Schmalenbach Business Review

, Volume 17, Issue 3–4, pp 309–335 | Cite as

Do Affective States Influence Risk Preferences?

Evidence from Incentive-Compatible Experiments
  • Theresa Treffers
  • Philipp D. Koellinger
  • Arnold Picot
Original Article

Abstract

Recent discussions in decision sciences and economics stress the potential impact of affect on decision outcomes. In this study, we conducted incentive-compatible laboratory experiments (N = 253) to investigate whether affect causes temporary fluctuations in risk preferences. In particular, we employed film clips to induce participants into joyful, fearful and sad affective states and subsequently elicited risk preferences by asking the participants to make choices among different lotteries. The financial consequences of the lottery choices varied randomly among the fixed-, low-, and high-stakes treatment groups. We find only weak evidence that affective states influence risk preferences. In particular, we find some evidence that sadness leads to risk aversion, but we find no effects for joy and fear. Our findings question recent claims in the literature that the relationship between affect and risk preferences is strong and unambiguous.

Keywords

Affect Risk preferences Incentive-compatible Laboratory experiments Financial stakes 

JEL-Classification

D03 D81 C91 

References

  1. Allen, N.B., and P.B.T. Badcock. 2003. The social risk hypothesis of depressed mood: evolutionary, psychosocial, and neurobiological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin 129:887–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen, S., G.W. Harrison, M.I. Lau, and E.E. Rutstroem. 2006. Elicitation using multiple price list formats. Experimental Economics 9:383–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, C.J. 2003. The psychology of doing nothing: forms of decision avoidance result from reason and emotion. Psychological Bulletin 129:139–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ashenfelter, O., C. Harmon, and H. Oosterbeek. 1999. A review of estimates of the schooling/earnings relationship, with tests for publication bias. Labour Economics 6:453–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baillon, A., P.D. Koellinger, and T. Treffers. 2014. Sadder but wiser: the effects of affective states and weather on ambiguity attitudes. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2418946. Accessed 1 December 2015.Google Scholar
  6. Blavatskyy, P.R. 2009. Betting on own knowledge: experimental test of overconfidence. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 38:39–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Botzen, W.J.W., J. de Boer, and T. Terpstra. 2013. Framing of risk and preferences for annual and multi-year flood insurance. Journal of Economic Psychology 39:357–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Callen, M., M. Isaqzadeh, J.D. Long, and C. Sprenger. 2014. Violence and risk preference: experimental evidence from Afghanistan. American Economic Review 104:123–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Camerer, C.F., and R.M. Hogarth. 1999. The effects of financial incentives in experiments: a review and capital-labor-production framework. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 19:7–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cameron, L., and M. Shah. 2012. Risk-taking behavior in the wake of natural disasters. http://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/62540/1/721216366.pdf. Accessed 1 December 2015.Google Scholar
  11. Carver, C.S., and E. Harmon-Jones. 2009. Anger is an approach-related affect: evidence and implications. Psychological Bulletin 135:183–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chiles, T.H., and J.F. McMackin. 1996. Integrating variable risk preferences, trust, and transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review 21:73–99.Google Scholar
  13. Chow, G.C. 1960. Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions. Econometrica 28:591–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  15. Cohn, A., J. Engelmann, E. Fehr, and M.A. Maréchal. 2015. Evidence for countercyclical risk aversion: an experiment with financial professionals. American Economic Review 105(2):860–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Conte, A., M.V. Levati, and C. Nardi. 2013. Risk preferences and the role of emotions. https://papers.econ.mpg.de/esi/discussionpapers/2013-046.pdf. Accessed 1 December 2015.Google Scholar
  17. Croson, R., and U. Gneezy. 2009. Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature 47:448–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Davidson, R. 1994. On emotion, mood, and related affective constructs. In The nature of emotion: fundamental questions, ed. P. Ekman, R. Davidson, 51–55. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Dickersin, K., and Y.I. Min. 1993. Publication bias: the problem that won’t go away. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 703:135–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dohmen, T., A. Falk, D. Huffman, U. Sunde, J. Schupp, and G.G. Wagner. 2011. Individual risk attitudes: measurement, determinants, and behavioral consequences. Journal of the European Economic Association 9:522–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Eckel, C.C., M.A. El-Gamal, and R.K. Wilson. 2009. Risk loving after the storm: a Bayesian-network study of Hurricane Katrina evacuees. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 69:110–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ekman, P. 1992. An argument for basic emotions. Cognition & Emotion 6:169–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Erdfelder, E., F. Faul, and A. Buchner. 1996. GPOWER: a general power analysis program. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, & Computer 28:1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fehr-Duda, H., T. Epper, A. Bruhin, and R. Schubert. 2011. Risk and rationality: the effects of mood and decision rules on probability weighting. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 78:14–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Finucane, M.L., A. Alhakami, P. Slovic, and S.M. Johnson. 2000. The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 13:1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fischbacher, U. 2007. z‑Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experimental Economics 10:171–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fischer, P., T. Greitemeyer, A. Kastenmüller, C. Vogrincic, and A. Sauer. 2011. The effects of risk-glorifying media exposure on risk-positive cognitions, emotions, and behaviors: a meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin 137:367–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Forgas, J.P. 1995. Mood and judgment: the affect infusion model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin 117:39–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fredrickson, B. 2002. Positive emotions. In Handbook of positive psychology, ed. C. Snyder, S. Lopez, 120–134. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Gerrards-Hesse, A., K. Spies, and F.W. Hesse. 1994. Experimental inductions of emotional states and their effectiveness: a review. British Journal of Psychology 85:55–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Goeree, J.K., C.A. Holt, and T.R. Palfrey. 2003. Risk averse behavior in generalized matching pennies games. Games & Economic Behavior 45:97–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Göritz, A.S., and K. Moser. 2006. Web-based mood induction. Cognition & Emotion 20:887–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gosling, S.D., P.J. Rentfrow, and W.B. Swann Jr.. 2003. A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality 37:504–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Grable, J.E., and M.J. Roszkowski. 2008. The influence of mood on the willingness to take financial risks. Journal of Risk Research 11:905–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gray, E., and D. Watson. 2001. Emotion, mood, and temperament: similarities, differences and a synthesis. In Emotions at work: theory, research and applications in management, ed. R. Payne, C. Cooper, 21–34. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  36. Greiner, B. 2004. The online recruitment system ORSEE – a guide for the organization of experiments in economics. In Forschung und wissenschaftliches Rechnen 2003. GWDG Bericht 63, ed. K. Kremer, V. Macho, 79–93. Göttingen: Gesellschaft für Wissenschaftliche Datenverarbeitung. Research and scientific computation 2003. GWDG report 63.Google Scholar
  37. Gross, J.J., and R.W. Levenson. 1995. Emotion elicitation using films. Cognition & Emotion 9:87–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Guiso, L., P. Sapienza, and L. Zingales. 2013. Time varying risk aversion. http://www.kellogg.northwestern.edu/faculty/sapienza/htm/risk_aversion.pdf. Accessed 1 December 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gujarati, D. 1970. Use of dummy variables in testing for equality between sets of coefficients in linear regressions: a generalization. American Statistician 24:18–22.Google Scholar
  40. Harmon-Jones, E. 2003. Anger and the behavioral approach system. Personality & Individual Differences 35:995–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Harrison, G.W., M.I. Lau, and E.E. Rutstroem. 2009. Risk attitudes, randomization to treatment, and self-selection into experiments. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 70:498–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Haushofer, J., and E. Fehr. 2014. On the psychology of poverty. Science 344:862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Heilman, R.M., L.G. Crişan, D. Houser, M. Miclea, and A.C. Miu. 2010. Emotion regulation and decision making under risk and uncertainty. Emotion 10:257–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hewig, J., D. Hagemann, J. Seifert, M. Gollwitzer, E. Naumann, and D. Bartussek. 2005. A revised film set for the induction of basic emotions. Cognition & Emotion 19:1095–1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hey, J. 2001. Does repetition improve consistency? Experimental Economics 4:5–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hirshleifer, D., and T. Shumway. 2003. Good day sunshine: stock returns and the weather. Journal of Finance 58:1009–1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hockey, G.R.J., A.J. Maule, P.J. Clough, and L. Bdzola. 2000. Effects of negative mood states on risk in everyday decision making. Cognition & Emotion 14:823–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Holt, C.A., and S.K. Laury. 2002. Risk aversion and incentive effects. American Economic Review 92:1644–1655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ifcher, J., and H. Zarghamee. 2011. Happiness and time preference: the effect of positive affect in a random-assignment experiment. American Economic Review 101:3109–3129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ioannidis, J.P. 2005. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine 2:e124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ioannidis, J.P. 2008. Why most discovered true associations are inflated. Epidemiology 19(5):640–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Isen, A.M. 2000. Positive affect and decision making. In Handbook of emotion, ed. M. Lewis, J.M. Haviland-Jones, 417–435. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  53. Isen, A.M., and R. Patrick. 1983. The effect of positive feelings on risk taking: when the chips are down. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 31:194–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Johansson-Stenman, O. 2010. Risk aversion and expected utility of consumption over time. Games & Economic Behavior 68:208–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kamstra, M.J., L.A. Kramer, and M.D. Levi. 2000. Losing sleep at the market: the daylight saving anomaly. American Economic Review 90:1005–1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kamstra, M.J., L.A. Kramer, and M.D. Levi. 2003. Winter blues: a SAD stock market cycle. American Economic Review 93:324–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kim, M.Y., and R. Kanfer. 2009. The joint influence of mood and a cognitively demanding task on risk-taking. Motivation & Emotion 33:362–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kliger, D., and O. Levy. 2003. Mood-induced variation in risk preferences. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 52:573–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kugler, T., T. Connolly, and L.A. Ordóñez. 2012. Emotion, decision, and risk: betting on gambles versus betting on people. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 25:123–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Landis, R.S., L.R. James, C.E. Lance, C.A. Pierce, and S.G. Rogelberg. 2014. When is nothing something? Editorial for the null results special issue of journal of business and psychology. Journal of Business & Psychology 29:163–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Leith, K.P., and R.F. Baumeister. 1996. Why do bad moods increase self-defeating behavior? Emotion, risk tasking, and self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71:1250–1267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Lerner, J.S., and D. Keltner. 2000. Beyond valence: toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgement and choice. Cognition & Emotion 14:473–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Lerner, J.S., and D. Keltner. 2001. Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81:146–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Lerner, J.S., D.A. Small, and G. Loewenstein. 2004. Heart strings and purse strings carryover effects of emotions on economic decisions. Psychological Science 15:337–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Levy, O., and I. Galili. 2008. Stock purchase and the weather: individual differences. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 67:755–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Levy, Y., and J. Yagil. 2011. Air pollution and stock returns in the US. Journal of Economic Psychology 32:374–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Lin, S., T. Odean, and E.B. Andrade. 2012. Bubbling with excitement: an experiment. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2024549. Accessed 1 December 2015.Google Scholar
  68. Loewenstein, G.F., E.U. Weber, C.K. Hsee, and N. Welch. 2001. Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin 127:267–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Mukherjee, K. 2010. A dual system model of preferences under risk. Psychological Review 177:243–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Open Science Collaboration. 2015. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science 349(6251):aac4716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Pham, M.T. 2004. The logic of feeling. Journal of Consumer Psychology 14:360–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Pham, M.T. 2007. Emotion and rationality: a critical review and interpretation of empirical evidence. Review of General Psychology 11:155–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Raghunathan, R., and M.T. Pham. 1999. All negative moods are not equal: motivational influences of anxiety and sadness on decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 79:56–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Rietveld, C.A., et al, 2014. Common genetic variants associated with cognitive performance identified using the proxy-phenotype method. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111(38):13790–13794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Saunders Jr., E.M. 1993. Stock prices and Wall Street weather. American Economic Review 83:1337–1345.Google Scholar
  76. Scherer, K.R. 2005. What are emotions? And how can they be measured? Social Science Information 44:695–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Schwarz, N., and G.L. Clore. 1983. Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45:513–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Shu, H.C. 2010. Investor mood and financial markets. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 76:267–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. De Silva, D.G., R.A.J. Pownall, and L. Wolk. 2012. Does the sun ‘shine’on art prices? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 82:167–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Smith, V.L. 1982. Microeconomic systems as an experimental science. American Economic Review 72:923–955.Google Scholar
  81. Stanton, A.L., S.B. Kirk, C.L. Cameron, and S. Danoff-Burg. 2000. Coping through emotional approach: scale construction and validation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78:1150–1169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Stigler, G.J., and G.S. Becker. 1977. De gustibus non est disputandum. American Economic Review 67:76–90.Google Scholar
  83. Sunstein, C.R. 2003. Terrorism and probability neglect. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 26:121–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Verheyen, C., and A.S. Göritz. 2009. Plain texts as an online mood-induction procedure. Social Psychology 40:6–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Viscusi, W.K. 2009. Valuing risks of death from terrorism and natural disasters. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 38:191–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Voors, M.J., E.E.M. Nillesen, P. Verwimp, E.H. Bulte, R. Lensink, and D.P. Van Soest. 2012. Violent conflict and behavior: a field experiment in Burundi. American Economic Review 102:941–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Watson, D., and L.A. Clark. 1994. The PANAS-X: manual for the positive and negative affect schedule – expanded form. Iowa City: University of Iowa.Google Scholar
  88. Watson, D., L.A. Clark, and A. Tellegen. 1988. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54:1063–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Weber, E.U., A. Blais, and N.E. Betz. 2002. A domain-specific risk-attitude scale: measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 15:263–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Wegener, D.T., and R.E. Petty. 1994. Mood management across affective states: the hedonic contingency hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66:1034–1048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Westermann, R., K. Spies, G. Stahl, and F.W. Hesse. 1996. Relative effectiveness and validity of mood induction procedures: a meta-analysis. European Journal of Social Psychology 26:557–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Yuan, K., L. Zheng, and Q. Zhu. 2006. Are investors moonstruck? Lunar phases and stock returns. Journal of Empirical Finance 13:1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft für Betriebswirtschaft e.V. (SG) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Theresa Treffers
    • 1
  • Philipp D. Koellinger
    • 2
    • 3
  • Arnold Picot
    • 4
  1. 1.Private University Seeburg CastleSeekirchen am WallerseeAustria
  2. 2.Department of Complex Trait GeneticsFree University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Institute for Behavior and Biology (EURIBEB)Erasmus University RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Research Center for Information, Organisation and Management, Munich School of ManagementLudwig-Maximilians-UniversitätMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations