Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Improved projection-based energy weighting for spectral CT

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Radiation Detection Technology and Methods Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Conventional X-ray CT scanners have limited ability to distinguish low-contrast substances. However, spectral CTs with photon counting detectors can identify photon energy and utilize spectral information, which is expected to achieve improved contrast. Energy weighting is a kind of reconstruction method for spectral CT. By assigning appropriate weight for each energy channel, the image contrast can be improved. Hence, how to determine the optimal weights is very important.

Methods

In this paper, we developed an improved projection-based energy weighting model for spectral CT. In this model, the object thickness of low-density materials is assumed as a constant, and the measured spectrum distribution is used to calculate the weight coefficients. Both phantom and tissue experiments were conducted in spectral CT scanner.

Results

The results showed that the thickness of low-density materials has little influence on the energy weight, so it can be regarded as a constant. For low-contrast phantom, the contrast-to-noise ratio was improved ~ 32% by the proposed projection-based weighting method.

Conclusions

The improved projection-based energy weighting model is effective in practice. It can increase the contrast of low-density materials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P.M. Shikhaliev et al., Computed tomography with energy-resolved detection: a feasibility study. Phys. Med. Biol. 53, 1475–1495 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. D. Niederlohner et al., Practical aspects of energy weighting in X-ray imaging. IEEE Nucl. Sci. Symp. Conf. Record. 5, 3191–3194 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. H.Q. Le et al., Radiation dose reduction using a CdZnTe-based computed tomography system: comparison to flat-panel detectors. Med. Phys. 37, 1225–1236 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. C. Reinhart et al., Experimental simulation of a spectroscopic pixel X-ray detector. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 546, 205–208 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. P.M. Shikhaliev, Projection X-ray imaging with photon energy weighting: experimental evaluation with a prototype detector. Phys. Med. Biol. 54, 4971–4992 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. K.S. Kalluri et al., Investigation of energy weighting using an energy discriminating photon counting detector for breast CT. Med. Phys. 40, 081923 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sung-Hoon Choi et al., Projection-based energy weighting on photon-counting X-ray images in digital subtraction mammography: a feasibility study. SPIE Med. Imaging 9033, 90334B (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. P.M. Shikhaliev, Beam hardening artefacts in computed tomography with photon counting, charge integrating and energy weighting detectors: a simulation study. Phys. Med. Biol. 50, 5813–5827 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. P.M. Shikhaliev, Photon counting spectral CT versus conventional CT: comparative evaluation for breast imaging application. Phys. Med. Biol. 56, 1905–1930 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. T.G. Schmidt, Optimal “image-based” weighting for energy-resolved CT. Med. Phys. 36, 3018–3027 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. R.A. Brooks et al., Statistical limitations in X-ray reconstructive tomography. Med. Phys. 3, 237–240 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. M.J. Tapiovaara et al., SNR and DQE analysis of broad spectrum X-ray imaging. Phys. Med. Biol. 30, 519–529 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. P.M. Shikhaliev, Computed tomography with energy-resolved detection: a feasibility study. Phys. Med. Biol. 53, 1475–1495 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. K.S. Kalluri et al., Investigation of energy weighting using an energy discriminating photon counting detector for breast CT. Med. Phys. 40, 081923 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. X-ray Mass Attenuation Coefficients (2004). https://www.nist.gov/pml/X-ray-mass-attenuation-coefficients. Accessed 12 Oct 2018

  16. D. Niederlohner et al., The energy weighting technique: measurements and simulations. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 546, 37–41 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ruizhe Li et al., Spectrum reconstruction method based on the detector response model calibrated by X-ray fluorescence. Phys. Med. Biol. 62, 1032–1045 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFC0100400, Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China), the Instrument Developing Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. YZ201511), the Key Technology Research and Development Team Project of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. GJJSTD20170005).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhe Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cheng, Z., Li, M., Xu, Q. et al. Improved projection-based energy weighting for spectral CT. Radiat Detect Technol Methods 3, 28 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41605-019-0106-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41605-019-0106-2

Keywords

Navigation