Evaluation of Selected Pharmaceuticals on Plant Stress Markers in Wheat
- 128 Downloads
Herein we report on the interactions between two common pharmaceuticals and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) plants. Pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) enter wastewater treatment plants from industrial and household sewers. These chemicals are not completely removed during wastewater processing, and in many countries, are being found in drinking water sources and in surface waters downstream of wastewater treatment plants. If treated wastewater effluent is re-used to irrigate crops, the potential adverse interactions between PPCPs and plants needs to be understood. β-estradiol and gemfibrozil appeared to affect wheat seedlings through oxidative stress, as indicated by increases in lipid peroxidation, hydrogen peroxide, carotenoid, and antioxidant enzyme activities. Additionally, plant cell damage in wheat seedlings was indicated by an increase in electrolyte leakage. Although our study was not designed to elucidate possible mechanisms, the changes in activity of plant enzymes in response to some pharmaceuticals is likely the consequence of oxidative stress and the initiation of pathways to protect the plant from further cell damage.
KeywordsPPCPs Gemfibrozil Plant enzymes Triticum aestivum L.
This study was supported in part by Erzincan University BAP FEN-A-080715-0159, by a TÜBITAK 2219 International Postdoctoral Research Fellowship to Etem Osma, and a TÜBITAK 2221-Visiting Scientist Program Fellowship to Todd Anderson. This study is of the second author’s M.S. thesis.
- Anderson TA, Malaviya P, Osma E (2015) Using conventional HPLC to study the interaction of pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) with plants. Pharm Anal Acta 6(9):414–417Google Scholar
- Erdal S (2012) Androsterone-induced molecular and physiological changes in maize seedlings in response to chilling stress. J Plant Physiol 57:1–7Google Scholar
- Erdal S, Dumlupinar R (2010) Progesterone and β-estradiol stimulate seed germination in chickpea by causing important changes in biochemical parameters. ZeitschriftfürNaturforschung C 65(3–4):239–244Google Scholar
- FAOSTAT (2017). Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations; Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
- Kachout SS, Mansoura AB, Leclerc JC, Mechergui R, Rejeb MN, Ouerghi Z (2009) Effects of heavy metals on antioxidant activities of Atriplex hortensis and A. rosea. J Food Agric Environ 7(3–4):938–945Google Scholar
- Lichtenthaler HK, Buschmann C (2001) Chlorophylls and carotenoids: measurement and characterization by UV–VIS spectroscopy. In: Wrolstad RE (ed) Current protocols in food analytical chemistry. John Wiley and Sons, NewYork, pp F4.3.1–F4.3.8Google Scholar
- Mutlu S, Atici O, Kaya Y (2009) Effect of cement dust on diversity and antioxidant enzyme activities of plants growing around a cement factory. Freseninus Environ Bull 18(10):1827–1923Google Scholar
- Orcutt DM, Nilsen ET (2000) The physiology of plants under stress: soil and abiotic factor. John Wiley and Sons, New York, p 683Google Scholar
- Pandey P, Irulappan V, Bagavathiannan MV, Senthil-Kumar M (2017) Impact of combined abiotic and biotic stresses on plant growth and avenues for crop improvement by exploiting physio-morphological traits. Front Plant Sci 8:537Google Scholar
- Rao KVM, Raghavendra AS, Reddy KJ (2006) Physiology and molecular biology of stress tolerance in plants. Springer, Netherlands. ISBN 1-4020-4224-8Google Scholar
- Schulze ED, Beck E, Müller-Hohenstein K (2005) Plant ecology. Springer, Berlin, p 702Google Scholar
- Srivastava S, Srivastava AK, Suprasanna PD, Souza SF (2009) Comparative biochemical and transcriptional profiling of two contrasting varieties of Brassica juncea L. in response to arsenic exposure reveals mechanisms of stress perception and tolerance. J Exp Bot 60(12):3419–3431CrossRefGoogle Scholar