Advertisement

Web-based Multimedia Mapping for Spatial Analysis and Visualization in the Digital Humanities: a Case Study of Language Documentation in Nepal

  • Shunfu HuEmail author
  • Brajesh Karna
  • Kristine Hildebrandt
Article

Abstract

There has been a growing interest in utilizing geographic information systems (GIS) in the digital humanities and social sciences (DH). GIS-based DH projects usually emphasize spatial analysis and cartographic capability (e.g., displaying the locations of people, events, or movements), however, GIS alone cannot easily integrate multimedia components (e.g., descriptive text, photographs, digital audio, and video) of DH projects. Multimedia mapping provides a unique approach to integrating geospatial information in digital map format and multimedia information, which is useful for DH integration into spatial analysis and visualization. As cartographic mapping and GIS evolve from a traditional desktop platform to the World Wide Web, it is of significance to design and develop a Web-based multimedia mapping approach that could carry out spatial analysis and incorporate multimedia components, which is greatly beneficial to the DH applications. Our objectives of the language documentation research project in Nepal were to (1) use geo-tagging equipment to collect audio and visual recordings of three types of socio-linguistic data: language attitudes and practices interviews, free-form narratives, and elicited vocabulary and grammatical paradigm sets, from representative speakers of the four endangered languages in twenty-six Manang villages; (2) design and develop a Web-based, interactive multimedia atlas that can display data points corresponding to the speakers, links to the three types of data gathered in multimedia format, provides friendly user interface for the manipulation and spatial analysis of all the data. It is anticipated that the Web-based, interactive, and multimedia language atlas can bring all local and international stakeholders, such as the speech communities, linguists, local government agencies, and the public, together to raise awareness of language structures, language practices, language endangerment, and opportunities for preservation, all through this easy-to-use means that enhance the geo-spatial representation in engaging visual and sensory (multimedia) formats. Google Maps API and JavaScript are employed to develop this online, interactive, and multimedia language atlas.

Keywords

Multimedia mapping Spatial analysis Visualization Digital humanities Language documentation WWW 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Science Foundation’s Division of Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences - Documenting Endangered Languages (funding no. 1149639): “Documenting the Languages of Manang” and by an equipment support grant from SIU Edwardsville. We are grateful to members of the Gurung, Gyalsumdo, Manange and Nar-Phu-speaking communities in Manang, Nepal, for their help in gathering these data. We are grateful to Dubi Nanda Dhakal, Oliver Bond, Sangdo Lama, and Ritar Lhakpa Lama for assistance with interviews. We are grateful to Saita Gurung and Manisha Chaudhary for assistance with atlas construction and development. All errors are the responsibility of the authors.

Funding

This research was supported by the US National Science Foundation’s Division of Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences-Documenting Endangered Languages (funding no. 1149639): “Documenting the Languages of Manang” and by an equipment support grant from SIU Edwardsville.

Compliance with ethical standards

The authors of this paper will agree, accept, and comply with all the ethical standards set by the journal.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

The field data collection (i.e., field interviews) was approved by the SIUE’s Institute Research Board. The authors used an approved oral informed consent script for data collection.

Informed Consent

The authors have given the informed consent to publish this article in the Journal of Geovisualization and Spatial Analysis if accepted.

Supplementary material

41651_2017_12_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1.9 mb)
ESM 1 (PDF 1974 kb)

References

  1. Auer P, Schmidt J (eds) (2009) Language and space: an international handbook of linguistic variation. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.  https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110220278 Google Scholar
  2. Belsis P, Gritzalis S, Malatras A, Skourlas C, Chalaris I (2004). Enhancing knowledge management through the use of GIS and multimedia. Lecture Notes in artificial intelligence (Subseries of Lecture notes in computer science), vol 3336. pp 319–329Google Scholar
  3. Bickel B (1997) Spatial operations in deixis, cognition, and culture: where to orient oneself in Belhare. In: Nuyts J, Pederson E (eds) Language and conceptualization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 46–83.  https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139086677.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bill R (1998) Multimedia-GIS concepts and applications. Geo-Inf Syst 11:21–24Google Scholar
  5. Britain D (2009) Language and space: The variationist approach. In: Auer P and Schmidt JE (eds) Language and space: An international handbook of linguistic variation, vol 1. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 142–162Google Scholar
  6. Buchstaller I, Corrigan KP (2011) How to make intuitions succeed: Testing methods for analyzing syntactic microvariation. In: Maguire W and McMahon A (eds) Analyzing variation in English: what we know, what we don’t, and why it matters. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 30–48Google Scholar
  7. Buchstatller I, Alvanides S (2013) Employing geographical principles for sampling in state of the art dialectological projects. J Linguist Geogr 1:96–114Google Scholar
  8. Cartwright W (1999) Development of multimedia. In: Peterson MP, Gartner G (eds) Multimedia cartography. Springer, New York, pp 11–30.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03784-3_2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Central Bureau of Statistics (2012) National population and housing census 2011. Government of Nepal National Planning Commission SecretariatGoogle Scholar
  10. Chang KT (ed) (2015) Introduction to geographic information systems. McGraw-Hill Education, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Cheshire J, Viv E, Henrik M, Bert W (eds) (1989) Dialect and education. Multilingual Matters, Clevedon/PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  12. Cheshire J, Viv E, Pamela W (1993) Non-standard English and dialect levelling. In: Milroy J, Milroy L (eds) The grammar of English dialects in the British Isles. Longman, London, pp 53–96Google Scholar
  13. Chong AK (1999) Orthoimage mapping bases for hybrid, multimedia, and virtual environment GIS. Cartography 28(1):33–41.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00690805.1999.9714298 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cotton B, Oliver R (1994) The Cyberspace Lexicon—an illustrated dictionary of terms from multimedia to virtual reality. Phaidon Press Ltd., LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Coupland N, Hywel B, Betsy E, Garrett P (2006) Imagining Wales and the Welsh language. J Lang Soc Psychol 25(4):351–376.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X06292803 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dear M, Ketchum J, Luria S, Richardson D (eds) (2011) Geohumanities: art, history, text at the edge of place, 226–240. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Gawne L, Ring H (2016) Mapmaking for language documentation and description. Lang Doc Conserv 10:188–242. http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/ldc/. Last Accessed 28 Nov 2016
  18. Giles H, Taylor D, Bourhis R (1977) Dimensions of Welsh identity. Eur J Soc Psychol 7:29–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Goodchild MF, Janelle DG (eds) (2004) Spatially integrated social science. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Goryachko VV, Chernyshev AV (2004) Multimedia and GIS-technologies in atlas mapping. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta 5(2):16–20Google Scholar
  21. Harris TM, Bergeron S, Rouse LJ (2011) Humanities GIS: place, spatial storytelling and immersive visualization in the humanities. In: Dear M, Ketchum J, Luria S, Richardson D (eds) Geohumanities: art, history, text at the edge of place. Routledge, London, pp 226–240Google Scholar
  22. Harrison KD (2008) When languages die: the extinction of the world’s languages and the erosion of human knowledge. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Hildebrandt K, Dhakal DN, Bond O, Vallejo M & Fyffe A (2015) A sociolinguistic survey of the languages of Manang, Nepal: co-existence and endangerment. NFDIN J 14.6:104–122. http://www.nfdin.gov.np/securi/. Last Accessed 28 Nov 2016
  24. Hildebrandt KA, Hu S (2017) Areal analysis of language attitudes and practices: A case study from Nepal. Language Documentation and Conservation. Special Publication 13: 152-179, http://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/handle/10125/24753
  25. Hu S (1999) Integrated multimedia approach to the utilization of an Everglades vegetation database. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 65(2):193–198Google Scholar
  26. Hu S (2012) Multimedia Mapping on the Internet Using Commercial APIs. In Peterson MP (ed.) Online maps with APIs and Mapservices, 61–71, SpringerGoogle Scholar
  27. Hu S, Gabriel AO, Bodensteiner LR (2003) Inventory and characteristics of wetland habitat on the Winnebago Upper Pool Lakes, Wisconsin, USA: an integrated multimedia-GIS approach. Wetland 23(1):82–94.  https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2003)023%5B0082:IACOWH%5D2.0.CO;2
  28. Kansakar TR (2006) Research on the typology of Nepal’s languages. Nepalese linguist 22:106–128. http://www.digitalhimalaya.com/collections/journals/nepling/. Last Accessed 28 Nov 2016
  29. Kirk JM, Kretzschmar WA (1992) Interactive linguistic mapping of dialect features. Lit Linguist Comput 7(3):168–175.  https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/7.3.168 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kretzschmar WA (1996) Quantitative areal analysis of dialect features. Lang Var Chang 8(01):13–39.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394500001058 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kretzschmar W, Juuso I, Bailey CT (2014) Computer simulation of dialect feature diffusion. J Linguist Geogr 2(01):41–57.  https://doi.org/10.1017/jlg.2014.2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Labov W, Ash S, Boberg C (2006) Atlas of North American English: phonology and phonetics. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.  https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110167467 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lameli A, Kehrein R, Rabanus S (eds) (2010) The handbook of language mapping. Mouton de Gruyter, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  34. Laurance WF (2014) Roads benefit people but can have massive environmental costs. National Geographic (online). https://blog.nationalgeographic.org/2014/10/19/roads-benefit-people-but-can-have-massive-environmental-costs/. Accessed 5 January 2018
  35. Laurini R, Milleret-Raffort F (1990) Principles of geomatic hypermaps. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, Zurich, Switzerland, 2, 642–655Google Scholar
  36. Openshaw S, Mounsey H (1987) Geographic information systems and the BBC’s Domesday interactive videodisk. Int J Geogr Inf Syst 1(2):173–179.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02693798708927802 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Peterson MP (2008). International Perspectives on Maps and the Internet: An Introduction. In Peterson MP (ed.), International Perspectives on Maps and the Internet (pp. 3–10), SpringerGoogle Scholar
  38. Rhind DP, Armstrong P, Openshaw S (1988) The Domesday machine: a nationwide geographical information system. Geogr J 154(1):56–58.  https://doi.org/10.2307/633476 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shepherd ID (1991) Information integration and GIS. In: Maguire DJ, Goodchild MF, Rhind DW (eds) Geographical information systems: principles and applications, vol 1. Longman Scientific and Technical Publications, Essex, pp 337–357Google Scholar
  40. Shiffer MJ (1998) Multimedia GIS for planning support and public discourse. Cartogr Geogr Inf Syst 25(2):89–94.  https://doi.org/10.1559/152304098782594562 Google Scholar
  41. Slobin D (1996) Two ways to travel: verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In: Shibatani M, Thompson SA (eds) Grammatical constructions: their form and meaning. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 195–217Google Scholar
  42. Soomro TR, Zheng K, Turay S, Pan Y (1999) Capabilities of multimedia GIS. Chin Geogr Sci 9(2):159–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stanford JN (2009) One size fits all? Dialectometry in a small clan-based indigenous society. Lang Var Chang 24:247–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Trudgill P (1974) Linguistic change and diffusion: description and explanation in sociolinguistic dialect geography. Lang Soc 3(02):215–246.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500004358 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wallin E (1990) The map as hypertext—on knowledge support systems for the territorial concern. In: Proceedings of the first European conference on geographical information system, EGIS’ 90I. EGIS Foundation, Munich, p 1125–1134Google Scholar
  46. Yagoub MM (2003) Building an historical remote sensing atlas and multimedia GIS for Al Ain. GEO: Connexion 2. 7:54–55Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shunfu Hu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Brajesh Karna
    • 2
  • Kristine Hildebrandt
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of GeographySouthern Illinois University EdwardsvilleEdwardsvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Computer SciencesSouthern Illinois University EdwardsvilleEdwardsvilleUSA
  3. 3.Department of English Language and LiteratureSouthern Illinois University EdwardsvilleEdwardsvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations