Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

In-Process Measurement of Thickness of Cured Resin in Evanescent-Wave-Based Nano-stereolithography Using Critical Angle Reflection

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Nanomanufacturing and Metrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Stereolithography is one of the most powerful ways to fabricate complex three-dimensional polymeric-based structures layer-by-layer using optical power. Evanescent-wave-based nano-stereolithography using ultra-thin field distribution of evanescent wave to solidify photosensitive resin can provide a sub-micrometer vertical resolution of each layer. To meet strong demands for in-process thickness measurement of cured resin in evanescent-wave-based nano-stereolithography, a measurement method that utilizes variations of resin’s refractive index after polymerization and a high sensitivity of total internal reflection at the critical angle has been proposed. By launching the a measurement light from a substrate to resin at the critical angle and detecting reflections from the resin, slight change in refractive index and thickness of cured resin that have great influences on reflectivity can be in-process measured. This method has been firstly examined by simulation using the rigorous coupled wave analysis method. Here, we show that an increase in cured resin’s thickness induces a decrease in the reflectivity. In experiments, the largest reflectivity contrast between cured and uncured resins has been proved at the critical angle. In addition, the relationship between reflectivity drop and thickness has been calibrated and a linear relationship within a certain thickness range has been experimentally confirmed. Furthermore, the difference of curing process between continuous and discontinuous exposure has been investigated by using the proposed measurement method. At last, image subtraction and a median filter have been applied in imaging processing to remove influences of uneven illumination and background noises.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lee JW, Lan PX, Kim B, Lim G, Cho DW (2008) Fabrication and characteristic analysis of a poly(propylene fumarate) scaffold using micro-stereolithography technology. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 87(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lee KS, Kim RH, Yang DY, Park SH (2008) Advances in 3D nano/microfabrication using two-photon initiated polymerization. Prog Polym Sci 33(6):631–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Vaezi M, Seitz H, Yang S (2013) A review on 3D micro-additive manufacturing technologies. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67(5–8):1721–1754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cooke MN, Fisher JP, Dean D, Rimnac C, Mikos AG (2003) Use of stereolithography to manufacture critical-sized 3D biodegradable scaffolds for bone ingrowth. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 64(2):65–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee KW, Wang SF, Fox BC, Ritman EL, Yaszemski MJ, Lu LC (2007) Poly(propylene fumarate) bone tissue engineering scaffold fabrication using stereolithography:effects of resin formulations and laser parameters. Biomacromolecules 8(4):1077–1084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Griffith ML, Halloran JW (1996) Freeform fabrication of ceramics via stereolithography. J Am Ceram Soc 79(10):2601–2608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Popov VK, Evseev AV, Ivanov AL, Roginski VV, Volozhin AI, Howdle SM (2004) Laser stereolithography and supercritical fluid processing for custom-designed implant fabrication. J Mater Sci Mater Med 15(2):123–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hsieh TM, Ng CWB, Narayanan K, Wan AC, Ying JY (2010) Three-dimensional microstructured tissue scaffolds fabricated by two-photon laser scanning photolithography. Biomaterials 31(30):7648–7652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sun C, Fang N, Wu DM, Zhang X (2005) Projection micro-stereolithography using digital micro-mirror dynamic mask. Sens Actuators A 121(1):113–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Choi JW, Wicker R, Lee SH, Choi KH, Ha CS, Chung I (2009) Fabrication of 3D biocompatible/biodegradable micro-scaffolds using dynamic mask projection microstereolithography. J Mater Process Technol 209(15):5494–5503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhou C, Chen Y, Yang Z, Khoshnevis B (2013) Digital material fabrication using mask-image-projection-based stereolithography. Rapid Prototyp J 19(3):153–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ecoffet C, Espanet A, Lougnot DJ (1998) Photopolymerization by evanescent waves: a new method to obtain nanoparts. Adv Mater 10(5):411–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Takahashi S, Kajihara Y, Takamasu K (2012) Submicrometer thickness layer fabrication for layer-by-layer microstereolithography using evanescent light. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 61(1):219–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Suzuki Y, Tahara H, Michihata M, Takamasu K, Takahashi S (2016) Evanescent light exposing system under nitrogen purge for nano-stereolithography. Procedia CIRP 42:77–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Michihata M, Takamasu K, Takahashi S (2016) Proposal of in-process measurement for micro-stereolithography using surface plasmon resonance. Phys Procedia 83:964–970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Michihata M, Kong D, Takamasu K, Takahashi S (2017) A simulation study of plasmonic substrate for in-process measurement of refractive index in nano-stereolithography. Int J Autom Technol 11(5):772–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kong D, Michihata M, Takamasu K, Takahashi S (2017) In-process measurement on the thickness of photosensitive resin in evanescent wave-based nano-stereolithography. In: The 13th international symposium on measurement technology and intelligent instruments, No. 17

  18. Kong D, Michihata M, Takamasu K, Takahashi S (2017) Monitor resin’s curing degree for in-process measurement in micro-stereolithography. In: The 7th international conference of Asian society for precision engineering and nanotechnology, MET-0-08

  19. Beuermann S, Buback M, Davis TP, Gilbert RG, Hutchinson RA, Olaj OF, van Herk AM (1997) Critically evaluated rate coefficients for free-radical polymerization, 2. Propagation rate coefficients for methyl methacrylate. Macromol Chem Phys 198(5):1545–1560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rueggeberg FA, Margeson DH (1990) The effect of oxygen inhibition on an unfilled/filled composite system. J Dent Res 69(10):1652–1658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Andrzejewska E, Andrzejewski M (1998) Polymerization kinetics of photocurable acrylic resins. J Polym Sci Part A Polym Chem 36(4):665–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kaur M, Srivastava AK (2002) Photopolymerization: a review. J Macromol Sci Part C Polym Rev 42(4):481–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Watts DC, Marouf AS, Al-Hindi AM (2003) Photo-polymerization shrinkage-stress kinetics in resin-composites: methods development. Dent Mater 19(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Esposito Corcione C, Greco A, Maffezzoli A (2004) Photopolymerization kinetics of an epoxy based resin for stereolithography. J Appl Polym Sci 92(6):3484–3491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chiou BS, Khan SA (1997) Real-time FTIR and in situ rheological studies on the UV curing kinetics of thiol-ene polymers. Macromolecules 30(23):7322–7328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Salmoria GV, Klauss P, Pires ATN, Roeder J, Soldi V (2008) Investigations on cure kinetics and thermal degradation of stereolithography Renshape™ 5260 photosensitive resin. Polym Test 27(6):698–704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Subramanian K, Krishnasamy V, Nanjundan S, Reddy AR (2000) Photosensitive polymer: synthesis, characterization and properties of a polymer having pendant photocrosslinkable group. Eur Polymer J 36(11):2343–2350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Fuh JYH, Lu L, Tan CC, Shen ZX, Chew S (1999) Processing and characterising photo-sensitive polymer in the rapid prototyping process. J Mater Process Technol 89:211–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Brockman JM, Nelson BP, Corn RM (2000) Surface plasmon resonance imaging measurements of ultrathin organic films. Annu Rev Phys Chem 51(1):41–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Homola J (2008) Surface plasmon resonance sensors for detection of chemical and biological species. Chem Rev 108(2):462–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Alkaisi MM, Blaikie RJ, McNab SJ, Cheung R, Cumming DRS (1999) Sub-diffraction-limited patterning using evanescent near-field optical lithography. Appl Phys Lett 75(22):3560–3562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Schneider LFJ, Pfeifer CS, Consani S, Prahl SA, Ferracane JL (2008) Influence of photoinitiator type on the rate of polymerization, degree of conversion, hardness and yellowing of dental resin composites. Dent Mater 24(9):1169–1177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Andrzejewska E (2001) Photopolymerization kinetics of multifunctional monomers. Prog Polym Sci 26(4):605–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. De Boer J, Visser RJ, Melis GP (1992) Time-resolved determination of volume shrinkage and refractive index change of thin polymer films during photopolymerization. Polymer 33(6):1123–1126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Langer G, Kavc T, Kern W, Kranzelbinder G, Toussaere E (2001) Refractive index changes in polymers induced by deep UV irradiation and subsequent gas phase modification. Macromol Chem Phys 202(18):3459–3467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Fujita K, Nishiyama N, Nemoto K, Okada T, Ikemi T (2005) Effect of base monomer’s refractive index on curing depth and polymerization conversion of photo-cured resin composites. Dent Mater J 24(3):403–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Howard B, Wilson ND, Newman SM, Pfeifer CS, Stansbury JW (2010) Relationships between conversion, temperature and optical properties during composite photopolymerization. Acta Biomater 6(6):2053–2059

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masaki Michihata.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kong, D., Michihata, M., Takamasu, K. et al. In-Process Measurement of Thickness of Cured Resin in Evanescent-Wave-Based Nano-stereolithography Using Critical Angle Reflection. Nanomanuf Metrol 1, 112–124 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41871-018-0013-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41871-018-0013-z

Keywords

Navigation