Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sequence Learning Enhancement Following Single-Session Meditation Is Dependent on Metacontrol Mode and Experienced Effort

Journal of Cognitive Enhancement Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Cite this article

Abstract

Focused attention (FAM) and open monitoring (OMM) meditation types establish distinct metacontrol states that have immediate effects on how attention allocation strategies are utilised in subsequent, unrelated tasks. Because attention allocation is a central factor in sequential action, the present experiment investigated whether a single-session of FAM and OMM enhanced subsequent sequence performance and learning. Relative to a control listening task, a single session of FAM or OMM resulted in heightened sequence performance without affecting sequence learning on average. However, the level of effort experienced in the meditation conditions was found to significantly correlate with sequence learning indices and post hoc analyses revealed that low effort level in both meditation groups was associated with significantly greater general sequence performance improvements. Interestingly, the degree of sequence-specific learning that brought about these improvements was enhanced only by OMM and only in those reporting low effort level with this meditation type. Thus, only the combination of low effort and OMM established a cognitive control state that was beneficial for the acquisition of complex sequence structures. This work provides further insights into instantaneous effects of FAM and OMM on goal-oriented cognitive function while also raising important questions about the control of mediation-induced states.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahamse, E. L., & Noordzij, M. L. (2011). Designing training programs for perceptual-motor skills: practical implications from the serial reaction time task. European Review of Applied Psychology-Revue Europeenne De Psychologie Appliquee, 61(2), 65–76. doi:10.1016/j.erap.2010.12.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrahamse, E. L., & Verwey, W. B. (2008). Context dependent learning in the serial RT task. Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung, 72(4), 397–404. doi:10.1007/s00426-007-0123-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrahamse, E. L., Jiménez, L., Verwey, W. B., & Clegg, B. A. (2010). Representing serial action and perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(5), 603–623. doi:10.3758/pbr.17.5.603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrahamse, E. L., Ruitenberg, M. F. L., de Kleine, E., & Verwey, W. B. (2013). Control of automated behavior: insights from the discrete sequence production task. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00082

  • Ainsworth, B., Eddershaw, R., Meron, D., Baldwin, D. S., & Garner, M. (2013). The effect of focused attention and open monitoring meditation on attention network function in healthy volunteers. Psychiatry Research, 210(3), 1226–1231. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2013.09.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Amer, T., Campbell, K. L., & Hasher, L. (2016). Cognitive control as a double-edged sword. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(12), 905–915.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baas, M., Nevicka, B., & Ten Velden, F. S. (2014). Specific mindfulness skills differentially predict creative performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(9), 1092–1106. doi:10.1177/0146167214535813.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., Heatherton, T. F., & Tice, D. M. (1994). Losing control: how and why people fail at self-regulation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Tice, D. M. (2007). The strength model of self-control. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(6), 351–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borragan, G., Slama, H., Destrebecqz, A., & Peigneux, P. (2016). Cognitive fatigue facilitates procedural sequence learning. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00086

  • Brashers-Krug, T., Shadmehr, R., & Bizzi, E. (1996). Consolidation in human motor memory. Nature, 382(6588), 252–255. doi:10.1038/382252a0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brefczynski-Lewis, J. A., Lutz, A., Schaefer, H. S., Levinson, D. B., & Davidson, R. J. (2007). Neural correlates of attentional expertise in long-term meditation practitioners. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(27), 11483–11488. doi:10.1073/pnas.0606552104.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, O. L., Presti, D. E., Callistemon, C., Ungerer, Y., Liu, G. B., & Pettigrew, J. D. (2005). Meditation alters perceptual rivalry in Tibetan Buddhist monks. Current Biology, 15(11), R412–R413. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2005.05.043.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, R. W., Immink, M. A., Lushington, K., & Mosewich, A. D. (2016). Stimulus or response based sequence learning is determined by temporal placement of a preceding focused attention meditation. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 38(S), S52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, B. A., DiGirolamo, G. J., & Keele, S. W. (1998). Sequence learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2(8), 275–281. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01202-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Colzato, L. S., Ozturk, A., & Hommel, B. (2012). Meditate to create: the impact of focused-attention and open-monitoring training on convergent and divergent thinking. Frontiers in Psychology, 3. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00116

  • Colzato, L. S., Szapora, A., Lippelt, D. P., & Hommel, B. (2014). Prior meditation practice modulates performance and strategy use in convergent- and divergent-thinking problems. Mindfulness, 1–7. doi:10.1007/s12671-014-0352-9.

  • Colzato, L. S., Sellaro, R., Samara, I., Baas, M., & Hommel, B. (2015a). Meditation-induced states predict attentional control over time. Consciousness and Cognition, 37, 57–62. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2015.08.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Colzato, L. S., Sellaro, R., Samara, I., & Hommel, B. (2015b). Meditation-induced cognitive-control states regulate response-conflict adaptation: evidence from trial-to-trial adjustments in the Simon task. Consciousness and Cognition, 35, 110–114. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2015.04.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Colzato, L. S., van der Wel, P., Sellaro, R., & Hommel, B. (2016). A single bout of meditation biases cognitive control but not attentional focusing: evidence from the global-local task. Consciousness and Cognition, 39, 1–7. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2015.11.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Daltrozzo, J., & Conway, C. M. (2014). Neurocognitive mechanisms of statistical-sequential learning: what do event-related potentials tell us? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00437

  • Delevoye-Turrell, Y. N., & Bobineau, C. (2012). Motor consciousness during intention-based and stimulus-based actions: modulating attention resources through mindfulness meditation. Frontiers in Psychology, 3. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00290

  • Elsner, B., & Hommel, B. (2001). Effect anticipation and action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 27(1), 229–240. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.27.1.229.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Finn, A. S., Lee, T., Kraus, A., & Kam, C. L. H. (2014). When it hurts (and helps) to try: the role of effort in language learning. PloS One, 9(7). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0101806.

  • Foerde, K., Knowlton, B. J., & Poldrack, R. A. (2006). Modulation of competing memory systems by distraction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103(31), 11778–11783. doi:10.1073/pnas.0602659103.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Galea, J. M., Albert, N. B., Ditye, T., & Miall, R. C. (2010). Disruption of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex facilitates the consolidation of procedural skills. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(6), 1158–1164. doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21259.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gallant, S. N. (2016). Mindfulness meditation practice and executive functioning: breaking down the benefit. Consciousness and Cognition, 40, 116–130. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2016.01.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gard, T., Holzel, B. K., & Lazar, S. W. (2014). The potential effects of meditation on age-related cognitive decline: a systematic review. Advances in Meditation Research: Neuroscience and Clinical Applications, 1307, 89–103. doi:10.1111/nyas.12348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, S. B., & Salkind, N. J. (2005). Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh: analyzing and understanding data (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasenkamp, W., Wilson-Mendenhall, C. D., Duncan, E., & Barsalou, L. W. (2012). Mind wandering and attention during focused meditation: a fine-grained temporal analysis of fluctuating cognitive states. NeuroImage, 59(1), 750–760. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hockey, G. R. J. (2011). A motivational control theory of cognitive fatigue. In P. L. Ackerman (Ed.), Cognitive fatigue: multidisciplinary perspectives on current research and future applications (pp. 167–188). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgins, H. S., & Adair, K. C. (2010). Attentional processes and meditation. Consciousness and Cognition, 19(4), 872–878. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2010.04.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, P. C. (2008). Cognitive versus stimulus-response theories of learning. Learning & Behavior, 36(3), 227–241. doi:10.3758/Lb.36.3.227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holzel, B. K., Lazar, S. W., Gard, T., Schuman-Olivier, Z., Vago, D. R., & Ott, U. (2011). How does mindfulness meditation work? Proposing mechanisms of action from a conceptual and neural perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(6), 537–559. doi:10.1177/1745691611419671.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B. (1996). The cognitive representation of action: automatic integration of perceived action effects. Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung, 59(3), 176–186. doi:10.1007/Bf00425832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B. (2000). The prepared reflex: automaticity and control in stimulus-response translation. In M. S. & D. J. (Ed.), Control of cognitive processes: attention and performance (pp. 247–273). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B. (2015). Between persistence and flexibility: the Yin and Yang of action control. Advances in Motivation Science, 2, 33–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Immink, M. A. (2016). Post-training meditation promotes motor memory consolidation. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01698

  • Keele, S. W., Ivry, R., Mayr, U., Hazeltine, E., & Heuer, H. (2003). The cognitive and neural architecture of sequence representation. Psychological Review, 110(2), 316–339. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.110.2.316.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kiesel, A., & Hoffmann, J. (2004). Variable action effects: response control by context-specific effect anticipations. Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung, 68(2–3), 155–162. doi:10.1007/s00426-003-0152-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lippelt, D. P., Hommel, B., & Colzato, L. S. (2014). Focused attention, open monitoring and loving kindness meditation: effects on attention, conflict monitoring, and creativity—a review. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01083

  • Lumma, A. L., Kok, B. E., & Singer, T. (2015). Is meditation always relaxing? Investigating heart rate, heart rate variability, experienced effort and likeability during training of three types of meditation. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 97(1), 38–45. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.04.017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, A., Slagter, H. A., Dunne, J. D., & Davidson, R. J. (2008). Attention regulation and monitoring in meditation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(4), 163–169. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.01.005.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Malinowski, P. (2013). Neural mechanisms of attentional control in mindfulness meditation. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 7. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2013.00008

  • Manna, A., Raffone, A., Perrucci, M. G., Nardo, D., Ferretti, A., Tartaro, A., et al. (2010). Neural correlates of focused attention and cognitive monitoring in meditation. Brain Research Bulletin, 82(1–2), 46–56. doi:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2010.03.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meiran, N., Hommel, B., Bibi, U., & Lev, I. (2002). Consciousness and control in task switching. Consciousness and Cognition, 11(1), 10–33. doi:10.1006/ecog.2001.0521.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49–100. doi:10.1006/cogp.1999.0734.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, A., & Malinowski, P. (2009). Meditation, mindfulness and cognitive flexibility. Consciousness and Cognition, 18(1), 176–186. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2008.12.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, A., Gruber, T., Derose, J., & Malinowski, P. (2012). Regular, brief mindfulness meditation practice improves electrophysiological markers of attentional control. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00018

  • Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning—evidence from performance-measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19(1), 1–32. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(87)90002-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, J., & Johnson, P. (1994). Assessing implicit learning with indirect tests—determining what is learned about sequence structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 20(3), 585–594. doi:10.1037//0278-7393.20.3.585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, E. M. (2007). The serial reaction time task: implicit motor skill learning? Journal of Neuroscience, 27(38), 10073–10075. doi:10.1523/Jneurosci.2747-07.2007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sakai, K., Kitaguchi, K., & Hikosaka, O. (2003). Chunking during human visuomotor sequence learning. Experimental Brain Research, 152(2), 229–242. doi:10.1007/s00221-003-1548-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sakai, K., Hikosaka, O., & Nakamura, K. (2004). Emergence of rhythm during motor learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(12), 547–553. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.10.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information-processing.1. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84(1), 1–66. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.1.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarb, H., & Schumacher, E. H. (2012). Generalized lessons about sequence learning from the study of the serial reaction time task. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 8(2), 165–178. doi:10.5709/acp-0113-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Slagter, H. A., Lutz, A., Greischar, L. L., Francis, A. D., Nieuwenhuis, S., Davis, J. M., & Davidson, R. J. (2007). Mental training affects distribution of limited brain resources. PLoS Biology, 5(6), 1228–1235. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stroop, J. R. (1992). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions (Reprinted from Journal Experimental-Psychology, Vol 18, Pg 643–662, 1935). Journal of Experimental Psychology-General, 121(1), 15–23. Retrieved from <Go to ISI>://WOS:A1992HE76400004

  • Tang, Y. Y., Ma, Y., Wang, J., Fan, Y., Feng, S., Lu, Q., et al. (2007). Short-term meditation training improves attention and self-regulation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(43), 17152–17156. doi:10.1073/pnas.0707678104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, Y. Y., Holzel, B. K., & Posner, M. I. (2015). The neuroscience of mindfulness meditation. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 16(4), 213–U280. doi:10.1038/nrn3916.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tops, M., Boksem, M. A. S., Quirin, M., IJzerman, H., & Koole, S. L. (2014). Internally directed cognition and mindfulness: an integrative perspective derived from predictive and reactive control systems theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00429

  • Tubau, E., Hommel, B., & Lopez-Moliner, J. (2007). Modes of executive control in sequence learning: from stimulus-based to plan-based control. Journal of Experimental Psychology-General, 136(1), 43–63. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.136.1.43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vago, D. R., & Silbersweig, D. A. (2012). Self-awareness, self-regulation, and self-transcendence (S-ART): a framework for understanding the neurobiological mechanisms of mindfulness. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00296

  • Valentine, E. R., & Sweet, P. L. (1999). Meditation and attention: a comparison of the effects of concentrative and mindfulness meditation on sustained attention. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 2(1), 59–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Hurk, P. A. M., Giommi, F., Gielen, S. C., Speckens, A. E. M., & Barendregt, H. P. (2010). Greater efficiency in attentional processing related to mindfulness meditation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(6), 1168–1180. doi:10.1080/17470210903249365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Leeuwen, S., Singer, W., & Melloni, L. (2012). Meditation increases the depth of information processing and improves the allocation of attention in space. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00133

  • Veale, J. F. (2014). Edinburgh handedness inventory—short form: a revised version based on confirmatory factor analysis. Laterality, 19(2), 164–177. doi:10.1080/1357650x.2013.783045.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Willingham, D. B. (1999). Implicit motor sequence learning is not purely perceptual. Memory & Cognition, 27(3), 561–572. doi:10.3758/Bf03211549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeidan, F., Johnson, S. K., Diamond, B. J., David, Z., & Goolkasian, P. (2010). Mindfulness meditation improves cognition: evidence of brief mental training. Consciousness and Cognition, 19(2), 597–605. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2010.03.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Health Sciences & Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia

    Maarten A. Immink

  2. Cognitive Psychology Unit & Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands

    Lorenza S. Colzato, Marije Stolte & Bernhard Hommel

  3. Department of Cognitive Psychology, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany

    Lorenza S. Colzato

  4. Institute for Sports and Sport Science, University of Kassel, Kassel, Germany

    Lorenza S. Colzato

  5. Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Special Education: Cognitive and Motor Disabilities, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Marije Stolte

Authors
  1. Maarten A. Immink
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lorenza S. Colzato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marije Stolte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bernhard Hommel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maarten A. Immink.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Immink, M.A., Colzato, L.S., Stolte, M. et al. Sequence Learning Enhancement Following Single-Session Meditation Is Dependent on Metacontrol Mode and Experienced Effort. J Cogn Enhanc 1, 127–140 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41465-017-0019-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41465-017-0019-2

Keywords

search

Navigation