Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Hybrid windowed networks for on-the-fly Doppler broadening in RMC code

  • Published:
Nuclear Science and Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

On-the-fly Doppler broadening of cross sections is important in Monte Carlo simulations, particularly in Monte Carlo neutronics-thermal hydraulics coupling simulations. Methods such as Target Motion Sampling (TMS) and windowed multipole as well as a method based on regression models have been developed to solve this problem. However, these methods have limitations such as the need for a cross section in an ACE format at a given temperature or a limited application energy range. In this study, a new on-the-fly Doppler broadening method based on a Back Propagation (BP) neural network, called hybrid windowed networks (HWN), is proposed to resolve the resonance energy range. In the HWN method, the resolved resonance energy range is divided into windows to guarantee an even distribution of resonance peaks. BP networks with specially designed structures and training parameters are trained to evaluate the cross section at a base temperature and the broadening coefficient. The HWN method is implemented in the Reactor Monte Carlo (RMC) code, and the microscopic cross sections and macroscopic results are compared. The results show that the HWN method can reduce the memory requirement for cross-sectional data by approximately 65%; moreover, it can generate keff, power distribution, and energy spectrum results with acceptable accuracy and a limited increase in the calculation time. The feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed HWN method are thus demonstrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. B. Forget, S. Xu, K. Smith, Direct Doppler broadening in Monte Carlo simulations using the multipole representation. Ann. Nucl. Energy 64, 78–85 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2013.09.043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. K. Wang, S. Liu, Z. Li et al., Analysis of BEAVRS two-cycle benchmark using RMC based on full core detailed model. Prog. Nucl. Energ. 98, 301–312 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2017.04.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. T. Viitanen, J. Leppänen, Effect of the target motion sampling temperature treatment method on the statistics and performance. Ann. Nucl. Energy 82, 217–225 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2014.08.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J. Leppänen, M. Pusa, T. Viitanen et al., The serpent Monte Carlo code: status, development and applications in 2013. Ann. Nucl. Energy 82, 142–150 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2014.08.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. C. Josey, B. Forget, K. Smith. Efficiency and accuracy evaluation of the windowed multipole direct Doppler baradening method.in PHYSOR 2014, The Westin Miyako, Kyoto, Japan (2014).

  6. G. Yesilyurt, W.R. Martin, F.B. Brown et al., On-the-fly Doppler broadening for Monte Carlo Codes. Nucl. Sci. Eng. 171, 239–257 (2012). https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE11-67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J.A. Walsh, B. Forget, K.S. Smith et al., On-the-fly Doppler broadening of unresolved resonance region cross sections. Prog. Nucl. Energy 101, 444–460 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2017.05.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. A.T. Pavlou, W. Ji, On-the-fly sampling of temperature-dependent thermal neutron scattering data for Monte Carlo simulations. Ann. Nucl. Energy 71, 411–426 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2014.04.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. S. Liu, Y. Yuan, J. Yu et al., Development of on-the-fly temperature-dependent cross sections treatment in RMC code. Ann. Nucl. Energy 94, 144–149 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2016.02.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. S. Liu, X. Peng, C. Josey et al., Generation of the windowed multipole resonance data using vector fitting technique. Ann. Nucl. Energy 112, 30–41 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2017.09.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. X. Liu, L. Deng, Z. Hu et al., Study of on-the-fly Doppler broadening in JMCT program. Acta Phys. Sin. 65, 42–47 (2016). https://doi.org/10.7498/aps.65.092501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. E.R. Caianiello, Mathematical theory of neural networks. IFAC Proc. Vol. 2, 395–397 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-6670(17)68880-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. F. Cao, K. Yao, J. Liang, Deconvolutional neural network for image super-resolution. Neural Netw. 132, 394–404 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2020.09.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. H. Heo, B. So, I. Yang et al., Automated recovery of damaged audio files using deep neural networks. Digit. Invest. 30, 117–126 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diin.2019.07.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Y. Li, J. Li, J. Huang et al., Fitting analysis and research of measured data of SAW micro-pressure sensor based on BP neural network. Measurement 155, 107533 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2020.107533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. S. Zare, M. Ayati, Simultaneous fault diagnosis of wind turbine using multichannel convolutional neural networks. ISA Trans. 108, 230–239 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2020.08.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. R. Pahič, B. Ridge, A. Gams et al., Training of deep neural networks for the generation of dynamic movement primitives. Neural Netw. 127, 121–131 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2020.04.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. D.E. Rumelhart, G.E. Hinton, R.J. Williams, Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature 323, 533–536 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1038/323533a0

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. P.S. Kumar, H.S. Behera, K.K. Anisha et al., Advancement from neural networks to deep learning in software effort estimation: perspective of two decades. Comp. Sci. Rev. 38, 100288 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2020.100288

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. K. Wang, Z. Li, D. She et al., RMC – A Monte Carlo code for reactor core analysis. Ann. Nucl. Energy 82, 121–129 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2014.08.048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. R.E. MacFarlane, A.C. Kahler, Methods for processing ENDF/B-VII with NJOY. Nucl. Data Sheets 111, 2739–2890 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2010.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Data collection and analysis were performed by Tian-Yi Huang and Ze-Guang Li. The programming and tests are strongly supported by Kan Wang, Xiao-Yu Guo and Jin-Gang Liang. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Tian-Yi Huang and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ze-Guang Li.

Additional information

This work was supported by the Science Challenge Project (No. TZ2018001), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 11775126, 11545013, 11775127), Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program by CAST (No. 2016QNRC001), and Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, TY., Li, ZG., Wang, K. et al. Hybrid windowed networks for on-the-fly Doppler broadening in RMC code. NUCL SCI TECH 32, 62 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-021-00901-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-021-00901-2

Keywords

Navigation