Skip to main content
Log in

Construct validity of “Not Just Right Experiences”: results from a picture-based assessment procedure

  • Original emprical study
  • Published:
International Journal of Cognitive Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It has been contended that research about “Not Just Right Experiences” (NJREs) would be biased by the type of measures prevalently utilized to assess such phenomenon. That is, items intended to assess a construct conceptualized as a possible vulnerability factor of obsessive–compulsive (OC) symptoms may have tapped the symptoms themselves. In the current study, a picture-based measure of NJREs (NJR-PM) not derived from OC themes was administered to two samples of undergraduate students along with questionnaires of OC symptoms, general distress, and NJREs (the NJRE-Q-R). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses in these undergraduate samples showed that the NJR-PM had a unidimensional structure. The total score derived by the sum of ratings to each picture proved insensitive to gender. The NJR-PM was more strongly associated with the NJRE-Q-R than to general distress. Commonality analysis showed that the NJR-PM and the two NJRE-Q-R indices predicted OC symptoms both conjointly and in a distinct way. In addition, the NJR-PM predicted all common types of obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) symptoms over and beyond general distress and discriminated individuals with high scores in OC symptoms from low-score counterparts. NJREs can be measured also without reference to patients’ symptoms and may therefore be useful in advancing our understanding of obsessive–compulsive disorder.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Despite some slight differences in NJRE definition (e.g., lack of a sense of satisfaction, a sensation of “incompleteness,” or the subject’s underlying impression that “something is wrong”), almost all these studies used the same indicators to assess NJREs, so we can reasonably assume that they all refer to the same phenomena.

  2. Recently, an interview-based format was also developed to evaluate this construct. However, the lack of data due to the novelty of such instrument and the heterogeneity of the content—rather different from the usual instruments to assess NJREs—do not allow to take it in consideration as a standard measure of NJREs.

  3. Consistent with the theory, it has been observed that NJREs are present in more than 80% of individuals

  4. We used this threshold to select a wide range of NJREs. As per our general goal, we wanted to develop a method derived by common experiences of laypeople.

  5. A description of each item is provided in Supplementary material.

  6. For the sake of clarity, covariances among items are not shown. They are available on request.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudio Sica.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(JPG 92 kb)

ESM 2

(JPG 56 kb)

ESM 3

(JPG 39 kb)

ESM 4

(JPG 107 kb)

ESM 5

(JPG 26 kb)

ESM 6

(JPG 125 kb)

ESM 7

(JPG 81 kb)

ESM 8

(JPG 52 kb)

ESM 9

(JPG 78 kb)

ESM 10

(JPG 59 kb)

ESM 11

(JPG 56 kb)

ESM 12

(JPG 43 kb)

ESM 13

(JPG 38 kb)

ESM 14

(JPG 57 kb)

ESM 15

(JPG 99 kb)

ESM 16

(DOCX 28.1 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sica, C., Bottesi, G., Caudek, C. et al. Construct validity of “Not Just Right Experiences”: results from a picture-based assessment procedure. J Cogn Ther 12, 217–241 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41811-019-00054-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41811-019-00054-6

Keywords

Navigation