Optimal Design and Synthesis of Sustainable Integrated Biorefinery for Pharmaceutical Products from Palm-Based Biomass

Abstract

In the last decade, numerous technologies have been developed to convert biomass into value-added products (bioenergy, biomaterial and biochemical). However, not much research has been done in the identification of possible pathways to convert biomass into pharmaceutical products. This research focuses on exploiting the potential pharmaceutical products that can be derived from palm-based biomass. However, due to the large number of potential products, multiple reaction pathways and processing technologies involved. Thus, there is a need for a systematic methodology which is capable to identify the optimal production routes in the integrated biorefinery based on different optimisation objectives. In this work, a mathematical optimisation-based approach is developed to determine the optimum conversion pathway that converts palm-based biomass into pharmaceutical products with maximum economic performance. Besides, a novel approach which can estimate the operating cost of pharmaceutical products is also introduced in this work. In addition, sensitivity analysis is carried out to investigate the impact of changes in conversion of reaction, market price and operating cost to the economic performance of the synthesised integrated biorefinery.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Abbreviations

q 1 :

Conversion pathway from biomass to intermediate 1

q 2 :

Conversion pathway from intermediate 1 to intermediate 2

q 3 :

Conversion pathway from intermediate 2 to intermediate 3

q 4 :

Conversion pathway from intermediate 3 to final product

F :

Flow rate

\( {B}_b^{\mathrm{Bio}} \) :

Total flow rate of biomass feedstock

\( {T}_n^{Inter} \) :

Total flow rate of intermediates

\( {T}_p^{Prod} \) :

Total flow rate of final products

R q :

Conversion rate for a given pathway

GP Total :

Gross profit of the overall integrated biorefinery configuration

TAC:

Total annualised cost

TAOC:

Total annualised operating cost

\( {G}_p^{\mathrm{Prod}} \) :

Cost of final products p

\( {G}_b^{\mathrm{Opr}} \) :

Operating cost for conversion of biomass b

\( {G}_{s1}^{\mathrm{Opr}} \) :

Operating cost for conversion of intermediate 1 s 1

\( {G}_{s2}^{\mathrm{Opr}} \) :

Operating cost for conversion of intermediate 2 s 2

\( {G}_{s3}^{\mathrm{Opr}} \) :

Operating cost for conversion of intermediate 3 s 3

References

  1. Abdelaziz O, Gadalla M, El-Halwagi M, Ashour F (2015) A hierarchical approach for the design improvements of an Organocat biorefinery. Bioresour Technol 181:321–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Andiappan V, Ng D, Bandyopadhyay S (2014) Synthesis of biomass-based trigeneration systems with uncertainties. Ind Eng Chem Res 53(46):18016–18028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Andiappan V, Ko A, Lau V, Ng L, Ng R, Chemmangattuvalappil N, Ng D (2015) Synthesis of sustainable integrated biorefinery via reaction pathway synthesis: economic, incremental environmental burden and energy assessment with multiobjective optimization. AICHE J 61(1):132–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Banimostafa A, Papadokonstantakis S, Hungerbühler K (2015) Retrofit design of a pharmaceutical batch process considering “green chemistry and engineering” principles. AICHE J 61(10):3423–3440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bao B, Ng D, Tay D, Jiménez-Gutiérrez A, El-Halwagi M (2011) A shortcut method for the preliminary synthesis of process-technology pathways: an optimization approach and application for the conceptual design of integrated biorefineries. Comput Chem Eng 35(8):1374–1383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bhushan S, Kalia K, Sharma M, Singh B, Ahuja P (2008) Processing of apple pomace for bioactive molecules. Crit Rev Biotechnol 28(4):285–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cussler E, Moggridge G (2001) Chemical product design. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  8. D’Annibale A, Sermanni G, Federici F, Petruccioli M (2006) Olive-mill wastewaters: a promising substrate for microbial lipase production. Bioresour Technol 97(15):1828–1833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Du C, Lin S, Koutinas A, Wang R, Webb C (2007) Succinic acid production from wheat using a biorefining strategy. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 76(6):1263–1270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fernando S, Adhikari S, Chandrapal C, Murali N (2006) Biorefineries: current status, challenges, and future direction. Energy Fuel 20(4):1727–1737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gnansounou E, Dauriat A (2010) Techno-economic analysis of lignocellulosic ethanol: a review. Bioresour Technol 101(13):4980–4991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gong J, You F (2014) Optimal design and synthesis of algal biorefinery processes for biological carbon sequestration and utilization with zero direct greenhouse gas emissions: MINLP model and global optimization algorithm. Ind Eng Chem Res 53(4):1563–1579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gordon R, Seckbach J (2012) The science of algal fuels. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherland

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Haleem R, Salem M, Fatahallah F, Abdelfattah L (2015) Quality in the pharmaceutical industry—a literature review. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal 23(5):463–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Harisha AS, Nayak SP, Pavan MS et al (2015) A new synthesis of Entacapone and report on related studies. J Chem Sci 127(11):1977–1991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hart CA, Rajora ML (2009) Overcoming institutional barriers to biomass power in China and India. Sustainable Development Law and Policy 9(3):26–31 64-65

    Google Scholar 

  17. House K, Baclig A, Ranjan M, van Nierop E, Wilcox J, Herzog H (2011) Economic and energetic analysis of capturing CO2 from ambient air. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108(51):20428–20433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Huber GW, Corma A (2007) Synergies between bio- and oil refineries for the production of fuels from biomass. Angew Chemie Int Ed 2007(46):7184–7201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Iida T, Ota K, Sasozaki T, Sugiyama H (2015) Multiobjective design method for the use processes of pharmaceutical excipients considering quality and cost-effectiveness. J Pharm Innov 10(4):313–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kimble M, Pasdeloup M, Spencer C (2008) Sustainable bioenergy development in UEMOA member countries. West African Economic and Monetary Union, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso

    Google Scholar 

  21. Klein-Marcuschamer D, Simmons B, Blanch H (2011) Techno-economic analysis of a lignocellulosic ethanol biorefinery with ionic liquid pre-treatment. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 5(5):562–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lohrasbi M, Pourbafrani M, Niklasson C, Taherzadeh M (2010) Process design and economic analysis of a citrus waste biorefinery with biofuels and limonene as products. Bioresour Technol 101(19):7382–7388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Marvin W, Schmidt L, Daoutidis P (2013) Biorefinery location and technology selection through supply chain optimization. Ind Eng Chem Res 52(9):3192–3208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mohan T, El-Halwagi M (2006) An algebraic targeting approach for effective utilization of biomass in combined heat and power systems through process integration. Clean Techn Environ Policy 9(1):13–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Müller G, Sugiyama H, Stocker S, Schmidt R (2014) Reducing energy consumption in pharmaceutical production: framework and case study. J Pharm Innov 9:212–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Murillo-Alvarado P, Ponce-Ortega J, Serna-Gonzalez M, Castro-Montoya A, El-Halwagi M (2013) Optimization of pathways for biorefineries involving the selection of feedstocks, products, and processing steps. Ind Eng Chem Res 52(14):5177–5190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Naik S, Goud V, Rout P, Dalai A (2010) Production of first and second generation biofuels: a comprehensive review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 14(2):578–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ng D, Pham V, El-Halwagi M, Jimenez-Gutierrez A, Spriggs H (2009) A hierarchical approach to the synthesis and analysis of integrated biorefineries. Design for Energy and the Environment: Proceedings of Seventh International Conference on Foundations of Computer-Aided Process Design 1(8):425–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ng L, Andiappan V, Chemmangattuvalappil N, Ng D (2015a) Novel methodology for the synthesis of optimal biochemicals in integrated biorefineries via inverse design techniques. Ind Eng Chem Res 54(21):5722–5735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ng L, Andiappan V, Chemmangattuvalappil N, Ng D (2015b) A systematic methodology for optimal mixture design in an integrated biorefinery. Ind Eng Chem Res 81:288–309

    Google Scholar 

  31. Petrides D, Siletti C, Jimenez J, Psathas P, Mannion Y (2011) Optimizing the design and operation of fill-finish facilities using process simulation and scheduling tools. Pharm Eng 2:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  32. Pham V, El-Halwagi M (2011) Process synthesis and optimization of biorefinery configurations. AICHE J 58(4):1212–1221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Pokoo-Aikins G, Nadim A, El-Halwagi M, Mahalec V (2009) Design and analysis of biodiesel production from algae grown through carbon sequestration. Clean Techn Environ Policy 12(3):239–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ponce-Ortega J, Pham V, El-Halwagi M, El-Baz A (2012) A disjunctive programming formulation for the optimal design of biorefinery configurations. Ind Eng Chem Res 51(8):3381–3400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ravaghi-Ardebili Z, Manenti F (2015) Unified modelling and feasibility study of novel green pathway of biomass to methanol/dimethylether. Appl Energy 145:278–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sammons N, Yuan W, Eden M, Aksoy B, Cullinan H (2008) Optimal biorefinery product allocation by combining process and economic modeling. Chem Eng Res Des 86(7):800–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Segawa A, Yoshikawa S, Toyama T, Nakanishi H, Kikuchi-Uehara E, Hirao M, Sugiyama H (2016) Method for reducing environmental, health, and safety risks in active pharmaceutical ingredient manufacturing based on multiobjective evaluation. Process Saf Environ Prot 104:304–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Sherwood T (1959) Mass transfer between phases. Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Texas

    Google Scholar 

  39. Silez Lopez A, Li Q, Thompson I (2010) Biorefinery of waste orange peel. Natl Center Biotechnol Inf 30(1):63–69

    Google Scholar 

  40. Stuart P, El-Halwagi M (2013) Integrated biorefineries. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wang L (2014) Sustainable bioenergy production. CRC Press, Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  42. Zondervan E, Nawaz M, de Haan A, Woodley J, Gani R (2011) Optimal design of a multi-product biorefinery system. Comput Chem Eng 35(9):1752–1766

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MOSTI) Malaysia under Grant no. 06-02-12-SF0224.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nishanth G. Chemmangattuvalappil.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Electronic Supplementary Material

ESM 1

(DOCX 28 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ng, S.Y., Ong, S.Y., Ng, Y.Y. et al. Optimal Design and Synthesis of Sustainable Integrated Biorefinery for Pharmaceutical Products from Palm-Based Biomass. Process Integr Optim Sustain 1, 135–151 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41660-017-0010-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Integrated biorefinery
  • Pharmaceutical products
  • Palm-based biomass
  • Reaction pathway
  • Economic performance
  • Uncertainty