Abstract
The increasing pressure on manufacturing organizations to produce eco-friendly products has led these organizations to select sustainable contract manufacturers for outsourcing their products. This study aims to develop an approach for selecting a contract manufacturer (CM), having the capability of producing environmentally sustainable automotive products for original equipment manufacturers (OEMs). A framework is proposed to achieve this task. This framework is developed by integrating two multi-criteria decision-making techniques (MCDM), viz. Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and ViseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR). The selection of the CM for producing eco-friendly automotive products is based on certain criteria (i.e., different life cycle stages of products to be considered by CM) and sub-criteria (i.e., various ecodesign practices to be implemented by CM under each life cycle stage of products). A total of 22 sub-criteria are selected on the basis of literature and expert’s opinion from auto industry and academia. The application of the proposed research has been demonstrated through a case study which includes 4 alternative contract manufacturing companies related to automotive products. AHP method has been utilized to assign the weightage to different criteria and sub-criteria, whereas VIKOR approach has been utilized to evaluate the environmental performance of 4 CMs and to select the most efficient one. Results show that “Ensuring easy maintenance and repair,” “Improving durability and higher reliability,” and “Using alternative manufacturing techniques” are the top 3 criteria for the selection of sustainable CM. In addition, CM3 stands out to be the most sustainable among the four alternative CMs because of the ability to consider key environmental criteria especially during the selection of raw materials and manufacturing processes. The outcomes of this research may be utilized by the OEMs to understand the different criteria for selection of a sustainable contract manufacturer. Also, the proposed approach can lead the OEMs to evaluate the environmental performance of different contract manufacturers and to select the best one.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
References
Akhshik M, Panthapulakkal S, Tjong J, Sain M (2019) The effect of lightweighting on greenhouse gas emissions and life cycle energy for automotive composite parts. Clean Techn Environ Policy 21(3):625–636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-018-01662-0
Amindoust A, Ahmed S, Saghafinia A, Bahreininejad A (2012) Sustainable supplier selection: a ranking model based on fuzzy inference system. Appl Soft Comput 12(6):1668–1677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2012.01.023
Anastas P, Zimmerman J (2003) Design through 12 principles of green engineering. Environ Sci Technol 37(5):94A–101A
Belletire S, St Pierre L, White P (2012) Okala ecodesign strategy wheel app. Okala Practitioner. http://www.okala.net/downloadapp.html
Bhamra TA (2004) Ecodesign: the search for new strategies in product development Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B. J Eng Manuf 218(5):557–569. https://doi.org/10.1177/095440540421800509
Bolandifar E, Kouvelis P, Zhang F (2016) Delegation vs. control in supply chain procurement under competition. Prod Oper Manag 25(9):1528–1541. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12566
Borchardt M, Poltosi LAC, Sellitto MA, Pereira GM (2009) Adopting ecodesign practices: case study of a midsized automotive supplier. Environ Qual Manag 19(1):7–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.20232
Borchardt M, Wendt MH, Pereira GM, Sellitto MA (2011) Redesign of a component based on ecodesign practices: environmental impact and cost reduction achievements. J Clean Prod 19(1):49–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.08.006
Choi J-K, Schuessler R, Ising M, Kelley D, Kissock K (2018) A pathway towards sustainable manufacturing for mid-size manufacturers. Procedia CIRP 69:230–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.11.107
Das D, Bhattacharya S, Sarkar B (2019) Material selection in product design under risk and uncertainty introducing the conditional logit in the madm framework. J Ind Prod Eng 36(7):440–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2019.1683089
de Medina HV (2006) Eco-design for materials selection in automobile industry. Proceedings of the 13th CIRP International Conference on Life Cycle Engineering, 1, 299–304
Dotoli M, Epicoco N, Falagario M, Sciancalepore F (2015) A cross-efficiency fuzzy data envelopment analysis technique for performance evaluation of decision making units under uncertainty. Comput Ind Eng 79:103–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2014.10.026
Fiksel J (1996) Design for environment: creating eco-efficient product and proceses. McGraw-Hill
Fu Y-K (2019) An integrated approach to catering supplier selection using AHP-ARAS-MCGP methodology. J Air Transp Manag 75:164–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2019.01.011
Giudice F, Rosa GL, Ristano A (2006) Product design for the environment: a life cycle approach. Taylor and Francis Group LLC
Gonzalez B, Adenso-Dıaz B, Gonzalez-Torre PL (2002) A fuzzy logic approach for the impact assessment in LCA. Resour Conserv Recycl 37(1):61–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3449
Guo P, Song J-S, Wang Y (2010) Outsourcing structures and information flow in a three-tier supply chain. Int J Prod Econ 128(1):175–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.06.017
Gupta H, Barua MK (2017) Supplier selection among SMEs on the basis of their green innovation ability using BWM and fuzzy TOPSIS. J Clean Prod 152:242–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.125
Harputlugil T, Prins M, Gultekin T, Topcu I (2011) Conceptual framework for potential implementations of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) methods for design quality assessment. In Management and innovation for a sustainable built envi-ronment. University of Technology. http://www.misbe2011.nl/proceedings.htm
Hong Z, Guo X (2019) Green product supply chain contracts considering environmental responsibilities. Omega 83:155–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2018.02.010
Hsu C-W, Hu AH (2009) Applying hazardous substance management to supplier selection using analytic network process. J Clean Prod 17(2):255–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.05.004
Hsu C-W, Kuo T-C, Chen S-H, Hu AH (2013) Using DEMATEL to develop a carbon management model of supplier selection in green supply chain management. J Clean Prod 56:164–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.09.012
Indian Automobile Industry Analysis (2019 March). India Brand Equity Foundation. https://www.ibef.org/industry/automobiles-presentation
Kang D, Park Y (2014) Review-based measurement of customer satisfaction in mobile service: sentiment analysis and VIKOR approach. Expert Syst Appl 41(4):1041–1050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.07.101
Kannan D, ABL J, des Jabbour CJC (2014) Selecting green suppliers based on GSCM practices: using fuzzy TOPSIS applied to a Brazilian electronics company. Eur J Oper Res 233(2):432–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.07.023
KarimiAzari A, Mousavi N, Mousavi SF, Hosseini S (2011) Risk assessment model selection in construction industry. Expert Syst Appl 38(8):9105–9111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.12.110
Kuo RJ, Hong SY, Huang YC (2010) Integration of particle swarm optimization-based fuzzy neural network and artificial neural network for supplier selection. Appl Math Model 34(12):3976–3990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2010.03.033
Lee AHI, Kang H-Y, Hsu C-F, Hung H-C (2009) A green supplier selection model for high-tech industry. Expert Syst Appl 36(4):7917–7927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.11.052
Liang H, Dong L, Tanikawa H, Zhang N, Gao Z, Luo X (2017) Feasibility of a new-generation nighttime light data for estimating in-use steel stock of buildings and civil engineering infrastructures. Resour Conserv Recycl 123:11–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.04.001
Liu T, Deng Y, Chan F (2018) Evidential supplier selection based on DEMATEL and game theory. Int J Fuzzy Sys 20(4):1321–1333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-017-0400-4
Luthra S, Garg D, Haleem A (2016) The impacts of critical success factors for implementing green supply chain management towards sustainability: an empirical investigation of Indian automobile industry. J Clean Prod 121:142–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.095
Luthra S, Govindan K, Kannan D, Mangla SK, Garg CP (2017a) An integrated framework for sustainable supplier selection and evaluation in supply chains. J Clean Prod 140:1686–1698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.078
Luthra S, Govindan K, Kannan D, Mangla SK, Garg CP (2017b) An integrated framework for sustainable supplier selection and evaluation in supply chains. J Clean Prod 140:1686–1698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.078
Luttropp C, Lagerstedt J (2006) EcoDesign and The Ten Golden Rules: generic advice for merging environmental aspects into product development. J Clean Prod 14(15–16):1396–1408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.11.022
Mangla SK, Govindan K, Luthra S (2016) Critical success factors for reverse logistics in Indian industries: a structural model. J Clean Prod 129:608–621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.124
McLennan J (2004) The philosophy of sustainable design: the future of architecture. Ecotone Publishing LLC
Mildenberger U, Khare A (2000) Planning for an environment-friendly car. Technovation 20(4):205–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972
Murray B (2013) Embedding environmental sustainability in product design. Product Sustainability Forum, UK
Niekamp S, Bharadwaj UR, Sadhukhan J, Chryssanthopoulos MK (2015) A multi-criteria decision support framework for sustainable asset management and challenges in its application. J Ind Prod Eng 32(1):23–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2014.1000401
Niu B, Wang Y, Guo P (2015) Equilibrium pricing sequence in a co-opetitive supply chain with the ODM as a downstream rival of its OEM. Omega 57:249–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2015.05.005
Niu B, Mu Z, Chen L, Lee CKM (2019) Coordinate the economic and environmental sustainability via procurement outsourcing in a co-opetitive supply chain. Resour Conserv Recycl 146:17–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.007
Perçin S (2019) An integrated fuzzy SWARA and fuzzy AD approach for outsourcing provider selection. J Manuf Technol Manag 30(2):531–552. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-08-2018-0247
Plouffe S, Lanoie P, Berneman C, Vernier M-F (2011) Economic benefits tied to ecodesign. J Clean Prod 19(6–7):573–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.12.003
Prakash C, Barua MK (2016) A combined MCDM approach for evaluation and selection of third-party reverse logistics partner for Indian electronics industry. Sust Prod Consumpt 7:66–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2016.04.001
Quinn JB (1999) Strategic outsourcing: leveraging knowledge capabilities. Sloan Manag Rev 40:9–21
Quinn JB, Hilmer F (1994) Strategic outsourcing. Sloan Manag Rev 35:43–55
Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill
Sakao T, Wasserbaur R, Mathieux F (2019) A methodological approach for manufacturers to enhance value-in-use of service-based offerings considering three dimensions of sustainability. CIRP Ann 68(1):33–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2019.04.084
Sarkis J, Gonzalez-Torre P, Adenso-Diaz B (2010) Stakeholder pressure and the adoption of environmental practices: the mediating effect of training. J Oper Manag 28:163–176
Sellitto M, Bittencourt SAM, Reckziegel B (2015) Evaluating the implementation of gscm in industrial supply chains: two cases in the automotive industry. Chem Eng Trans 43:1315–1320. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1543220
Sharma RC, Sharma N (2014) Environmental impact of automobiles in India. J Basic Applied Eng Res 1(2):46–49
Singh PK, Sarkar P (2019) A framework based on fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS for prioritizing solutions to overcome the barriers in the implementation of ecodesign practices in SMEs. Int J Sus Dev World Ecol 26(6):506–521. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2019.1605547
Sodhi MS, Tang CS (2013) Strategies and tactics of Chinese contract manufacturers and western OEMs (2001–2011). Int J Prod Econ 146(1):14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.10.014
Stuart JA, Sommerville RM (1998) Materials selection for life cycle design. Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment. ISEE - 1998 (Cat. No.98CH36145) 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISEE.1998.675049
Tahriri F, Osman MR, Ali A, Yusuff RM (2008) A review of supplier selection methods in manufacturing industries Suranaree. J Science Technol 15(3):201–208
Telenko C, Seepersad CC, Webber ME (2008) A compilation of design for environment principles and guidelines. Volume 5: 13th Design for Manufacturability and the Lifecycle Conference; 5th Symposium on International Design and Design Education; 10th International Conference on Advanced Vehicle and Tire Technologies, 289–301. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2008-49651
Tharumarajah A, Koltun P (2007) Is there an environmental advantage of using magnesium components for light-weighting cars? J Clean Prod 15(11–12):1007–1013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.05.022
Thirupathi RM, Vinodh S, Dhanasekaran S (2019) Application of system dynamics modelling for a sustainable manufacturing system of an Indian automotive component manufacturing organisation: a case study. Clean Techn Environ Policy 21(5):1055–1071. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-019-01692-2
Tischner U (2000) How to do EcoDesign?: a guide for environmentally and economically sound design. Art Books International Limited. https://books.google.co.in/books?id=rJuVNQAACAAJ
Tolio T, Bernard A, Colledani M, Kara S, Seliger G, Duflou J, Battaia O, Takata S (2017) Design, management and control of demanufacturing and remanufacturing systems. CIRP Ann 66(2):585–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2017.05.001
van Hemel CG, Brezet J (1997) Ecodesign: a promising approach to sustainable production and consumption. United Nations Environmental Programme
van Hemel C, Cramer J (2002) Barriers and stimuli for ecodesign in SMEs. J Clean Prod 10(5):439–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526
Vanalle RM, Ganga GMD, Filho MG (2017) Green supply chain management: an investigation of pressures, practices, and performance within the Brazilian automotive supply chain. J Clean Prod 151:250–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.066
Vehicular pollution in India (2018)
Vezzoli C, Manzini E (2008) Design for environmental sustainability. Springer
Wimmer W, Züst R (2003) Ecodesign pilot: product investigation, learning and optimization tool for sustainable product development, with CD-ROM. Springer Netherlands. http://public.eblib.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=3036035
Ye F, Li Y, Yang Q (2018) Designing coordination contract for biofuel supply chain in China. Resour Conserv Recycl 128:306–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.11.023
Zah R, Hischier R, Leão AL, Braun I (2007) Curauá fibers in the automobile industry – a sustainability assessment. J Clean Prod 15(11–12):1032–1040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.05.036
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Singh, P.K., Sarkar, P. A Multi-Criteria Decision Approach to Select Contract Manufacturer for Sustainable Development of Automotive Products: an Integrated Framework. Process Integr Optim Sustain 5, 843–857 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41660-021-00181-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41660-021-00181-8