The Journal of Analysis

, Volume 27, Issue 1, pp 259–276 | Cite as

Multi-criteria decision making method based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets

  • J. Priyadharsini
  • P. BalasubramaniamEmail author
Original Research Paper


Multi-criteria group decision making is a widely used efficient decision methodology to improve quality of the decision. In this paper, the interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy weighted arithmetic average operator, the interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy weighted geometric average operator, and an accuracy function of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy value are introduced. The proposed aggregation operators with a accuracy function is more efficient to take decision. Finally, an example is provided to illustrate the application of the developed approach. The results show that the proposed new approach is more comprehensive and flexible by comparing with the other existing aggregation operators and accuracy functions.


Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy set Arithmetic operator Geometric operator Accuracy function Multi-criteria fuzzy decision making 

Mathematics Subject Classification

20F10 62C86 


Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of Interest

No conflicts of interest to declare.


  1. 1.
    Atanassov, K. 1986. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 20: 87–96.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Atanassov, K. 1994. Operators over interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 64: 159–174.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Atanassov, K., and G. Gargov. 1989. Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 31: 343–349.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen, S.M., and J.M. Tan. 1994. Handling multicriteria fuzzy decision-making problems based on vague set theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 67: 163–172.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen, N.A., Xu Zeshi, and Meimei Xia. 2013. Interval valued hesitant preference relations and their applications to group decision making. Knowledge Based Systems 37: 528–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goraleczany, M.B. 1987. A method of inference in approximate reasoning based on interval-valued fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 21: 1–17.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Herrera, F., and E. Herrera-Viedma. 2000. Linguistic decision analysis-Steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 114: 103–113.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jun, Y. 2009. Multicriteria fuzzy decision-making based on a novel accuracy function under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications 36: 6899–6902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lakshmana, G.N., S. Jeevaraj, and P. Dhanasekaran. 2017. An intuitionistic fuzzy multi-criteria decision making method based on non-hesitance score for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Soft Computing 21: 7077–7082.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lakshmana, G.N.V., S. Muralikrishnan, and Geetha Sivaraman. 2011. Multi-criteria decision-making method based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Expert Systems with Applications 38: 1464–1467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lakshmana, G.N.V., G. Venkateshwari, and G. Sivraman. 2008. Ranking of intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (IEEE Fuzz 2008), 1971–1974.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liu, H.W., and G.J. Wang. 2007. Multicriteria decision-making methods based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. European Journal of Operational Research 179: 220–233.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mitchell, H.B. 2004. Ranking intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. Fuzziness and Knowledge Based Systems, International Journal of Uncertainty 12: 377–386.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Qiu, J., and L. Li. 2017. A new approach for multiattribute group decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information. Applied Soft Computing 61: 111–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Turksen, B. 1986. Interval valued fuzzy sets based on normal forms. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 20: 191–210.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Xu, Z.S. 2005. An overview of methods for determining OWA weights. International Journal of Intelligent systems 20: 843–865.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Xu, Z.S. 2007. Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 15: 1179–1187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Xu, Z.S. 2007. Methods for aggregating interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information and their application to decision making. Control and Decision 22: 215–219.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Xu, Z.S. 2007. Some similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their applications to multiple attribute decision making. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making 6: 109–121.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Xu, Z.S. 2010. A distance measure based method for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making. Information Sciences 180: 181–190.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Xu, Z.S. 2013. Compatibility analysis of intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations in group decision making. Group Decision and Negotiation 22: 463–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Xu, Z.S., and J. Chen. 2007. An approach to group decision making based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy judgment matrices. System Engineer-Theory and Practice 27: 126–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Xu, Z.S., and J. Chen. 2007. On geometric aggregation over interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information. In The 4th International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD07), Haikou, China, 466–471.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Xu, Z.S., and Q.L. Da. 2003. An overview of operators for aggregating information. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 18: 953–969.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Xu, Z.S., and C. Xiaoqiang. 2012. Intuitionistic Fuzzy Information Aggregation Theory and Applications. Beijing: Springer, Science Press.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Xu, Z.S., and R.R. Yager. 2006. Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. International Journal of General System 35: 417–433.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ye, J. 2007. Improved method of multicriteria fuzzy decision-making based on vague sets. Computer-Aided Design 39: 164–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zadeh, L.A. 1965. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 8: 338–353.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zhao, H., Z.S. Xu, M.F. Ni, et al. 2010. Generalized aggregation operators for intuitionistic fuzzy sets. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 25: 1–30.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zeng, S.Z., and W.H. Su. 2011. Intuitionistic fuzzy ordered weighted distance operator. Knowledge-Based Systems 24: 124–1232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zeng, S., J.M. Merigi, D.P. Marques, H. Jin, and F. Gu. 2016. Intuitionistic fuzzy induced ordered weighted averaging distance operator and its application to decision making. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems 32: 11–22.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Forum D'Analystes, Chennai 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsGandhigram Rural Institute-Deemed UniversityGandhigramIndia

Personalised recommendations