Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Working Memory Training in Adolescents Decreases Laboratory Risk Taking in the Presence of Peers

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Cognitive Enhancement Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Adolescence is a period of heightened risk taking relative to both adulthood and childhood, due in part to peers’ increased influence on adolescent decision making. Because adolescents’ choices have harmful consequences, there is great interest in specific interventions that might attenuate risk taking. We hypothesized that it might be possible to reduce adolescent risk taking through an intervention targeting the ability/tendency to engage cognitive control processes. While some studies of working memory training (WMT) have indicated subsequent enhancement of adults’ cognitive control abilities, potential impacts on adolescent cognitive control have not been explored. Accordingly, we tested whether 4 weeks of WMT (relative to active control training, ACT) might increase performance on cognitive control measures and decrease risk taking in adolescents. Adolescents receiving WMT, compared to those receiving ACT, exhibited some evidence of improved short-term memory performance following the 4-week training period. Improvements did not significantly transfer to performance on basic cognitive control measures. However, on two risk-taking tasks administered at post-training either with or without an anonymous peer audience, adolescents who received WMT evinced suppressed levels of risk taking when observed by peers, an effect not seen in ACT. Further work is needed to more fully characterize the potential of WMT interventions in stemming risk behavior within adolescent samples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aïte, A., Cassotti, M., Linzarini, A., Osmont, A., Houdé, O., & Borst, G. (2016). Adolescents’ inhibitory control: keep it cool or lose control. Developmental Science, (January), 1–9.

  • Albert, D., Chein, J. M., & Steinberg, L. (2013). The teenage brain: peer influences on adolescent decision making. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(2), 114–120.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Au, J., Sheehan, E., Tsai, N., Duncan, G. J., Buschkuehl, M., & Jaeggi, S. M. (2015). Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory: a meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 366–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bickel, W. K., Yi, R., Landes, R. D., Hill, P. F., & Baxter, C. (2011). Remember the future: working memory training decreases delay discounting among stimulant addicts. Biological Psychiatry, 69(3), 260–265.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Borella, E., Carretti, B., Riboldi, F., & De Beni, R. (2010). Working memory training in older adults: evidence of transfer and maintenance effects. Psychology and Aging, 25(4), 767.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Botdorf, M., Rosenbaum, G. M., Patrianakos, J., Steinberg, L., & Chein, J. M. (2016). Adolescent risk-taking is predicted by individual differences in cognitive control over emotional, but not non-emotional, response conflict. Cognition and Emotion, 9931(April), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, S., Bault, N., Coricelli, G., & Blakemore, S. J. (2010). Adolescents’ heightened risk-seeking in a probabilistic gambling task. Cognitive Development, 25(2010), 183–196.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Casey, B. J., Galvan, A., & Somerville, L. H. (2016). Beyond simple models of adolescence to an integrated circuit-based account: a commentary. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 128–130.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chein, J. (2015). Peers and adolescent risk taking. Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences. Edited, 1–13.

  • Chein, J., Albert, D., O’Brien, L., Uckert, K., & Steinberg, L. (2011). Peers increase adolescent risk taking by enhancing activity in the brain’s reward circuitry. Developmental Science, 14(2), F1–10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Chein, J., & Morrison, A. (2010). Expanding the mind’s workspace: training and transfer effects with a complex working memory span task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(2), 193–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, R., Cattarello, A., & Johnstone, B. (1996). The effectiveness of drug abuse resistance education project. Preventative Medicine, 31825, 307–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Water, E., Cillessen, A. H. N., & Scheres, A. (2014). Distinct age-related differences in temporal discounting and risk taking in adolescents and young adults. Child Development, 85(5), 1881–1897 https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12245.

  • Defoe, I. N., Dubas, J. S., Figner, B., & Van Aken, M. A. G. (2015). A meta-analysis on age differences in risky decision making: adolescents versus children and adults. Psychological Bulletin, 141(1), 29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ennett, S. T., Tobler, N. S., Ringwalt, C. L., & Flewelling, R. L. (1994). How effective is drug abuse resistance education? A meta-analysis of project DARE outcome evaluations. American Journal of Public Health, 84(9), 1394–1401.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Figner, B., Mackinlay, R. J., Wilkening, F., & Weber, E. U. (2009). Affective and deliberative processes in risky choice: age differences in risk taking in the Columbia Card Task. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(3), 709–730.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, M., & Steinberg, L. (2005). Peer influence on risk taking, risk preference, and risky decision making in adolescence and adulthood: an experimental study. Developmental Psychology, 41(4), 625–635.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hautus, M. J. (1995). Corrections for extreme proportions and their biasing effects on estimated values of d′. Behavior Research Methods Instruments, & Computers, 27(1), 46–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaeggi, S. M., Buschkuehl, M., Shah, P., & Jonides, J. (2014). The role of individual differences in cognitive training and transfer. Memory & Cognition, 42(3), 464–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kann, L., Kinchen, S., Shanklin, S. L., Flint, K. H., Kawkins, J., Harris, W. A., … Zaza, S. (2012). Youth risk behavior surveillance—United States, 2011, Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Surveillance summaries (Washington, D.C.: 2002) 61(4), 1–168.

  • Karbach, J., & Verhaeghen, P. (2014). Making working memory work: a meta-analysis of executive-control and working memory training in older adults. Psychological Science, 25(11), 2027–2037.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kun, Y. (2007). Impact of computerized cognitive training on working memory, fluid intelligence, science achievement (doctoral dissertation).

  • Melby-Lervåg, M., & Hulme, C. (2013). Is working memory training effective? A meta-analytic review. Developmental Psychology, 49(2), 270–291.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Melby-Lervåg, M., Redick, T., & Hulme, C. (2016). Working memory training does not improve performance on measures of intelligence or other measures of “far transfer”: evidence from a meta-analytic review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(4), 512–534.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, S. H., Schoel, C., & Stevens, A. A. (2008). Mechanisms underlying heightened risk taking in adolescents as compared with adults. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(2), 272–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, A. B., & Chein, J. M. (2011). Does working memory training work? The promise and challenges of enhancing cognition by training working memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(1), 46–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, L., Albert, D., Chein, J., & Steinberg, L. (2011). Adolescents prefer more immediate rewards when in the presence of their peers. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(4), 747–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulsen, D. J., Carter, R. M., Platt, M. L., Huettel, S. A., & Brannon, E. M. (2012). Neurocognitive development of risk aversion from early childhood to adulthood. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5(January), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, S. D., & Stansfield, R. B. (2008). I know how you feel: task-irrelevant facial expressions are spontaneously processed at a semantic level. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 8(1), 54–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pugin, F., Metz, A. J., Stauffer, M., Wolf, M., Jenni, O. G., & Huber, R. (2014). Working memory training shows immediate and long-term effects on cognitive performance in children and adolescents. F1000Research, (0), 1–10.

  • Richmond, L. L., Morrison, A. B., Chein, J. M., & Olson, I. R. (2011). Working memory training and transfer in older adults. Psychology and Aging, 26(4), 813–822.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Romer, D., Betancourt, L. M., Brodsky, N. L., & Giannetta, J. M. (2012). Does adolescent risk taking imply weak executive function? A prospective study of relations between working memory performance, impulsivity, and risk taking in early adolescence. Developmental Science, 14(5), 1119–1133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sala, G., & Gobet, F. (2017). Working memory training in typically developing children: a meta-analysis of the available evidence. Developmental Psychology.

  • Salminen, T., Strobach, T., & Schubert, T. (2012). On the impacts of working memory training on executive functioning. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shavelson, R., Yuan, K., & Alonzo, A. (2008). On the impact of computerized cognitive training on working memory and fluid intelligence. In D. C. Berliner & H. Kuppermintz (Eds.), Contributions of educational psychology to changing institutions, environments, and people (pp. 1–11). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shipstead, Z., Redick, T. S., & Engle, R. W. (2012). Is working memory training effective? Psychological Bulletin, 138(4), 628–654.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, E. P., Smith, A. R., Silva, K., Icenogle, G., Duell, N., Chein, J., & Steinberg, L. (2016). The dual systems model: review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(2015), 103–117.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simons-Morton, B., Lerner, N., & Singer, J. (2005). The observed effects of teenage passengers on the risky driving behavior of teenage drivers. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 37(6), 973–982.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simons-Morton, B., Ouimet, M. C., Zhang, Z., Klauer, S., Lee, S. E., Wang, J., et al. (2011). The effect of passengers and risk-taking friends on risky driving and crashes/near crashes among novice teenagers. Journal of Adolescent Health, 49(6), 587–593.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. R., Chein, J., & Steinberg, L. (2014). Peers increase adolescent risk taking even when the probabilities of negative outcomes are known. Developmental Psychology, 50, 1564–1568.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Somerville, L. H., Hare, T., & Casey, B. (2012). Frontostriatal maturation predicts cognitive control failure to appetitive cues in adolescents. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(9), 2123–2134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, L. (2008). A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking. Developmental Review, 28(1), 78–106.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, L., Albert, D., Cauffman, E., Banich, M., Graham, S., & Woolard, J. (2008). Age differences in sensation seeking and impulsivity as indexed by behavior and self-report: evidence for a dual systems model. Developmental Psychology, 44(6), 1764–1778.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, L., & Monahan, K. C. (2007). Age differences in resistance to peer influence. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1531–1543.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Unsworth, N., Heitz, R. P., Schrock, J. C., & Engle, R. W. (2005). An automated version of the operation span task. Behavior Research Methods, 37(3), 498–505.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weicker, J., Villringer, A., & Thöne-Otto, A. (2015). Can impaired working memory functioning be improved by training? A meta-analysis with a special focus on brain injured patients. Neuropsychology, 30(2), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weigard, A., Chein, J., Albert, D., Smith, A., & Steinberg, L. (2014). Effects of anonymous peer observation on adolescents’ preference for immediate rewards. Developmental Science, 17(1), 71–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • West, S. L., & O’Neal, K. K. (2004). Project D.A.R.E. outcome effectiveness revisited. American Journal of Public Health, 94(6), 1027–1029.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wysong, E., & Wright, D. W. (1995). A decade of DARE: efficacy, politics and drug education. Sociological Focus, 28(3), 283–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimring, F. E. (2000). American youth violence. Oxford University Press.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would also like to thank Drs. Susanne Jaeggi and Martin Buschkuehl for the use of their n-back task.

Funding

This work was supported by an R21 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA031436) awarded to JMC and LS.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, USA

    Gail M. Rosenbaum

  2. Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, USA

    Morgan A. Botdorf

  3. Department of Psychology, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, USA

    Jamie L. Patrianakos

  4. Department of Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia, USA

    Laurence Steinberg & Jason M. Chein

Authors
  1. Gail M. Rosenbaum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Morgan A. Botdorf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jamie L. Patrianakos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Laurence Steinberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jason M. Chein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gail M. Rosenbaum.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rosenbaum, G.M., Botdorf, M.A., Patrianakos, J.L. et al. Working Memory Training in Adolescents Decreases Laboratory Risk Taking in the Presence of Peers. J Cogn Enhanc 1, 513–525 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41465-017-0045-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41465-017-0045-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation