Abstract
Climate change is a reality. It is happening and posing adverse impacts globally as well as on Pakistan. To effectively respond to this ubiquitous threat, Pakistan formulated the National Climate Change Policy (NCCP) in 2012 and operationalized it in 2013. Yet it encourages further analyses and evaluations so as to identify any un-addressed or unidentified measures in the policy, to examine the established policy measures more in depth, and to ensure its effective implementation. This study presents a qualitative analysis of the NCCP. To undertake the analysis in a recognized and systematic fashion, the policy document is evaluated against a criterion set by Cheung et al. (Aust Health Rev 34:405–413, 2010). The main characteristics of this criterion include accessibility, policy background, policy goals, resources, monitoring and evaluation, public opportunities, and obligations. This study contributes to the literature to understand the critical aspects of a climate policy from a developing and one of the most affected countries due to climate change. The study is important to explore the strengths and shortcomings of the policy. Additionally, our study contributes by setting a framework of novel insights by utilizing a new criterion for analyzing a climate policy. The analysis provides valuable inputs to the subnational governments in Pakistan which are actually responsible for implementation of climate and other related policies. Our evaluation found that NCCP offers some strengths but the document has certain weaknesses too. The policy is a promising document which provides directions and guidelines to the subnational governments for establishing their policies and effective actions plans. It provides a proper mechanism of monitoring the implementation activities in the country. Moreover, it covers important sectors and emphasizes on integration of sectoral policies with climate change policy. The policy presents a reasonable mechanism to enhance the human and institutional capacity. However, it lacks realistic and comprehensive backing for established goals and objectives. For instance, it proposes some measures which are not practically actionable. One of such measures suggests to protecting the glaciers which is not possible keeping in view the existing military conflict between Pakistan and India in the region. This shows that the policy lacks to base on empirical research. The findings of the study will be very helpful for policy makers and climate experts while revising or revisiting the policy document. This analysis provides valuable lessons to provincial governments in Pakistan while framing their provincial climate change policies and action plans. The study opens new research areas and avenues for further evaluations and analysis for the NCCP and upcoming provincial climate change policies in Pakistan.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aftab E, Hickey GM (2010) Forest administration challenges in Pakistan: the case of the Patriata reserved forest and the new Murree development. Int For Rev 12:97–105
Banoori W (2012). Pakistan: climate report. http://www.thefrontierpost.com/article/163613. Accessed July 2017
Chelimsky E (2006) The purposes of evaluation in a democratic society. In: Shaw IF, Greene JC, Mark MM (eds) Handbook of evaluation: policies, programs and practices. Sage, London
Cheung KK, Mirzaei M, Leeder S (2010) Health policy analysis: a tool to evaluate in policy documents the alignment between policy statements and intended outcomes. Aust Health Rev 34:405–413
Crabbé A, Leroy P (2008) The handbook of environmental policy evaluation. Earthscan’, London
Ellahi A, Zaka B (2015) Analysis of higher education policy frameworks for open and distance education in Pakistan. Eval Rev 39(2):255–277
Germanwatch (2014) Global climate change risk index. Germanwatch, Berlin
Haug C, Rayner T, Jordan A, Hildingsson R, Stripple J, Monni S et al (2010) Navigating the dilemmas of climate policy in Europe: evidence from policy evaluation studies. Clim Change 101(3–4):427–445
Hilden M, Jordan A, Rayner T (2014) Climate policy innovation: developing an evaluation perspective. Environ Politics 23(5):884–905
Huitema D et al (2011) The evaluation of climate policy. Policy Sci 44(2):179–198
Kelkar U, Bhadwal S (2007) South Asian regional study on climate change impacts and adaptation: Implications for human development. Human development report, United Nations Development Programme
Khan HR (2012) A review of national climate change policy of Pakistan. SPO discussion paper series, pp 1–13. Available at SPO National Centre 30-A Nazim-ud-din Road F-10/4 Islamabad 44000 Pakistan. http://www.spopk.org. Accessed 15 July 2013
Khan MA, Samiullah M (2015) Financing for disaster risk reduction in Pakistan. In: Rehman AU et al (eds) Disaster risk reduction approaches in Pakistan, disaster risk reduction. Springer, Japan
Knaap GJ, Kim TJ (1998) Introduction: environmental program evaluation. Framing the subject, identifying issues. In: Knaap GJ, Kim TJ (eds) Environmental program evaluation. A primer. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, pp 1–20
Kraft ME, Furlong SR (2010) Public policy Politics, analysis, and alternatives. CQ Press, Washington
Kurosaki T, Khan H, Shah MK, Tahir M (2011) Natural disasters, relief aid, and household vulnerability in Pakistan: evidence from a pilot survey in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. PRIMCED discussion paper series 12, Hitotsubashi University
Lehtonen M (2005) OECD environmental performance review programme. Accountability (f)or learning? Evaluation 11:169–188
Leiserowitz AA (2005) American risk perceptions: is climate change dangerous? Risk Anal 25:1433–1442
Majone G (1977) Technology assessment and policy analysis. Policy Sci 8(2):173–175
Malik SM, Awan H, Khan N (2012) Mapping vulnerability to climate change and its repercussion on human health in Pakistan. Glob Health 2012(8):31
Martinuzzi A (2004) Sustainable development evaluations in Europe—market analysis, meta evaluation and future challenges. J Environ Assess Policy Manag 6(4):411–442
Mickwitz P (2013) Policy evaluation. In: Jordan A, Adelle C (eds) Environmental Policy in the EU: Actors, Institutions and Processes. Routledge, London, pp 267–286
Mickwitz P, Birnbaum M (eds) (2009) Environmental Program and Policy Evaluation: Addressing Methodological Challenges. New Directions for Evaluation Number 122. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Morton JF (2007) The impact of climate change on smallholder and subsistence agriculture. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104(50):19680–19685
Mumtaz M (2013) National climate change policy of Pakistan: an analysis. MPhil thesis, National Defence University, Pakistan
Nickerson RS (1998) Confirmation bias: a ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Rev Gen Psychol 2(2):175–220
Rasul G, Chaudhry Q, Mahmood A, Hyder K, Dahe Q (2011) Glaciers and glacial lakes under changing climate in Pakistan. Pak J Meteorol 8(15):1–11
Singh BR, Singh O (2012) Study of impacts of global warming on climate change: rise in sea level and disaster frequency. In: Singh BR (ed) Global warming—impacts and future perspective. ISBN 978-953-51-0755-2. Publication date: September 19, 2012 under CC BY 3.0 license. http://www.intechopen.com/books/global-warming-impacts-and-future-perspective. Accessed Aug 2017
Sivakumar MVK, Stefanski R (2011) Climate change in South Asia. In: Lal R, Sivakumar MVK, Faiz SMA, Mustafizur-Rahman AHM, Islam KR (eds) Climate change and food security in South Asia. Springer, Netherlands, pp 13–30
Sterrett C (2011) Review of climate change adaptation practices in South Asia. Oxfam research reports, Climate Concern, Australia
Toulemonde J (2000) Evaluation culture(s) in Europe: differences and convergence between national practices. Vierteljahrsheftezur Wirtschaftsforschung DIW 69(3):350–357
Urwin K, Jordan A (2008) Does public policy support or undermine climate change adaptation? Exploring policy interplay across different scales of governance. Glob Environ Change 18(1):180–191
Vedung E (1997) Public policy and program evaluation. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick
Vedung E (2013) Six models of evaluation. In: Araral E, Fritzen S, Howlett M et al (eds) Routledge Handbook of Public Policy. Routledge, London, pp 387–400
Walker BJ, Adger WN, Russel D (2014) Institutional barriers to climate change adaptation in decentralised governance structures: transport planning in England. Urban Stud 52(12):2250–2266
Wassmann R, Jagadish S, Sumfleth K, Pathak H, Howell G, Ismail A, Serraj R, Redona E, Singh R, Heuer S (2009) Chapter 3 regional vulnerability of climate change impacts on asian rice production and scope for adaptation. In: Advances in agronomy, vol 102. Academic Press, pp 91–133
Weiss CH (1993) Where politics and evaluation research meet. Eval Pract 14(1):93–106
Weitzman ML (2009) On modeling and interpreting the economics of catastrophic climate change. Rev Econ Stat 91(1):1–19
Wilson E (2006) Adapting to climate change at the local level: the spatial planning response. Local Environ 11(6):609–662
Yusuf S (2011) Pakistan’s first climate change policy ready. http://beta.dawn.com/news/631779/Pakistans-first-climate-change-policy-ready. Accessed Nov 2017
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
It is declared that there are no conflicts of interest with respect to this research, its authorships, and/or publication of the article.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mumtaz, M. The National Climate Change Policy of Pakistan: An Evaluation of Its Impact on Institutional Change. Earth Syst Environ 2, 525–535 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41748-018-0062-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41748-018-0062-x