Abstract
In this study, thermal–hydraulic parameters inside the containment of a WWER-1000/v446 nuclear power plant are simulated in a double-ended cold leg accident for short and long times (by using CONTAIN 2.0 and MELCOR 1.8.6 codes), and the effect of the spray system as an engineering safety feature on parameters mitigation is analyzed with the former code. Along with the development of the accident from design basis accident to beyond design basis accident, the Zircaloy–steam reaction becomes the source of in-vessel hydrogen generation. Hydrogen distribution inside the containment is simulated for a long time (using CONTAIN and MELCOR), and the effect of recombiners on its mitigation is analyzed (using MELCOR). Thermal–hydraulic parameters and hydrogen distribution profiles are presented as the outcome of the investigation. By activating the spray system, the peak points of pressure and temperature occur in the short time and remain below the maximum design values along the accident time. It is also shown that recombiners have a reliable effect on reducing the hydrogen concentration below flame propagation limit in the accident localization area. The parameters predicted by CONTAIN and MELCOR are in good agreement with the final safety analysis report. The noted discrepancies are discussed and explained.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J.N. Sorensen, G.E. Apostolakis, T.S. Kress et al., On the role of defence in depth in risk-informed regulation. Washington, D.C, (1999)
O. Noori-Kalkhoran, M. Rahgoshay, A. Minuchehr et al., Analysis of thermal-hydraulic parameters of WWER-1000 containment in a large break LOCA. Ann. Nucl. Energy 68, 101–111 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ANUCENE.2014.01.009
IAEA, Mitigation of hydrogen hazards in severe accidents in nuclear power plants. Vienna (2011)
NRC, U.S. nuclear regulatory commission regulations: title 10, Code of Federal Regulations
O. Noori-Kalkhoran, A. Minuchehr, M. Rahgoshay et al., Short-term and long-term analysis of WWER-1000 containment parameters in a large break LOCA. Prog. Nucl. Energy 74, 201–212 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PNUCENE.2014.03.007
O. Noori-Kalkhoran, A.S. Shirani, R. Ahangari, Simulation of Containment Pressurization in a Large Break-Loss of Coolant Accident Using Single-Cell and Multicell Models and CONTAIN Code. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 48, 1140–1153 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NET.2016.03.008
D. Papini, D. Grgić, A. Cammi et al., Analysis of different containment models for IRIS small break LOCA, using GOTHIC and RELAP5 codes. Nucl. Eng. Des. 241, 1152–1164 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2010.06.016
Y.S. Chen, Y.R. Yuann, L.C. Dai, Lungmen ABWR containment analyses during short-term main steam line break LOCA using GOTHIC. Nucl. Eng. Des. 247, 106–115 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2012.02.012
G. Jimenez, C. Serrano, E. Lopez-Alonso, BWR Mark III containment analyses using a GOTHIC 8.0 3D model. Ann. Nucl. Energy 85, 687–703 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2015.06.025
Z. Huang, W. Ma, Performance evaluation of passive containment cooling system of an advanced PWR using coupled RELAP5/GOTHIC simulation. Nucl. Eng. Des. 310, 83–92 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2016.10.004
EPRI, GOTHIC Thermal hydraulic analysis package installation and operations manual (2016)
M. Povilaitis, S. Kelm, E. Urbonavičius, The generic containment SB-LOCA accident simulation: comparison of the parameter uncertainties and user-effect. Ann. Nucl. Energy 106, 1–10 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2017.03.037
B. De Boeck, Prevention and mitigation measures to ensure containment integrity. Nucl. Eng. Des. 209, 147–154 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-5493(01)00397-1
S. Yu, M. Yan, J. Wang et al., Numerical investigations on the response of the passive containment cooling system and containment under a DELB LOCA scenario. Prog. Nucl. Energy 97, 26–37 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2016.12.011
X.G. Huang, Y.H. Yang, X. Cheng et al., Effect of spray on performance of the hydrogen mitigation system during LB-LOCA for CPR1000 NPP. Ann. Nucl. Energy 38, 1743–1750 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2011.04.003
B.G. Jeon, H.C. No, Thermal-hydraulic evaluation of passive containment cooling system of improved APR + during LOCAs. Nucl. Eng. Des. 278, 190–198 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2014.07.038
S. Şahin, M.S. Sarwar, Hydrogen hazard and mitigation analysis in PWR containment. Ann. Nucl. Energy 58, 132–140 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2013.03.001
S.R. Ravva, K.N. Iyer, A.J. Gaikwad, Development of sump model for containment hydrogen distribution calculations using CFD code. Nucl. Eng. Des. 295, 429–440 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2015.10.00
J.M. Martín-Valdepeñas, M.A. Jiménez, F. Martín-Fuertes et al., Improvements in a CFD code for analysis of hydrogen behaviour within containments. Nucl. Eng. Des. 237, 627–647 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2006.09.002
A.M. Gómez-Torres, E. Sáinz-Mejía, J.V. Xolocostli-Munguía et al., CFD analysis of hydrogen volumetric concentrations in a hard venting containment system of a mark II BWR. Ann. Nucl. Energy 85, 552–565 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2015.06.008
G.P. Choi, D.Y. Kim, K.H. Yoo et al., Prediction of hydrogen concentration in nuclear power plant containment under severe accidents using cascaded fuzzy neural networks. Nucl. Eng. Des. 300, 393–402 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2016.02.015
T. Szabó, F. Kretzschmar, T. Schulenberg, Obtaining a more realistic hydrogen distribution in the containment by coupling MELCOR with GASFLOW. Nucl. Eng. Des. 269, 330–339 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.07.009
W. Breitung, P. Royl, Procedure and tools for deterministic analysis and control of hydrogen behavior in severe accidents. Nucl. Eng. Des. 202, 249–268 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-5493(00)00380-0
E. Bachellerie, F. Arnould, M. Auglaire et al., Generic approach for designing and implementing a passive autocatalytic recombiner PAR-system in nuclear power plant containments. Nucl. Eng. Des. 221, 151–165 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-5493(02)00330-8
AEOI (Atomic Energy Organization of Iran), BNPP final safety analysis report (FSAR). Iran (2007)
Drell IL, Belles FE (1958) Survey of hydrogen combustion properties. United States: NASA Technical report
H. Karwat, J. Bardelay, T. Hashimoto, SOAR on containment thermalhydraulics and hydrogen distribution. OECD/NEA/CSNI (1999)
K.K. Murata, D.C. William, J. Tills et al., Code manual for CONTAIN 2.0; A computer code for nuclear reactor containment analysis. Albuquerqu, NM: Sandia National Lab (1997)
R.O. Gauntt, R.K. Cole, C.M. Erickson et al., MELCOR Computer Code Manuals. NUREG/CR-6119, Rev. 2 (2000)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Part of this research has been developed under the auspices of EU H2020 Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions COFUND Grant SIRCIW, Agreement No. 663830.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Noori-kalkhoran, O., Jafari-ouregani, N., Gei, M. et al. Simulation of hydrogen distribution and effect of Engineering Safety Features (ESFs) on its mitigation in a WWER-1000 containment. NUCL SCI TECH 30, 97 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-019-0624-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-019-0624-0