Reproductive Technologies, Care Crisis and Inter-generational Relations in North India: Towards a Local Ethics of Care

Abstract

This paper reflects on the social consequences of biotechnological control of population for values and ethics of care within the family household in rural north India. Based on long-term ethnographic research, it illustrates the manner in which social practices intermingle with reproductive choices and new reproductive technologies, leading to a systematic elimination of female foetuses, and thus, imbalanced sex ratios. This technological fashioning of populations, the paper argues, has far-reaching consequences for the institutions of family, marriage and kinship in north India particularly in relation to care circulation within the family-household leading to a shifting local ethics of care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

  1. 1.

    The state took cognizance of this and enacted the Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (PCPNDT) Act, 1994 to ban sex-selective diagnostic testing, but the practice remains widespread.

  2. 2.

    As per 2011 census, the child sex ratio for India is 919 females per 1000 males, significantly higher than the figures for Haryana and Rajasthan.

  3. 3.

    Parental perception of daughters as a ‘liability’ in India is tied to the burden of controlling her sexuality before marriage, arranging dowry for her marriage and the fact that even though parents will make investments in her upbringing, she will move to another household post marriage and will contribute productively to her marital and not natal home.

  4. 4.

    All names are Pseudonyms.

  5. 5.

    Courtyard shelters set up by the Indian Government, as part of its Integrated Child Development Scheme (ICDS) in 1975.

  6. 6.

    ASHA stands for Accredited Social Health Activists. The Indian Ministry of Health and Family Welfare defines ASHA workers as ‘health activist(s) in the community who will create awareness on health and its social determinants and mobilize the community towards local health planning and increased utilization and accountability of the existing health services’.

  7. 7.

    PHC stands for Primary Health Centre which is the first contact point between rural populations and the medical officer.

  8. 8.

    An excess of males in the prime marriageable group in comparison with the number of females in the same age group is referred to as male marriage squeeze.

  9. 9.

    Even though marriage squeeze existed in earlier times, due to widely prevalent practice of female infanticide in Haryana and Rajasthan, customs of fraternal polyandry and accommodating involuntary bachelors in the family and aging parents into the married son’s household were some of the ways by which social reproduction and provision of care within the families was ensured (Kaur 2008; Gupta and Sarkar 2015), but the dominant trend now is towards monogamous marriages as a desirable model, and thus, questions of care provision assume centrality amidst these structural changes (see Chaudhary 2018; Mishra 2018 for details).

  10. 10.

    Between 1951 and 2011, India’s elderly population (aged 60 and above) has increased from 361 million to 1.21 billion (Registrar General of India, SRS Statistical Report 2011).

  11. 11.

    Conventionally, marriages in India are arranged over a small geographical radius keeping in mind conventional rules of matchmaking-caste endogamy, hypergamy and dowry exchange. In cross-region marriages, such rules are largely not a consideration.

References

  1. Agrawal, Sutapa, and Sayeed Unisa. 2010. Active and Passive Elimination of Girl Child: Findings from Rural Haryana. In Unwanted Daughters: Gender Discrimination in Modern India, ed. T.V. Sekher and Neelamber Hatti, 222–243. Jaipur: Rawat Publications.

  2. Bhati, Vipin, writer, and Satyajit Bhatkal, director. 2012. Female foeticide: daughters are precious. In Satyamev Jayate [Truth Alone Triumphs], talk show, 6 May 2012, Aamir Khan, and Kiran Rao, producers. Mumbai: Star Network.

  3. Bhatnagar, Rashmi Dube, Renu Dube, and Reena Dube. 2005. Female Infanticide in India: A Feminist Cultural History. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

  4. Borneman, John. 2001. Caring and To Be Cared For: Displacing Marriage, Kinship, Gender, and Sexuality. In The Ethics of Kinship, edited by James D. Faubion, 29–46. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

  5. Brijnath, Bianca. 2014. Unforgotten: Love and the Culture of Dementia Care in India. Oxford: Berghahn.

  6. Buch, Elana D. 2015. Anthropology of Ageing and Care. Annual Review of Anthropology 44: 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-014254.

  7. Carsten, Janet. 2004. After kinship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  8. Census of India. 1991. Provisional population totals, series 1. Delhi: Ministry of Home Affairs, Census Commissioner.

  9. Census of India. 2001. Provisional population totals, series 1. Delhi: Ministry of Home Affairs, Census Commissioner.

  10. Chatterjee, Nilanjana, and Nancy E. Riley. 2001. Planning an Indian Modernity: The Gendered Politics of Fertility Control. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 26 (3): 811–845. https://doi.org/10.1086/495629.

  11. Chaudhry, Shruti. 2018. Now it is Difficult to get Married: Contextualising Cross-Regional Marriage and Bachelorhood in Rural North India. In Scarce Women and ‘Surplus’ Men in Communities of Asia: Macro Demographics versus Local Dynamics, edited by Sharada Srinivasan, and Shuzhuo Li, 85–104. Springer.

  12. Chaudhry, Shruti, and Taneesha D. Mohan. 2011. Of Marriage and Migration: Bengali and Bihari Brides in a U.P. Village. Indian Journal of Gender Studies 18 (3): 311–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/097152151101800302.

  13. Chowdhry, Prem. 2007. Contentious Marriages, Eloping Couples: Gender, Caste and Patriarchy in North India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

  14. Cohen, Lawrence. 1998. No Aging in India: Alzheimer’s, the Bad Family and Other Modern Things. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

  15. Darling, Malcolm L. 1928. The Punjab peasant in prosperity and debt. Delhi: Oxford University Press.

  16. Das Gupta, Monica, Jiang Zhenghua, Li Bohua, Xie Zhenming, Woojin Chung, and Bae Hwa-Ok. 2003. Why is son preference so persistent in East and South Asia? A cross-country study of China, India and the Republic of Korea. Journal of Development Studies 40 (2): 153–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380412331293807.

  17. Donner, Henrike. 2008. Domestic goddesses: Maternity, Globalization and Middle-class Identity in Contemporary India. Aldershot: Ashgate.

  18. Economist. 2015. The marriage squeeze in India and China: Bare branches, redundant males. Economist, 18 April 2015. https://www.economist.com/asia/2015/04/18/bare-branches-redundant-males

  19. Eklund, Lisa, and Navtej Purewal. 2017. The Bio-Politics of Population Control and Sex-Selective Abortion in China and India. Feminism and Psychology 27 (1): 34–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353516682262.

  20. Ferrant, Gaëlle, Luca Maria Pesando, and Keiko Nowacka. 2014. Unpaid Care Work: The Missing Link in the Analysis of Gender Gaps in Labor Outcomes. Issues Paper. OECD Development Center. https://www.oecd.org/dev/development-gender/gender-publications.htm. Accessed 20 December 2020.

  21. George, Sabu M. and Dahiya, Ranbir S. 1998. Female Foeticide in Rural Haryana. Economic and Political Weekly 33 (32): 2191–198. https://www.epw.in/journal/1998/32/special-articles/female-foeticide-rural-haryana.html. Accessed 20 December 2020.

  22. Gilligan, Carol. 1993. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  23. Ginsburg, Faye, and Rayna Rapp. 1991. The Politics of Reproduction. Annual Review of Anthropology 20: 311–343. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.20.100191.001523.

  24. Glenn, Evelyn N. 1992. From Servitude to Service Work: Historical Continuities in the Racial Division of Paid reproductive Labour. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 18 (1): 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1086/494777.

  25. Grayling, A.C. 2005. The power to choose a Baby’s Gender. New Science 2494, 9 April 2005.

  26. Greenhalgh, Susan. 1994. Controlling Births and Bodies in Village China. American Ethnologist 21 (1): 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1994.21.1.02a00010.

  27. Guilmoto, Christophe Z. 2012. Skewed Sex Ratios at Birth and Future Marriage Squeeze in China and India, 2005–2100. Demography 49: 77–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-011-0083-7.

  28. Guilmoto, Christophe Z. 2018. Sex imbalances in Asia: An ongoing conversation between anthropologists and demographers. In Scarce Women and Surplus Men in China and India: Macro Demographics versus Local Dynamics, edited by Sharada Srinivasan, and Shuzhuo Li, 145–61. Dordrecht: Springer.

  29. Gupta, Anish, and Trishna Sarkar. 2015. Possessed by Land. Down To Earth, 9 September 2015. https://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/economy/possessed-by-land-50884. Accessed 20 December 2020.

  30. Hershman, Paul. 1981. Punjabi kinship and marriage. Delhi: Hindustan Publishing Corporation.

  31. Hvistendahl, Mara. 2011. Unnatural Selection: Choosing Boys Over Girls, and the Consequences of a World Full of Men. New York, NY: Public Affairs.

  32. Ibnouf, Fatma Osman. 2020. The Ethics of Care and Conceptualization of Unpaid Care Work. In War-time Care Work and Peacebuilding in Africa: Gender, Development and Social Change, 53-74. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

  33. Kaur, Ravinder. 2004. Across Region Marriage: Poverty, Female Migration and Sex Ratio. Economic and Political Weekly 39 (25): 2596-603. https://www.epw.in/journal/2004/25/special-articles/across-region-marriages.html. Accessed 20 December 2020.

  34. Kaur, Ravinder. 2008. Missing Women and Brides from Faraway: Social Consequences of the Skewed Sex Ratio in India. AAS Working Papers in Social Anthropology. Vienna: Institut für Sozialanthropologie, Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1553/wpsa1.

  35. Kaur, Ravinder. 2010. Bengali Bridal Diaspora: Marriage as a Livelihood Strategy. Economic and Political Weekly 155 (5): 16–18. https://www.epw.in/journal/2010/05/commentary/bengali-bridal-diaspora-marriage-livelihood-strategy.html. Accessed 20 December 2020.

  36. Kaur, Ravinder, Surjit S. Bhalla, Manoj Kumar, and Prasanthi Ramakrishnan. 2015. Sex Ratio Imbalances and Marriage Squeeze in India: 2000-2050. New Delhi: UNFPA.

  37. Kaur, Ravinder, and Taanya Kapoor. 2021. The Gendered Biopolitics of Sex Selection in India: Increasing the ‘Bio-value’ of Daughters. Asian Bioethics Review 13 (1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41649-020-00159-7.

  38. Lamb, Sarah. 2000. White Saris and Sweet Mangoes: Aging, Gender and Body in North India. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

  39. Lamb, Sarah. 2002. Intimacy in a Transnational Era: The Remaking of Ageing among Indian Americans. Diaspora 11 (3): 299–330. https://doi.org/10.1353/dsp.2011.0003.

  40. Lamb, Sarah. 2005. Cultural and Moral Values Surrounding Care and (In)dependence in Late Life: Reflections from India in an Era of Global Modernity. Care Management Journals 6 (2): 80–89. https://doi.org/10.1891/cmaj.6.2.80.

  41. Lamb, Sarah. 2009. Aging and the Indian Diaspora: Cosmopolitan Families in India and Abroad. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

  42. Lamb, Sarah. 2013. In/dependence, Intergenerational Uncertainty, and the Ambivalent State: Perceptions of Old Age Security in India. South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies 36 (1): 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/00856401.2012.732552.

  43. Lamb, Sarah. 2020. Old-Age Homes, Love, and Other New Cultures of Aging in Middle-Class India. In The Cultural Context of Aging: World-wide Perspectives. fourth edition, edited by Jay Sokolovsky, 466–491. Westport, CT: Praeger.

  44. Larsen, Mattias, Ravinder Kaur. 2013. Signs of change? Sex ratio imbalance and shifting social practices in Northern India. Economic & Political Weekly 158 (35): 45–52. https://www.epw.in/journal/2013/35/consequences-gender-imbalance-special-issues/signs-change.html. Accessed 20 December 2020.

  45. Lorber, Judith. 1994. Paradoxes of gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

  46. Maines, David R. 1993. Narrative's Moment and Sociology's Phenomena: Toward a Narrative Sociology. Sociological Quarterly 34 (1): 17–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1993.tb00128.x.

  47. Martinsen, Elin H. 2011. Care for Nurses Only? Medicine and the Perceiving Eye. Health Care Analysis 19 (1): 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-010-0161-9.

  48. Mishra, Paro. 2013. Sex Ratios, Cross-Region Marriage and the Challenge to Caste Endogamy in Haryana. Economic and Political Weekly 158 (35): 70–78. https://www.epw.in/journal/2013/35/consequences-gender-imbalance-special-issues/sex-ratios-cross-region-marriages-and. Accessed 20 December 2020.

  49. Mishra, P. 2017. Transcending Boundaries. Negotiating Identities: A Study of Cross-region Marriages North India. PhD dissertation, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi.

  50. Mishra, Paro. 2018. Being ‘Bare Branches’: Demographic Imbalance, Marriage Exclusion and Masculinity in North India. In Scarce Women and ‘Surplus’ Men in Communities of Asia: Macro Demographics versus Local Dynamics, edited by Sharada Srinivasan, and Shuzhuo Li, 25–46. Springer.

  51. Mishra, Paro, and Ravinder Kaur. 2021. Gender Imbalance, Marriage Squeeze and Multiple Biological Clocks: Exploring the Challenges to Intergenerational Contract in North India. Anthropology and Aging, forthcoming.

  52. Nandan, Monica. 2005. Adaptation to American Culture: Voices of Asian Indian Immigrants. Journal of Gerontological Work 44: 175–203. https://doi.org/10.1300/J083v44n03_11.

  53. Nidadavolu, Vijaya, and Hillary Bracken. 2006. Abortion and Sex Determination: Conflicting Messages in Information Materials in a District of Rajasthan, India. Reproductive Health Matters 14  (27):  160–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-8080(06)27228-8.

  54. Onkar, Prashant, and Kajal Mitra. 2012. Important points in the PC-PNDT Act. Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging 22 (2): 141–143. https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-3026.101117.

  55. Patel, Tulsi. 2010. Risky lives: Indian girls caught between individual rationality and public good. In Unwanted Daughters: Gender Discrimination in Modern India, edited by T.V. Sekher and Neelambar Hatti, 16–37. Jaipur: Rawat Publications.

  56. PTI. 2016. Number of elderly rises, more so in villages: report. The Hindu, Business Line, 22 April 2016. https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/economy/number-of-elderly-rises-more-so-in-villages-report/article8509794.ece.

  57. Purewal, Navtej. 2018. Sex Selective Abortion, Neoliberal Patriarchy and Structural Violence in India, Feminist Review 119 (1): 20–38. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41305-018-0122-y.

  58. Rao, Mohan. 2004. From Population Control to Reproductive Health: Malthusian Arithmetic. New Delhi: Sage.

  59. Retherford, Robert D., and Tanmay Kumar Roy. 2003. Factors Affecting Sex-Selective Abortion in India and 17 Major States. National Family and Health Survey Subject Report No. 21. Mumbai: International Institute of Population Sciences.

  60. Riessman, Catherine K. 2000. Positioning Gender Identity in Narratives of Infertility: South Indian Women’s Lives in Context. In Infertility around the Globe: New Thinking on Childlessness, Gender and Reproductive Technologies, ed. Maricia C. Inhorn and Frank Van Balen, 152–170. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

  61. Robertson, John A. 1994. The Presumptive Primacy of Procreative Liberty. In Children of choice: Freedom and the new reproductive technologies, 22–42. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  62. Robinson, Fiona. 2011. The Ethics of Care: A Feminist Approach to Human Security. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

  63. Roy, Archana K., Ambarish Kumar Rai, and Parveen Nangia. 2018. Skewed sex ratio, male marriage squeeze and cross-cultural marriages: A study of an ecologically vulnerable region in India. Canadian Journal of Tropical Geography 5 (2): 16–24. https://www3.laurentian.ca/rcgt-cjtg/volume-5-issue-2/4060/?lang=en. Accessed 20 December 2020.

  64. Samaiyar, Priyajit, and William Joe. 2010. Implications of Declining Sex Ratio on Marriage Squeeze in India. In Unwanted Daughters: Gender Discrimination in Modern India, edited by T.V. Sekher and Neelambar. Hatti, 205–221. Jaipur: Rawat Publications.

  65. Sandler, Ronald L. 2014. Introduction: Technology and Ethics. In Ethics and Emerging Technologies, 1–23. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

  66. Sen, Amartya. 1990. More than 100 million women are missing. New York Review of Books, 20 December 1990. https://www.nybooks.com/articles/1990/12/20/more-than-100-million-women-are-missing/. Accessed 20 December 2020.

  67. Shalev, Carmel. 2012. An Ethic of Care and Responsibility: Reflections on Third Party Reproduction. Medicine Studies 3: 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12376-012-0074-z.

  68. Siwach, Suhkbir. 2011. No bride for over 3 lakh bachelors in Haryana. Times of India, 11 April 2011. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/gurgaon/No-bride-for-over-3-lakhbachelors-inHaryana/articleshow/7940850.cms

  69. Tabaie, Sheida. 2017. Stopping female foeticide in India: The failure and unintended consequence of ultrasound restriction. Journal of Global Health 7 (1): 010304. https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.07.010304.

  70. Tronto, Joan C. 1993. Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York, NY: Routledge.

  71. Unisa, Sayeed, Sucharita Pujari, and R Usha. 2007. Sex. Selective Abortion in Haryana: Evidence from Pregnancy History and Antenatal Care. Economic and Political Weekly 42 (1): 60–66.

  72. Vishwanath, L.S. 1998. Efforts of Colonial state to suppress female Infanticide: Use of Sacred Texts, Generation of Knowledge. Economic and Political Weekly 33 (19): 1104–1112. https://www.epw.in/journal/1998/19/special-statistics-specials/efforts-colonial-state-suppress-female-infanticide-use. Accessed 20 December 2020.

  73. Wadley, Susan S. 2008. Wife, mother, widow: Exploring women’s lives in north India. Delhi: Chronicle Books.

Download references

Acknowledgements

An earlier version of this paper was presented at the Conference on ‘Reproduction, Demography and Cultural Anxieties in India and China in the 21st Century’, held at IIT, Delhi, in February 2020. The paper has benefitted from comments received at the conference. I am immensely grateful to both the anonymous reviewers for their critical inputs on the paper. I would also like to acknowledge the support provided by Research Assistants—Sonika Hudda, Tanya Sharma and Soniya Singh—for data collection in Rajasthan.

Funding

This research was supported by the University Grants Commission (UGC), New Delhi, and the Indian Council of Social Science Research (ICSSR), New Delhi.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paro Mishra.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mishra, P. Reproductive Technologies, Care Crisis and Inter-generational Relations in North India: Towards a Local Ethics of Care. ABR (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41649-020-00158-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Sex selection
  • Marriage squeeze
  • Care crisis
  • Ethics of care
  • Inter-generational relations