Skip to main content
Log in

Uterusfehlbildungen – korrekte Diagnostik und Dokumentation

Uterine Malformations: Correct Diagnosis and Documentation

  • Tipps & Tricks im Gyn-Ultraschall
  • Published:
Journal für Gynäkologische Endokrinologie/Schweiz Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6
Abb. 7
Abb. 8

Literatur

  1. Hoopmann M, Dürr W (2018) Uterine Fehlbildungen. In: Hecher K, Gembruch U, Steiner H (Hrsg) Ultraschalldiagnostik in Geburtshilfe und Gynäkologie, 2. Aufl. Springer, Heidelberg, S 824–828

    Google Scholar 

  2. Acien P, Acien MI (2011) The history of female genital tract malformation classifications and proposal of an updated system. Hum Reprod Update 17:693–705

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. AFS (1988) The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, mullerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril 49:944–955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Grimbizis GF, Gordts S, Di Spiezio SA, Brucker S, De AC, Gergolet M, Li TC, Tanos V, Brolmann H, Gianaroli L, Campo R (2013) The ESHRE/ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies. Hum Reprod 28:2032–2044

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Ludwin A, Ludwin I (2015) Comparison of the ESHRE-ESGE and ASRM classifications of Mullerian duct anomalies in everyday practice. Hum Reprod 30:569–580

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ludwin A, Martins WP, Nastri CO, Ludwin I, Coelho Neto MA, Leitao VM, Acien M, Alcazar JL, Benacerraf B, Condous G, De Wilde RL, Emanuel MH, Gibbons W, Guerriero S, Hurd WW, Levine D, Lindheim S, Pellicer A, Petraglia F, Saridogan E (2018) Congenital Uterine Malformation by Experts (CUME): better criteria for distinguishing between normal/arcuate and septate uterus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 51(1):101–109. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.18923

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rikken JFW, Kowalik CR, Emanuel MH, Mol BWJ, Van der Veen F, van Wely M, Goddijn M (2017) Septum resection for women of reproductive age with a septate uterus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd008576.pub4

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christoph Brezinka.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

C. Brezinka gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine vom Autor durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Additional information

Dieser Beitrag wird auch im Journal für Gynäkologische Endokrinologie/Österreich 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s41974-018-0029-9 veröffentlicht.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brezinka, C. Uterusfehlbildungen – korrekte Diagnostik und Dokumentation. J. Gynäkol. Endokrinol. 21, 23–27 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41975-018-0031-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41975-018-0031-7

Navigation