Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Systematic Adaptation of Violence Contexts in the ISIS Discourse: A Contrastive Corpus-Based Study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Corpus Pragmatics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Categorizing an act as ‘violence’, ‘resistance’, ‘defense’ or ‘punishment’ depends on the context within which the act occurs. Concerned with the context of violence, this study adopts a pragmatic approach to focus on the techniques ISIS uses to project participants involved in the context of violence, in corpora representing the Arabic and English ISIS discourses in 2014 and 2015. FrameNet is employed to identify the typical participants in the violence contexts/frames. Results show that the projection of participants in violent events systematically varies according to the addressed society ISIS targets. ISIS depends on priming historical conflicts to urge hostile encounter against socio-linguistically and historically diverse enemies. Addressing the Arab world in which the Shia/Sunni conflict is central, ISIS wages the war mainly against Safawi armies. However, the ISIS English discourse basically activates the Crusader/Muslim war. Overall, four expandable designations are constantly used to label any ISIS enemy: ‘crusader’ for Christian enemies; ‘Murtadd’ for Sunni Muslim opponents; ‘Safawi’ for Shia adversaries and ‘Kuffar/disbelievers’ for religiously undefined groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbasi, A. (2007, May). Affect intensity analysis of dark web forums. In 2007 IEEE Intelligence and Security Informatics (pp. 282–288). IEEE.

  • Arosoaie, A. (2017). In the name of honour and freedom: The sacred as a justifying tool for ISIS’and secular violence. Culture and Religion, 18(3), 278–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arts, T., Belinkov, Y., Habash, N., Kilgarriff, A., & Suchomel, V. (2014). arTenTen: Arabic corpus and word sketches. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences, 26(4), 357–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkins, S., Fillmore, C., & Johnson, C. (2003a). Lexicographic relevance: Selecting information from corpus evidence. International Journal of Lexicography, 16(3), 251–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkins, S., Rundell, M., & Sato, H. (2003b). The contribution of FrameNet to practical lexicography. International Journal of Lexicography, 16(3), 333–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, P., & Vessey, R. (2018). A corpus-driven comparison of English and French Islamist extremist texts. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 23(3), 255–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, E., & Singleton, M. (2016). Foreign fighters in the Syria and Iraq conflict: Statistics and characteristics of a rapidly growing phenomenon. In Foreign Fighters under International Law and Beyond (pp. 9–25). The Hague: TMC Asser Press.

  • Bertoldi, A., & Chishman, R. (2011, August). Developing a frame-based lexicon for the Brazilian legal language: The case of the criminal_process frame. In International Workshop on AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems, pp. 256–270.

  • Colas, B. (2017). What does Dabiq do? ISIS hermeneutics and organizational fractures within Dabiq magazine. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 40(3), 173–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colvin, S. (2009). Ulrike Meinhof and West German terrorism: Language, violence, and identity. Rochester, NY: Camden House.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Marcken, C. G. (1990, June). Parsing the LOB corpus. In Proceedings of the 28th annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 243–251). Association for Computational Linguistics.

  • Doosje, B., Moghaddam, F., Kruglanski, A., De Wolf, A., Mann, L., & Feddes, A. (2016). Terrorism, radicalization and de-radicalization. Current Opinion in Psychology, 11, 79–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, G. (2007). The psychology of genocide, massacres, and extreme violence: Why “normal” people come to commit atrocities. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fillmore, C. (1975). An alternative to checklist theories of meaning. In Proceedings of the first annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp. 123–131.

  • Fillmore, C., & Baker, C. (2011). A frames approach to semantic analysis. In The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis (pp. 313–340). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Fillmore, C., Petruck, M., Ruppenhofer, J., & Wright, A. (2003). FrameNet in action: The case of attaching. International Journal of Lexicography, 16(3), 297–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisman, R., & Miguel, E. (2010). Economic gangsters: Corruption, violence, and the poverty of nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, J. (1990). Cultural violence. Journal of Peace Research, 27(3), 291–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garver, N. (1968). What violence is. The Nation, 209(24), 819–822. Online.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geen, R. G. (2001). Human aggression. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghajar-Khosravi, S., Kwantes, P., Derbentseva, N., & Huey, L. (2016). Quantifying salient concepts discussed in social media content: An analysis of Tweets posted by ISIS Fangirls. Journal of Terrorism Research, 7(2), 79–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gildea, D., & Jurafsky, D. (2002). Automatic labeling of semantic roles. Computational Linguistics, 28(3), 245–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 69–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haykel, B. (2016). ISIS and al-Qaeda—What are they thinking? Understanding the adversary. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 668(1), 71–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herbst, P., & Herbst, R. (2003). Talking terrorism: A dictionary of the loaded language of political violence. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, H. J. (2017). Learning from ISIS’s virtual propaganda war for Western Muslims: A comparison of Inspire and Dabiq. In M. Conway, L. Jarvis, & O. Lehane (Eds.), Terrorists’ use of the Internet: Assessment and response (pp. 136–170). Amsterdam: IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, A., & Estrada, M. A. R. (2016). The effects of terrorism on economic performance: The case of Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS). Quality & Quantity, 50(4), 1645–1661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laqueur, W., & Wall, C. (2018). The future of terrorism: ISIS, Al-Qaeda, and the Alt-Right. New York: Thomas Dunne Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, W. (2015). http://yoshikoder.sourceforge.net/ykconverter/index.html.

  • Macnair, L., & Frank, R. (2018). The mediums and the messages: Exploring the language of Islamic State media through sentiment analysis. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 11, 438–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahood, S., & Rane, H. (2017). Islamist narratives in ISIS recruitment propaganda. The Journal of International Communication, 23(1), 15–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCauley, C., & Moskalenko, S. (2017). Understanding political radicalization: The two-pyramids model. American Psychologist, 72(3), 205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motz, A. (2016). The psychology of female violence: Crimes against the body. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nimmer, L. (2011). De-contextualization in the terrorism discourse: A social constructionist view. KVÜÕA Toimetised, 14, 223–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novenario, C. M. I. (2016). Differentiating Al Qaeda and the Islamic State through strategies publicized in Jihadist magazines. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 39(11), 953–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, M. (2008, April). The UAM CorpusTool: Software for corpus annotation and exploration. In Proceedings of the XXVI Congreso de AESLA (pp. 3–5). Almeria Spain.

  • Pennebaker, J. (2011). Using computer analyses to identify language style and aggressive intent: The secret life of function words. Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict, 4(2), 92–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perelberg, R. (2005). Psychoanalytic understanding of violence and suicide. London: Psychology Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ruppenhofer, J., Ellsworth, M., Petruck, M. R., Johnson, C. R., & Scheffczyk, J. (2016). FrameNet II: Extended theory and practice. Berkeley: Online Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, B., & Schröder, I. (2001). Anthropology of violence and conflict. London: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheets-Johnstone, M. (2016). Strangers, trust, and religion: On the vulnerability of being alive. Human Studies, 39(2), 167–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steindal, M. (2016). ISIS totalitarian ideology and discourse: An analysis of the Dabiq Magazine discourse. Master’s thesis, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås.

  • Stephan, M. (2015). Civil resistance vs ISIS. Journal of Resistance Studies, 1(2), 127–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, C. (2013). Islam without Allah?: The rise of religious externalism in Safavid Iran. Routledge.

  • Volavka, J. (2008). Neurobiology of violence. New York: American Psychiatric Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, T. (2018). Theology, heroism, justice, and fear: An analysis of ISIS propaganda magazines Dabiq and Rumiyah. Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict, 11(3), 186–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welss, M., & Hassan, H. (2016). ISIS inside the Army of Terror. New York: Regan Arts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wignell, P., O’Halloran, K. L., Tan, S., Lange, R., & Chai, K. (2018). Image and text relations in ISIS materials and the new relations established through recontextualisation in online media. Discourse & Communication, 12, 535–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wignell, P., Tan, S., O’Halloran, K. L., & Lange, R. (2017). A mixed methods empirical examination of changes in emphasis and style in the extremist magazines Dabiq and Rumiyah. Perspectives on Terrorism, 11(2), 2–20.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their useful comments on the earlier draft of this article. I would also like to thank Miss Megan E. Wagy and Dr Tyler J. True, Northern Arizona University, for the esthetic work they did by proofreading this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of English Language, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt

    Esra’ Moustafa Abdelzaher

Authors
  1. Esra’ Moustafa Abdelzaher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Esra’ Moustafa Abdelzaher.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abdelzaher, E.M. The Systematic Adaptation of Violence Contexts in the ISIS Discourse: A Contrastive Corpus-Based Study. Corpus Pragmatics 3, 173–203 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-019-00055-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-019-00055-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation