Skip to main content

Dignity and the Process of Social Innovation: Lessons from Social Entrepreneurship and Transformative Services for Humanistic Management

Abstract

In this paper we advance inquiry into human dignity in relation to the theory and practice of social entrepreneurship and innovation in a two-fold manner. First, we explore how concepts from the literatures of human dignity and humanistic management can inform and enrich social entrepreneurship and innovation. Second, we examine case studies of social entrepreneurship and innovation to refine how we think about and operationalize notions of human dignity. In this way, we connect human dignity research more closely to alternative life-conducive forms of organizing. Our goals are to advance an understanding of human dignity and to make this concept more accessible and relevant in business and management, as well as to explore how the practice of social entrepreneurship and innovation can both enrich and be enriched by the notion of human dignity. Third, we draw on the emerging literature of humanistic management to generate a classification system in the context of social innovation that specifies how organizing can contribute to dignity restoration, dignity protection, and dignity promotion. We elaborate and showcase paradigmatic cases, probe the limits of these cases for future research, and consider how to extend this dignity organizing model to other modes of business practice, such as the notion of value creation. Fourth, we outline an emerging research agenda for those interested in connecting innovation and organizing practices writ large with the notion of human dignity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/

References

  1. Anderson, Laurel, Amy L. Ostrom, Canan Corus, Raymond P. Fisk, Andrew S. Gallan, Mario Giraldo, Martin Mende, Mark Mulder, Steven W. Rayburn, Mark S. Rosenbaum, Kunio Shirahada, and Jerome D. Williams. 2013. Transformative service research: An agenda for the future. Journal of Business Research 66 (8): 1203–1210.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andreski, Stanislav. 1983. Max Weber on capitalism, bureaucracy, and religion: A selection of texts. London: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arkow, Phil. 2015. Animal-assisted therapy and activities: A study and research resource guide for the use of companion animals in animal-assisted interventions. Stratford: Phil Arkow.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bailliet, Cecilia. 2006. Responsibilities of the destination country. Forced Migration Review 25: 28–30.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Beyleveld, David, and Roger Brownsword. 2002. Human dignity in bioethics and biolaw. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brown, Peter G., and Jeremy J. Schmidt. 2014. Living in the Anthropocene: Business as usual, or compassionate retreat? In State of the World. Worldwatch Institute, 63–71. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Business Roundtable. 2019. Business Roundtable redefines the purpose of a corporation to promote ‘an economy that serves all Americans’. Business Roundtable. https://www.businessroundtable.org/business-roundtable-redefines-the-purpose-of-a-corporation-to-promote-an-economy-that-serves-all-americans

  8. Chowdhury, Imran, and Filipe Santos. 2010. Scaling social innovations: The case of gram Vikas. In Scaling social impact, ed. Edward Skloot and Paul N. Bloom, 147–166. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Comunidades de la Tierra. 2019. Dónde trabajamos. http://www.comunidadesdelatierra.org/comunidades.php. Accessed 23 Jan 2019.

  10. Dees, J. Gregory. 1998. The meaning of social entrepreneurship. https://entrepreneurship.duke.edu/news-item/the-meaning-of-social-entrepreneurship/. Accessed 7 July 2019.

  11. Dierksmeier, Claus. 2011. Reorienting management education: From the Homo Economicus to human dignity. Humanistic Management Network, No. 13-05. Available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=1766183.

  12. Dierksmeier, Claus. 2015. Human dignity and the business of business. Human Systems Management 34 (1): 33–42.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Donaldson, T., and J.P. Walsh. 2015. Toward a theory of business. Research in Organizational Behavior 35: 181–207.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dunham, L.C. 2010. From Rational to Wise Action: Recasting Our Theoriesof Entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 92 (4): 513–530.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Edwards-Schachter, M., and M.L. Wallace. 2017. ‘Shaken, but not stirred’: Sixty years of defining social innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 119: 64–79.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Erhard, Werner H., Michael C. Jensen, and Steve Zaffron. 2009. Integrity: A positive model that incorporates the normative phenomena of morality, Ethics and Legality. Harvard Business School NOM Working Paper. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1542759. Accessed 20 June 2019.

  17. Etzioni, Amitai. 1987. Entrepreneurship, adaptation and legitimation: A macro-behavioral perspective. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 8 (2): 175–189.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Evan, William M., and R. Edward Freeman. 1988. A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian capitalism. In Ethical theory and business, ed. T. Beauchamp and N.E. Bowie. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fisk, Raymond P., Alison M. Dean, Linda Alkire, Alison Joubert, Josephine Previte, Nichola Robertson, and Mark Scott Rosenbaum. 2018. Design for service inclusion: Creating inclusive service systems by 2050. Journal of Service Management 29 (5): 834–858.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fisscher, Olaf, David Frenkel, Yotam Lurie, and Andre Nijhof. 2005. Stretching the frontiers: Exploring the relationships between entrepreneurship and ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 60 (3): 207–209.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Forschner, Maximilian. 1981. Die stoische Ethik : über den Zusammenhang von Natur-, Sprach- und Moralphilosophie im altstoischen System. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Forschner, Maximilian. 2011. Stoic humanism. In Humanistic ethics in the age of globality, ed. Claus Dierksmeier, Wolfgang Amann, Ernst Von Kimakowitz, Heiko Spitzeck, and Michael Pirson, 49–59. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Foster, Charles. 2011. Human dignity in bioethics and law. Sydney: Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Francis, Pope. 2015. Apostolic Exhortation, Evangelii Gaudium, of the Holy Father Francis to the bishops, clergy, consecrated persons and the lay faithful, on the proclamation of the Gospel in today’s world. http://w2.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/apost_exhortations/documents/papa-francesco_esortazione-ap_20131124_evangelii-gaudium.html. Accessed 20 June 2019.

  25. Freeman, R. Edward. 1984. Strategic management- a stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Freeman, R. Edward, Andrew C. Wicks, and Bidhan Parmar. 2004. Stakeholder theory and the corporate objective revisited. Organization Science 15 (3): 364–369.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Fromm, Erich. 2001. The sane society. London: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Goffman, Erving. 1963. Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hargrave, Timothy J., and Andrew H. Van de Ven. 2006. A collective action model of institutional innovation. Academy of Management Review 31 (4): 864–888.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Haslam, Nick. 2006. Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review 10 (3): 252–264.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hayek, Friedrich. 1970. Constitution of liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  32. HeatWatch. 2015. Human trafficking hides in plain sight. http://www.heatwatch.org/. Accessed 21 May 2019.

  33. Henrich, Joseph, Robert Boyd, Samuel Bowles, Colin Camerer, Ernst Fehr, Herbert Gintis, and Richard McElreath. 2001. In search of homo economicus: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. American Economic Review 91 (2): 73–78.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hicks, Donna. 2011. Dignity - Its essential role in resolving conflict. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hicks, Donna. 2018. Leading with dignity: How to create a culture that brings out the best in people. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Hodson, Randy. 2001. Dignity at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Holloway, Carson. 2008. Magnanimity and statesmanship. Blue Ridge Summit: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  38. International Labour Conference. 2019. Universal social protection for human dignity, social justice and sustainable development. https://www.ioe-emp.org/index.php?eID=dumpFile&t=f&f=135215&token=ecc1ca47192773b765270924a983802f89a2365b. Accessed 10 July 2019.

  39. Irvine, Leslie. 2013. My dog always eats first: Homeless people and their animals. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Jensen, Michael C., and William H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3 (4): 305–360.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Jensen, Michael C., and William H. Meckling. 1994. The nature of man. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 7 (2): 4–19.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kant, Immanuel.1785. Groundwork of the metaphysic of morals. Koenigsberg.

  43. Kateb, George. 2011. Human dignity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Korten, David. 2007. The great turning: From empire to earth community. Oakland: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Korten, David. 2018. From a theory of the firm to a theory of community. https://davidkorten.org/theory-firm-theory-community/. Accessed 1 July 2019.

  46. Kostera, Monika, and Michael Pirson. 2016. Dignity and organization. Palgrave McMillan: New York/London.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Lawrence, Paul R., and Michael Pirson. 2015. Economistic and humanistic narratives of leadership in the age of globality: Toward a renewed Darwinian theory of leadership. Journal of Business Ethics 128 (2): 383–394.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Lichtenstein, Benyamin B. 2009. Eight leverage points for sustainability entrepreneuring. Working paper presented at the Satter Conference for Social Entrepreneurship, New York University.

  49. Loomba, Arvinder P.S. 2017. Reconstructing lives: Transformative services for human trafficking survivors. Journal of Services Marketing 31 (4/5): 373–384.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Loomba, Arvinder P. S. and Kokhanovski, Elena. 2013. Restore humanity: project management's role in fighting human trafficking. https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/human-trafficking-project-management-5849. Accessed 22 Feb 2019.

  51. Lovins, L. Hunter. 2016. Needed: A better story. Humanistic Management Journal 1 (1): 75–90.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Martin, Roger L., and Sally Osberg. 2007. Social entrepreneurship: The case for definition. Stanford Social Innovation Review 5 (Spring): 29–38.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Maslow, Abraham H. 1954. Motivation and personality. New York: Harper & Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  54. McCloskey, Deirdre. 2010. Bourgeois dignity: Why economics can’t explain the modern world. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  55. McCrudden, Christopher. 2013a. In pursuit of human dignity: An introduction to current debates. In Understanding human dignity, ed. Christopher McCrudden, 1–15. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  56. McCrudden, Christopher. 2013b. Understanding human dignity. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  57. McDermott, John Joseph. 1977. The writings of William James. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Melé, Domènec. 2003. The challenge of humanistic management. Journal of Business Ethics 44 (1): 77–88.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Melé, Domènec. 2009. Current trends of humanism in business. In Humanism in business: Perspectives on the development of a responsible business society, ed. H. Spitzeck, M. Pirson, W. Amann, S. Khan, and E. von Kimakowitz, 170–184. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Milczarczyk, Aneta. 2017. Dignity restoration: The indirect goal of social enterprises’ activity. In Dignity and the organization, ed. M. Kostera and M. Pirson, 125–148. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Mulgan, Geoff, Simon Tucker, Rushanara Ali, and Ben Sanders. 2007. Social innovation: What it is, why it matters and how it can be accelerated. Skoll Centre for Social Entrepreneurship, Working paper. Said Business School, Oxford University.

  62. Murphy, Patrick J., and Susan M. Coombes. 2009. A model of social entrepreneurial discovery. Journal of Business Ethics 87 (3): 325–336.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Nicholls, Alex. 2006. Social entrepreneurship: New models of sustainable social change. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Nida-Rümelin, Julian. 2009. Philosophical grounds of humanism in economics. In Humanism in business: Perspectives on the development of a responsible business society, ed. Heiko Spitzeck, Michael Pirson, Wolfgang Amman, Shiban Khan, and Ernst von Kimakowitz, 15–25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Nussbaum, Martha. 1993. Non-relative virtues: An Aristotelian approach. In The quality of life, ed. Martha Nussbaum and Amartya Sen. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Nussbaum, M.C. (1995). Objectification. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 24 (4); 249–291

  67. Nussbaum, Martha. 1998. Political animals: Luck, love and dignity. Metaphilosophy 29 (4): 273–287.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Nussbaum, Martha. 2003. Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice. Feminist Economics 9 (2–3): 33–59.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Nussbaum, Martha. 2011. Creating capabilities – The human development approach. Belknap: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Payne, Dinah, and Brenda E. Joyner. 2006. Successful U.S. entrepreneurs: Identifying ethical decision making and social responsibility behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics 65 (3): 203–217.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Phills, J.A., K. Deiglmeier, and D.T. Miller. 2008. Rediscovering social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review 6 (43): 34–43.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Pickup, Francine. 1998. More words but no action? Forced migration and trafficking of women. Gender and Development 6 (1): 44–51.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Pirson, Michael. 2017. Humanistic management-protecting dignity and promoting well being. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Pirson, M.A., and Dierksmeier, C. 2014. Reconnecting management theory and social welfare: A humanistic perspective. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2014 (1): 12245.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Pirson, M.A. and Lawrence, P.R. (2010). Journal of Business Ethics, 93: 553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0239-1

    Google Scholar 

  76. Pirson, Michael, and Paul R. Lawrence. 2010. Humanism in business–towards a paradigm shift? Journal of Business Ethics 93 (4): 553–565.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Pirson, Michael, and Erica Steckler. 2019. A humanistic ontology for responsible management. In Business and society 360, Volume 3, ed. David M. Wasieleski and James Weber, 295–322. Bingley: Emerald Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Pirson, Michael, Claus Dierksmeier, and Kenneth Goodpaster. 2014. Human dignity and business. Business Ethics Quarterly 24 (3): 501–503.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Pirson, Michael, Kenneth Goodpaster, and Claus Dierksmeier. 2016. Guest editors’ introduction: Human dignity and business. Business Ethics Quarterly 26 (4): 465–478.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Pless, Nicola M., and Jenny Appel. 2012. In pursuit of dignity and social justice: Changing lives through 100% inclusion - how gram Vikas fosters sustainable rural development. Journal of Business Ethics 111 (3): 389–411.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Pol, E., and S. Ville. 2009. Social innovation: Buzz word or enduring term? The Journal of Socio-Economics 38: 878–885.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Polanyi, Karl. 1957. The great transformation. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Rader, Meryl. 2017. LifeStraw’s Safe Water Fund provides Puerto Ricans with access to safe water filters and purifiers. https://www.vestergaard.com/press-releases/item/lifestraw. Accessed 26 June 2019.

  84. Rogers, Carl Ransom. 1995. On becoming a person: A therapist's view of psychotherapy. Boston: Houghton Muffin.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Romo, Raphael. 2015. Human trafficking survivor: I was raped 43,200 times. http://www.cnn.com/2015/11/10/americas/freedom-project-mexicotrafficking-survivor/. Accessed 12 Mar 2019.

  86. Rosen, Michael. 2012. Dignity: Its history and meaning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Rosenbaum, Mark S., Canan Corus, Amy L. Ostrom, Laurel Anderson, Raymond P. Fisk, Andrew S. Gallan, Mario Giraldo, Martin Mende, Mark Mulder, Steven W. Rayburn, Kunio Shirahada, and Jerome D. Williams. 2011. Conceptualization and aspirations of transformative service research. Journal of Research for Consumers 19: 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Rosenthal, Caitlin. 2014. From slavery to scientific management. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Santos, Filipe M. 2012. A positive theory of social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics 111 (3): 335–351.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Scadron, Jessica. 2018. How one bay area politician uses social innovation to fight human trafficking. http://www.socialharmony.co/news/da-nancy-omalley-uses-innovation-fight-human-trafficking/. Accessed 23 Feb 2019.

  91. Scruton, Roger. 1999. The aesthetics of music. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Seligman, Martin E.P. 2002. Authentic happiness. Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential to lasting fulfillment. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Sen, Amartya. 2001. Development as freedom. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Solymossy, Emeric, and John K. Masters. 2002. Ethics through an entrepreneurial lens: Theory and observation. Journal of Business Ethics 38 (3): 227–240.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Spitzeck, H., Pirson, M., Amann, W., Khan, S., and Von Kimakowitz, E. (Eds.). (2009). Humanism in Business. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808395

    Google Scholar 

  96. Steckler, Erica L., and Jean M. Bartunek. 2012. Revealing themes: Applying a positive lens to the chapters on change agency. In Using a positive lens to explore social change and organizations, ed. Karen Golden-Biddle and Jane E. Dutton, 135–150. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Steckler, Erica L., and Sandra Waddock. 2018. Self-sustaining practices of successful social change agents: A retreats framework for supporting transformational change. Humanistic Management Journal 2 (2): 171–198.

    Google Scholar 

  98. The Economist. 2015. The business of business: An old debate about what companies are for has been revived. https://www.economist.com/business/2015/03/19/the-business-of-business. Accessed 19 May 2019.

  99. UNICEF. 2009. UNICEF and WHO launch report on diarrhea, the second greatest killer of children. https://www.unicef.org/media/media_51407.html. Accessed 2 May 2019.

  100. United Nations. 1948. Universal declaration of human rights. United Nations. https://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/

  101. United Nations. 2001. Access to safe water fundamental human need, basic human right, says Secretary-General in message on World Water Day. https://www.un.org/press/en/2001/sgsm7738.doc.htm. Accessed 22 Apr 2019.

  102. USA Department of State. 2014. 2014 trafficking in persons report. https://2009-2017.state.gov/j/tip/rls/tiprpt/2014/. Accessed 21 Apr 2019.

  103. USA Department of State. 2018. 2018 trafficking in persons report. https://www.state.gov/reports/2018-trafficking-in-persons-report/. Accessed 22 Apr 2019.

  104. Vestergaard. 2014. LifeStraw by Vestergaard. https://www.vestergaard.com/our-products/lifestraw. Accessed 22 Apr 2019.

  105. Vogel, David. 2005. The market for virtue: The potential and limits of corporate social responsibility. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  106. Waddock, Sandra. 2014. Presentation at academy of management, words rarely used in management theory. Paper presented at the Academy of Management, Philadelphia.

  107. Waddock, Sandra, and James E. Post. 1995. Catalytic alliances for social problem solving. Human Relations 48 (8): 951–973.

    Google Scholar 

  108. Waddock, Sandra, and Erica Steckler. 2016. Visionaries and wayfinders: Deliberate and emergent pathways to vision in social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics 133 (4): 719–734.

    Google Scholar 

  109. Waldron, J. 2013. Citizenship and Dignity. Understanding Human Dignity. C. McCrudden, Oxford University Press

  110. Waldron, J., and Dan-Cohen, M. 2012. Dignity, rank, and rights. Oxford University Press

  111. Weber, M. and S. Andreski 1983. Max Weber on capitalism, bureaucracy, and religion : a selection of texts. London: Routledge.

  112. World Economic Forum. 2015. What is a social entrepreneur. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2015/12/explainer-what-is-a-social-entrepreneur/

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mario Vázquez-Maguirre.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pirson, M., Vázquez-Maguirre, M., Corus, C. et al. Dignity and the Process of Social Innovation: Lessons from Social Entrepreneurship and Transformative Services for Humanistic Management. Humanist Manag J 4, 125–153 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41463-019-00071-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Dignity
  • Social Innovation
  • Social Entrepreneurship
  • Transformative Services
  • Social Enterprises