Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Ramifications of State Affect on the Relationship Between Workday Coworker Incivility and Counterproductive Work Behavior

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Occupational Health Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to assess whether coworker incivility exhibits short-term effects on the enactment of counterproductive work behaviors, as well as to investigate the role emotions play in enhancing or mitigating the enactment of these behaviors. Drawing on social exchange theory, the target similarity model, and affect-as-information hypothesis, an experience sampling study across five consecutive workdays was conducted. Multi-level analyses using 448 observations revealed that on days when individuals experienced coworker incivility, they reported engaging in both interpersonal and organizational counterproductive work behaviors. We also found support for a buffering effect wherein positive affect in the morning weakened the relationship of workday coworker incivility with workplace counterproductive work behaviors, whereas negative affect in the morning strengthened this relationship. Altogether, this study provides a deeper understanding of naturally occurring work experiences, clarifies the positive, short-term association of coworker incivility with counterproductive work behaviors, and considers how state affect can impact interpretation of workday events. We conclude with theoretical and practical implications in addition to directions for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

Notes

  1. We note that we had captured affect in the evening survey, alongside incivility and CWB. When we controlled for positive and negative affect in the evening survey while testing our hypothesized model with morning affect and workday incivility and CWB, no differences were found in the results.

References

  • Adiyaman, D., & Meier, L. L. (2021). Short-term effects of experienced and observed incivility on mood and self-esteem.Work & Stress,1–14.

  • Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., & Reno, R. R. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage.

  • Andersson, L. M., & Pearson, C. M. (1999). Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 452–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashkanasy, N. M., & Dorris, A. D. (2017). Emotions in the workplace. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 67–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, R. J., & Robinson, S. L. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 349–360.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, C. M., Carpenter, N. C., & Barratt, C. L. (2012). Do other-reports of counterproductive work behavior provide an incremental contribution over self-reports? A meta-analytic comparison. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 613. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026739.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Wiley.

  • Bowling, N. A., & Eschleman, K. J. (2010). Employee personality as a moderator of the relationships between work stressors and counterproductive work behavior. Journal of occupational health psychology, 15(1), 91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical models: Applications and data analysis methods. Sage Publications, Inc.

  • Dhanani, L. Y., LaPalme, M. L., & Joseph, D. L. (2021). How prevalent is workplace mistreatment? A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Organizational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enders, C. K., & Tofighi, D. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12(2), 121.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Forgas, J. P., & George, J. M. (2001). Affective influences on judgments and behavior in organizations: An information processing perspective. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 86(1), 3–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, A. S., Butts, M. M., Yuan, Z., Rosen, R. L., & Sliter, M. T. (2018). Further understanding incivility in the workplace: The effects of gender, agency, and communion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(4), 362.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Germeys, L., & De Gieter, S. (2017). Clarifying the dynamic interrelation of conflicts between the work and home domain and counterproductive work behaviour. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26(3), 457–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grégoire, S., & Lachance, L. (2015). Evaluation of a brief mindfulness-based intervention to reduce psychological distress in the workplace. Mindfulness, 6(4), 836–847.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, S., Harold, C. M., Oh, I. S., Kim, J. K., & Agolli, A. (2021). A meta-analysis integrating 20 years of workplace incivility research: Antecedents, consequences, and boundary conditions. Journal of Organizational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hershcovis, M. S., & Barling, J. (2010). Towards a multi-foci approach to workplace aggression: A meta‐analytic review of outcomes from different perpetrators. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(1), 24–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hülsheger, U. R., van Gils, S., & Walkowiak, A. (2021). The regulating role of mindfulness in enacted workplace incivility: An experience sampling study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(8), 1250–1265.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jayawickreme, E., Tsukayama, E., & Kashdan, T. B. (2017). Examining the effect of affect on life satisfaction judgments: A within-person perspective. Journal of Research in Personality, 68, 32–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.04.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, R., Murtaza, G., Neveu, J. P., & Newman, A. (2021). Reciprocal relationship between workplace incivility and deviant silence—The moderating role of moral attentiveness. Applied Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12316

  • Koopman, J., Conway, J. M., Dimotakis, N., Tepper, B. J., Lee, Y. E., Rogelberg, S. G., & Lount, R. B. Jr. (2020). Does CWB repair negative affective states, or generate them? Examining the moderating role of trait empathy. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000837. Advance online publication.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lavelle, J. J., Rupp, D. E., & Brockner, J. (2007). Taking a multifoci approach to the study of justice, social exchange, and citizenship behavior: The target similarity model. Journal of Management, 33(6), 841–866.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavelle, J., Rupp, D. E., Manegold, J. G., & Thornton, M. (2013). Multifoci justice and target similarity. In M. Ambrose, & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of justice in work organizations. The Oxford University Press.

  • Leiter, M. P., Laschinger, K. K. S., Day, A., & Oore, D. G. (2011). The impact of civility interventions on employee social behaviour, distress and attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 1258–1274.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, W., Zhou, Z. E., & Che, X. X. (2019). Effect of workplace incivility on OCB through burnout: The moderating role of affective commitment. Journal of Business and Psychology, 34(5), 657–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCord, M. A., Joseph, D. L., Dhanani, L. Y., & Beus, J. M. (2018). A meta-analysis of sex and race differences in perceived workplace mistreatment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(2), 137.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McMahan, E. A., & Estes, D. (2015). The effect of contact with natural environments on positive and negative affect: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10(6), 507–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier, L. L., & Gross, S. (2015). Episodes of incivility between subordinates and supervisors: Examining the role of self-control and time with an interaction‐record diary study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(8), 1096–1113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier, L. L., & Spector, P. E. (2013). Reciprocal effects of work stressors and counterproductive work behavior: A five-wave longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(3), 529.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Myin-Germeys, I., & Kuppens, P. (2021). Experience sampling methods, an introduction. In I. Myin-Germeys, & P. Kuppens (Eds.), The Open Handbook of Experience Sampling Methodology (pp. 7–19). The Center for Research on Experience Sampling and Ambulatory Methods Leuven (REAL) - Belgium.

  • Osatuke, K., Mohr, D., Ward, C., Moore, S. C., Dyrenforth, S., & Belton, L. (2009). Civility, respect, Engagement in the workforce (CREW); Nationwide organisation development intervention at Veterans Health Administration. Journal Applied Behavioural Science, 45(3), 384–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ottinot, R. C. (2008). The development and validation of the perceived workplace civility climate scale (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of South Florida.

  • Penney, L. M., & Spector, P. E. (2005). Job stress, incivility, and counterproductive work behavior (CWB): The moderating role of negative affectivity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(7), 777–796.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ployhart, R. E., Holtz, B. C., & Bliese, P. D. (2002). Longitudinal data analysis: Applications of random coefficient modeling to leadership research. The Leadership Quarterly, 13, 455–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S. L., & Bennett, R. J. (1995). A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 555–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, C. C., Koopman, J., Gabriel, A. S., & Johnson, R. E. (2016). Who strikes back? A daily investigation of when and why incivility begets incivility. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(11), 1620–1634.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rupp, D. E., Shao, R., Jones, K. S., & Liao, H. (2014). The utility of a multifoci approach to the study of organizational justice: A meta-analytic investigation into the consideration of normative rules, moral accountability, bandwidth-fidelity, and social exchange. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 123(2), 159–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawhney, G., McCord, M., Cunningham, A., & Adjei, K. (2020). Exploring the in(effectiveness) of leader behaviors in relation to workplace deviance: A meta-analysis Paper presented at the 2020 Meeting of the Southern Management Association.

  • Sawhney, G., & Michel, J. S. (2021). Challenge and hindrance stressors and work outcomes: The moderating role of day-level affect. Journal of Business and Psychology, 1–17.

  • Schilpzand, P., & Huang, L. (2018). When and how experienced incivility dissuades proactive performance: An integration of sociometer and self-identity orientation perspectives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(8), 828.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schulte-Braucks, J., Baethge, A., Dormann, C., & Vahle-Hinz, T. (2019). Get even and feel good? Moderating effects of justice sensitivity and counterproductive work behavior on the relationship between illegitimate tasks and self-esteem. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 24(2), 241.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N. (1990). Feelings as information: Informational and motivational functions of affective states. In E. T. Higgins, & R. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (2 vol., pp. 527–561). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(3), 513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shockley, K. M., Ispas, D., Rossi, M. E., & Levine, E. L. (2012). A meta-analytic investigation of the relationship between state affect, discrete emotions, and job performance. Human Performance, 25(5), 377–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sliter, M., Sliter, K., & Jex, S. (2012). The employee as a punching bag: The effect of multiple sources of incivility on employee withdrawal behavior and sales performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(1), 121–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonnentag, S. (2015). Dynamics of well-being. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2, 261–293. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonnentag, S., & Binnewies, C. (2013). Daily affect spillover from work to home: Detachment from work and sleep as moderators. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83(2), 198–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonnentag, S., Binnewies, C., & Mojza, E. J. (2008). Did you have a nice evening?“ a day-level study on recovery experiences, sleep, and affect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(3), 674–684.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spanouli, A., & Hofmans, J. (2021). A resource-based perspective on organizational citizenship and counterproductive work behavior: The role of vitality and core self‐evaluations. Applied Psychology, 70(4), 1435–1462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P. E., & Fox, S. (2002). An emotion-centered model of voluntary work behavior: Some parallels between counterproductive work behavior and organizational citizenship behavior. Human resource management review, 12(2), 269–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Totterdell, P., Wall, T., Holman, D., Diamond, H., & Epitropaki, O. (2004). Affect networks: A structural analysis of the relationship between work ties and job-related affect. Journal of applied psychology, 89(5), 854.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tremmel, S., & Sonnentag, S. (2018). A sorrow halved? A daily diary study on talking about experienced workplace incivility and next-morning negative affect. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 23(4), 568.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vahle-Hinz, T., Baethge, A., & Van Dick, R. (2019). Beyond one work day? A daily diary study on causal and reverse effects between experienced workplace incivility and behaving rude towards others. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28, 272–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Bos, K. (2003). On the subjective quality of social justice: The role of affect as information in the psychology of justice judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 482.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, B. M., Magley, V. J., Reeves, D. W., Davies-Schrils, K. A., Marmet, M. D., & Gallus, J. A. (2012). Assessing workgroup norms for civility: The development of the civility norms questionnaire-brief. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27(4), 407–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weigelt, O., Syrek, C. J., Schmitt, A., & Urbach, T. (2019). Finding peace of mind when there still is so much left undone—A diary study on how job stress, competence need satisfaction, and proactive work behavior contribute to work-related rumination during the weekend. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 24(3), 373.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Welbourne, J. L., & Sariol, A. M. (2017). When does incivility lead to counterproductive work behavior? Roles of job involvement, task interdependence, and gender. Journal of occupational health psychology, 22(2), 194.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel, M., & Okimoto, T. G. (2016). Retributive justice. In C. Sabbagh & M. Schmitt (Eds.), Handbook of social justice theory and research (pp. 237–256). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3216-0_13

  • Yuan, Z., Park, Y., & Sliter, M. T. (2020). Put you down versus tune you out: Further understanding active and passive e-mail incivility. Journal of occupational health psychology, 25(5), 330–344.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Z. E., Yan, Y., Che, X. X., & Meier, L. L. (2015). Effect of workplace incivility on end-of-work negative affect: Examining individual and organizational moderators in a daily diary study. Journal of occupational health psychology, 20(1), 117–130.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychological Sciences, Auburn University, 205 Thach Hall, Auburn, AL, 36849, USA

    Gargi Sawhney

  2. Department of Psychology, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA

    Mallory A. McCord

Authors
  1. Gargi Sawhney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mallory A. McCord
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The first author conceived of and designed the study. Material preparation and data analyses were performed by the first author. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Dr. Gargi Sawhney, and the second author commented on the initial versions of the manuscript. Both authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gargi Sawhney.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics Approval

The study was approved by the IRB prior to data collection.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sawhney, G., McCord, M.A. The Ramifications of State Affect on the Relationship Between Workday Coworker Incivility and Counterproductive Work Behavior. Occup Health Sci 7, 557–574 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41542-023-00147-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41542-023-00147-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation