Skip to main content
Log in

Unveiling the familiar in the unconventional: the case of Klima DAO

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Journal of Organization Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While we applaud Jirásek’s documentation of Klima DAO, we question a number of the arguments and conclusions in his article. In particular, we raise doubts concerning the extent to which Klima DAO truly represents a novel, particularly flat kind of organization. We also comment on other, unclear aspects of Klima DAO’s organization and the generalizability of this organizing mode to other contexts. In all, we are skeptical concerning the strong claims Jirásek makes about Klima DAO, including that it is “a model for future organizations in search of greater transparency and flatter governance structures.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Data availability

Not applicable.

References

  • Buterin V (2021) Moving beyond coin voting governance. Available at: https://vitalik.ca/general/2021/08/16/voting3.html

  • DuPont Q (2017) Experiments in algorithmic governance: a history and ethnography of “The DAO”, a failed decentralized autonomous organization. In: Campbell-Verduyn M (ed) Bitcoin and Beyond. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Foss NJ (2002) Coase vs. Hayek: economic organization in the knowledge economy. Int J Econ Bus 9:9–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foss NJ, Klein PG (2022) Why managers matter: the perils of the bossless company. Hachette, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman SJ, Hart OD (1986) The costs and benefits of ownership: a theory of vertical and lateral integration. J Polit Econ 94:691–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jirásek M (2023) Klima DAO: a crypto answer to carbon markets. J Org Design (this issue)

  • Lumineau F, Wang W, Schilke O (2021) Blockchain governance—a new way of organizing collaborations? Organ Sci 32:500–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martela F (2019) What makes self-managing organizations novel? Comparing how Weberian bureaucracy, Mintzberg’s adhocracy, and self-organizing solve six fundamental problems of organizing. J Org Design 8

  • Puranam P, Alexy O, Reitzig M (2014) What’s “new” about new forms of organizing. Acad Manag Rev 39:162–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajan R, Zingales L (1998) Power in a theory of the firm. Quart J Econ 113:387–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicolai J. Foss.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Foss, N.J., Xu, T. Unveiling the familiar in the unconventional: the case of Klima DAO. J Org Design 12, 289–291 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41469-023-00157-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41469-023-00157-7

Keywords

Navigation