Abstract
While a number of optimization models have been proposed for siting refueling/recharging stations for alternative fuel/electric vehicles, many of these approaches require detailed origin–destination (OD) data of refueling trips that are often very costly or challenging to obtain. This paper introduces two new arc-based coverage models for locating alternative fuel stations for regions where OD data are unavailable or unsuitable. Station spacing parameters are proposed to reduce redundant coverage while helping fill in regional coverage gaps. The first model is more suitable for early stages of planning, while the second addresses coverage overlap issues during later stages when a denser station network is formed. Both models can handle cases with a set of pre-existing stations. The new models are applied to planning a network of compressed natural gas (CNG) fueling stations for heavy-duty CNG-powered trucking in the Southwest USA. The models are generalizable to other regions, fuels, and vehicle types when applicable OD data are lacking.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agnolucci P (2007) Hydrogen infrastructure for the transport sector. Int J Hydrog Energy 32:3526–3544
Agnolucci P, McDowall W (2013) Designing future hydrogen infrastructure: insights from analysis at different spatial scales. Int J Hydrog Energy 38:5181–5191
ALLSTAYS (2016) All truck stops. Retrieved from https://www.allstays.com/DL/pro-promo-truck-stops.htm. Last accessed on May 9th, 2019
Berman O, Larson RC, Fouska N (1992) Optimal location of discretionary service facilities. Transp Sci 26:201–211
Boostani A, Ghodsi R, and Miab AK (2010) Optimal location of compressed natural gas (CNG) refueling station using the arc demand coverage model. Mathematical/Analytical Modelling and Computer Simulation (AMS), 2010 Fourth Asia International Conference On, 193–198
Brey JJ, Brey R, Carazo AF, Ruiz-Montero M, Tejada M (2016) Incorporating refuelling behaviour and drivers’ preferences in the design of alternative fuels infrastructure in a city. Transport Res C-Emer 65:144–155
Brey J, Carazo A, Brey R (2014) Analysis of a hydrogen station roll-out strategy to introduce hydrogen vehicles in Andalusia. Int J Hydrog Energy 39:4123–4130
Capar I, Kuby M, Leon VJ, Tsai Y (2013) An arc cover–path-cover formulation and strategic analysis of alternative-fuel station locations. Eur J Oper Res 227:142–151
Dagdougui H (2012) Models, methods and approaches for the planning and design of the future hydrogen supply chain. Int J Hydrog Energy 37:5318–5327
Freight Analysis Framework. (2012) Retrieved from https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/freight/freight_analysis/faf/. Last accessed on May 9th, 2019
Funke SÁ, Gnann T, Plötz P (2015) Addressing the different needs for charging infrastructure: an analysis of some criteria for charging infrastructure set-up. In: E-mobility in Europe. Springer, Cham
Goodchild, Michael F. Noronha, Valerian T. (1987) Location-allocation and impulsive shopping: the case of gasoline retailing. Spatial analysis and location-allocation models eds A. Ghosh and G. Rushton. van Nostrand Reinhold, New York
He F, Wu D, Yin Y, Guan Y (2013) Optimal deployment of public charging stations for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. Transp Res B Methodol 47:87–101
He Y, Kockelman KM, Perrine KA (2019) Optimal locations of US fast charging stations for long-distance trip completion by battery electric vehicles. J Clean Prod 214:452–461
Hodgson MJ (1990) A flow capturing location allocation model. Geogr Anal 22:270–279
Hosseini M, MirHassani S (2015) A heuristic algorithm for optimal location of flow-refueling capacitated stations. Int Trans Oper Res 24:1377–1403
Hwang SW, Kweon SJ, Ventura JA (2015) Infrastructure development for alternative fuel vehicles on a highway road system. Transport Res E-Log 77:170–183
Jaffe AM, Dominguez-Faus R, Lee A, Medlock K, Parker N, Scheitrum D, Burke A, Zhao H, and Fan Y (2015) Exploring the role of natural gas in U.S. trucking. UC Davis, Davis, CA
Jing W, Yan Y, Kim I, Sarvi M (2016) Electric vehicles: a review of network modelling and future research needs. Adv Mech Eng 8(1):1–8
Kelley S, Kuby M (2013) On the way or around the corner? Observed refueling choices of alternative-fuel drivers in Southern California. J Transp Geogr 33:258–267
Kelley S, Kuby M (2017) Decentralized refueling of compressed natural gas (CNG) fleet vehicles in Southern California. Energy Policy 109:350–359
Ko J, Gim TT, Guensler R (2017) Locating refuelling stations for alternative fuel vehicles: a review on models and applications. Transp Rev 37:551–570
Kuby MJ, Lim S (2005) The flow-refueling location problem for alternative-fuel vehicles. Socio Econ Plan Sci 39:125–145
Kuby MJ, Kelley SB, Schoenemann J (2013) Spatial refueling patterns of alternative-fuel and gasoline vehicle drivers in Los Angeles. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ 25:84–92
Kuby M, Capar I, Kim J (2016) Efficient and equitable transnational infrastructure planning for natural gas trucking in the European Union. Eur J Oper Res 257:979–991
Lim S, Kuby M (2010) Heuristic algorithms for alternative-fuel stations using the flow-refueling location model. Eur J Oper Res 204(1):51–61
Lin Z, Ogden J, Fan Y, Chien-Wei C (2008) The fuel-travel-back approach to hydrogen station siting. Int J Hydrog Energy 33:3096–3101
Liu H, Wang DZ (2017) Locating multiple types of charging facilities for battery electric vehicles. Transp Res B Methodol 103:30–55
Mirchandani P, Adler J, Madsen OB (2014) New logistical issues in using electric vehicle fleets with battery exchange infrastructure. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 108:3–14
Murray AT, Church RL (1996) Analyzing cliques for imposing adjacency restrictions in forest models. For Sci 42(2):166–175
Nicholas MA, Ogden J (2006) Detailed analysis of urban station siting for California hydrogen highway network. Transp Res Rec 1983:121–128
Ogden J, Nicholas M (2011) Analysis of a “cluster” strategy for introducing hydrogen vehicles in Southern California. Energy Policy 39:1923–1938
Osorio-Tejada JL, Llera-Sastresa E, Scarpellini S (2017) Liquefied natural gas: could it be a reliable option for road freight transport in the EU? Renew Sust Energ Rev 71:785–795
Rahman I, Vasant PM, Singh BSM, Abdullah-Al-Wadud M, Adnan N (2016) Review of recent trends in optimization techniques for plug-in hybrid, and electric vehicle charging infrastructures. Renew Sust Energ Rev 58:1039–1047
Sathaye N, Kelley S (2013) An approach for the optimal planning of electric vehicle infrastructure for highway corridors. Transport Res E-Log 59:15–33
Scheitrum D, Jaffe AM, Dominguez-Faus R, Parker N (2017) California low carbon fuel policies and natural gas fueling infrastructure: synergies and challenges to expanding the use of RNG in transportation. Energy Policy 110:355–364
Stephens-Romero SD, Brown TM, Kang JE, Recker WW, Samuelsen GS (2010) Systematic planning to optimize investments in hydrogen infrastructure deployment. Int J Hydrog Energy 35:4652–4667
Suzuki Y (2008) A generic model of motor-carrier fuel optimization. Naval Research Logistics (NRL) 55(8):737–746
Upchurch C, Kuby MJ, Lim S (2009) A capacitated model for location of alternative-fuel stations. Geogr Anal 41:85–106
Wang Y, Lin C (2009) Locating road-vehicle refueling stations. Transport Res E-Log 45:821–829
Zeng W, Castillo I, Hodgson MJ (2010) A generalized model for locating facilities on a network with flow-based demand. Netw Spat Econ 10(4):579–611
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by the Arizona Board of Regents’ Research Innovation Fund with matching funds from Arizona State University and the University of Arizona.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhong, Q., Tong, D., Kuby, M. et al. Locating Alternative Fuel Stations for Maximizing Coverage and Ensuring Sufficient Spacing: a Case Study of CNG Truck Fueling. Process Integr Optim Sustain 3, 455–470 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41660-019-00092-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41660-019-00092-9