Skip to main content
Log in

Solve DNA sequence assembly problem using hybrid crow search optimization and multi classification techniques

  • Original Research
  • Published:
International Journal of Information Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The reconstruction of a DNA chain from the randomly collected fragments set is known as the Deoxyribonucleic Acid Fragment Assembly Problem (DNA-FAP). In the genome project, this problem is usually considered an important step. Genome fragment assembly is the main objective in a much more important human genome sequence and helps to cure several genetic problems. Cost plays an important part in the process of genome fragment assembly. However, metaheuristics and machine learning model help to reduce the complexity level and error rates of genome assembly problem. The proposed work for hybrid Crow search optimization and multiple classifiers to calculate high similarity consensus sequence. The implementation result exhibits the proposed model produces better results and is compared with existing art techniques. This model performed types of benchmark datasets and provide different metric results in DNA sequence assembly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chial H (2008) DNA sequencing technologies key to the Human Genome Project. Nat Educ 1(1):219

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hunkapiller T, Kaiser R, Hood L (1991) Large-scale DNA sequencing. Curr Opin Biotech 2:92–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chang Y, Sahinidis NV (2011) An integer programming approach to DNA sequence assembly. Comput Biol Chem 35(4):251–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2011.06.001

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Setubal J, Meidanis J (1999) Introduction to computational molecular biology. International Thomson Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boev AS, Rakitko AS, Usmanov SR et al (2021) Genome assembly using quantum and quantum-inspired annealing. Sci Rep 11:13183. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88321-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Faris H, Mafarja MM, Heidari AA, Aljarah I, Al-Zoubi AM, Mirjalili S et al (2018) An efficient binary salp swarm algorithm with crossover scheme for feature selection problems. Knowl-Based Syst 154:43–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Khalid A, Enem A, Colmenares E (2018) Distributed cache-reduction approach to DNA sequencing using a greedy algorithm for the shortest common superstring. Int Conf Comput Sci Comput Intell (CSCI) 2018:1380–1385. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSCI46756.2018.00267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Allaoui M, Ahiod B, El Yafrani M (2018) A hybrid crow search algorithm for solving the DNA fragment assembly problem. Expert Syst Appl 102:44–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.02.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ülker ED (2016) Adaptation of harmony search algorithm for DNA fragment assembly problem. SAI Comput Conf (SAI) 2016:135–138. https://doi.org/10.1109/SAI.2016.7555973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Al-Rifaie FM, Al-Rifaie MM (2015) Investigating stochastic diffusion search in DNA sequence assembly problem. In: 2015 SAI intelligent systems conference (IntelliSys), 2015, pp 625–631. https://doi.org/10.1109/IntelliSys.2015.7361205

  11. Chaiyaratana N, Meksangsouy P (2003) DNA fragment assembly using an ant colony system algorithm. Evol Comput 3:1756–1763. https://doi.org/10.1109/CEC.2003.1299885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhao Y et al (2008) An improved ant colony algorithm for DNA sequence alignment. Int Symp Inf Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISISE.2008.8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kurniawan TB, Zuwairie I (2009) Implementation of an ant colony system for DNA sequence optimization. Int J Artif Life Robot. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-009-0683-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fang SC (2005) A genetic algorithm approach to solving DNA fragment assembly problem. Int J Comput Theor Nanosci 2:499–505. https://doi.org/10.1166/jctn.2005.2974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Johnson ME, Parsons RJ (1995) DNA sequence assembly and genetic algorithms-new results and puzzling insights. In: Proceedings ISMB–third international conference on intelligent systems for molecular biology, pp 277–284

  16. Shegaonkar VP, Thomas A (2015) A survey on merging DNA fragments using soft computing algorithm. In: 2015 international conference on innovations in information, embedded and communication systems (ICIIECS), 2015, pp 1–4, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIIECS.2015.7193150

  17. Huang KW, Chen JL et al (2015) A memetic particle swarm optimization algorithm for solving the DNA fragment assembly problem. Neural Comput Appl 26(3):495–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fang J, Zhou Q, Wu X, Yang S (2013) Network traffic prediction model based on catfish-PSO-SVM. JNW 8(11):2534–2540. https://doi.org/10.4304/jnw.8.11.2534-2540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Raja G, Srinivasulu Reddy U (2021) DNA fragment assembly using hybridized catfish PSO. Int J Softw Innov 9:69–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Indumathy R, Maheswari SUMA, Subashini G (2015) Nature-inspired novel Cuckoo Search Algorithm Springer India. Sadhana 40:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-014-0300-3

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Mallén-Fullerton GM, Fernandez-Anaya G (2013) DNA fragment assembly using optimization. IEEE Congress Evol Comput. https://doi.org/10.1109/CEC.2013.6557749

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Ma X, Wu J, Xue X (2013) Identification of DNA-binding proteins using support vector machine with sequence information. Comput Math Methods Med 2013:8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/524502.524502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ranjard L, Wong TKF, Rodrigo AG (2019) Effective machine-learning assembly for next-generation amplicon sequencing with very low coverage. BMC Bioinform 20:654. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-019-3287-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ayyad SM, Saleh AI, Labib LM (2019) Gene expression cancer classification using modified K-Nearest Neighbors technique. Biosystems 176:41–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Song D, Chen Y, Min Q, Sun Q, Ye K, Zhou C et al (2019) Similarity-based machine learning support vector machine predictor of drug-drug interactions with improved accuracies. J Clin Pharm Ther 44(2):268–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Elloumi M, Kaabi S (1999) Exact and approximation algorithms for the DNA sequence assembly problem. SCI Biol Med 8:152–157

    Google Scholar 

  27. Askarzadeh A (2016) A novel metaheuristic method for solving constrained engineering optimization problems: crow search algorithm. Comput Struct 169:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Raja G, Reddy US (2017) Nature inspired algorithms for genome subsequence assembly in Hadoop. In: 2017 IEEE international conference on computational intelligence and computing research (ICCIC), pp 1–4. IEEE

  29. Jain S, Bharti KK (2021) Chaos inspired particle swarm optimization with levy flight for genome sequence assembly. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.10623

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Raja.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Raja, G., Reddy, U.S. Solve DNA sequence assembly problem using hybrid crow search optimization and multi classification techniques. Int. j. inf. tecnol. 14, 2541–2547 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-022-00972-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-022-00972-3

Keywords

Navigation