Journal of Business Cycle Research

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 189–224 | Cite as

Q-Targeting in New Keynesian Models

Research Paper
  • 50 Downloads

Abstract

We consider optimal monetary policy in a model that integrates credit frictions in the standard New Keynesian model with sticky prices and wages as well as adjustment costs of capital. Different from traditional models with credit frictions, such as those by Carlstrom and Fuerst (Econ Theory 12:583–597, 1998), our model is able to generate an anti-cyclical external finance premium as observed empirically in the U.S. economy. Monetary policy is characterized by a Taylor rule according to which the nominal interest rate is set as a function of the deviation of the inflation rate from its target rate, the output gap, and Tobin’s q. The latter is measured by the relative price of newly installed capital. We show that monetary policy should optimally decrease interest rates with higher capital prices. However, the consideration of Tobin’s q implies only small welfare effects. These results are robust with respect to a more general Epstein and Zin (Econometrica 57:937–969, 1989) welfare specification and to exogenous shifts to both the atemporal marginal rate of substitution between consumption and leisure as well as the households’ discounting behavior.

Keywords

Asset prices Monetary policy New Keynesian model Q targeting 

JEL Classification

E12 E32 E52 G12 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) under grant MA 1110/3-1 within its priority program ”Financial Market Imperfections and Macroeconomic Performance”. We gratefully acknowledge this support.

References

  1. Basu, S., & Bundick, B. (2012). Uncertainty shocks in a model of effective demand. In NBER working paper. No. 18420.Google Scholar
  2. Bernanke, B. S., & Gertler, M. (1999). Monetary policy and asset price volatility. Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Quarter IV, 17–51.Google Scholar
  3. Bernanke, B. S., & Gertler, M. (2001). Should central banks respond to movements in asset prices? American Economic Review, 91(2), 253–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernanke, B. S., Gertler, M., & Gilchrist, S. (1999). The financial accelerator in a quantitative business cycle framework. In J.B. Taylor & M. Woodford (eds.), Handbook of macroeconomics, Volume 1C. pp. 1341–1393. North-Holland: Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  5. Bullard, J., & Mitra, K. (2002). Learning about monetary policy rules. Journal of Monetary Economics, 49(6), 1105–1129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Calvo, G. A. (1983). Staggered prices in a utility-maximizing framework. Journal of Monetary Economics, 12, 383–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carlstrom, C. T., & Fuerst, T. S. (1997). Agency costs, net worth, and business fluctuations: A computable general equilibrium analysis. American Economic Review, 87, 893–910.Google Scholar
  8. Carlstrom, C. T., & Fuerst, T. S. (1998). Agency costs and business cycles. Economic Theory, 12, 583–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carlstrom, C. T., & Fuerst, T. S. (2007). Asset prices, nominal rigidities, and monetary policy. Review of Economic Dynamics, 10, 256–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chari, V. V., Kehoe, P. J., & McGrattan, E. R. (2009). New Keynesian models: Not yet useful for policy analysis. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 1(1), 242–266.Google Scholar
  11. Christiano, L. J., Eichenbaum, M., & Evans, C. L. (2005). Nominal rigidities and the dynamic effects of a shock to monetary policy. Journal of Political Economy, 113, 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Christiano, L. J., Eichenbaum, M. S., & Trabandt, M. (2015). Understanding the great recession. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 7, 110–167.Google Scholar
  13. Christiano, L., Ilut, C., Motto, R., & Rostagno, M. (2010). Monetary policy shocks and stock market booms. In Proceedings—Economic policy symposium. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City: Jackson Hole. pp. 85–145.Google Scholar
  14. Cúrdia, V., & Woodford, M. (2016). Credit friction and optimal monetary policy. Journal of Monetary Economics, 84, 30–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chugh, S. K. (2013). Costly external finance and labor market dynamics. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 37, 2882–2912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Epstein, L. G., Farhi, E., & Strzalecki, T. (2014). How much would you pay to resolve long run risk? American Economic Review, 104(9), 2680–2697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Epstein, L. G., & Zin, S. (1989). Substitution, risk aversion and the temporal behavior of consumption and asset returns: A theoretical framework. Econometrica, 57, 937–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Erceg, C. J., Henderson, D. W., & Levin, A. D. (2000). Optimal monetary policy with staggered wage and price contracts. Journal of Monetary Economics, 46, 281–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Faia, E., & Monacelli, T. (2007). Optimal interest rate rules, asset prices, and credit frictions. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 31, 3228–3254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gale, D., & Hellwig, M. (1985). Incentive-compatible debt contracts: The one-period problem. Review of Economic Studies, 52, 647–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gilchrist, S., & Saito, M. (2008). Expectations, asset prices, and monetary policy: The role of learning. In J. Y. Campbell (Ed.), Asset prices and monetary policy (pp. 45–102). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gourio, F. (2012). Disaster risk and business cycles. American Economic Review, 102(6), 2734–2766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hall, R. E. (1997). Macroeconomic fluctuations and the allocation of time. Journal of Labor Economics, 15(1), S223–S250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jermann, U. J. (1998). Asset pricing in production economies. Journal of Monetary Economics, 41, 257–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lütkepohl, H. (2005). New introduction to multiple time series analysis. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Machado, V. D. G. (2012). Monetary policy and asset price volatility. In Working Paper Series, Banco Central do Brasil. No. 274.Google Scholar
  27. Mimir, Y. (2016). Financial intermediaries, credit shocks and business cycles. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 78(1), 42–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nakajima, T. (2005). A business cycle model with variable capacity utilization and demand disturbances. European Economic Review, 49, 1331–1360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schmitt-Grohé, S., & Uribe, M. (2004a). Solving dynamic general equilibrium models using a second-order approximation to the policy function. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 28, 755–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schmitt-Grohé, S., & Uribe, M. (2004b). Optimal operational monetary policy in the Christiano-Eichenbaum-Evans model of the US business cycle. In Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) discussion paper No. 4554.Google Scholar
  31. Schmitt-Grohé, S., & Uribe, M. (2005). Optimal fiscal and monetary policy in a medium-scale macroeconomic model: Expanded version. In National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Working Paper, No. W11417.Google Scholar
  32. Schmitt-Grohé, S., & Uribe, M. (2007). Optimal simple and implementable monetary and fiscal rules. Journal of Monetary Economics, 54, 1702–1725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Swanson, E. T. (2012). Risk aversion and the labor margin in dynamic equilibrium models. American Economic Review, 102(4), 1663–1691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Taylor, J. B. (1993). Discretion versus policy rules in practice. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 30, 195–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Townsend, R. M. (1979). Optimal contracts and competitive markets with costly state verification. Journal of Economic Theory, 21, 265–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Williamson, S. D. (1987). Costly monitoring, optimal contracts, and equilibrium credit rationing. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 102, 135–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of AugsburgAugsburgGermany
  2. 2.CESifoMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations