Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assessment tool for e-services take-up (ATEST): a small Island states context

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Information Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

e-Services help in fostering the development of a knowledge society as more citizens and businesses can access, adopt and use government services through online channels. Existing evidence in Mauritius, however, shows low usage of online government services. The goal of this research consisted of developing a framework to guide government agencies in Mauritius in increasing the likelihood of success and uptake of e-Services. This study uses a novel approach, i.e. the Real-Time Delphi method based on a consensus of expert opinions as the main research method to identify critical success factors influencing the user uptake of e-Services. Moreover, it not only proposes a framework as a solution but also operationalises the framework into a tool which can be used in practice to predict the likelihood of take-up of an e-Service implemented by a Government agency. Additionally, the tool was made flexible so that it can be used not only in the Mauritian context but can also be adapted to reflect the context of other countries. Government policy-makers can leverage on the developed framework to formulate better policies and guidelines for the successful take-up of online public services in Mauritius. Furthermore, e-Service owners can use the tool to evaluate their e-Service strategy and identify priority areas where resources and effort have to be dedicated so that their e-Services can be successfully adopted and used by citizens. The validity and effectiveness of the tool was evaluated using existing e-Services in Mauritius having varying user uptake and the results were found to reflect to a great extent the prevailing uptake situation of existing e-Services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amberg M, Markov R, Okujava S (2005) A framework for valuing the economic profitability of e-government. In: Proceedings of International conference on e-government, Dan Remenyi, Academic Conferences Ltd, Ottawa, Canada, pp. 31–41

  2. Berntzen L (2014) Measuring the Impact of eGovernment services. The Eighth international conference on digital society. https://www.thinkmind.org/download.php?articleid=icds_2014_2_50_10195 Accessed 21 Nov 2017

  3. Cap Gemini Ernst & Young (2002) Online availability of public services: how does europe progress? Web Based survey on electronic public services (overall report Oct 2001–Oct 2002)

  4. Colesca S (2009) Increasing e-trust: a solution to minimize risk in e government adoption. J Appl Quantitative Methods 4(1):31–44

    Google Scholar 

  5. European Commission (2015). Future-proofing eGovernment for a digital single market. Final report. June 2015. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/eu-egovernment-report-2015-shows-online-public-services-europe-are-smart-could-be-smarter. Accessed 20 Sept 2017

  6. Gilbert D, Balestrini P, Littleboy D (2004) Barriers and benefits in the adoption of e-government. Int J Public Sect Manage 17(4):286–301. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550410539794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gillwald A, Islam B (2011) National information & communication technology strategic plan (NICTSP) 2011–2014: towards I-Mauritiushttp://mtci.govmu.org/English/Documents/NICTSP20112014.pdf. Accessed 24 June 2017

  8. Gordon TJ (1994) The delphi method. Futures research methodology, 2. http://fpf.ueh.edu.vn/imgnews/04-Delphi.pdf. Accessed 18 Oct 2017

  9. Gordon TJ (2003) The Delphi method. In: Glenn JC, Gordon TJ (eds) Futures research methodology version 2.0. American council for the united nations university, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gordon TJ (2009) The real-time delphi method. Futures research methodology version, 3, p 19. http://www.econ.uba.ar/unai/archivos/actividades/30_de_octubre/Real_Time_Delphi_Ted_Gordon.pdf. Accessed 18 Oct 2017

  11. Government of Mauritius (2016a) Cabinet decisions—7 April 2016http://pmo.govmu.org/English/cabinetoffice/Pages/default.aspx. Accessed 24 June 2017

  12. Government of Mauritius. (2016). MRC inventors’ day: technology and innovation part of the growth strategy to make Mauritius a thriving economy. http://www.govmu.org/English/News/Pages/MRC-Inventors%E2%80%99-Day-Technology-and-innovation-part-of-the-growth-strategy-to-make-Mauritius-a-thriving-economy.aspx. Accessed 14 Nov 2017

  13. Heeks R (2006) Implementing and managing eGovernment. An international text. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  14. International Telecommunication Union (ITU). (2016). ICTs for a sustainable world#ICT4SDG. from: http://www.itu.int/en/sustainable-world/Pages/default.aspx. Accessed 07 Aug 2017

  15. Kumar V, Mukerji B, Butt I, Persaud A (2007) Factors for successful e-government adoption: a conceptual framework. Electron J e-Gov 5(1):63–76

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lanvin B (2008) Where is e-Government going in 2020? e-leaders conference 2008, OECD. http://www.insead.edu/facultyresearch/centres/elab/publications/documents/Whereise-governmentgoingin2020BLanvinv1.2_000.pdf. Accessed 28 March 2017

  17. Li H, Suomi R (2009) A proposed scale for measuring e-service quality. Int J U-E-Service Sci Technol 2(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lindgren I (2012) Towards a Conceptual framework for identifying public e-service stakeholders: on where to start looking. In: Scholl HJ et al. (eds), Electronic government and electronic participation. Joint Proceedings of Ongoing Research and Projects of IFIP EGOV and IFIP ePart 2012. Trauner Verlag, Kristiansand, Norway

  19. Lindgren I (2013) Public e-service stakeholders: a study on who matters for public e-service development and implementation. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:616838/FULLTEXT01.pdf. Accessed 18 Oct 2017

  20. Mahadeo JD (2009) Towards an understanding of the factors influencing the acceptance and diffusion of e-government services. Electron J e-Gov 7(4):391–402

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ministry of Information and Communication Technology (2012) National broadband policy 2012–2020, Government of Mauritius. http://mtci.govmu.org/English/Documents/NationalBroadband.pdf. Accessed 24 June 2017

  22. Ministry of Information and Communication Technology (2013). e-Government strategy 2013–2017, central informatics Bureauhttp://mtci.govmu.org/English/Documents/eGovStrategyfinalv201393.pdf. Accessed 24 June 2017

  23. National Audit Office (2015). Report of The director of audit on the accounts of the Republic of Mauritius for the year ended 31 December 2014. http://nao.govmu.org/English/ReportsandPublications/Pages/AnnualReport-yr2014-mtius.aspx. Accessed 24 June 2017

  24. OECD (2009) OECD E-government studies rethinking e-government services: user-centred approaches, OECD publishing, Paris. http://www.oecd.org/gov/digital-government/rethinkingegovernmentservicesuser-centredapproaches.htm. Accessed 12 Jan 2018

  25. OECD (2011) Uptake of e-government services, in Government at a Glance 2011, OECD publishing http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/gov_glance-2011-55-en. Accessed 24 June 2017

  26. Okoli C, Pawlowski SD (2004) The delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Inf Manage 42:15–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Preston CC, Colman AM (2000) Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta psychologica, 104(1):1–15. https://lra.le.ac.uk/bitstream/2381/3937/1/Optimal%20Number%20of%20Response%20Categories.pdf. Accessed 18 Oct 2017

  28. United Nations (2004). Global e-government readiness report 2004 towards access for opportunity, department of economic and social affairs, New York. https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/portals/egovkb/Documents/un/2004-Survey/Complete-Survey.pdf. Accessed 20 Sept 2017

  29. Vencatachellum I, Pudaruth S (2010) Investigating e-government services uptake in Mauritius: a user’s perspective. International Research Symposium in Service Management, Mauritius, pp 1–19

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Central Informatics Bureau, Ebene, Mauritius

    Hemchandra Betchoo

  2. Centre for Information Technology and Systems, University of Mauritius, Reduit, Mauritius

    Roshan Halkhoree

  3. Centre for Innovative and Lifelong Learning, University of Mauritius, Reduit, Mauritius

    Mohammad Issack Santally

  4. Department of Software and Information Systems, University of Mauritius, Reduit, Mauritius

    Roopesh Kevin Sungkur

Authors
  1. Hemchandra Betchoo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Roshan Halkhoree
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohammad Issack Santally
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Roopesh Kevin Sungkur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roopesh Kevin Sungkur.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Betchoo, H., Halkhoree, R., Santally, M.I. et al. Assessment tool for e-services take-up (ATEST): a small Island states context. Int. j. inf. tecnol. 11, 187–201 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-018-0264-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-018-0264-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation