Skip to main content
Log in

Operation der Rektozele – die chirurgische Perspektive

Rectocele repair—the surgical perspective

  • MKÖ
  • Published:
Journal für Urologie und Urogynäkologie/Österreich Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Die Rektozele, meist begleitet von einer rektalen Intussuszeption, bedingt fallweise die quälenden Symptome einer Enddarmentleerungsstörung, auch ODS (obstruktives Defäkationssyndrom) genannt. Die Diagnose ergibt sich aus der Anamnese und Palpation, ergänzt durch Proktoskopie und Defäkografie. Initial ist immer eine konservative Therapie indiziert. Bei deren Versagen kommen Operationen zur Anwendung – zumeist das peranale Verfahren des anterioren Mukosastrippings, seltener die transabdominale Rektopexie, welche weniger Komplikationen mit sich bringt als die STARR („stapled transanal rectal resection“).

Abstract

Rectocele, often associated with rectal intussusception, may in some cases lead to the distressing symptoms of impaired rectal voiding, also termed as ODS (obstructive defecation syndrome). The diagnosis is established by the patient’s history and confirmed by proctoscopy and defecography. As a rule, initially only conservative therapy is indicated. If this fails, surgery is resorted to—mostly the peranal procedure of anterior mucosal stripping, less frequently transabdominal rectopexy, which carries fewer complications than STARR (stapled transanal rectal resection).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Bruch HP, Fischer F, Schiedeck TH, Schwandner O (2004) Obstructed defecation. Chirurg 75:861–870

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Agachan F, Chen T, Pfeifer J, Reissman P, Wexner SD (1996) A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients. Dis Colon Rectum 39:681–685

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Altomare DF, Spazzafumo L, Rinaldi M, Dodi G, Ghiselli R, Piloni V (2008) Set-up and statistical validation of a new scoring system for obstructed defaecation syndrome. Colorectal Dis 10:84–88

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Philipp MO (2018) Die Obstipation aus der Sicht der Radiologie. J Urol Urogynäkol 25:7–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Roos JE, Weishaupt D, Wildermuth S, Willmann JK, Marincek B, Hilfiker PR (2002) Experience of 4 years with open MR defecography: pictorial review of anorectal anatomy and disease. Radiographics 22:817–832

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ratz V, Wech T, Schindele A, Dierks A, Sauer A, Reibetanz J, Borzi A, Bley T, Köstler H (2016) Dynamic 3D MR-Defecography. Rofo 188(9):859–863

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Christensen P, Krogh K (2010) Transanal irrigation for disordered defecation: a systematic review. Scand J Gastroenterol 45:517–527

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hochwimmer R (2018) Die paradoxe M.-puborectalis Kontraktion aus der Sicht der Physiotherapie. J Urol Urogynäkol 25:12–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gaj F, Trecca A, Andreucetti J, Crispino P (2011) Treatment of rectocele and rectal mucosal prolapse with mucosal flaps excision and with manual reconstruction. Clin Ter 162:e7–e11

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schwandner O, Hillemanns P (2016) Indications, technique and results of the STARR procedure. Chirurg 87:909–917

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Podzemny V, Pescatori LC, Pescatori M (2015) Management of obstructed defecation. World J Gastroenterol 28:1053–1060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Isbert C (2016) Transtar™ operation for rectocele and obstructed defecation syndrome. Chirurg 87:924–932

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Joubert K, Laryea JA (2017) Abdominal Approaches to Rectal Prolapse. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 30(1):57–62

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Schwandner O (2016) Proktologische Diagnostik. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, S 181

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Horisberger K, Rickert A, Templin S, Post S, Kienle P (2016) Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy in complex pelvic floor disorder. Int J Colorectal Dis 3:991–996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. van Iersel JJ, Paulides TJ, Verheijen PM, Lumley JW, Broeders IA, Consten EC (2016) Current status of laparoscopic and robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for external and internal rectal prolapse. World J Gastroenterol 22:4977–1987

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ingrid Haunold.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

I. Haunold gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine von der Autorin durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Haunold, I. Operation der Rektozele – die chirurgische Perspektive. J. Urol. Urogynäkol. 25, 132–134 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41972-018-0045-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41972-018-0045-z

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation