Skip to main content
Log in

Review of the role of safety engineers in the prevention and mitigation of fires during oil and gas plant design

  • Review
  • Published:
Life Cycle Reliability and Safety Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are several hazards associated with oil and gas plants, but fire and explosion are the most destructive events. To minimize the possibility and consequences of negative events and hazards, a variety of industries, such as oil and gas, require a substantial amount of health, safety, and environmental engineering expertise. Fire safety engineers play a very significant role in developing fire safety designs and analyses during the design stage. As part of this process, other departments, such as process, instrumentation, and piping, are consulted. While there has been a considerable amount of research conducted on safety-related issues in the past, including safety culture, management, risk assessment, safety instrumented systems (SIS), and inherent safety implementation, no study has addressed the role of safety engineers in preventing and mitigating fires. This review examines the roles and responsibilities of safety engineers during the design process of oil and gas plants in a comprehensive and general manner with the objective of preventing and mitigating fire hazards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Code or data availability

Not applicable to this paper.

References

  • Alnoaimi F, Mazzuchi T (2021) Risk management application in an oil and gas company for projects. Tech Manag Innov J 1(1):26–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Baalisampang T, Abbassi R, Garaniya V, Khan F, Dadashzadeh M (2017) Modelling the impacts of fire in a typical FLNG processing facility. Proceedings of the international conference on safety and fire engineering (SAFE’17). Cochin University of Science and Technology, p C1

    Google Scholar 

  • Bae JH, Shin SC, Park BC, Kim SY (2016) Design optimization of ESD (emergency shutdown) system for offshore process based on reliability analysis. MATEC Web Conf 52:02003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron H (2015) Oil and gas engineering guide, 2nd edn. Technip

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyler CL (1983) Development and burning of a layer of products of incomplete combustion generated by a Buoyant diffusion flame (Fire Flashover). Harvard University

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickerton J (2012) The fire triangle. Loss Prev Bull

  • Bottrill G, Cheyne D, Vijayaraghavan G (2005) Practical electrical equipment and installations in hazardous areas. Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozek A, Gordon C, Phillips N (2014) Electrical hazardous area classification design as a basis for safer operations. In: 2014 IEEE Petroleum and Chemical Industry Technical Conference (PCIC), IEEE, pp 459–464

  • Bryan A, Smith E, Mitchel K (2013) Fire and gas systems engineering handbook. Kenexis Consulting Cooperation, Columbus

    Google Scholar 

  • Chettouh S, Hamzi R, Benaroua K (2016) Examination of fire and related accidents in Skikda Oil Refinery for the period 2002–2013. J Loss Prev Process Ind 41:186–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark JD, Harris JW (1985) Fire and its roles in early hominid lifeways. Afr Archaeol Rev 3(1):3–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullen LW (1993) The public inquiry into the Piper Alpha disaster. Drill Contract (united States) 49:4

    Google Scholar 

  • Drysdale DD, Sylvester-Evans R (1998) The explosion and fire on the Piper Alpha platform, 6 July 1988. A case study. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 356(1748):2929–2951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faller R (2004) Project experience with IEC 61508 and its consequences. Saf Sci 42(5):405–422

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fang L, Wu Z, Wei L, Liu J (2008) Design and development of safety instrumented system. In: 2008 IEEE International Conference on Automation and Logistics, IEEE, pp 2685–2690

  • Gisborne HT (2004) Fundamentals of fire behavior. Fire Manag Today 64(1):15–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Goudsblom J (1992) Fire and civilization. Viking Adult. ISBN: 0140157972, pp.1–256

  • Gowlett JA (2016) The discovery of fire by humans: a long and convoluted process. Philos Trans R Soc B 371(1696):20150164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harker SD (1998) The palingenesy of the Piper oil field, UK North Sea. Pet Geosci 4(3):271–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartzell GE (1996) Overview of combustion toxicology. Toxicology 115(1–3):7–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendershot DC (2011) Inherently a safer design an overview of key elements. American Society of Safety Engineers (ASSE), Professional Safety, pp 48–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendershot DC (2012) Inherently a safer design. The fundamentals. American Institute of Chemical Engineering (AICHE), pp 40–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoefer U, Gutmachera D (2012) Fire gas detection. Proced Eng 47:1446–1459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Y, Jiang S, Liang R, Sun P, Hai Y, Zhang L (2020) Thermal-triggered insulating fireproof layers: a novel fire-extinguishing MXene composites coating. Chem Eng J 391:123621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iakovlev IV, Pesterev AP (2022) Labor Safety in the Oil and Gas Industry. IOP Conf Ser 988(2):022038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 61508 (2010) Functional safety of electrical/electronic/programmable electronic safety-related systems, Part 1: General requirements, 2nd edn. IEC, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishii M, Ito Y, Yamamoto M, Harada H, Iwasaki M (1989) An automatic recognition system for piping and instrument diagrams. Syst Comput Jpn 20(3):32–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jafarov E, Tishkin D, Vagin A, Limonov B, Dorozhkin A, Actorsky Y (2021) Causes and consequences of fire emergencies on oil and gas platforms. Rev Geintec-Gestao Inov E Tecnol 11(2):1253–1258

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin H, Lundteigen MA, Rausand M (2011) Reliability performance of safety instrumented systems: A common approach for both low-and high-demand mode of operation. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 96(3):365–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jinzhang J, Fengxiao W (2022) Study on emergency escape route planning under fire accidents in the Burtai coal mine. Sci Rep 12(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kashwani G, Nielsen Y (2017) Evaluation of safety engineering system in oil and gas construction projects in UAE. GEOMATE J 12(29):178–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan FI, Amyotte PR (2002) Inherent safety in offshore oil and gas activities: a review of the present status and future directions. J Loss Prev Process Ind 15(4):279–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan F, Rathnayaka S, Ahmed S (2015) Methods and models in process safety and risk management: Past, present and future. Process Saf Environ Prot 98:116–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lecheheb N, Abbas A, Nedjar M (2006) Adgas LNG plant pre-fire plans. SPE international health safety and environment conference. OnePetro

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon RK, Cole JA (2000) Unmixed combustion: an alternative to fire. Combust Flame 121(1–2):249–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mearns K, Yule S (2009) The role of national culture in determining safety performance: Challenges for the global oil and gas industry. Saf Sci 47(6):777–785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller K (1991) Piper alpha and the Cullen report. Indus LJ 20:176

    Google Scholar 

  • Naik SB, Kallurkar S (2016) A literature review on efficient plant layout design. Int J Ind Eng 7(2):43–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Nnadi U, El-Hassan Z, Smyth D, Mooney J (2007) Lack of proper safety management systems in Nigeria oil and gas pipelines. Delta

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan DP (2011) Fire fighting pumping systems at industrial facilities. William Andrew

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan DP (2014) Handbook of fire and explosion protection engineering principles: for oil, gas, chemical and related facilities. William Andrew

    Google Scholar 

  • Ojuola J, Mostafa S, Mohamed S (2020) Investigating the role of leadership in safety outcomes within oil and gas organisations. Saf Reliab 39(2):121–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oubre HJ, Thurman R, Vallee JC (1977) Emergency shutdown systems-evolution and status. Offshore Europe. OnePetro

    Google Scholar 

  • Panchal TS (2014) Science of Fire tetrahedron & Chain reaction of fire mechanism. Fire Eng 39(2):7–9

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Pédrot PM, Tabareau N (2020) The Fire Triangle. Proc ACM Program Lang 4:1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterka P, Hagarová M, Krešák J, Vojtko M, Baranová G (2022) Failure analysis of the industrial water piping system leakage. Eng Fail Anal 131:105843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrovskiy EA, Buryukin FA, Bukhtiyarov VV, Savich IV, Gagina MV (2015) The FMEA-Risk analysis of oil and gas process facilities with hazard assessment based on fuzzy logic. Mod Appl Sci 9(5):25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popescu CM, Pfriem A (2020) Treatments and modification to improve the reaction to fire of wood and wood based products—an overview. Fire Mater 44(1):100–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pula R, Khan FI, Veitch B, Amyotte PR (2005) Revised fire consequence models for offshore quantitative risk assessment. J Loss Prev Process Ind 18(4–6):443–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purkiss JA, Li LY (2013) Fire safety engineering design of structures. CRC Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pyne SJ (2019) Fire: a brief history. University of Washington Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Rankin B (2007) Electrical equipment in hazardous areas: field inspections. Hazard Areas Conf-IDC Technol 2:2–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao RS, Mkvsg K, Subrahmanyam A (2014) Challenges in oil and gas industry for major fire and gas leaks-risk reduction methods. Int J Res Eng Technol 3:16

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy PKA, Reddy ES, Bhaskar TNSS, Yadav BP, Singh AK (2020) Design of fire and gas detection system for a process plant: a review. Advances in industrial safety. Springer, pp 271–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhardt ED, Keane RE, Brown JK (2001) Modeling fire effects. Int J Wildland Fire 10(4):373–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roland HE, Moriarty B (1991) System safety engineering and management. John Wiley & Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberger R (2017) On the hermeneutics of everyday things: or, the philosophy of fire hydrants. AI Soc 32(2):233–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders RE (2015) Chemical process safety: learning from case histories. Butterworth-Heinemann

    Google Scholar 

  • SKY Bray (2022) Safety management. https://www.skybrary.aero/articles/safety-management. Accessed 17 Dec 2022

  • Smith DJ, Simpson KG (2020) The safety critical systems handbook: a straightforward guide to functional safety: IEC 61508 (2010 Edition), IEC 61511 (2015 edition) and related guidance. Butterworth-Heinemann

    Google Scholar 

  • Sotoodeh K (2018) Why are butterfly valves a good alternative to ball valves for utility services in the offshore industry? Am J Ind Eng 5(1):36–40. https://doi.org/10.12691/ajie-5-1-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spitzenberger C, Johnson C, Le M, Mshelia A, Pitblado R (2016) Strike the right balance between active and passive fire protection. CEP, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, pp 61–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava A, Gupta JP (2010) New methodologies for security risk assessment of oil and gas industry. Process Saf Environ Prot 88(6):407–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein L (2011) The triangle fire. The triangle fire. Cornell University Press, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Suardin JA, McPhate AJ Jr, Sipkema A, Childs M, Mannan MS (2009) Fire and explosion assessment on oil and gas floating production storage offloading (FPSO): an effective screening and comparison tool. Process Saf Environ Prot 87(3):147–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki A, Fuchino T, Muraki M, Hayakawa T (1991) An evolutionary method of arranging the plot plan for process plant layout. J Chem Eng Jpn 24(2):226–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toghraei M (2015) Plot plan design: process requirements. Chem Eng 122(1):52

    Google Scholar 

  • Toghraei M (2019) Piping and instrumentation diagram development. John Wiley & Sons, USA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tommasini R (2013) The classification of hazardous areas where explosive gas atmospheres may be present. Saf Sci 58:53–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tong SJ, Wu ZZ, Wang RJ, Wu H (2016) Fire risk study of long-distance oil and gas pipeline based on QRA. Proced Eng 135:369–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trollope WSW (1984) Fire behaviour. Ecological effects of fire in South African ecosystems. Springer, Berlin, pp 199–217

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tugnoli A, Cozzani V, Di Padova A, Barbaresi T, Tallone F (2012) Mitigation of fire damage and escalation by fireproofing: a risk-based strategy. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 105:25–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Thuyet N, Ogunlana SO, Dey PK (2007) Risk management in oil and gas construction projects in Vietnam. Int J Energy Sect Manag. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203887059-13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verma AK, Ajit S, Karanki DR (2010) Reliability and safety engineering, 43rd edn. Springer, pp 373–392

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wang CP, Shih BJ (2018) Research on the integration of fire water supply. Proced Eng 211:778–787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watanapa A, Kajondecha P, Duangpitakwong P, Wiyaratn W (2011) Analysis plant layout design for effective production. Proc Int Multi Conf Eng Comput Sci 2:543–559

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang X, Haugen S, Paltrinieri N (2018) Clarifying the concept of operational risk assessment in the oil and gas industry. Saf Sci 108:259–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yutao Z, Yuanbo Z, Yaqing L, Xueqiang S, Yujie Z (2021) Heat effects and kinetics of coal spontaneous combustion at various oxygen contents. Energy 234:121299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu P, Liyanage JP, Panesar SS, Kumar R (2020) Review of workflows of emergency shutdown systems in the Norwegian oil and gas industry. Saf Sci 121:594–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuccaro G (2012) A case of choice of passive fire protection (pfp) in an oil and gas epc project. Chem Eng Trans 26:315–320

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable to this paper.

Funding

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The manuscript is written by only one author, KS.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karan Sotoodeh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Ethical approval

Not applicable to this paper.

Consent to participate

Not applicable to this paper.

Consent for publication

Not applicable to this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sotoodeh, K. Review of the role of safety engineers in the prevention and mitigation of fires during oil and gas plant design. Life Cycle Reliab Saf Eng 12, 83–92 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41872-023-00220-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41872-023-00220-y

Keywords

Navigation