Skip to main content
Log in

Pro-Social Behavior: Contributions of Religiosity, Empathic Concern, and Spirituality

  • Published:
International Journal of Latin American Religions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the present study is to examine the relationship between empathy, antisocial behavior, religiosity, and spirituality as causal variables of pro-social behavior. The study has also considered the influence of other variables such as age, sex, religious creed, and ethnicity in a Catholic sample of Bolivian university students. A preliminary conceptual model of empathic concern was proposed based on the studied variables. While the relationship between religiosity and pro-social behavior did not prove to be very sound, the results did show strong ties between pro-social behavior, empathy, and spirituality, revealing how these variables contribute to explaining such behavior. The output of the modeling process indicates (verified through standardized weights) that at least three of the four latent variables included in the model showed a relevant influence on pro-social behavior (empathy, religiosity, and spirituality). Antisocial behavior was dismissed as a source of an endogenous variable explanation. Although the model seems to be acceptable, some adjustments are needed to achieve a more comprehensive understanding of the empathy—a pro-social conceptual framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Mateo 22, 39, Lucas 10, 25–37, and Levítico 19, 18.

References

  • Altemeyer B, Hunsberger B (2005) Fundamentalism and authoritarianism. In: Paloutzian RF, Park CL (eds) Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality. Guilford Press, New York, pp 378–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayten A (2013) Are religious people benevolent people? A study on the case of Turkish Muslims. J Intercult Relig Stud 4:63–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C.D. (1998). Altruism and prosocial behavior. In D.T. Gilbert, S.T. Fiske & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology. New York: McGraw Hill. (4th Edition Vol. 2 pp. 282–316)

  • Batson CD, Schoenrade P, Ventis WL (1993) Religion and the individual: a social-psychological perspective. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Batson CD, Shaw LL (1991) Evidence for altruism: toward a pluralism of prosocial motives. Psychol Inq 2(2):107–122. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellah R, Madsen R, Sullivan W, Swidler A, Tipton S (1985) Habits of the heart: individualism and commitment in American life. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Belzen JA (2005) In defense of the object: on trends and dimensions in psychology of religion. Int J Psychol Relig 15:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Ami Bartal I, Decety J, Mason P (2011) Empathy and pro-social behavior in rats. Science 334:1427–1430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler PM (2005) EQS 6 Structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.

  • Byrne BM (2010) Structural equation modeling with AMOS. Basic concepts and programming. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Caprara GV, Steca P, Zelli A, Capanna C (2005) A new scale for measuring adults’ prosocialness. Eur J Psychol Assess 21(2):77–89. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.21.2.77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho YI, Martin MJ, Conger RD, Widaman KF (2009) Differential item functioning on antisocial behavior scale items for adolescents and young adults from single-parent and two-parent families. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 32(2):157–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cristina-Richand M, Mesurado B (2016) Las emociones positivas como promotoras de las conductas pro-sociales e inhibidores de las conductas agresivas. Acción Psicológica 13:31–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaz-Heredia, L.P., Muñoz-Sánchez, A.I., & De Vargas, D. (2012). Confiabilidad y validez del cuestionario de espiritualidad de Parsian y Dunning en versión española. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 20(3): 8 pantallas. Obtained from www.eerp.usp.br/rlae, on February, 15, 2017

  • Dillon M, Wink P, Fay K (2003) Is spirituality determinant to generativity? J Sci Study Relig 42:427–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decety J (2012) Why is empathy so important? In: Decety J (ed) Empathy. From bench to bedside. The MIT Press, Cambridge, pp vii–vix

    Google Scholar 

  • Decety J, Cowell JM, Lee K, Mahasneh R, Malcolm-Smith S, Selcuk B, Zhou X (2015) The negative association between religiousness and children’s altruism across the world. Curr Biol 25:2951–2955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duriez B (2004) Are religious people nicer people? Taking a closer look at the religion–empathy relationship. Mental Health Relig Culture 7(3):249–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott DS, Huizinga DE, Menard S (1989) Multiple problem youth: delinquency, substance use and mental health problems. Springer, New York, NY

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Euler F, Steinlin CS, Staddler C (2017) Distinct profile of reactive and proactive aggression in adolescents: associations with cognitive and affective empathy. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Mental Health 11:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis LJ, Croft SJ, Pyke A (2012) Religious diversity, empathy, and God images: perspectives from the psychology of religion shaping a study among adolescents in the UK. J Beliefs Values 33(3):293–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galen LW (2012) Does religious belief promote Prosociality? A critical examination. Psychol Bull 138(5):876–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guillén N, Roth E, Alfaro A, Fernández E (2015) Youth alcohol drinking behavior: associated risk and protective factors. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología y Salud 6:53–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy SA, Walker LJ, Rackham DD, & Olsen JA (2012) Religiosity and adolescent empathy and aggression: The mediating role of moral identity. Psych Religion Spirituality 4:237-248. doi:10.1037/a0027566.

  • Hardy SA, Carlo G (2005) Religiosity and prosocial behaviours in adolescence: the mediating role of prosocial values. J Moral Educ 34(2):231–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber II JT & MacDonald DA (2012) An Investigation of the relations between Altruism, empathy, and spirituality. J Hum Psych 52(2):206-221

  • Hunsberger B, Jackson LM (2005) Religion, meaning, and prejudice. J Soc Issues 61:807–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iannaccone L, Berman E (2006) Religious extremism: the good, the bad, and the deadly. Public Choice 128:109–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jolliffe D, Farrington DP (2006) Development and validation of the basic empathy scale. J Adolesc 29(4):589–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koenig HG, Büssing A (2010) The Duke University Religion Index (DUREL): a five-item measure for use in epidemiological studies. Religions 1:78–85. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel1010078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koening LB, McGue M, Krueger RF, Bouchard TJ Jr (2007) Religiousness, antisocial behavior, and altruism: genetic and environmental mediation. J Pers 75(2):265–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick LA (2005) Attachment, evolution, and the psychology of religion. Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Laird RD, Marks LD, Marrero MD (2011) Religiosity, self-control, and antisocial behavior: religiosity as a promotive and protective factor. J Appl Dev Psychol 32:78–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laythe B, Finkel D, Bringle R, Kirkpatrick LA (2002) Religious fundamentalism as a predictor of prejudice: a two-component model. J Sci Study Relig 41:623–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Light y Zahn-Waxler (2012) Nature and forms of empathy in the first years of life. In: Decety J (ed) Empathy. From bench to bedside. The MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 109–130

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald DA (2000) Spirituality: description, measurement, and relation to the five factor model of personality. J Pers 68:153–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall LE, Marshall WL (2011) Empathy and antisocial behavior. J Forensic Psychiatr Psychol 22(5):742–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meissner CA, Brigham JC (2001) Thirty of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: a meta-analytic review. Psychol Public Policy Law 7:3–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merino-Soto C, Grimaldo-Muchotrigo M (2015) Validación Estructural de la Escala Básica de Empatía (Basic Empathy Scale) Modificada en Adolescentes: un Estudio Preliminar. Revista Colombiana de Psicología 24(2):261–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliva A, Antolín L, Pertegal M, Ríos M, Parra A, Hernando A, Reina M (2011) Instrumentos para la evaluación de la salud mental y el desarrollo positivo adolescente y los activos que lo promueven. Consejería de Salud, Sevilla

    Google Scholar 

  • Paciotti B, Richerson P, Baum B, Lubell M, Waring T, McElreath R, Efferson C, Edsten E (2011) Are religious individuals more generous, trusting, and cooperative? An experimental test of the effect of religion on prosociality. Res Econ Anthropol 31:269–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth E (2012) Análisis multivariado en la investigación psicológica: Modelado predictivo y causal con SPSS y Amos. SOIPA, La Paz

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruffle B, Sosis R (2006) Cooperation and the in-group-out-group bias: a field test on Israeli kibbutz members and city residents. J Econ Behav Organ 60:147–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salas-Wright CP, Olate R, Vaughn MG (2013) The protective effects of religious coping and spirituality on delinquency. Results among high-risk and gang-involved Salvadoran youth. Crim Justice Behav 40(9):988–1008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saroglou V, Galand P (2004) Identities, values, and religion: a study among Muslim, other immigrant, and native Belgian young adults after the 9/11 attacks. Identity: Int J Theory Res 4:97–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saroglou V, Pichon I, Trompette L, Verschueren M, Dernelle R (2005) Prosocial behavior and religion: new evidence based on projective measures and peer ratings. J Sci Study Relig 44:323–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saroglou V (2006) Religion’s role in prosocial behavior: myth or reality? Psychol Relig Newsletter APA Div 36(31):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Saroglou V (2012) Is religion not prosocial at all? Comment on Galen (2012). Psychol Bull 138(5):907–912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shariff AF, Norenzayan A (2007) God is watching you: Priming God concepts increases prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game. Psychol Sci 18(9):803–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons LG, Simons RL, Conger RD (2004) Identifying the mechanisms whereby family religiosity influences the probability of adolescent antisocial behavior. J Comp Fam Stud 35(4):547–563

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson PJ, Wood RW, Morris RJ (1985) Dimensions of religiosity and empathy. J Psychol Christ 4(3):73–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Yavuz KF, Sahin O, Ulusory S, Ipek OU, Kurt E (2016) Experiential avoidance, empathy and anger-related attitudes in antisocial personality disorder. Turkish J Med Sci 40(6):1792–1800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yodrabum, S. (2005) Integration of family, educational institute, and psychological characteristics as correlates of intention to take responsibility for future family in undergraduate male students. Unpublished Master Thesis, National Institute of Development Administration, Bangkok, Thailand

  • Yonker JE, Schnabelrauch CA, DeHaan LG (2012) The relationship between spirituality and religiosity on psychological outcomes in adolescents and emerging adults: a meta-analytic review. J Adolescente 35(2):299–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, L. (2012). Exploring religiosity’s effects on altruistic behaviour, Social Research Report, University of British Columbia, March. Obtained from: file:///C:/Users/Eric/Downloads/2433-183278-1-PB%20(1).pdf, on January, 2017

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric Roth.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roth, E. Pro-Social Behavior: Contributions of Religiosity, Empathic Concern, and Spirituality. Int J Lat Am Relig 1, 401–417 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41603-017-0024-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41603-017-0024-3

Keywords

Navigation