Skip to main content
Log in

Optimizing air quality monitoring device deployment: a strategy to enhance distribution efficiency

  • Original Research
  • Published:
International Journal of Information Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Precise and efficient air quality monitoring is a pivotal step in combating the harmful effects of pollution. Our research addresses the challenges in obtaining accurate air quality data and identifying pollution sources. It introduces an algorithm to optimize the deployment of air quality monitoring devices, enhancing distribution efficiency. The algorithm considers spatial distribution to minimize capital and operational costs. Utilizing an extensive 300 days dataset covering Durgapur (80 km\(^2\)), it achieves an above 90% accuracy rate in predicting air quality. By strategically selecting monitoring locations, it maximizes data coverage while minimizing costs. This advancement supports cost-effective pollution control and resource allocation decisions in affected regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

The dataset will be provided upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Alsaber A, Alsahli R, Al-Sultan A et al (2023) Evaluation of various machine learning prediction methods for particulate matter \(pm_{10}\) in Kuwait. Int J Inf Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-023-01521-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baume O, Gebhardt A, Gebhardt C et al (2011) Network optimization algorithms and scenarios in the context of automatic mapping. Comput Geosci 37:289–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2010.04.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chang H, Yu Z, Yu Z et al (2021) Location selection for air quality monitoring with consideration of limited budget and estimation error. IEEE Trans Mobile Comput. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMC.2021.3065656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hsieh HP, Lin SD, Zheng Y (2015) Inferring air quality for station location recommendation based on urban big data. In: Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, KDD ’15, pp 437–446. https://doi.org/10.1145/2783258.2783344

  5. Li J, Chen J, He S, et al (2011) On energy-efficient trap coverage in wireless sensor networks. In: 2011 IEEE 32nd Real-Time Systems Symposium, pp 139–148. https://doi.org/10.1109/RTSS.2011.20

  6. Liu (2020) Exploring the relationship between air pollution and meteorological conditions in china under environmental governance. Sci Reports 10:14518. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71338-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Loukili H, Abdelkader A, Jioui I et al (2022) Combining multiple regression and principal component analysis to evaluate the effects of ambient air pollution on children’s respiratory diseases. Int J Inf Technol 14:1305–1310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-022-00906-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ngo V, Duong Thi Thuy V, Nguyen-Tat BT et al (2023) A big data smart agricultural system: recommending optimum fertilisers for crops. Int J Inf Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-022-01150-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rahi P, Sood S, Bajaj R et al (2021) Air quality monitoring for smart ehealth system using firefly optimization and support vector machine. Int J Inf Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-021-00778-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Robinson C, Franklin R, Roberts J (2021) Optimising for equity: sensor coverage, networks and the responsive city. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-902765/v1

  11. Shaban KB, Kadri A, Rezk E (2016) Urban air pollution monitoring system with forecasting models. IEEE Sens J 16(8):2598–2606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sun C, Li VOK, Lam JCK et al (2019) Optimal citizen-centric sensor placement for air quality monitoring: a case study of city of Cambridge, the United Kingdom. IEEE Access 7:47390–47400. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2909111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Thakur N, Karmakar S, Shrivastava R (2023) Hybrid deep learning algorithms for forecasting air quality index using dimension reduction technique in search of precise results. Int J Inf Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-023-01350-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu L, Bocquet M (2011) Optimal redistribution of the background ozone monitoring stations over France. Atmos Environ 45:772–783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.08.038

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pritisha Sarkar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors affirm that there are no identifiable conflicting financial interests or personal affiliations that could have potentially influenced the findings presented in this paper.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sarkar, P., Saha, M. Optimizing air quality monitoring device deployment: a strategy to enhance distribution efficiency. Int. j. inf. tecnol. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-024-01893-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-024-01893-z

Keywords

Navigation