Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Unique Effects of Hope, Optimism, and Self-Efficacy on Subjective Well-Being and Depression in German Adults

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Well-Being Assessment

Abstract

Positive thinking is a source of mental health. Hope, optimism, and generalized self-efficacy (GSE) are three factors of positive thinking that are strongly correlated but theoretically distinct. Specifically, these positive thinking factors covary with subjective well-being (composed of positive affect, negative affect, and satisfaction with life; SWB) and depression. However, the distinctiveness of hope, optimism, and GSE and their independent contributions to predicting SWB and depression is not well documented empirically. The present study used confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling in a large (n = 6077), older (M = 62.49, SD = 11.63), German sample. The sample was 51.3% male with no statistically significant differences in the predictors based on gender. We found the following results. First, the three factors of hope, optimism, and GSE better accounted for their individual items than a single overarching factor of positive thinking. However, because hope and GSE were not identifiable as distinct latent constructs in this sample (r = .98), they were modeled as one construct in subsequent analyses. Second, combined hope/GSE and optimism had a strong positive relationship (r = .74) among themselves and a weak to moderate positive relationship with higher SWB (positive affect, r = .70; negative affect, r = −.42; satisfaction with life, r = .68) and lower depression (r = −.44). Third, hope/GSE and optimism in the same model had unique weak to moderate latent effects on SWB and depression. The fact that hope and GSE were not distinguishable in this sample ran contrary to the existing literature. Overall, the positive thinking factors were highly correlated with each other and were found to be significant predictors of higher well-being and lower depression in this sample. Further investigation of the lack of distinctiveness of positive thinking in this sample is warranted given these unexpected findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Yes

Code Availability

Yes

References

  • Alarcon, G. M., Bowling, N. A., & Khazon, S. (2013). Great expectations: A meta-analytic examination of optimism and hope. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(7), 821–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington: American Psychiatric Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Antaramian, S. P., Huebner, E. S., Hills, K. J., & Valois, R. F. (2010). A dual-factor model of mental health: Toward a more comprehensive understanding of youth functioning. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 80(4), 462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandtstädter, J., & Wentura, D. (1994). Veränderungen der Zeit-und Zukunftsperspektive im Übergang zum höheren Erwachsenenalter: entwicklungspsychologische und differentielle Aspekte. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 26(1), 2–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Segerstrom, S. C. (2010). Optimism. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(7), 879–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, E. C., Yu, E. A., & Hirsch, J. K. (2013). On the confluence of optimism and hope on depressive symptoms in primary care patients: Does doubling up on bonum futurum proffer any added benefits? The Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(5), 404–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciarrocchi, J. W., & Deneke, E. (2005). Hope, optimism, pessimism, and spirituality as predictors of well-being controlling for personality. Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion, 16, 161–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciarrochi, J., Parker, P., Kashdan, T. B., Heaven, P. C., & Barkus, E. (2015). Hope and emotional well-being: A six-year study to distinguish antecedents, correlates, and consequences. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10(6), 520–532.

  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, J. R., & Henry, J. D. (2004). The positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS): Construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43(3), 245–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damásio, B. F., Valentini, F., Núñes-Rodriguez, S. I., Kliem, S., Koller, S. H., Hinz, A., Brahler, E., Finck, C., & Zenger, M. (2016). Is the general self-efficacy scale a reliable measure to be used in cross-cultural studies? Results from Brazil, Germany and Colombia. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 19(e29), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dittmann-Kohli, F., Kohli, M., Künemund, H., Motel, A., Steinleitner, C., & Westerhof, G., with the infas Sozialforschung. (1997). Übersetzung ins Deutsche durch DEAS-Projekt/Translation into German by DEAS project. Lebenszusammenhänge, Selbst- und Lebenskonzeptionen. Berlin: Free University.

  • Edwards, L., Rand, K. L., Lopez, S. J., & Snyder, C. R. (2007). Understanding hope: A review of measurement and construct validity research. In A. D. Ong & M. H. M. van Dulmen (Eds.), Oxford handbook of methods in positive psychology (pp. 83–95). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engstler, H., & Schmiade, N. (2013). The German ageing survey (DEAS)–a longitudinal and time-series study of people in the second half of life. Schmollers Jahrbuch, 133(1), 97–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, M. W., & Lopez, S. J. (2009). Positive expectancies and mental health: Identifying the unique contributions of hope and optimism. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(6), 548–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaesmer, H., Grande, G., Braehler, E., & Roth, M. (2011). The German version of the satisfaction with life scale (SWLS). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 27(2), 127–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hautzinger, M., & Bailer, M. (1993). Allgemeine Depressions-Skala: ADS; Manual. Beltz-Test-GmbH: Weinheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellman, C. M., Pittman, M. K., & Munoz, R. T. (2013). The first twenty years of the will and the ways: An examination of score reliability distribution on Snyder’s dispositional Hope scale. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(3), 723–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keyes, C. L. (1998). Social well-being. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61, 121–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, P. (2012). Emotions. In B. Davies & E. Stump (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Aquinas. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. Y., & Gallagher, M. W. (2017). Hope and well-being. In M. W. Gallagher & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of hope (pp. 287–298). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehr, D., Hillert, A., Schmitz, E., & Sosnowsky, N. (2008). Screening depressiver störungen mittels allgemeiner depressions-skala (ADS-K) und state-trait depressions scales (STDS-T) eine vergleichende evaluation von Cut-off-werten. Diagnostica, 54(2), 61–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leist, A. K., Ferring, D., & Filipp, S.-H. (2010). Remembering positive and negative life events: Associations with future time perspective and functions of autobiographical memory. GeroPsych – The Journal of Gerontopsychology and Geriatric Psychiatry, 23(3), 137–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lightsey Jr., O. R., Burke, M., Ervin, A., Henderson, D., & Yee, C. (2006). Generalized self-efficacy, self-esteem, and negative affect. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement, 38(1), 72–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 151–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, L. J., Bistricky, S. L., Phillips, C. A., D'Souza, J. M., Richardson, A. L., Lai, B. S., Short, M., & Gallagher, M. W. (2020). The potential unique impacts of hope and resilience on mental health and well-being in the wake of hurricane Harvey. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 33, 962–972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luszczynska, A., Gutiérrez-Doña, B., & Schwarzer, R. (2005a). General self-efficacy in various domains of human functioning: Evidence from five countries. International Journal of Psychology, 40(2), 80–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luszczynska, A., Scholz, U., & Schwarzer, R. (2005b). The general self-efficacy scale: Multicultural validation studies. The Journal of Psychology, 139(5), 439–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moè, A., Pazzaglia, F., & Ronconi, L. (2010). When being able is not enough. The combined value of positive affect and self-efficacy for job satisfaction in teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(5), 1145–1153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, R. O., & Hancock, G. R. (2008). Best practices in structural equation modeling. In J. W. Osborne (Ed.), Best practices in quantitative methods (pp. 488–508). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

  • Muthén, L.K. & Muthén, B.O. (1998-2017). Mplus User’s Guide. Eighth Edition. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

  • Nes, L. S., & Segerstrom, S. C. (2006). Dispositional optimism and coping: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3), 235–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan, G. (2011). The relationship between hope, eustress, self-efficacy, and life satisfaction among undergraduates. Social Indicators Research, 101(1), 155–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouweneel, E., Le Blanc, P. M., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2013). Do-it-yourself: An online positive psychology intervention to promote positive emotions, self-efficacy, and engagement at work. Career Development International, 18(2), 173–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychological Assessment, 5(2), 164–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peleg, G., Barak, O., Harel, Y., Rochberg, J., & Hoofien, D. (2009). Hope, dispositional optimism and severity of depression following traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 23(10), 800–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(3), 385–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rand, K. L. (2017). Hope, self-efficacy, and optimism: Conceptual and empirical differences. In M. W. Gallagher & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of hope (pp. 45–58). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritschel, L. A., & Sheppard, C. S. (2017). Hope and depression. In M. W. Gallagher & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Hope (pp. 209–220). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, S., & Sieben, N. (2017). Hope measurement. In M. W. Gallagher & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Hope (pp. 83–94). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (1985). Optimism, coping, and health: Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies. Health Psychology, 4(3), 219–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, J., Klaiberg, A., & Brähler, E. (2003). Diagnostik von Lebensqualität und Wohlbefinden–Eine Einführung. In Diagnostische Verfahren zu Lebensqualität und Wohlbefinden (pp. 9–24). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized self-efficacy scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs (pp. 35–37). Windsor: NFER-NELSON.

  • Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1999). Skalen zur erfassung von Lehrer-und schülermerkmalen. Dokumentation der psychometrischen Verfahren im Rahmen der Wissenschaftlichen Begleitung des Modellversuchs Selbstwirksame Schulen. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J., Fleeson, W., Geiselmann, B., Settersten, R., & Kunzmann, U. (1996). Wohlbefinden im hohen Alter: Vorhersagen aufgrund objektiver Lebensbedingungen und subjektiver Bewertung [Well-being in very old age: Predictions from objective life conditions and subjective experience]. Die Berliner Altersstudie (pp. 497–523). Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.

  • Snyder, C. R. (2002). Hope theory: Rainbows in the mind. Psychological Inquiry, 13(4), 249–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, C. R., Harris, C., Anderson, J. R., Holleran, S. A., Irving, L. M., Sigmon, S. T., Yoshinobu, L., Gibb, J., Langelle, C., & Harney, P. (1991). The will and the ways: Development and validation of an individual-differences measure of hope. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(4), 570–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1994). Positive illusions and well-being revisited: Separating fact from fiction. Psychological Bulletin, 116(1), 21–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tong, Y., & Song, S. (2004). A study on general self-efficacy and subjective well-being of low SES-college students in a Chinese university. College Student Journal, 38(4), 637–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trompetter, H. R., Lamers, S. M. A., Westerhof, G. J., Fledderus, M., & Bohlmeijer, E. T. (2017). Both positive mental health and psychopathology should be monitored in psychotherapy: Confirmation for the dual-factor model in acceptance and commitment therapy. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 91, 58–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valle, M. F., Huebner, E. S., & Suldo, S. M. (2006). An analysis of hope as a psychological strength. Journal of School Psychology, 44(5), 393–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. M., & Rhodes, R. E. (2016). The confounded self-efficacy construct: Conceptual analysis and recommendations for future research. Health Psychology Review, 10(2), 113–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, S. S., & Lim, T. (2009). Hope versus optimism in Singaporean adolescents: Contributions to depression and life satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(5–6), 648–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Y. L., Liu, L., Wang, X. X., Wang, Y., & Wang, L. (2014). Prevalence and associated positive psychological variables of depression and anxiety among Chinese cervical cancer patients: A cross-sectional study. PLoS One, 9(4), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, M., & Kam, C. C. S. (2016). Hope and general self-efficacy: Two measures of the same construct? The Journal of Psychology, 150(5), 543–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Houston, 3695 Cullen Boulevard Room 126, Houston, TX, 77204-5022, USA

    Johann M. D’Souza, Michael J. Zvolensky & Matthew W. Gallagher

  2. Texas Institute for Measurement, Evaluation, and Statistics, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA

    Johann M. D’Souza & Matthew W. Gallagher

  3. Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA

    Michael J. Zvolensky

  4. Department of Psychological, Health, and Learning Sciences, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA

    Bradley H. Smith

Authors
  1. Johann M. D’Souza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael J. Zvolensky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bradley H. Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Matthew W. Gallagher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johann M. D’Souza.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

D’Souza, J.M., Zvolensky, M.J., Smith, B.H. et al. The Unique Effects of Hope, Optimism, and Self-Efficacy on Subjective Well-Being and Depression in German Adults. J well-being assess 4, 331–345 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41543-021-00037-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41543-021-00037-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation