Preparation, characterisation and industrial evaluation of foamed fireclay

  • Samir B. Hanna
  • Noha A. AjibaEmail author


In this study, the direct foaming method was used to prepare groups of porous fireclay refractories containing 36–42 wt% Al2O3 from Aswan ball clay and Kalabsha kaolin (local raw material). A mixture of calcium oxide or carbide and aluminium powder was used as a foaming agent. Sodium silicate and a surfactant were employed to assist the foaming process. The physico-mechanical and mineralogical properties in addition to the microstructure characteristics of the fired samples were investigated using standard methods in addition to the XRD and SEM techniques. The effects of some preparation variables such as foaming agent, firing temperature and clay type on their properties and microstructure were also studied. The results indicated that, when CaC2 was used instead of CaO as a foaming agent, an enlargement in pore sizes accompanied with a decrease in the bulk density of samples takes place, particularly when the water content increases. On increasing the firing temperature from 1350 to 1450 °C, the pore sizes of the samples decrease, and hence, their bulk density increases. The replacement of ≥ 25 wt% of Aswan ball clay with Kalabsha kaolin improves its chemical composition and physical properties to be more suitable for the foaming process. The prepared samples are classified based on their bulk density and application temperature in groups 24–26 and class L according to ASTM and UN specifications.


Porous aluminosilicate Direct foaming method Kalabsha kaolin Aswan ball clay 



  1. 1.
    Soltan, A.M., et al.: Degradation of aluminosilicate refractories: an integrated approach. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 35(16), 4573–4592 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eppler, R.A., Eppler, D.R.: Glazes and Glass Coatings. American Ceramic Society, Westerville, OH (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Poirier, J., et al.: Analysis and interpretation of refractory microstructures in studies of corrosion mechanisms by liquid oxides. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 28(8), 1557–1568 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stjernberg, J., et al.: Laboratory scale study of the degradation of mullite/corundum refractories by reaction with alkali-doped deposit materials. Ceram. Int. 39(1), 791–800 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Novak, AE: Refractory engineering: materials, design & construction, 355 (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Garbers-Craig, A.M.: Presidential address: how cool are refractory materials? J. South. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall. 108, 491–506 (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Carlucci, C., et al.: Properties of aluminosilicate refractories with synthesized boron-modified TiO2 nanocrystals. Nanomater. Nanotechnol. 5, 8 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Balkevich, V.L., et al.: Contact interaction of bacor and silica refractories. Refractories. 25(1–2), 118–121 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Arahori, T., Suzuki, T.: Transformation of tridymite to cristobalite below 1470 C in silica refractories. J. Mater. Sci. 22(6), 2248–2252 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sadik, C., El Amrani, I.-E., Albizane, A.: Recent advances in silica-alumina refractory: a review. J. Asian Ceram. Soc. 2(2), 83–96 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fu, L., Gu, H., Huang, A., Ni, H.: Correlations among processing parameters and porosity of a lightweight alumina. Ceram. Int. 44(12), 14076–14081 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fu, L., Huang, A., Gu, H., Ni, H.: Fabrication of lightweight alumina containing fine closed pores by controlling the relationship between phase stress and superplasticity: experimental and mathematical studies. Ceram. Int. 44(16), 20034–20042 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fu, L., Huang, A., Gu, H., Ni, H.: Properties and microstructures of lightweight alumina containing different types of nano-alumina. Ceram. Int. 44(15), 17885–17894 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Andrews, A., Adam, J., Gawu, S.K.Y.: Development of fireclay aluminosilicate refractory from lithomargic clay deposits. Ceram. Int. 39(1), 779–783 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Doza, DK, and Liu, JY: Lightweight dry refractory. U.S. Patent No. 6,458,732. 1 Oct. 2002Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ezzeldeen, S., Ibrahim, I.A.: Production of insulating refractory bricks using rice straw. Silic. Ind. 1-2, 21–25 (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Colombo, P: Ceramic Foams: Fabrication, Properties and Applications. Key Engineering Materials. Vol. 206. Trans Tech Publications, 2002Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sepulveda, P.: Gelcasting foams for porous ceramics. Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 76(10), 61–65 (1997)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pradhan, M., Bhargava, P.: Defect and microstructural evolution during drying of soapnut-based alumina foams. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 28(16), 3049–3057 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    He, X., Zhou, X., Su, B.: 3D interconnective porous alumina ceramics via direct protein foaming. Mater. Lett. 63(11), 830–832 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Banhart, J.: Manufacture, characterisation and application of cellular metals and metal foams. Prog. Mater. Sci. 46(6), 559–632 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Juettner, T., et al.: Structure of kaoline–alumina based foam ceramics for high temperature applications. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 27(2–3), 1435–1441 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hanna, SB, Ajiba, NA and Ibrahim, SK: Some factors affecting the properties and microstructure of foamed fireclay refractories. Refract. Eng., 22–27 (2014)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Razak, H.A., Mahde, A.K., Yahya, A.H.: Chemical cellulation technique for lightweight clay bricks. Br. Ceram. Trans. 101(4), 172–176 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Clements, J.F.: Characteristics of refractory insulating materials. Brit Ceram Soc Trans. 65(8), 479–496 (1966)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Oliveira, M., Ferreira, J.M.F.: Structural and mechanical characterisation of MgO-, CaO- and BaO-doped aluminosilicate ceramics. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 344(1–2), 35–44 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Moller, Feuerungs Lengo GmbH, Lengo, Germany “Refractory material”, Company brochure (1997)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hanna, SB; Ahmed, MA; Kennauy, S; Naguib, WM; et al.: Production of thermal insulations bricks (bulk density = 0.6 gm/cm3) from local raw materials, Academy of Research and Technology, Final Report, July (2006)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mansour, TSA:The study of constitution and properties of high alumina insulating refractories made of some local and imported raw materials. M. Sc. thesis, Cairo, Univ., Faculty of Science, Cairo University (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Australian Ceramic Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Refractories, Ceramics and Building MaterialsNational Research CentreDokkiEgypt

Personalised recommendations