Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Die ESHRE-Endometrioseleitlinien: Neuigkeiten und Bestehendes

Teil 1: Die Diagnosestellung

Les lignes directrices de lʼESHRE sur lʼendométriose: nouveautés et points à retenir

Partie 1: le diagnostic

  • Noch gewusst
  • Published:
Journal für Gynäkologische Endokrinologie/Schweiz Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1

Literatur

  1. Becker CM, Bokor A, Heikinheimo O, Horne A, Jansen F, Kiesel L et al (2022) ESHRE guideline: endometriosis. Hum Reprod Open 2022(2):hoac009. https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoac009

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Dunselman GAJ, Vermeulen N, Becker C, Calhaz-Jorge C, D’Hooghe T, De Bie B et al (2014) ESHRE guideline: management of women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod 29(3):400–412

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kennedy S, Bergqvist A, Chapron C, D’Hooghe T, Dunselman G, Greb R et al (2005) ESHRE guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis. Hum Reprod 20(10):2698–2704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Evers HJLH (2013) Is adolescent endometriosis a progressive disease that needs to be diagnosed and treated? Hum Reprod 28(8):2023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ghai V, Jan H, Shakir F, Haines P, Kent A (2020) Diagnostic delay for superficial and deep endometriosis in the United Kingdom. J Obstet Gynaecol 40(1):83–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fruscalzo A, Stochino E, Pluchino N, Bouquet de Jolinière J, Feki A (2021) La nouvelle classification de l’endométriose révisée selon #Enzian : finalement une nomenclature complète et efficace ? J Gynäkol Endokrinol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41975-021-00194-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bazot M, Lafont C, Rouzier R, Roseau G, Thomassin-Naggara I, Daraï E (2009) Diagnostic accuracy of physical examination, transvaginal sonography, rectal endoscopic sonography, and magnetic resonance imaging to diagnose deep infiltrating endometriosis. Fertil Steril 92(6):1825–1833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hudelist G, Ballard K, English J, Wright J, Banerjee S, Mastoroudes H et al (2011) Transvaginal sonography vs. clinical examination in the preoperative diagnosis of deep infiltrating endometriosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 37(4):480–487

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen FP, Soong YK, Lee N, Lo SK (1998) The use of serum CA-125 as a marker for endometriosis in patients with dysmenorrhea for monitoring therapy and for recurrence of endometriosis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 77(6):665–670

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nisenblat V, Bossuyt PMM, Farquhar C, Johnson N, Hull ML (2016) Imaging modalities for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD9591

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wykes CB, Clark TJ, Khan KS (2004) Accuracy of laparoscopy in the diagnosis of endometriosis: a systematic quantitative review. BJOG 111(11):1204–1212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kuznetsov L, Dworzynski K, Davies M, Overton C, Guideline Committee (2017) Diagnosis and management of endometriosis: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ 358:j3935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Guo SW (2009) Recurrence of endometriosis and its control. Hum Reprod Update 15(4):441–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ballard K, Lowton K, Wright J (2006) What’s the delay? A qualitative study of women’s experiences of reaching a diagnosis of endometriosis. Fertil Steril 86(5):1296–1301

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Abteilung für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, HFR Fribourg – Freiburger Spital, Chemin des Pensionnats 2–6, 1708, Freiburg, Schweiz

    Arrigo Fruscalzo, Anis Feki & Dorothea Wunder

Authors
  1. Arrigo Fruscalzo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anis Feki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dorothea Wunder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arrigo Fruscalzo.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

A. Fruscalzo, A. Feki und D. Wunder geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Für diesen Beitrag wurden von den Autor/-innen keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren durchgeführt. Für die aufgeführten Studien gelten die jeweils dort angegebenen ethischen Richtlinien.

Additional information

Hinweis des Verlags

Der Verlag bleibt in Hinblick auf geografische Zuordnungen und Gebietsbezeichnungen in veröffentlichten Karten und Institutsadressen neutral.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fruscalzo, A., Feki, A. & Wunder, D. Die ESHRE-Endometrioseleitlinien: Neuigkeiten und Bestehendes. J. Gynäkol. Endokrinol. CH 25, 150–154 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41975-022-00259-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41975-022-00259-7

Schlüsselwörter

Mots clés

Search

Navigation