Skip to main content
Log in

No Evidence for Performance Improvements in Episodic Memory Due to Fidgeting, Doodling or a “Neuro-Enhancing” Drink

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Cognitive Enhancement Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The media advertises fidgeting devices and nutrition supplements as possible ways to enhance cognition, which often have not been validated. The current study investigates the influence of fidget spinners, stress balls, doodling, and a supposedly neuro-enhancing beverage called “Neuronade” on the encoding performance in an episodic memory task using a within-subject design. Sport students (n = 58, Mage = 24 years; 24 women) learned the method of loci as an episodic memory strategy. Memory encoding took place under different conditions, administered in a partially counterbalanced order. Compared with the baseline, none of the products resulted in memory enhancements, with the fidget spinner and doodling even reducing performances, and the stress ball and the Neuronade not changing cognitive performance. These findings strongly suggest that the scientific community should become more active in investigating claims of supposedly neuro-enhancing products.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Please note that there were missing data on the Digit Symbol for 9 participants who missed the respective session.

  2. We thank an anonymous reviewer for this suggestion.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Daniel Bill, Keito Philippi, Janine Vieweg, and Manuel Zachej for their help with the data entry and for helpful discussions. The authors would also like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments.

Funding

This work was supported by the Saarland University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The authors both contributed equally to this study. S. Schaefer developed the study concept. Both authors contributed to the study design and cooperated in conducting the literature review. S. Schaefer collected the data. G. Amico analyzed and interpreted the data, with input from S. Schaefer. G. Amico led the drafting of the manuscript, with substantial contributions from S. Schaefer.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gianluca Amico.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The data has been presented as an oral presentation at the “50.te Jahrestagung der Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Sportpsychologie” (Meeting of the German Sport Psychology Association), May 2018, Cologne.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amico, G., Schaefer, S. No Evidence for Performance Improvements in Episodic Memory Due to Fidgeting, Doodling or a “Neuro-Enhancing” Drink. J Cogn Enhanc 4, 2–11 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41465-019-00124-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41465-019-00124-9

Keywords

Navigation