Data from the KID demonstrated that SMA1 hospitalizations were lengthy and extremely costly, particularly when compared with hospitalizations with no CCC. The average total hospital charges per SMA1 hospitalization were US$150,921 (US$11,143 per day) compared with those of the no CCC group, which were US$19,261 (US$5990 per day). Moreover, the average total hospital costs per SMA1 hospitalization were higher than those in the no CCC group (US$50,190 vs US$5862, respectively). SMA1 hospitalizations were longer than those of the no CCC group (15.1 vs 3.4 days, respectively). SMA1 hospitalizations billed for more procedures than hospitalizations with no CCC (81.9% vs 39.4% billing for one or more procedure codes, respectively); many of these procedures were for nutritional and ventilatory support. Thus, the high hospitalization charges observed for SMA1 hospitalizations appear to be due to both the longer duration and increased complexity of the care provided.
Although more recent studies analyzing the burden of SMA in the US have reported high annual direct costs [11, 15, 16], they fail to analyze costs associated with specific SMA types. Specifically, the total healthcare expenditures associated with patients with an SMA diagnosis at ≤ 3 years of age ranged from US$112,644 [16] to US$121,682 [15]. After adjusting for mortality, the total costs for infantile SMA patients were 14-fold higher than matched non-SMA patients in the first month (US$52,234 vs US$3731, respectively). By month 30, this gap widened to 56-fold (US$574,197 vs US$9828) [11]. In line with clinical experience and studies suggesting the high annual cost of care for SMA1 children [11, 15,16,17], we found that the average total hospital charges for a single hospitalization for SMA1 patients were US$150,921 with total costs of US$50,190. Given that SMA1 children experience an average of approximately 4.2 hospitalizations annually [11], and care requirements for SMA1 children also include outpatient care, ancillary services, specialized equipment, and prescription costs, the results suggest that the annualized HRU for SMA1 patients is potentially far beyond that previously reported in small data sets likely biased towards older, long-lived patients with relatively mild disease.
In addition to high direct annual costs, SMA is also associated with additional costs, which are often described as ‘hidden costs’, including costs associated with appointments (e.g., transportation costs), time (e.g., time off work and time spent accessing care), financial costs associated with condition management (e.g., private insurance, respite care, and specialist equipment), and psychosocial/health and wellbeing (e.g., disruption of schooling, impact on relationships, and depression). In a nationwide cross-sectional study in Germany that included 189 patients with SMA1-3, the total annual direct medical cost of illness among 12 patients surveyed with SMA1 was €53,707, increasing to €107,807 after the addition of direct non-medical costs as well as indirect costs [17]. Another small population-based cross-sectional study in Spain that included 81 SMA patients reported that the total annual costs for SMA patients were €10,882 in direct healthcare costs and €22,839 in direct non-healthcare costs [10]. Although both the German and Spanish studies were small with relatively few SMA1 patients (n = 12 [6%] in Klug et al. [17] and n = 8 [10%] in Lopez-Bastida et al. [10]) and most of the participants were older and more chronic in their disease, both studies highlight the considerable burden of SMA beyond direct medical costs, including both direct non-healthcare costs and indirect costs.
The high resource use described in the current study is not surprising as it is consistent with standard of care guidelines, which stress the proactive multidisciplinary care necessary to manage SMA1 symptoms [4]. In a retrospective study of 49 SMA1 patients, proactive management of respiratory symptoms, including cough assist, noninvasive ventilatory support, and invasive ventilation (i.e., tracheostomy), was associated with increased survival time compared with supportive care [22]. This proactive care approach also increased the rate of hospitalization for respiratory insufficiency and shortened the time from diagnosis to hospitalization for respiratory insufficiency [22]. Proactive supportive care was also associated with increased care costs compared with supportive care (median costs of US$116,988 vs US$76,746 over a 686-day period, respectively) [22].
In the present study, the total charges were converted to total costs using CCRs provided by the KID. Analysis of the total costs revealed that they were approximately one-third the total charges for each group. This is consistent with previously published HRU studies using the KID, which reported charges that were 2.7- [23] and 3.2-fold [24] higher than the costs.
The present study is limited in that it only focused on the costs associated with individual hospitalizations and does not directly assess per-patient charges as well as the acuity of care. In addition, it was not a longitudinal analysis, and no adjustments were made to control for confounding across the three groups. Furthermore, charge-to-cost conversion ratios were hospital-specific; therefore, the true conversion rate may vary substantially across treatments. In an analysis of the economic burden of SMA, the primary costs were associated with outpatient visits; total prescription costs were also high [16]. Therefore, a large portion of the costs associated with SMA were not captured in the KID dataset. Furthermore, respiratory morbidity is affected by the level of supportive care utilized by the patient. Although standard of care, at the time, specifies ventilatory and nutritional support, use is variable in the general population as some parents elect that their child receive maximal supportive care whereas other select palliative-only care without treatment. Because supportive care use in these cases cannot be determined using the KID dataset, these estimates likely represent a mixture of high-use children and low-use children. Finally, these estimates were made from the KID 2012 dataset, which is before the approval of nusinersen, the first disease-modifying drug approved for SMA; thus, these estimates would not necessarily be generalizable to patients treated with this drug.