Abstract
To address the persistent underrepresentation of women and racial and ethnic minorities in STEM, the current study utilized a quasi-experimental posttest waitlist control group approach to examine the effect of a 1-year virtual peer mentoring program on the academic, professional, and psychosocial outcomes of graduate mentors and undergraduate mentees enrolled in STEM degree programs at two historically black institutions. The findings demonstrated that mentors and mentees participating in the mentoring program experienced increased levels of community, STEM achievement, career self-efficacy, and intent to persist in STEM degrees and careers. Mentors experienced increased interest in science, engineering, and technology, and mentees experienced increased interest in science, engineering, and mathematics. The implications of the program, especially among women and racial and ethnic minorities enrolled in historically black institutions, are discussed, as well as suggestions for future study.

Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2017). Digital compass learning: distance education enrollment report 2017. Babson survey research group. https://onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/digtiallearningcompassenrollment2017.pdf. Accessed 28 Aug 2020.
Anagnos, T., & Lyman-Holt, M. A. L. (2015). Virtual peer teams: connecting students with the online work environment. https://peer.asee.org/virtual-peer-teams-connecting-students-with-the-online-work-environment. Accessed 28 Aug 2020.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: Macmillan.
Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents, 5(1), 307–337.
Beyer, S. (2008). Gender differences and intra-gender differences amongst management information systems students. Journal of Information Systems Education, 19, 301–310.
Blake-Beard, S., Bayne, M., Crosby, F., & Muller, C. (2011). Matching by race and gender in mentoring relationships: keeping our eyes on the prize. Journal of Social Issues, 67(3), 622–643.
Bolliger, D., & Halupa, C. (2012). Student perceptions of satisfaction and anxiety in an online doctoral program. Distance Education, 33(1), 81–98.
Brainard, S. G., & Carlin, L. (1998). A six-year longitudinal study of undergraduate women in engineering and science. Journal of Engineering Education, 87(4), 369–375.
Byars-Winston, A., Branchaw, J., Pfund, C., Leverett, P., & Newton, J. (2015). Culturally diverse undergraduate researchers’ academic outcomes and perceptions of their research mentoring relationships. International Journal of Science Education, 37(15), 2533–2554.
Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218.
Carpi, A., Ronan, D. M., Falconer, H. M., & Lents, N. H. (2017). Cultivating minority scientists: undergraduate research increases self-efficacy and career ambitions for underrepresented students in STEM. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(2), 169–194.
Castellanos, J., Gloria, A. M., Besson, D., & Harvey, L. O. C. (2016). Mentoring matters: racial ethnic minority undergraduates’ cultural fit, mentorship, and college and life satisfaction. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 46(2), 81–98.
Chemers, M., Zurbriggen, E., Syed, M., Goza, B., & Bearman, S. (2011). The role of efficacy and identity in science career commitment among underrepresented minority students. Journal of Social Issues, 67(3), 469–491.
Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
Dawson, A. E., Bernstein, B. L., & Bekki, J. M. (2015). Providing the psychosocial benefits of mentoring to women in STEM: CareerWISE as an online solution. New Directions for Higher Education, 2015(171), 53–62.
Dolan, E., & Johnson, D. (2009). Toward a holistic view of undergraduate research experiences: an exploratory study of impact on graduate/postdoctoral mentors. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 6(18), 487–500.
Espinosa, L. (2011). Pipelines and pathways: women of color in undergraduate STEM majors and the college experiences that contribute to persistence. Harvard Educational Review, 81(2), 209–241.
Estrada, M., Hernandez, P. R., & Schultz, P. W. (2018). A longitudinal study of how quality mentorship and research experience integrate underrepresented minorities into STEM careers. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-04-0066 Accessed 28 Aug 2020.
Falk, N. A., Rottinghaus, P. J., Casanova, T. N., Borgen, F. H., & Betz, N. E. (2017). Expanding women’s participation in STEM: insights from parallel measures of self-efficacy and interests. Journal of Career Assessment, 25(4), 571–584.
Fehmi, D., Braun, T. F., & Gublo, K. (2017). Peer mentor program for the general chemistry laboratory designed to improve undergraduate STEM retention. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(12), 1873–1880.
Fouad, N., Singh, R., Cappaert, K., Chang, W., & Wan, M. (2016). Comparison of women engineers who persist in or depart from engineering. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 92, 79–93.
Gandhi, M., & Johnson, M. (2016). Creating more effective mentors: mentoring the mentor. AIDS and Behavior, 20(2), 294–303.
Gloria, A. M., & Kurpius, S. E. R. (2001). Influences of self-beliefs, social support, and comfort in the university environment on the academic non-persistence decisions of American Indian undergraduates. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 7(1), 88–102.
Good, C., Rattan, A., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women’s representation in mathematics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(4), 700.
Graham, J., & McClain, S. (2019). A canonical correlational analysis examining the relationship between peer mentorship, belongingness, imposter feelings, and Black collegians’ academic and psychosocial outcomes. American Educational Research Journal, 56(6), 2333–2367.
Graham, M., Frederick, J., Byars-Winston, A., Hunter, A., & Handelsman, J. (2013). Increasing persistence of college students in STEM. Science, 341(6153), 1455–1456.
Griffith, A. L. (2010). Persistence of women and minorities in STEM field majors: is it the school that matters? Economics of Education Review, 29(6), 911–922.
Guy, B., & Boards, A. (2019). A seat at the table: exploring the experiences of underrepresented minority women in STEM graduate programs. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 1-12, 354–365.
Hill, C., Corbett, C., & St Rose, A. (2010). Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. American Association of University Women. https://time.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/why-so-few-women-in-science-technology-engineering-and-mathematics.pdf. Accessed 28 Aug 2020.
Hunter, A., Laursen, S., & Seymour, E. (2007). Becoming a scientist: the role of undergraduate research in students’ cognitive, personal, and professional development. Science Education, 91(1), 36–74.
Ireland, D., Freeman, K., Winston-Proctor, C., DeLaine, K., McDonald Lowe, S., & Woodson, K. (2018). (Un) hidden figures: a synthesis of research examining the intersectional experiences of black women and girls in STEM education. Review of Research in Education, 42(1), 226–254.
Johnson, D. R. (2012). Campus racial climate perceptions and overall sense of belonging among racially diverse women in STEM majors. Journal of College Student Development, 53(2), 336–346.
Junge, B., Quinones, C., Kakietek, J., Teodorescu, D., & Marsteller, P. (2010). Promoting undergraduate interest, preparedness, and professional pursuit in the sciences: an outcomes evaluation of the SURE program at Emory University. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 9(2), 119–132.
Kendricks, K. D., Nedunuri, K. V., & Arment, A. R. (2013). Minority student perceptions of the impact of mentoring to enhance academic performance in STEM disciplines. Journal of STEM Education, 14(2), 38–46.
Kier, M., Blanchard, M., Osborne, J., & Albert, J. (2014). The development of the STEM career interest survey (STEM-CIS). Research in Science Education, 44(3), 461–481.
Kobulnicky, H. A., & Dale, D. A. (2016). A community mentoring model for STEM undergraduate research experiences. Journal of College Science Teaching, 45(6), 17–23.
Laursen, S., Hunter, A., Seymour, E., Thiry, H., & Melton, G. (2010). Undergraduate research in the sciences: engaging students in real science. Hoboken: Wiley.
Lent, R., Brown, S., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79–122.
Luedke, C. L. (2017). Person first, student second: staff and administrators of color supporting students of color authentically in higher education. Journal of College Student Development, 58(1), 37–52.
MacPhee, D., Farro, S., & Canetto, S. S. (2013). Academic self-efficacy and performance of underrepresented STEM majors: gender, ethnic, and social class patterns. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 13(1), 347–369.
McGee, E. O. (2016). Devalued Black and Latino racial identities: a by-product of STEM college culture? American Educational Research Journal, 53(6), 1626–1662.
Mondisa, J. (2018). Examining the mentoring approaches of African-American mentors. Journal of African American Studies, 22, 293–308.
Mondisa, J., & McComb, S. A. (2015). Social community: a mechanism to explain the success of STEM minority mentoring programs. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 23(2), 149–163.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. The science of effective mentorship in STEMM. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25568. Accessed 28 Aug 2020.
National Science Foundation [NSF]. (2019). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf19304/. Accessed 28 Aug 2020.
Ong, M., Smith, J. M., & Ko, L. T. (2018). Counterspaces for women of color in STEM higher education: marginal and central spaces for persistence and success. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(2), 206–245.
Pacifici, L. B., & Thomson, N. (2011). What do they expect? A comparison of student expectations and outcomes of undergraduate research experiences. Journal of College Science Teaching, 41(1), 54–60.
Packard, B. W., Marciano, V. N., Payne, J. M., Bledzki, L. A., & Woodard, C. T. (2014). Negotiating peer mentoring roles in undergraduate research lab settings. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 22(5), 433–445.
Pallant, J. F., & Tennant, A. (2007). An introduction to the Rasch measurement model: an example using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 46(1), 1–18.
Pfund, C., House, S., Spencer, K., Asquith, P., Carney, P., Masters, K. S., McGee, R., Shanedling, J., Vecchiarelli, S., & Fleming, M. (2013). A research mentor training curriculum for clinical and translational researchers. Clinical and Translational Science, 6(1), 26–33.
Pfund, C., House, S., Asquith, P., Fleming, M. F., Buhr, K. A., Burnham, E. L., Eichenberger Gilmore, J., Huskins, W. C., McGee, R., Schurr, K., Shapiro, E. D., Spencer, K. C., & Sorkness, C. A. (2014). Training mentors of clinical and translational research scholars: a randomized controlled trial. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 89(5), 774–782.
Pon-Barry, H., Packard, B. W., & St. John, A. (2017). Expanding capacity and promoting inclusion in introductory computer science: a focus on near-peer mentor preparation and code review. Computer Science Education, 27(1), 54–77.
Prunuske, A. J., Wilson, J., Walls, M., & Clarke, B. (2013). Experiences of mentors training underrepresented undergraduates in the research laboratory. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 12(3), 403–409.
Rainey, K., Dancy, M., Mickelson, R., Stearns, E., & Moller, S. (2018). Race and gender differences in how sense of belonging influences decisions to major in STEM. International journal of STEM education, 5(1), 1–14.
Rice, D., & Alfred, M. (2014). Personal and structural elements of support for African American female engineers. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 15(2), 40–49.
Rockinson-Szapkiw, A., & Wendt, J. L. (2020). The benefits and challenges of a blended peer mentoring program for women peer mentors in STEM. International Journal on Mentoring and Coaching in Education. Retrieved from https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJMCE-03-2020-0011/full/html. Accessed 18 Dec 2020.
Rockinson-Szapkiw, A., Wendt, J. L. & Sharpe, K. M. (2020) The benefits and challenges of a blended peer mentoring program: peer mentors’ STEM beliefs, interests, skills, and behavior [Roundtable Session]. AERA Annual Meeting San Francisco, CA.
Rogers, J., Sorkness, C. A., Spencer, K., & Pfund, C. (2018). Increasing research mentor training among biomedical researchers at Clinical and Translational Science Award hubs: the impact of the facilitator training initiative. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, 2(3), 118–123.
Rovai, A. P. (2002). Development of an instrument to measure classroom community. The Internet and Higher Education, 5(3), 197–211.
Sharpe, K. M., Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. & Wendt, J. L. (2020) Building STEM self-efficacy and persistence: the case of online mentor training for underrepresented minority women peer mentors at historically black institutions [Paper Session]. AERA Annual Meeting San Francisco, CA.
Stoeger, H., Debatin, T., Heilemann, M., & Ziegler, A. (2019). Online mentoring for talented girls in STEM: the role of relationship quality and changes in learning environments in explaining mentoring success. In R. F. Subotnik, S. G. Assouline, P Olszewski-Kubilius, H. Stoeger, & A. Ziegler (Eds.). The future of research in talent development: promising trends, evidence, and implications of innovative scholarship for policy and practice. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 168, 75–99.
Tellhed, U., Bӓckstrӧm, M., & Bjӧrklund, F. (2017). Will I fit in and do well? The importance of social belongingness and self-efficacy for explaining gender difference in interest in STEM and HEED majors. Sex Roles, 77(1–2), 86–96.
Thiry, H., & Laursen, S. L. (2011). The role of student-advisor interactions in apprenticing undergraduate researchers into a scientific community of practice. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(6), 771–784.
Thoman, D. B., Arizaga, J. A., Smith, J. L., Story, T. S., & Soncuya, G. (2014). The grass is greener in non-science, technology, engineering, and math classes: examining the role of competing belonging to undergraduate women’s vulnerability to being pulled away from science. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 38(2), 246–258.
Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: a theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89–125.
Tinto, V. (1987). Leaving college: rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Tinto, V. (1988). Stages of student departure: reflections on the longitudinal character of student leaving. The Journal of Higher Education, 59(4), 438–455. https://doi.org/10.2307/1981920.
Tinto, V. (1993). A theory of individual departure from institutions of higher education. In V. Tinto (Ed.), Leaving college: rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (pp. 84137). University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Tinto, V. (2017). Through the eyes of students. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 19(3), 254–269.
Walton, G. M., & Cohen, G. L. (2007). A question of belonging: race, social fit, and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(1), 82.96.
Walton, G. M., Cohen, G. L., Cwir, D., & Spencer, S. J. (2012). Mere belonging: the power of social connections. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(3), 513–532.
Warner, R. M. (2013). Applied statistics: from bivariate through multivariate techniques (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Wendt, J. L., Rockinson-Szapkiw, A., & Conway, A. (2019). Using technology to foster peer mentoring relationships: development of a virtual peer mentorship training model for broadening participation in STEM. In L. Winfield, Z. Wilson-Kennedy, G. Thomas, & L. Watkins (Eds.), Growing diverse STEM communities: methodology, impact, and evidence (pp. 255–268). https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/bk-2019-1328.ch016. Accessed 18 Dec 2020.
Whittaker, J. A., & Montgomery, B. L. (2012). Cultivating diversity and competency in STEM: challenges and remedies for removing virtual barriers to constructing diverse higher education communities of success. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 11(1), A44–A51.
Wolf-Wendel, L., Ward, K., & Kinzie, J. (2009). A tangled web of terms: the overlap and unique contribution of involvement, engagement, and integration to understanding college student success. Journal of College Student Development, 50(4), 407–428.
Zaniewski, A. M., & Reinholz, D. (2016). Increasing STEM success: a near-peer mentoring program in the physical sciences. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(14), 1–12.
Funding
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1717082.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Disclaimer
Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rockinson-Szapkiw, A., Wendt, J.L. & Stephen, J.S. The Efficacy of a Blended Peer Mentoring Experience for Racial and Ethnic Minority Women in STEM Pilot Study: Academic, Professional, and Psychosocial Outcomes for Mentors and Mentees. Journal for STEM Educ Res 4, 173–193 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-020-00048-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-020-00048-6


