Optimal Process Capacity Allocation Under Abnormal Conditions

Abstract

Plant operations may need to be optimized in response to abnormal conditions resulting from various disruptive events. In such cases, it is of interest to minimize interim economic losses by allocating the capacities of process units optimally while the plant operations deviate from the nominal design conditions. This note extends the mixed integer linear programming (MILP) model previously developed by Kasivisvanathan et al. (Applied Energy 102: 492–500, 2013) by considering the effect of financial penalties for failure to meet contractual obligations to customers; it is assumed that such penalties are paid in direct proportion to the magnitude of production deficit. The extended model is illustrated with a case study of a chlor-alkali industrial complex, and general implications of the results are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Abbott M, Bazilian M, Egel D, Willis HH (2017) Examining the food–energy–water and conflict nexus. Curr Opin Chem Eng 18:55–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chong Z, Swartz CLE (2013) Optimal operation of process plants under partial shutdown conditions. AICHE J 59:4151–4168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chong Z, Swartz CLE (2016) Optimal response under partial plant shutdown with discontinuous dynamic models. AICHE J 86:120–135

    Google Scholar 

  4. Douglas JM (1985) A hierarchical decision procedure for process synthesis. AICHE J 31:353–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kasivisvanathan H, Barilea IDU, Ng DKS, Tan RR (2013) Optimal operational adjustment in multi-functional energy systems in response to process inoperability. Appl Energy 102:492–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lakshmanan S, Murugesan T (2014) The chlor-alkali process: work in progress. Clean Techn Environ Policy 16:225–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li Y (2019) Saudi oil production cut by 50% after drones attack crude facilities. CNBC, 14 September, Available at https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/14/saudi-arabia-is-shutting-down-half-of-its-oil-production-after-drone-attack-wsj-says.html, Accessed on January 2, 2020

  8. Litzen DB, Bravo JL (1999) Uncover low-cost debottlenecking opportunities. Chem Eng Prog 95:25–32

    Google Scholar 

  9. MacKenzie CA, Santos JR, Barker K (2012) Measuring changes in international production from a disruption: case study of the Japanese earthquake and tsunami. Int J Prod Econ 138:293–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Polley GT, Polley HL (2000) Design better water networks. Chem Eng Prog 96:47–52

    Google Scholar 

  11. Roshan M, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R, Rahimi Y (2019) A two-stage approach to agile pharmaceutical supply chain management with product substitutability in crises. Comput Chem Eng 127:200–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Schrage LE, LINDO Systems, Inc. (1997) Optimization modeling with LINGO. Duxbury Press, CA

    Google Scholar 

  13. Smith RL (2016) Conceptual chemical process design for sustainability. In: Ruiz-Mercado G, Cabezas H (eds) Sustainability in the design, Synthesis and Analysis of Chemical Engineering Processes. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 67–85

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tan RR, Foo DCY (2018) Integrated multi-scale water management as a climate change adaptation strategy. Clean Techn Environ Policy 20:1123–1125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tan RR, Cayamanda CD, Aviso KB (2014) P-graph approach to optimal operational adjustment in polygeneration plants under conditions of process inoperability. Appl Energy 135:402–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tan RR, Benjamin MFD, Cayamanda CD, Aviso KB, Razon LF (2016a) P-graph approach to optimizing crisis operations in an industrial complex. Ind Eng Chem Res 55:3467–3477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tan RR, Aviso KB, Cayamanda CD, Chiu ASF, Promentilla MAB, Ubando AT, Yu KDS (2016b) A fuzzy linear programming enterprise input–output model for optimal crisis operations in industrial complexes. Int J Prod Econ 181:410–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tan RR, Aviso KB, Chiu ASF, Promentilla MAB, Razon LF, Tseng M-L, Yu KDS (2017a) Towards “climate-proof” industrial networks. Resour Conserv Recycl 127:244–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tan RR, Foo DCY, Bandyopadhyay S, Aviso KB, Ng DKS (2017b) A mixed integer linear programming (MILP) model for optimal operation of industrial resource conservation networks (RCNs) under abnormal conditions. Computer Aided Chemical Engineering 40:607–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Westerberg AW, Hutchison HP, Motard RL, Winter P (1979) Process flowsheeting. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. R. Tan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gumilao, T.K., Aviso, K.B. & Tan, R.R. Optimal Process Capacity Allocation Under Abnormal Conditions. Process Integr Optim Sustain 4, 163–169 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41660-020-00110-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Inoperability
  • Optimization
  • Mixed integer linear programming
  • Abnormal operations