Abstract
The role of the markers bèi and bǎ for thematic role assignment in Chinese NP1-marker-NP2-V sentences was investigated in adult native speakers. While word order is identical, thematic roles are distributed reversely in these structures [patient-bèi-agent, (passive); agent-bǎ-patient, (active)]. If Mandarin speakers interpret NP1 as the agent of an event, viewing behavior was expected to differ between conditions for NP1-objects, indicating the revision of initial role assignment in the case of bèi. Given reliability differences between markers for role assignment, differences in anticipatory eye movements to NP2-objects were expected. 16 visual stimuli were combined with 16 sets of sentence pairs; one pair partner featuring a bèi-, the other a bǎ-structure. Growth curve analysis of 28 participants’ eye movements revealed no attention differences for NP1-objects. However, anticipatory eye movements to NP2-objects differed. This suggests that a stable event representation is constructed only after NP1 and the marker have been processed, but before NP2. As a control variable, syntactic/semantic complexity of NP1 was manipulated. The differences obtained indicate that the visual world paradigm is in principle sensitive to detect language-induced processing costs, which was taken to validate the null-finding for NP1. Interestingly, NP1 complexity also modulated predictive processing. Findings are discussed with respect to a differentiation between interpretative and predictive aspects incremental processing.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The dataset analyzed during the current study is available in the heiDATA, V1 repository: https://doi.org/10.11588/data/L7QPUY.
Notes
I will omit the discussion of the morphological/syntactic status of bèi and bǎ in the present paper, as this is irrelevant for our current purposes. Both markers, in the function they have today, historically evolved from verbs. However, in how far this fact contributes to online processing in Modern Chinese is not clear at all.
Elogits: log((possible number of fixations + 0.5)/(observed number of fixations − possible number of fixations +0.5))).
In order to calculate p values, we used normal approximation: format.pval(2 × (1 − pnorm(abs(coefs$t.value))), digits = 1, eps = 0.0001).
References
Allopenna, P. D., Magnuson, J. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory and Language,38(4), 419–439. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1997.2558.
Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y. (1999). Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition,73(3), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00059-1.
Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y. (2004). Now you see it, now you do not: Mediating the mapping between language and the visual world. In J. Henderson & F. Ferreira (Eds.), The interface of language, vision, and action: Eye movements and the visual world (pp. 347–386). New York: Psychology Press.
Altmann, G. T. M., & Mirković, J. (2009). Incrementality and prediction in human sentence processing. Cognitive Science,33(4), 583–609. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01022.x.
Barr, D. J. (2008). Analyzing ‘visual world’ eyetracking data using multilevel logistic regression. Journal of Memory and Language,59(4), 457–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.09.002.
Bever, T. G. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In J. R. Hayes (Ed.), Cognition and the development of language (Vol. 279, pp. 1–61). New York: Wiley.
Bornkessel, I., & Schlesewsky, M. (2006). The extended argument dependency model: A neurocognitive approach to sentence comprehension across languages. Psychological Review,113(4), 787. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.113.4.787.
Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., Kretzschmar, F., Tune, S., Wang, L., Genç, S., Philipp, M., et al. (2011). Think globally: Cross-linguistic variation in electrophysiological activity during sentence comprehension. Brain and Language,117(3), 133–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2010.09.010.
Chao, Y. R. (1968). A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Cooper, R. M. (1974). The control of eye fixation by the meaning of spoken language: A new methodology for the real-time investigation of speech perception, memory, and language processing. Cognitive Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(74)90005-X.
Crocker, M. W., Knoeferle, P., & Mayberry, M. R. (2010). Situated sentence processing: The coordinated interplay account and a neurobehavioral model. Brain and Language,112(3), 189–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2009.03.004.
Demiral, Ş. B., Schlesewsky, M., & Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I. (2008). On the universality of language comprehension strategies: Evidence from Turkish. Cognition,106(1), 484–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.01.008.
Eberhard, K., Spivey-Knowlton, S., Sedivy, J., & Tanenhaus, M. (1995). Eye movements as a window into real-time spoken language processing in natural contexts. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,24, 409–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02143160.
Frawley, W. (1992). Linguistic semantics. Hillsdale: Laurence Erlbaum.
Gerwien, J., & Rudka, M. (2019). Expectation changes over time: How long it takes to process focus imposed by German ‘sogar.’ In Ó. Loureda, I. Recio Fernández, L. Nadal, & A. Cruz (Eds.), Empirical studies of the construction of discourse (pp. 229–251). https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.305.08ger.
Gerwien, J., Wang, Y., & Wu, F. (2019). Predictive processing is affected by linguistic complexity of cue-preceding input. Poster presented at the 32nd annual CUNY conference on human sentence processing, March 29–March 31, 2019. https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/jerp4.
Gerwien, J., & Xi, K. (2017). Predicting object states in Mandarin Chinese—insights from the bǎ-construction. Poster presented at the 30th annual CUNY conference on human sentence processing, March 30–April 1, 2017. https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.35243.85286.
Gibson, E. (1998). Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition,68(1), 1–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00034-1.
Hsiao, F., & Gibson, E. (2003). Processing relative clauses in Chinese. Cognition,90(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00124-0.
Huang, Y. T., Zheng, X., Meng, X., & Snedeker, J. (2013). Children’s assignment of grammatical roles in the online processing of Mandarin passive sentences. Journal of Memory and Language,69(4), 589–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2013.08.002.
Huettig, F., Rommers, J., & Meyer, A. S. (2011). Using the visual world paradigm to study language processing: A review and critical evaluation. Acta Psychologica,137(2), 151–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.11.003.
Ito, A., Corley, M., & Pickering, M. J. (2018). A cognitive load delays predictive eye movements similarly during L1 and L2 comprehension. Bilingualism Language and Cognition,21(2), 251–264. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728917000050.
Jäger, L., Chen, Z., Li, Q., Lin, C.-J. C., & Vasishth, S. (2015). The subject-relative advantage in Chinese: Evidence for expectation-based processing. Journal of Memory and Language,79–80, 97–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2014.10.005.
Kaiser, E., & Trueswell, J. C. (2004). The role of discourse context in the processing of a flexible word-order language. Cognition,94(2), 113–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.01.002.
Kamide, Y., Altmann, G. T. M., & Haywood, S. L. (2003a). The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language,49(1), 133–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596x(03)00023-8.
Kamide, Y., Scheepers, C., & Altmann, G. T. M. (2003b). Integration of syntactic and semantic information in predictive processing: Cross-linguistic evidence from German and English. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,32(1), 37–55. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021933015362.
Kuperberg, G. R., & Jaeger, T. F. (2016). What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension? Language Cognition and Neuroscience,31(1), 32–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2015.1102299.
LaPolla, R. J. (2009). Chinese as a topic-comment (not topic-prominent and not SOV) language. In J. Xing (Ed.), Studies of Chinese linguistics: Functional approaches (Vol. 1, pp. 9–22). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Levy, R. (2008). Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. Cognition,106(3), 1126–1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.05.006.
Lewis, R. L., & Vasishth, S. (2005). An activation-based model of sentence processing as skilled memory retrieval. Cognitive Science,29(3), 375–419. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_25.
Li, P., Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1993). Processing a language without inflections: A reaction time study of sentence interpretation in Chinese. Journal of Memory and Language,32(2), 169–192. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1993.1010.
Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A. (1976). Subject and topic: A new typology of language. Subject and topic. New York: Academic Press.
Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. California: University of California Press.
Matin, E., Shao, K., & Boff, K. (1993). Saccadic overhead: Information procesing time with and without saccades. Perception and Psychophysics,53, 372–380. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206780.
Miao, X. (1981). Word order and semantic strategies in Chinese sentence comprehension. International Journal of Psycholinguistics,8(3), 109–122.
Miao, X., Chen, G., & Ying, H. (1986). Sentence comprehension in Chinese. Studies in Child Language Development,1986, 40–53.
Mirman, D. (2014). Growth curve analysis and visualization using R. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Mitsugi, S. (2017). Incremental comprehension of Japanese passives: Evidence from the visual-world paradigm. Applied Psycholinguistics,38(4), 953–983. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716416000515.
Philipp, M., Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., Bisang, W., & Schlesewsky, M. (2008). The role of animacy in the real time comprehension of Mandarin Chinese: Evidence from auditory event-related brain potentials. Brain and Language,105(2), 112–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2007.09.005.
Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science,268(5217), 1632–1634. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7777863.
Trueswell, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Garnsey, S. M. (1994). Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language,33(3), 285–318. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1994.1014.
Weckerly, J., & Kutas, M. (1999). An electrophysiological analysis of animacy effects in the processing of object relative sentences. Psychophysiology,36(5), 559–570. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0048577299971202.
Wu, F., Kaiser, E., & Andersen, E. (2012). Animacy effects in Chinese relative clause processing. Language and Cognitive Processes,27(10), 1489–1524. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2011.614423.
Yang, N., & van Bergen, G. (2007). Scrambled objects and case marking in Mandarin Chinese. Lingua,117(9), 1617–1635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2006.06.009.
Yang, Y., Wu, F., & Zhou, X. (2015). Semantic processing persists despite anomalous syntactic category: ERP evidence from Chinese passive sentences. PLoS One,10, 6. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131936.
Zhang, Y., Yu, J., & Boland, J. E. (2010). Semantics does not need a processing license from syntax in reading Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition,36(3), 765. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019254.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix 1
See Table 2.
Appendix 2
New looks’ analysis (looks to objects preceding markers)
Attention decay’ (new+old looks to objects preceding markers)
Prediction-ratios animate/inanimate referents
‘New looks’ analysis (looks to objects preceding markers) as a function of first phrase type
‘Attention decay’ (new+old looks to objects preceding markers) as a function of first phrase type
Prediction as a function of first phrase type
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gerwien, J. The interpretation and prediction of event participants in Mandarin verb-final active and passive sentences. J Cult Cogn Sci 3, 257–283 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41809-019-00049-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41809-019-00049-x