Advertisement

Journal of the Indian Institute of Science

, Volume 98, Issue 2, pp 137–157 | Cite as

Microfluidic Mimic for Colloid Membrane Filtration: A Review

  • Nandini Debnath
  • Mohtada Sadrzadeh
Review Article

Abstract

This review provides an overview of the recent improvements of microfluidic membrane mimics. A special focus is given to the filtration of colloids in this device. Methods for on-chip membrane filtration have undergone significant development and improvement over the past two decades. Many efforts have been made to develop a single chip microfluidic platform that integrates the benefits of microfluidics and membrane science and technology. This review addresses the potential for microfluidic devices to serve as microfiltration membranes for separation purposes, as well as, micro-sized tools to study colloidal fouling phenomena at the pore scale.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Financial support for this work through the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), Natural Resources Canada (NRCan), Suncor Energy, Devon Canada, and ConocoPhillips, is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. 1.
    Montgomery MA, Elimelech M (2007) Water and sanitation in developing countries: including health in the equation—millions suffer from preventable illnesses and die every year. Environ Sci Technol 41:17–24Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shannon MA, Bohn PW, Elimelech M, Georgiadis JG, Marĩas BJ, Mayes AM (2008) Science and technology for water purification in the coming decades. Nature 452:301–310Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sadrzadeh M, Hajinasiri J, Bhattacharjee S, Pernitsky D (2015) Nanofiltration of oil sands boiler feed water: effect of pH on water flux and organic and dissolved solid rejection. Sep Purif Technol 141:339–353Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Le NL, Nunes SP (2016) Materials and membrane technologies for water and energy sustainability. Sustain Mater Technol 7:1–28Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wiesner MR, Hackney J, Sethi S, Jacangelo JG, Jacangelo JG, Lafne J (1994) Cost estimates for membrane filtration and conventional treatment for membrane filtration and conventional treatment alternative for the removal of particles and organic material. Am Water Works Assoc 86:33–41Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baker RW (2012) Membrane technology and applications, 3rd edn. Wiley, West Sussex, pp 1–574Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mulder M (1996) Basic principles of membrane technology, 2nd edn. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 1–564Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Guo W, Ngo HH, Li J (2012) A mini-review on membrane fouling. Bioresour Technol 122:27–34Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Al Mamun MA, Sadrzadeh M, Chatterjee R, Bhattacharjee S, De S (2015) Colloidal fouling of nanofiltration membranes: a novel transient electrokinetic model and experimental study. Chem Eng Sci 138:153–163Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chen V, Fane AG, Madaeni S, Wenten IG (1997) Particle deposition during membrane filtration of colloids: transition between concentration polarization and cake formation. J Membr Sci 125:109–122Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mark D, Haeberle S, Roth G, Von Stetten F, Zengerle R (2010) Microfluidic lab-on-a-chip platforms: requirements, characteristics and applications. NATO Sci Peace Secur Series A 39:305–376Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Haeberle S, Mark D, Von Stetten F, Zengerle R (2012) Microfluidic platforms for lab-on-a-chip applications. Microsyst Nanotechnol 9783642182:853–895Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Salafi T, Zeming KK, Zhang Y (2017) Advancements in microfluidics for nanoparticle separation. Lab Chip 17:11–33Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Alvankarian J, Majlis BY (2015) Tunable microfluidic devices for hydrodynamic fractionation of cells and beads: a review. Sensors (Switzerland) 15:29685–29701Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ng E, Chen K, Hang A, Syed A, Zhang JXJ (2016) Multi-dimensional nanostructures for microfluidic screening of biomarkers: from molecular separation to cancer cell detection. Ann Biomed Eng 44:847–862Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gruber P, Marques MPC, Szita N, Mayr T (2017) Integration and application of optical chemical sensors in microbioreactors. Lab Chip 17:2693–2712Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hugh Fan Z (2013) Chemical sensors and microfluidics. J Biosens Bioelectron 4:1–2Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Anema SG (2009) The use of “lab-on-a-chip” microfluidic SDS electrophoresis technology for the separation and quantification of milk proteins. Int Dairy J 19:198–204Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dorfman KD, King SB, Olson DW, Thomas JDP, Tree DR (2013) Beyond gel electrophoresis: microfluidic separations, fluorescence burst analysis, and DNA stretching. Chem Rev 113:2584–2667Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tsai JH, Lin L (2002) A thermal-bubble-actuated micronozzle-diffuser pump. J Microelectromech Syst 11:665–671Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhang C, Xing D, Li Y (2007) Micropumps, microvalves, and micromixers within PCR microfluidic chips: advances and trends. Biotechnol Adv 25:483–514Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ren K, Dai W, Zhou J, Su J, Wu H (2011) Whole-Teflon microfluidic chips. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108:8162–8166Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Horsman KM, Bienvenue JM, Blasier KR, Landers JP (2007) Forensic DNA analysis on microfluidic devices: a review. J Forensic Sci 52:784–799Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Khandurina J, McKnight TE, Jacobson SC, Waters LC, Foote RS, Ramsey JM (2000) Integrated system for rapid PCR-based DNA analysis in microfluidic devices. Anal Chem 72:2995–3000Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chen X, Shen J, Hu Z, Huo X (2016) Manufacturing methods and applications of membranes in microfluidics. Biomed Microdevices 18:104Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    de Jong J, Lammertink RGH, Wessling M (2006) Membranes and microfluidics: a review. Lab Chip 6:1125Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chen X, Shen J (2017) Review of membranes in microfluidics. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 92:271–282Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sackmann EK, Fulton AL, Beebe DJ (2014) The present and future role of microfluidics in biomedical research. Nature 507:181–189Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chiu DT, de Mello AJ, Di Carlo D, Doyle PS, Hansen C, Maceiczyk RM, Wootton RCR (2017) Small but perfectly formed successes, challenges, and opportunities for microfluidics in the chemical and biological sciences. Chem 2:201–223Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zhang J, Yan S, Yuan D, Alici G, Nguyen N-T, Ebrahimi Warkiani M, Li W (2016) Fundamentals and applications of inertial microfluidics: a review. Lab Chip 16:10–34Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ng JMK, Gitlin I, Stroock AD, Whitesides GM (2002) Components for integrated poly(dimethylsiloxane) microfluidic systems. Electrophoresis 23:3461–3473Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Stroock AD, Whitesides GM (2002) Components for integrated poly (dimethylsiloxane) microfluidic systems. Electrophoresis 23:3461–3473Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mou L, Jiang X (2017) Materials for microfluidic immunoassays: a review. Adv Healthcare Mater 6:1–20Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bruus H (2008) Theoretical microfluidics. Physics 18:1–237Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Iliescu C, Taylor H, Avram M, Miao J, Franssila S (2012) A practical guide for the fabrication of microfluidic devices using glass and silicon. Biomicrofluidics 6:16505–1650516Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Likos C (2001) Effective interactions in soft condensed matter physics. Phys Rep 348:267–439Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bacchin P, Marty A, Duru P, Meireles M, Aimar P (2011) Colloidal surface interactions and membrane fouling: Investigations at pore scale. Adv Coll Interface Sci 164:2–11Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Yao KM, Habibian MT, O’Melia CR (1971) Water and waste water filtration: concepts and applications. Environ Sci Technol 5:1105–1112Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Tufenkji N, Elimelech M (2005) Breakdown of colloid filtration theory: role of the secondary energy minimum and surface charge heterogeneities. Langmuir 21:841–852Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Tufenkji N, Elimelech M (2004) Deviation from the classical colloid filtration theory in the presence of repulsive DLVO interactions. Langmuir 20:10818–10828Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hoek EMV, Bhattacharjee S, Elimelech M (2003) Effect of membrane surface roughness on colloid-membrane DLVO interactions. Langmuir 19:4836–4847Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Van den Broeck C, Lostak F, Lekkerkerker HNW (1981) The effect of direct interactions on Brownian diffusion. J Chem Phys 74:2006–2010Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Cheng Y, Wang Y, Ma Z, Wang W, Ye X (2016) A bubble- and clogging-free microfluidic particle separation platform with multi-filtration. Lab Chip 16:4517–4526Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Di H, Martin GJO, Dunstan DE (2017) A microfluidic system for studying particle deposition during ultrafiltration. J Membr Sci 532:68–75Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Liang L-G, Kong M-Q, Zhou S, Sheng Y-F, Wang P, Yu T, Inci F, Kuo WP, Li L-J, Demirci U, Wang S (2017) An integrated double-filtration microfluidic device for isolation, enrichment and quantification of urinary extracellular vesicles for detection of bladder cancer. Sci Rep 7:46224Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ohira S-I, Toda K (2005) Micro gas analysis system for measurement of atmospheric hydrogen sulfide and sulfur dioxide. Lab Chip 5:1374–1379Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Sticker D, Rothbauer M, Lechner S, Hehenberger M-T, Ertl P (2015) Multi-layered, membrane-integrated microfluidics based on replica molding of a thiolene epoxy thermoset for organ-on-a-chip applications. Lab Chip 15:4542–4554Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Wei H, Chueh B, Wu H, Hall EW, Li C, Schirhagl R, Lin J-M, Zare RN (2011) Particle sorting using a porous membrane in a microfluidic device. Lab Chip 11:238–245Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Anderson JR, Chiu DT, Jackman RJ, Chemiavskaya O, McDonald JC, Wu H, Whitesides SH, Whitesides GM (2000) Fabrication of topologically complex three-dimensional microfluidic systems in PDMS by rapid prototyping. Anal Chem 72:3158–3164Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Chen L, Warkiani ME, Liu HB, Gong HQ (2010) Polymeric micro-filter manufactured by a dissolving mold technique. J Micromech Microeng 20:075005Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Sundararajan N, Kim D, Berlin A (2005) Microfluidic operations using deformable polymer membranes fabricated by single layer soft lithography. Lab Chip 5:350–354Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Xu J, Vaillant R, Attinger D (2010) Use of a porous membrane for gas bubble removal in microfluidic channels: physical mechanisms and design criteria. Microfluid Nanofluid 9:765–772Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Chueh BH, Huh D, Kyrtsos CR, Houssin T, Futai N, Takayama S (2007) Leakage-free bonding of porous membranes into layered microfluidic array systems. Anal Chem 79:3504–3508Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Pham MH, Barz DPJ (2017) Bonding Nafion® with polydimethylsiloxane: a versatile approach towards ion-exchange membrane microfluidic devices. J Membr Sci 537:310–314Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Russo AP, Retterer ST, Spence AJ, Isaacson MS, Lepak LA, Spencer MG, Martin DL, MacColl R, Turner JN (2004) Direct casting of polymer membranes into microfluidic devices. Sep Sci Technol 39:2515–2530Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Thorslund S, Klett O, Nikolajeff F, Markides K, Bergquist J (2006) A hybrid poly(dimethylsiloxane) microsystem for on-chip whole blood filtration optimized for steroid screening. Biomed Microdevice 8:73–79Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Feng S, Nguyen MN, Inglis DW (2017) Microfluidic droplet extraction by hydrophilic membrane. Micromachines 8:1–8Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Jiang Y, Lee CS (2001) On-line coupling of micro-enzyme reactor with micro-membrane chromatography for protein digestion, peptide separation, and protein identification using electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 924:315–322Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Gao J, Xu J, Locascio LE, Lee CS (2001) Integrated microfluidic system enabling protein digestion, peptide separation, and protein identification. Anal Chem 73:2648–2655Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Cai ZX, Fang Q, Chen HW, Fang ZL (2006) A microfluidic chip based liquid–liquid extraction system with microporous membrane. Anal Chim Acta 556:151–156Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Metz S, Trautmann C, Bertsch A, Renaud P (2004) Polyimide microfluidic devices with integrated nanoporous filtration areas manufactured by micromachining and ion track technology. J Micromech Microeng 14:324–331Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Noblitt SD, Kraly JR, VanBuren JM, Hering SV, Collett JL, Henry CS (2007) Integrated membrane filters for minimizing hydrodynamic flow and filtering in microfluidic devices. Anal Chem 79:6249–6254Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Wang PC, Gao J, Lee CS (2002) High-resolution chiral separation using microfluidics-based membrane chromatography. J Chromatogr A 942:115–122Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Davies RT, Kim J, Jang SC, Choi E-J, Gho YS, Park J (2012) Microfluidic filtration system to isolate extracellular vesicles from blood. Lab Chip 12:5202–5210Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Hylton K, Mitra S (2008) A microfluidic hollow fiber membrane extractor for arsenic(V) detection. Anal Chim Acta 607:45–49Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Paustian JS, Azevedo RN, Lundin STB, Gilkey MJ, Squires TM (2014) Microfluidic microdialysis: spatiotemporal control over solution microenvironments using integrated hydrogel membrane microwindows. Phys Rev X 3:1–13Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Choi E, Park J (2011) In-situ formation of hydrogel membranes and growth of colloidal crystals in microchannels using one step stamping. In: 15th international conference on miniaturized systems for chemistry and life sciences 2011, MicroTAS 2011, vol 1, pp 236–238Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Ngene IS, Lammertink RGH, Wessling M, van der Meer W (2010) A microfluidic membrane chip for in situ fouling characterization. J Membr Sci 346:202–207Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Galambos P, Zavadil K, Shul R, Willison CG, Miller S (1999) Silicon nitride membranes for filtration and separation. Microfluidic Devices Syst II(3877):273–283Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Leïchlé T, Bourrier D (2015) Integration of lateral porous silicon membranes into planar microfluidics. Lab Chip 15:833–838Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Chau JLH, Wan YSS, Gavriilidis A, Yeung KL (2002) Incorporating zeolites in microchemical systems. Chem Eng J 88:187–200Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Vankelecom IFJ, Depre D, De Beukelaer S, Uytterhoeven JB (1995) Influence of zeolites in PDMS membranes. Pervaporation of water/alcohol mixtures. J Phys Chem 99:13193–13197Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Wan YSS, Chau JLH, Gavriilidis A, Yeung KL (2001) Design and fabrication of zeolite-based microreactors and membrane microseparators. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 42:157–175Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Toh CS, Kayes BM, Nemanick EJ, Lewis NS (2004) Fabrication of free-standing nanoscale alumina membranes with controllable pore aspect ratios. Nano Lett 4:767–770Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Bin Liu Z, Zhang Y, Yu JJ, Mak AFT, Li Y, Yang M (2010) A microfluidic chip with poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogel microarray on nanoporous alumina membrane for cell patterning and drug testing. Sens Actuat B 143:776–783Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Lu Y, Shi W, Qin J, Lin B (2010) Fabrication and characterization of paper-based microfluidics prepared in nitrocellulose membrane by Wax printing. Anal Chem 82:329–335Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Fan X, Jia C, Yang J, Li G, Mao H, Jin Q, Zhao J (2015) A microfluidic chip integrated with a high-density PDMS-based microfiltration membrane for rapid isolation and detection of circulating tumor cells. Biosens Bioelectron 71:380–386Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Li X, Chen W, Liu G, Lu W, Fu J (2014) Continuous-flow microfluidic blood cell sorting for unprocessed whole blood using surface-micromachined microfiltration membranes. Lab Chip 14:2565–2575Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    de Jong J, Ankoné B, Lammertink RGH, Wessling M (2005) New replication technique for the fabrication of thin polymeric microfluidic devices with tunable porosity. Lab Chip 5:1240–1247Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Warkiani ME, Wicaksana F, Fane AG, Gong HQ (2015) Investigation of membrane fouling at the microscale using isopore filters. Microfluid Nanofluid 19:307–315Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Chen W, Lam RHW, Fu J (2012) Photolithographic surface micromachining of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS). Lab Chip 12:391–395Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Chen X, Cui DF, Liu CC, Li H (2008) Microfluidic chip for blood cell separation and collection based on crossflow filtration. Sens Actuat B 130:216–221Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Marty A, Causserand C, Roques C, Bacchin P (2014) Impact of tortuous flow on bacteria streamer development in microfluidic system during filtration. Biomicrofluidics 8:1–12Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Robinson T, Kuhn P, Eyer K, Dittrich PS (2013) Microfluidic trapping of giant unilamellar vesicles to study transport through a membrane pore. Biomicrofluidics 7:044105Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Yoon Y, Kim S, Lee J, Choi J, Kim RK, Lee SJ, Sul O, Lee SB (2016) Clogging-free microfluidics for continuous size-based separation of microparticles. Sci Rep 6:1–8Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Biswas I, Ghosh R, Sadrzadeh M, Kumar A (2016) Nonlinear deformation and localized failure of bacterial streamers in creeping flows. Sci Rep 6:2–11Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Alvankarian J, Bahadorimehr A, Yeop Majlis B (2013) A pillar-based microfilter for isolation of white blood cells on elastomeric substrate. Biomicrofluidics 7:1–16Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Neeves KB, Diamond SL (2008) A membrane-based microfluidic device for controlling the flux of platelet agonists into flowing blood. Lab Chip 8:701–709Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Bacchin P, Derekx Q, Veyret D, Glucina K, Moulin P (2014) Clogging of microporous channels networks: role of connectivity and tortuosity. Microfluid Nanofluid 17:85–96Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Linkhorst J, Beckmann T, Go D, Kuehne AJC, Wessling M (2016) Microfluidic colloid filtration. Sci Rep 6:1–8Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Devendra R, Drazer G (2014) Deterministic fractionation of binary suspensions moving past a line of microposts. Microfluid Nanofluid 17:519–526Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Angelescu DE, Mercier B, Sless D, Schroetter R (2010) Microfluidic capillary separation and real-time spectroscopic analysis of specific components from multiphase mixtures. Anal Chem 82:2412–2420Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Gossett DR, Weaver WM, MacH AJ, Hur SC, Tse HTK, Lee W, Amini H, Di Carlo D (2010) Label-free cell separation and sorting in microfluidic systems. Anal Bioanal Chem 397:3249–3267Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Seo J, Lean MH, Kole A (2007) Membrane-free microfiltration by asymmetric inertial migration. Appl Phys Lett 91:033901Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Shin S, Shardt O, Warren PB, Stone HA (2017) Membraneless water filtration using CO2. Nat Commun 8:1–6Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Warkiani ME, Tay AKP, Guan G, Han J (2015) Membrane-less microfiltration using inertial microfluidics. Sci Rep 5:1–10Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Kwon T, Prentice H, De Oliveira J, Madziva N, Warkiani ME, Hamel JFP, Han J (2017) Microfluidic cell retention device for perfusion of mammalian suspension culture. Sci Rep 7:1–11Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    SooHoo JR, Walker GM (2009) Microfluidic aqueous two phase system for leukocyte concentration from whole blood. Biomed Microdevice 11:323–329Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Maruyama T, Matsushita H, Uchida JI, Kubota F, Kamiya N, Goto M (2004) Liquid membrane operations in a microfluidic device for separation of metal ions. Anal Chem 76:4495–4500Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Sato K, Hibara A, Tokeshi M, Hisamoto H, Kitamori T (2003) Microchip-based chemical and biochemical analysis systems. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 55:379–391Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Surmeian M, Slyadnev MN, Hisamoto H, Hibara A, Uchiyama K, Kitamori T (2002) Three-layer flow membrane system on a microchip for investigation of molecular transport. Anal Chem 74:2014–2020Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Reviakine I, Brisson A (2000) Formation of supported phospholipid bilayers from unilamellar vesicles investigated by atomic force microscopy. Langmuir 16:1806–1815Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    Hirano-Iwata A, Aoto K, Oshima A, Taira T, Yamaguchi RT, Kimura Y, Niwano M (2010) Free-standing lipid bilayers in silicon chips-membrane stabilization based on microfabricated apertures with a nanometer-scale smoothness. Langmuir 26:1949–1952Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Malmstadt N, Nash MA, Purnell RF, Schmidt JJ (2006) Automated formation of lipid-bilayer membranes in a microfluidic device. Nano Lett 6:1961–1965Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Castellana ET, Cremer PS (2006) Solid supported lipid bilayers: from biophysical studies to sensor design. Surf Sci Rep 61:429–444Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Ota S, Suzuki H, Takeuchi S (2011) Microfluidic lipid membrane formation on microchamber arrays. Lab Chip 11:2485–2487Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Sandison ME, Morgan H (2005) Rapid fabrication of polymer microfluidic systems for the production of artificial lipid bilayers. J Micromech Microeng 15:S139–S144Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Watanabe R, Soga N, Yamanaka T, Noji H (2014) High-throughput formation of lipid bilayer membrane arrays with an asymmetric lipid composition. Sci Rep 4:1–6Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Bacchin P, Aimar P, Sanchez V (1995) Model for colloidal fouling of membranes. AIChE J 41:368–376Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    Liu C, Thompson JA, Bau HH (2011) A membrane-based, high-efficiency, microfluidic debubbler. Lab Chip 11:1688–1693Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    Liang LG, Kong MQ, Zhou S, Sheng YF, Wang P, Yu T, Inci F, Kuo WP, Li LJ, Demirci U, Wang SQ (2017) An integrated double-filtration microfluidic device for isolation, enrichment and quantification of urinary extracellular vesicles for detection of bladder cancer. Sci Rep 7:1–10Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    Peterson DS (2005) Solid supports for micro analytical systems. Lab Chip 5:132–139Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    Tang CY, Chong TH, Fane AG (2011) Colloidal interactions and fouling of NF and RO membranes: a review. Adv Coll Interface Sci 164:126–143Google Scholar
  114. 114.
    Iritani E (2013) A review on modeling of pore-blocking behaviors of membranes during pressurized membrane filtration. Drying Technol 31:146–162Google Scholar
  115. 115.
    Sendekie ZB, Bacchin P (2016) Colloidal jamming dynamics in microchannel bottlenecks. Langmuir 32:1478–1488Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    Ramachandran V, Fogler HS (1998) Multilayer deposition of stable colloidal particles during flow within cylindrical pores. Langmuir 14:4435–4444Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    Sharp KV, Adrian RJ (2005) On flow-blocking particle structures in microtubes. Microfluid Nanofluid 1:376–380Google Scholar
  118. 118.
    Agbangla GC, Climent É, Bacchin P (2012) Experimental investigation of pore clogging by microparticles: evidence for a critical flux density of particle yielding arches and deposits. Sep Purif Technol 101:42–48Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    Bacchin P, Espinasse B, Bessiere Y, Fletcher DF, Aimar P (2006) Numerical simulation of colloidal dispersion filtration: description of critical flux and comparison with experimental results. Desalination 192:74–81Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    Derekx Q, Bacchin P, Veyret D, Glucina K, Moulin P (2012) Numerical and experimental study of fouling in microfluidic channels and microfiltration membranes. Procedia Eng 44:54–56Google Scholar
  121. 121.
    Johnson WP, Hilpert M (2013) Upscaling colloid transport and retention under unfavorable conditions: linking mass transfer to pore and grain topology. Water Resour Res 49:5328–5341Google Scholar
  122. 122.
    Tarabara VV, Koyuncu I, Wiesner MR (2004) Effect of hydrodynamics and solution ionic strength on permeate flux in cross-flow filtration: direct experimental observation of filter cake cross-sections. J Membr Sci 241:65–78Google Scholar
  123. 123.
    Zhang H, Gao J, Jiang T, Gao D, Zhang S, Li H, Yang F (2011) A novel approach to evaluate the permeability of cake layer during cross-flow filtration in the flocculants added membrane bioreactors. Bioresour Technol 102:11121–11131Google Scholar
  124. 124.
    Marty A, Roques C, Causserand C, Bacchin P (2012) Formation of bacterial streamers during filtration in microfluidic systems. Biofouling 28:551–562Google Scholar
  125. 125.
    Debnath N, Hassanpourfard M, Ghosh R, Trivedi J, Thundat T, Sadrzadeh M, Kumar A (2017) Abiotic streamers in a microfluidic system. Soft Matter 13:8698–8705Google Scholar
  126. 126.
    Karimi A, Karig D, Kumar A, Ardekani AM (2015) Interplay of physical mechanisms and biofilm processes: review of microfluidic methods. Lab Chip 15:23–42Google Scholar
  127. 127.
    Valiei A, Kumar A, Mukherjee PP, Liu Y, Thundat T (2012) A web of streamers: biofilm formation in a porous microfluidic device. Lab Chip 12:5133–5137Google Scholar
  128. 128.
    Hassanpourfard M, Nikakhtari Z, Ghosh R, Das S, Thundat T, Liu Y, Kumar A (2015) Bacterial floc mediated rapid streamer formation in creeping flows. Sci Rep 5:1–17Google Scholar
  129. 129.
    Hassanpourfard M, Ghosh R, Thundat T, Kumar A (2016) Dynamics of bacterial streamers induced clogging in microfluidic devices. Lab Chip 16:4091–4096Google Scholar
  130. 130.
    Drescher K, Shen Y, Bassler BL, Stone HA (2013) Biofilm streamers cause catastrophic disruption of flow with consequences for environmental and medical systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:4345–4350Google Scholar
  131. 131.
    Gori M, Simonelli MC, Giannitelli SM, Businaro L, Trombetta M, Rainer A (2016) Investigating nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in a liver-on-a-chip microfluidic device. PLoS ONE 11:1–15Google Scholar
  132. 132.
    Jiang J, Zhao H, Shu W, Tian J, Huang Y, Song Y, Wang R, Li E, Slamon D, Hou D, Du X, Zhang L, Chen Y, Wang Q (2017) An integrated microfluidic device for rapid and high-sensitivity analysis of circulating tumor cells. Sci Rep 7:1–11Google Scholar
  133. 133.
    Aung A, Bhullar IS, Theprungsirikul J, Davey SK, Lim HL, Chiu YJ, Ma X, Dewan S, Lo YH, McCulloch A, Varghese S (2016) McCulloch, 3D cardiac µ tissues within a microfluidic device with real-time contractile stress readout. Lab Chip 16:153–162Google Scholar
  134. 134.
    Perestrelo AR, Águas ACP, Rainer A, Forte G (2015) Microfluidic organ/body-on-a-chip devices at the convergence of biology and microengineering. Sensors (Switzerland) 15:31142–31170Google Scholar
  135. 135.
    Bhatia SN, Ingber DE (2014) Microfluidic organs-on-chips. Nat Biotechnol 32:760–772Google Scholar
  136. 136.
    Srigunapalan S, Lam C, Wheeler AR, Simmons CA (2011) A microfluidic membrane device to mimic critical components of the vascular microenvironment. Biomicrofluidics 5:1–9Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Institute of Science 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Engineering, 6-074 National Institute for Nanotechnology (NINT), Advanced Water Research Lab (AWRL)University of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical Engineering, 10-367 Donadeo Innovation Centre for Engineering, 6-074 National Institute for Nanotechnology (NINT), Advanced Water Research Lab (AWRL)University of AlbertaEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations