Abstract
Traditional approach for design, operation and regulation of the nuclear plants is deterministic in nature where the principle of defense in depth governs incorporation of multiple barriers and levels of protection. Single failure criteria, redundancy, diversity, fail safe criteria, quality assurance, etc., form the major cornerstone of this approach for safety demonstration. Traditional approach, which is conservative and prescriptive in nature, has served well for high level of safety since the inception of nuclear industry. However, with the accumulation of operating experiences, insights obtained from the accidents in the nuclear plants and growth of the probabilistic risk assessment methods, there is an increasing trend to implement a risk-informed approach in the nuclear plants. Over conservatism built in design, operation and regulation can be addressed using quantitative insights on risk and uncertainty such that the system availability or performance can be enhanced without compromising the safety. This paper proposes an integrated risk-based approach wherein probabilistic risk assessment framework has been used along with the deterministic insights to give credit to the available design provision in the nuclear plants. The objective is to use the margins available with the existing design to demonstrate safety of the plant by using risk framework along with the improved understanding of uncertainty. The model and procedure, involved in the risk-based approach, have been demonstrated through a case study performed on an Indian research reactor.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A Brief History of Nuclear Accidents Worldwide (2018) http://www.ucsusa.org/nuclear-power/nuclear-power-accidents/history-nuclear-accidents. Accessed 31 Aug 2018
Agarwal SK, Karhadkar CG, Zope AK, Singh K (2006) Dhruva: main design features, operational experience and utilization. Nucl Eng Des 236(7):747–757
Applications of Probabilistic Safety Assessment (PSA) for Nuclear Power Plants (2002) Series: IAEA TECDOC Series, No. 1200. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna
Basic Safety Principles for Nuclear Power Plants (1999) 75-INSAG-3 Rev.1 (series: INSAG Series, No. 12, STI-PUB-1082). International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna
Defence in Depth in Nuclear Safety (1996) Series: IAEA INSAG series, no. 10, STI/PUB/1013. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna
Deterministic Safety Analysis for Nuclear Power Plants (2010) Series: IAEA safety standard series, no. SSG-2, STI/PUB/1428. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna
FCOAST (1960) Adapted version of AECL code COASTDOWN developed by NRX staff
Hannaman GW, Spurgin AJ, Lukic YD (1984) Human cognitive reliability model for PRA analysis, Draft Report, NUS-5431, EPRI-2170-3. Electric Power Research Institute
Kinard M, Allen EJ (2004) Efficient numerical solution of the point kinetics equations in nuclear reactor dynamics. Ann Nucl Energy 31(9):1039–1051
Mazumdar T et al (2012) RITAC: reactivity initiated transient analysis code—an overview. Ann Nucl Energy 43:192–207
PRIS: Power Reactor Information System (2018) International Atomic Energy Agency. http://www.iaea.org/pris. Accessed 31 Aug 2018
Research Reactors (2018) World Nuclear Association. http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/non-power-nuclear-applications/radioisotopes-research/research-reactors.aspx. Accessed 31 Aug 2018
Safety of Research Reactors (2016) Series: IAEA safety standard series, no. SSR-3, STI/PUB/1751. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna
Singh T et al (2013) Development of neutronics and thermal hydraulics coupled code—SAC-RIT for plate type fuel and its application to reactivity initiated transient analysis. Ann Nucl Energy 62:61–80
Swain AD, Guttman HE (1983) Handbook of human reliability analysis with emphasis on Nuclear Power Plant Applications. NUREG/CR-1278, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission
United States Atomic Energy Commission (1975) Reactor safety study: an assessment of accident risks in U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Plant: Executive summary: Main report. WASH-1400-MR, United States Atomic Energy Commission
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (1987) Standard review plan for the review of safety analysis reports for nuclear power plants, NUREG-0800, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (1995) Use of probabilistic risk assessment methods in nuclear regulatory activities; final policy statement (60 FR 42622) 1995. https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/commission/policy/60fr42622.pdf. Accessed 18 Sep 2017
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2000) Technical basis and implementation guidelines for A Technique for Human Reliability Analysis (ATHENA). NUREG/CR-1624, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Varde, P.V., Singh, T., Mazumdar, T. et al. Risk-based approach towards design evaluation and re-assessment of shutdown safety margin. Life Cycle Reliab Saf Eng 7, 215–234 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41872-018-0047-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41872-018-0047-7