Advertisement

Journal of Analysis and Testing

, Volume 3, Issue 1, pp 80–88 | Cite as

Sweat-Based in Vitro Diagnostics (IVD): From Sample Collection to Point-of-Care Testing (POCT)

  • Mehenur Sarwar
  • Pablo Rodriguez
  • Chen-zhong LiEmail author
Review
  • 61 Downloads

Abstract

Sweat-based diagnostics offer an exciting avenue to noninvasively monitor analytes which had previously only been available through painful blood draws. Sweat is enriched with physiologically valuable information, and recent proteomic studies have identified numerous critical analytes which have highly correlated levels in blood, interstitial fluid and sweat. However, usage of sweat for health monitoring has not been studied extensively due to the substantial challenge of assembling a composite clinic-ready device. Recent advances in soft electronics have made this goal realizable, as these devices can perform electronic or optical monitoring on a flexible substrate using small volumes of liquid. While this field is still in its infancy, this review examines the physiological composition of sweat, various improvements in material science that improve sensor design, existing FDA approvals, methods of extracting sweat and comparisons to blood-based tests. Furthermore, this review assesses the critical challenges which must be overcome for this type of technology to make it out of research laboratories and into continuous clinical use. We believe that once properly harnessed, sweat-based diagnostics can provide patients a painless monitoring tool which can be customized to track a wide variety of medical conditions from the comfort of a patient’s own home.

Keywords

Wearable sensors Sweat tests In vitro diagnostics Biomarkers POCTs Sweat collection 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support by the National Science Foundation under NSF Cooperative Agreement (Nos. EEC-1648451 and EEC-1647837). Dr. Li also thanks the support sponsored by NSF Independent Research/Development (IRD) Program.

References

  1. 1.
    Robinson S, Robinson AH. Chemical composition of sweat. Physiol Rev. 1954;34(2):202–20.  https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.1954.34.2.202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Watabe A, Sugawara T, Kikuchi K, Yamasaki K, Sakai S, Aiba S. Sweat constitutes several natural moisturizing factors, lactate, urea, sodium, and potassium. J Dermatol Sci. 2013;72(2):177–82.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdermsci.2013.06.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Težak Ž, Kondratovich MV, Mansfield E. US FDA and personalized medicine: in vitro diagnostic regulatory perspective. Per. Med. 2010;7(5):517–30.  https://doi.org/10.2217/pme.10.53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Warren A. ELITechGroup Biomedical Systems announces the release of the Macroduct® advanced—a sweat induction and collection method cleared by the FDA. https://www.elitechgroup.com/north-america/news/elitechgroup-biomedical-systems-announces-the-release-of-the-macroduct-advanced-a-sweat-induction-and-collection-method-cleared-by-the-fda/. Accessed 28 Jan 2019.
  5. 5.
    Ghafar-Zadeh E. Wireless integrated biosensors for point-of-care diagnostic applications. Sensors. 2015;15(2):3236–61.  https://doi.org/10.3390/s150203236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gutierrez A. Novabiomedical. https://www.novabio.us/press/082514.php. Accessed 26 Jan 2019.
  7. 7.
    Rome BN, Kramer DB, Kesselheim AS. FDA approval of cardiac implantable electronic devices via original and supplement premarket approval pathways, 1979–2012. JAMA. 2014;311(4):385.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.284986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kuno Y. Physiology of human perspiration. London: J. & A. Churchill; 1934.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bates GP, Miller VS. Sweat rate and sodium loss during work in the heat. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2008;3:4.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6673-3-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sato K, Sato F. Individual variations in structure and function of human eccrine sweat gland. Am J Physiol Integr Comp Physiol. 1983;245(2):R203–8.  https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.1983.245.2.R203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Komorniczak M. Layers of the skin. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Skin_layers.svg. Accessed 28 Jan 2019.
  12. 12.
    Schlereth T. Hyperhidrosis. Dtsch. Aerzteblatt. 2009.  https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2009.0032.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shibasaki M, Crandall CG. Mechanisms and controllers of eccrine sweating in humans. Front Biosci (Schol Ed). 2010;2:685–96.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bovell D. The human eccrine sweat gland: structure, function and disorders. J Local Glob Heal Sci. 2015;2015(1):5.  https://doi.org/10.5339/jlghs.2015.5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Elson, JA. Human skin sweat glands. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Humanskinsweatglands100x1.jpg. Accessed 10 Oct 2018.
  16. 16.
    Montgomery I, Jenkinson DM, Elder HY, Czarnecki D, Mackie RM. The effects of thermal stimulation on the ultrastructure of the human atrichial sweat gland. II. The duct. Br J Dermatol. 1985;112(2):165–77.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.1985.tb00080.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sato K, Taylor JR, Dobson RL. The effect of oubain on eccrine sweat gland function. J Invest Dermatol. 1969;53(4):275–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yu Y, Prassas I, Muytjens CMJ, Diamandis EP. Proteomic and peptidomic analysis of human sweat with emphasis on proteolysis. J Proteomics. 2017;155:40–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2017.01.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Patterson MJ, Galloway SDR, Nimmo MA. Variations in regional sweat composition in normal human males. Exp Physiol. 2000;85(6):S0958067000020583.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958067000020583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Johnson RE, Pitts GC, Consolazio FC. Factors influencing chloride concentration in human sweat. Am J Physiol Content. 1944;141(4):575–89.  https://doi.org/10.1152/ajplegacy.1944.141.4.575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kenneth Walker H, Hall WD, Hurst JW. Clinical methods: the history, physical, and laboratory examinations. 1990.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rastegar A. Serum potassium. 1990.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wacharasint P, Nakada T, Boyd JH, Russell JA, Walley KR. Normal-range blood lactate concentration in septic shock is prognostic and predictive. Shock. 2012;38(1):4–10.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0b013e318254d41a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Marques-Deak A, Cizza G, Eskandari F, Torvik S, Christie IC, Sternberg EM, Phillips TM. Measurement of cytokines in sweat patches and plasma in healthy women: validation in a controlled study. J Immunol Methods. 2006;315(1–2):99–109.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jim.2006.07.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fu L-H, Qi C, Ma M-G, Wan P. Multifunctional cellulose-based hydrogels for biomedical applications. J Mater Chem B. 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C8TB02331J.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ranganathan N, Joseph Bensingh R, Abdul Kader M, Nayak SK. Synthesis and properties of hydrogels prepared by various polymerization reaction. Systems. 2018;or:1–25.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76573-0_18-1.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Experimental hydrogel bandage.jpg. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Experimental_hydrogel_bandage.jpg. Accessed 8 Mar 2019.
  28. 28.
    Wang C, Wang C, Huang Z, Xu S. Materials and structures toward soft electronics. Adv Mater. 2018;30(50):1801368.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201801368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yao S, Zhu Y. Nanomaterial-enabled stretchable conductors: strategies, materials and devices. Adv Mater. 2015;27(9):1480–511.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201404446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mekis D. Nanomaterial. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanomaterials. Accessed 8 Mar 2019.
  31. 31.
    Zhu S, So J-H, Mays R, Desai S, Barnes WR, Pourdeyhimi B, Dickey MD. Ultrastretchable fibers with metallic conductivity using a liquid metal alloy core. Adv Funct Mater. 2013;23(18):2308–14.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201202405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Johnson LA. FDA approves first blood sugar monitor without finger pricks. https://www.statnews.com/2017/09/28/fda-approves-blood-sugar-monitor-without-finger-pricks/. Accessed 28 Jan 2019.
  33. 33.
    Revolutionizing continuous glucose monitoring with freestyle libre. https://www.abbott.com/corpnewsroom/product-and-innovation/revolutionizing-cgm-with-freestyle-libre.html. Accessed 3 Feb 2019.
  34. 34.
    FDA. Summary of safety and effectiveness data; 2002. Accessed 3 Feb 2019.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Currano LJ, Sage FC, Hagedon M, Hamilton L, Patrone J, Gerasopoulos K. Wearable sensor system for detection of lactate in sweat. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):15890.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33565-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hoekstra R, Blondeau P, Andrade FJ. IonSens: a wearable potentiometric sensor patch for monitoring total ion content in sweat. Electroanalysis. 2018;30(7):1536–44.  https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.201800128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Caldara M, Colleoni C, Guido E, Re V, Rosace G. Optical monitoring of sweat pH by a textile fabric wearable sensor based on covalently bonded litmus-3-glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane coating. Sens Actuators, B Chem. 2016;222:213–20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2015.08.073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zilberstein G, Zilberstein R, Maor U, Righetti PG. Noninvasive wearable sensor for indirect glucometry. Electrophoresis. 2018;39(18):2344–50.  https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.201700424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kim J, De Araujo WR, Samek IA, Bandodkar AJ, Jia W, Brunetti B, Paixão TRLC, Wang J. Wearable temporary tattoo sensor for real-time trace metal monitoring in human sweat. Electrochem Commun. 2015;51:41–5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2014.11.024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Cho E, Mohammadifar M, Choi S. A single-use, self-powered, paper-based sensor patch for detection of exercise-induced hypoglycemia. Micromachines. 2017;8:(9).  https://doi.org/10.3390/mi8090265.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Bellando F, Garcia-Cordero E, Wildhaber F, Longo J, Guerin H, Ionescu AM. Lab on skin TM: 3D monolithically integrated zero-energy micro/nanofludics and FD SOI ion sensitive FETs for wearable multi-sensing sweat applications. IEEE Int Electron Dev Meeting (IEDM). 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1109/IEDM.2017.8268413.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Choi J, Kang D, Han S, Kim SB, Rogers JA. Thin, soft, skin-mounted microfluidic networks with capillary bursting valves for chrono-sampling of sweat. Adv Healthc Mater. 2017;6(5):1601355.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201601355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Emaminejad S, Gao W, Wu E, Davies ZA, Nyein YYH, Challa S, Ryan SP, Fahad HM, Chen K, Shahpar Z, et al. Autonomous sweat extraction and analysis applied to cystic fibrosis and glucose monitoring using a fully integrated wearable platform. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2017;114(18):4625–30.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1701740114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Sonner Z, Wilder E, Gaillard T, Kasting G, Heikenfeld J. Integrated sudomotor axon reflex sweat stimulation for continuous sweat analyte analysis with individuals at rest. Lab Chip. 2017;17(15):2550–60.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c7lc00364a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Gao W, Emaminejad S, Nyein HYY, Challa S, Chen K, Peck A, Fahad HM, Ota H, Shiraki H, Kiriya D, et al. Fully integrated wearable sensor arrays for multiplexed in situ perspiration analysis. Nature. 2016;529(7587):509–14.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Tai L, Gao W, Chao M, Bariya M, Ngo QP, Shahpar Z, Nyein HYY, Park H, Sun J, Jung Y, et al. Methylxanthine drug monitoring with wearable sweat. Sensors. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201707442.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Jia M, Chew WM, Feinstein Y, Skeath P, Sternberg EM. Quantification of cortisol in human eccrine sweat by liquid chromatography—tandem mass spectrometry. Analyst. 2016;141(6):2053–60.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5AN02387D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Parlak O, Keene ST, Marais A, Curto VF, Salleo A. Molecularly selective nanoporous membrane-based wearable organic electrochemical device for noninvasive cortisol sensing. Sci Adv. 2018;4(7):eaar2904.  https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aar2904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Xu S, Zhang Y, Jia L, Mathewson KE, Jang K-I, Kim J, Fu H, Huang X, Chava P, Wang R, et al. Soft microfluidic assemblies of sensors, circuits, and radios for the skin. Science. 2014;344(6179):70–4.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1250169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Nonferrous Metals Society of China 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mehenur Sarwar
    • 1
  • Pablo Rodriguez
    • 1
  • Chen-zhong Li
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Nanobioengineering/Bioelectronics Laboratory, and Department of Biomedical EngineeringFlorida International UniversityMiamiUSA

Personalised recommendations