Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Wound Healing by Keratinocytes: A Cytoskeletal Perspective

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Journal of the Indian Institute of Science Aims and scope

Abstract

Skin, being the protective barrier against the environment, can be subject to frequent trauma and stress, hence has the ability to heal itself rapidly. This capacity is attributed to a large number of resident stem cells and progenitors in the skin, which are activated to proliferate, migrate and differentiate to recreate the cellular diversity and regain tissue integrity. The barrier function of the skin is maintained by the epidermis, a multilayered epithelial compartment formed of keratinocytes. Wound repair evokes the capacity of cells to sense and respond to environmental cues. Tissue damage demands rapid cellular action, wherein spatio-temporally regulated cellular responses are critical determinants of the outcome of healing. Hence cells surrounding the wound have to immediately sense the damage and must activate the key signaling pathways to launch the wound-healing response. Emerging data is indicating that mechanical tension release is one of the first cues sensed by the neighboring cells of the damage. This cue is relayed by the cytoskeleton and converted into biochemical and cellular signals, which help the cells to respond accordingly to the trauma. In this review, we will focus on the role of keratinocytes and keratinocyte stem cells in wound healing, and the cytoskeletal dynamics involved therein.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1:
Figure 2:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Roshan A, Jones PH (2012) Act your age: tuning cell behavior to tissue requirements in interfollicular epidermis. Semin Cell Dev Biol 23:884–889

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fuchs E (2007) Scratching the surface of skin development. Nature 445:834–842

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jacob JT, Coulombe PA, Kwan R, Omary MB (2018) Types I and II keratin intermediate filaments. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 10:a018275

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sanghvi-Shah R, Weber GF (2017) Intermediate filaments at the junction of mechanotransduction, migration, and development. Front Cell Dev Biol 5:1–19

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang X, Yin M, Zhang LJ (2019) Keratin 6, 16 and 17-critical barrier alarmin molecules in skin wounds and psoriasis. Cells 8:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fuchs E (2008) Skin stem cells: rising to the surface. J Cell Biol 180:273–284

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Delva E, Tucker DK, Kowalczyk AP (2009) The desmosome. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect Biol 1:a002543

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tsuruta D, Hashimoto T, Hamill KJ, Jones JCR (2011) Hemidesmosomes and focal contact proteins: functions and cross-talk in keratinocytes, bullous diseases and wound healing. J Dermatol Sci 62:1–7

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Karsch S, Büchau F, Magin TM, Janshoff A (2020) An intact keratin network is crucial for mechanical integrity and barrier function in keratinocyte cell sheets. Cell Mol Life Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-019-03424-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Blanpain C, Fuchs E (2006) Epidermal stem cells of the skin. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 22:339–373

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Blanpain C, Fuchs E (2009) Epidermal homeostasis: a balancing act of stem cells in the skin. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10:207–217

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sumigray K, Lechler T (2015) Cell adhesion in epidermal development and barrier formation. Curr Top Dev Biol 112:383–414

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cotsarelis G (2006) Epithelial stem cells: a folliculocentric view. J Invest Dermatol 126:1459–1468

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Vidal VPI et al (2005) Sox9 is essential for outer root sheath differentiation and the formation of the hair stem cell compartment. Curr Biol 15:1340–1351

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Adam RC et al (2015) Pioneer factors govern super-enhancer dynamics in stem cell plasticity and lineage choice. Nature 521:366–370

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rhee H, Polak L, Fuchs E (2006) Lhx2 maintains stem cell character in hair follicles. Science 312:1946–1949

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Plikus MV et al (2012) Epithelial stem cells and implications for wound repair. Semin Cell Dev Biol 23:946–953

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ito M et al (2005) Stem cells in the hair follicle bulge contribute to wound repair but not to homeostasis of the epidermis. Nat Med 11:1351–1354

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Folgueras AR et al (2013) Architectural Niche Organization by LHX2 is linked to hair follicle stem cell function. Cell Stem Cell 13:314–327

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mardaryev AN et al (2011) Lhx2 differentially regulates Sox9, Tcf4 and Lgr5 in hair follicle stem cells to promote epidermal regeneration after injury. Development 138:4843–4852

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gurtner G, Werner S, Barrandon Y, Longaker M (2008) Wound repair and regeneration. Nature 453:314–321

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Pastar I et al (2014) Epithelialization in wound healing: a comprehensive review. Adv Wound Care 3:445–464

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sommerlad BC, Creasey JM (1978) The stretched scar: a clinical and histological study. Br J Plast Surg 31:34–45

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gomez GA, McLachlan RW, Yap AS (2011) Productive tension: force-sensing and homeostasis of cell–cell junctions. Trends Cell Biol 21:499–505

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang N, Butler JP, Ingber DE (1993) Mechanotransduction across the cell surface and through the cytoskeleton. Science 260:1124–1127

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Reichelt J (2007) Mechanotransduction of keratinocytes in culture and in the epidermis. Eur J Cell Biol 86:807–816

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sun Z, Guo SS, Fässler R (2016) Integrin-mediated mechanotransduction. J Cell Biol 215:445–456

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang W et al (2020) Hemidesmosomes modulate force generation via focal adhesions. J Cell Biol 219:1–19

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Russell D, Andrews PD, James J, Lane EB (2004) Mechanical stress induces profound remodelling of keratin filaments and cell junctions in epidermolysis bullosa simplex keratinocytes. J Cell Sci 117:5233–5243

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Cheah JS, Jacobs KA, Heinrich V, Lo SH, Yamada S (2019) Force-induced recruitment of cten along keratin network in epithelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116:19799–19801

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kenny FN et al (2018) Tissue stiffening promotes keratinocyte proliferation via activation of epidermal growth factor signaling. J Cell Sci 131(10):jcs215780

    Google Scholar 

  32. Yano S, Komine M, Fujimoto M, Okochi H, Tamaki K (2004) Mechanical stretching in vitro regulates signal transduction pathways and cellular proliferation in human epidermal keratinocytes. J Invest Dermatol 122:783–790

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Takei T et al (1997) Effect of strain on human keratinocytes in vitro. J Cell Physiol 173:64–72

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Dupont S et al (2011) Role of YAP/TAZ in mechanotransduction. Nature 474:179–184

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Lee MJ, Byun MR, Furutani-Seiki M, Hong JH, Jung HS (2014) YAP and TAZ regulate skin wound healing. J Invest Dermatol 134:518–525

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Fan R, Kim NG, Gumbiner BM (2013) Regulation of Hippo pathway by mitogenic growth factors via phosphoinositide 3-kinase and phosphoinositide-dependent kinase-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:2569–2574

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Beverdam A et al (2013) Yap controls stem/progenitor cell proliferation in the mouse postnatal epidermis. J Invest Dermatol 133:1497–1505

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhang H, Pasolli HA, Fuchs E (2011) Yes-associated protein (YAP) transcriptional coactivator functions in balancing growth and differentiation in skin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:2270–2275

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Eckert RL, Welter JF (1996) Transcription factor regulation of epidermal keratinocyte gene expression. Mol Biol Rep 23:59–70

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Zenz R et al (2008) Activator protein 1 (Fos/Jun) functions in inflammatory bone and skin disease. Arthr Res Ther 10:201

    Google Scholar 

  41. Yang M et al (2011) A preliminary study of differentially expressed genes in expanded skin and normal skin: implications for adult skin regeneration. Arch Dermatol Res 303:125–133

    Google Scholar 

  42. Park S et al (2017) Tissue-scale coordination of cellular behaviour promotes epidermal wound repair in live mice. Nat Cell Biol 19:155–163

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Aragona M et al (2017) Defining stem cell dynamics and migration during wound healing in mouse skin epidermis. Nat Commun 8:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  44. Safferling K et al (2013) Wound healing revised: a novel reepithelialization mechanism revealed by in vitro and in silico models. J Cell Biol 203:691–709

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Haensel D, Dai X (2018) Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in cutaneous wound healing: where we are and where we are heading. Dev Dyn 247:473–480

    Google Scholar 

  46. Hudson LG et al (2009) Cutaneous wound reepithelialization is compromised in mice lacking functional Slug (Snai2). J Dermatol Sci 56:19–26

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Komine M et al (2000) Inflammatory versus proliferative processes epidermis. Tumor necrosis factor α induces K6b keratin synthesis through a transcriptional complex containing NFκB and C/EBPβ. J Biol Chem 275:32077–32088

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Jiang CK et al (1993) Epidermal growth factor and transforming growth factor α specifically induce the activation- and hyperproliferation-associated keratins 6 and 16. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:6786–6790

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Takahashi K, Yan B, Yamanishi K, Imamura S, Coulombe PA (1998) The two functional keratin 6 genes of mouse are differentially regulated and evolved independently from their human orthologs. Genomics 53:170–183

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Hatzfeld M, Keil R, Magin TM (2017) Desmosomes and intermediate filaments: their consequences for tissue mechanics. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 9:a029157

    Google Scholar 

  51. Thomason HA et al (2012) Direct evidence that PKCá positively regulates wound re-epithelialization: correlation with changes in desmosomal adhesiveness. J Pathol 227:346–356

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Santoro MM, Gaudino G (2005) Cellular and molecular facets of keratinocyte reepithelization during wound healing. Exp Cell Res 304:274–286

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Serrels B et al (2007) Focal adhesion kinase controls actin assembly via a FERM-mediated interaction with the Arp2/3 complex. Nat Cell Biol 9:1046–1056

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Zaidel-Bar R, Itzkovitz S, Ma’ayan A, Iyengar R, Geiger B (2007) Functional atlas of the integrin adhesome. Nat Cell Biol 9:858–867

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Kuwahara M, Hatoko M, Tada H, Tanaka A (2001) E-cadherin expression in wound healing of mouse skin. J Cutan Pathol 28:191–199

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Seetharaman S, Etienne-Manneville S (2020) Cytoskeletal crosstalk in cell migration. Trends Cell Biol 30:720–735

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Charafeddine RA, Nosanchuk JD, Sharp DJ (2016) Targeting microtubules for wound repair. Adv Wound Care 5:444–454

    Google Scholar 

  58. Zhang J et al (2019) Microtubule-associated protein 4 phosphorylation regulates epidermal keratinocyte migration and proliferation. Int J Biol Sci 15:1962–1976

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Schmitt S et al (2013) Stathmin regulates keratinocyte proliferation and migration during cutaneous regeneration. PLoS ONE 8:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  60. Charafeddine RA et al (2015) Fidgetin-like 2: a microtubule-based regulator of wound healing. J Invest Dermatol 135:2309–2318

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Suozzi KC, Wu X, Fuchs E (2012) Spectraplakins: master orchestrators of cytoskeletal dynamics. J Cell Biol 197:465–475

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Wu X, Kodama A, Fuchs E (2008) ACF7 regulates cytoskeletal-focal adhesion dynamics and migration and has ATPase activity. Cell 135:137–148

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Wu X et al (2011) Skin stem cells orchestrate directional migration by regulating microtubule-ACF7 connections through GSK3β. Cell 144:341–352

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Wynn TA (2008) Cellular and molecular mechanisms of fibrosis. J Pathol 214:199–210

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Kalekar LA, Rosenblum MD (2019) Regulatory T cells in inflammatory skin disease: from mice to humans. Int Immunol 31:457–463

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Hassan WU, Greiser U, Wang W (2014) Role of adipose-derived stem cells in wound healing. Wound Repair Regen 22:313–325

    Google Scholar 

  67. DiPietro LA (2016) Angiogenesis and wound repair: when enough is enough. J Leukoc Biol 100:979–984

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Schäfer M, Werner S (2008) Cancer as an overhealing wound: an old hypothesis revisited. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9:628–638

    Google Scholar 

  69. Sundaram GM, Quah S, Sampath P (2018) Cancer: the dark side of wound healing. FEBS J 285:4516–4534

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Arwert EN, Hoste E, Watt FM (2012) Epithelial stem cells, wound healing and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 12:170–180

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Stojadinovic O et al (2005) Molecular pathogenesis of chronic wounds: the role of β-catenin and c-myc in the inhibition of epithelialization and wound healing. Am J Pathol 167:59–69

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

A.H. and A. SHP A. are supported by the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India. S.G. is supported by the Early Career Fellowship from The Wellcome Trust - DBT India Alliance. C.K. has been generously hosted by the laboraotory of Prof. Colin Jamora, inStem, Bangalore.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. IFOM-inStem Joint Research Laboratory, Institute for Stem Cell Science and Regenerative Medicine (inStem), Bangalore, Karnataka, 560065, India

    Akshay Hegde, Akhil SHP Ananthan, Chinmayi Kashyap & Subhasri Ghosh

  2. School of Chemical and Biotechnology, SASTRA University, Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India

    Akshay Hegde

Authors
  1. Akshay Hegde
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Akhil SHP Ananthan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chinmayi Kashyap
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Subhasri Ghosh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Subhasri Ghosh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all the authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hegde, A., Ananthan, A.S., Kashyap, C. et al. Wound Healing by Keratinocytes: A Cytoskeletal Perspective. J Indian Inst Sci 101, 73–80 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41745-020-00219-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41745-020-00219-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation