalent ions are introduced. The ion concentration effect was not linear in all the investigated concentrations where the droplet size reduces by increasing the ion concentration from 0.2 to 0.6 M. Further increase in the ion concentration showed a reverse effect where the droplet size started to increase. It is believed that this non-linear effect of the ion concentration is directly related to the double-layer thickness that may be reduced by increasing the ion concentration beyond 0.6 M.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Liu W, Zhu Y (2020) Development and application of analytical detection techniques for droplet-based microfluidics”-A Review. Anal Chim Acta 1113:66–84

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Grünberger A, Wiechert W, Kohlheyer D (2014) Single-cell microfluidics: opportunity for bioprocess development. Curr Opin Biotechnol 29:15–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ling FWM, Mahmood WK, Abdulbari HA (2017) Rapid prototyping of microfluidics devices using xurograhy method. MATEC Web Conf 111:1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Vladisavljević G, Nuumani R, Nabavi S (2017) Microfluidic production of multiple emulsions. Micromachines 8:75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Utada AS (2005) Monodisperse double emulsions generated from a microcapillary device. Science 308:537–541

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tanimu A, Jaenicke S, Alhooshani K (2017) Heterogeneous catalysis in continuous flow microreactors: A review of methods and applications. Chem Eng J 327:792–821

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Shah RK, Shum HC, Rowat AC, Lee D, Agresti JJ, Utada AS, Chu L-Y, Kim J-W, Fernandez-Nieves A, Martinez CJ, DA Weitz (2008) Designer emulsions using microfluidics. Mater Today 11: 18–27

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Acton JC, Saffle RL (1970) Stability of oil-in‐water emulsions. Effects of surface tension, level of oil, viscosity and type of meat protein. J Food Sci 35:852–855

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Abdulbari HA, Abdurahman NH, Rosli YM, Mahmood WK, Azhari HN (2011) Demulsification of petroleum emulsions using microwave separation method. Int J Physc Sci 6:5376–5382

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Trinh TA, Han Q, Ma Y, Chew JW (2019) Microfiltration of oil emulsions stabilized by different surfactants. J Membr Sci 579:199–209

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Utada AS, Lorenceau E, Link DR, Kaplan PD, Stone HA, DA Weitz (2005) Monodisperse double emulsions generated from a microcapillary device. Science 308: 537–541

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Smith GD, Donelan CE, Barden RE (1977) Oil-continuous microemulsions composed of hexane, water, and 2-propanol. J Colloid Interface Sci 60:488–496

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Porada JH, Mansueto M, Laschat S, Stubenrauch C (2017) Microemulsions with hydrophobic ionic liquids: Influence of the structure of the anion. J Mol Liq 227:202–209

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Doğan M, Göksel Saraç M, Aslan D, Türker (2020) Effect of salt on the inter-relationship between the morphological, emulsifying and interfacial rheological properties of O/W emulsions at oil/water interface. J Food Eng 275:109871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Abedi E, Majzoobi M, Farahnaky A, Pourmohammadi K, Mahmoudi MR (2018) Effect of ionic strength (NaCl and CaCl2) on functional, textural and electrophoretic properties of native and acetylated gluten, gliadin and glutenin. Int J Biol Macromol 120:2035–2047

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Schramm LL (1992) Petroleum Emulsions. In: Emulsions. American Chemical Society, Washington, pp 1–49

  17. Hunter RJ (1981) Zeta potential in colloid science. Academic, London

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hunter RJ (2001) Foundations of colloid science. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lashkarbolooki M, Ayatollahi S, Riazi M (2014) The impacts of aqueous ions on interfacial tension and wettability of an Asphaltenic–Acidic crude oil reservoir during smart water injection. J Chem Eng Data 59:3624–3634

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Reijenga J, van Hoof A, van Loon A, Teunissen B (2013) Development of methods for the determination of pKaValues. Anal Chem Insights 8:ACI.S12304

  21. Ugelstad J, Mörk PC, Aasen JO (1967) Kinetics of emulsion polymerization. J Polym Sci Part A-1 Polym Chem 5:2281–2288

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Koroleva MYu, Yurtov Ev (2003) Effect of ionic strength of dispersed phase on ostwald ripening in water-in-oil emulsions. Colloid J 65:40–43

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge University Malaysia Pahang’s financial support by the research grant with the number (RDU 1903142).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hayder A. Abdulbari.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abdulbari, H.A., Zahera, M. Investigating the effect of a monovalent ion on the droplet’s size and distribution in a surfactant-free droplet generation microfluidic chip. J Flow Chem 12, 31–39 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41981-021-00185-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41981-021-00185-y

Keywords

Navigation