Abstract
Nuclear fusion is one of the world’s primary energy sources. Studies on the structural fusion materials are very important in terms of the development of fusion technology. Chromium, nickel, zinc, scandium, titanium, and yttrium are important structural fusion materials. In this paper, for use in nuclear science and technology applications, the excitation functions of the 50Cr(d, n)51Mn, 58Ni(d, n)59Cu, 64Zn(d, n)65Ga, 66Zn(d, n)67Ga, 45Sc(d, 2n)45Ti, 47Ti(d, 2n)47V, 48Ti(d, 2n)48V, and 89Y(d, 2n)89Zr nuclear reactions were investigated. The calculations that are based on the pre-equilibrium and equilibrium reaction processes were performed using ALICE–ASH computer code. A comparison with geometry-dependent hybrid model has been made using the initial exciton numbers n 0 = 4–6 and level density parameters α = A/5; A/8; A/11. Also, the present model-based calculations were compared with the cross sections obtained using the formulae suggested from our previous studies. Furthermore, the cross section results have been compared with TENDL data based on TALYS computer code and the measured data in the literature.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M. Avrigeanu, V. Avrigeanu, P. Bem et al., Low energy deuteron-induced reactions on 93Nb. Phys. Rev. C 88, 014612 (2013). doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.88.014612
M. Yiğit, E. Tel, Alpha production cross sections for some target fusion structural materials up to 35 MeV. J. Fusion Energy. 32, 442–450 (2013). doi:10.1007/s10894-012-9591-8
M. Yiğit, E. Tel, Study on (n,2n) and (n, p) reactions of strontium nucleus. Nucl. Eng. Des. 293, 97–104 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2015.07.043
M. Yiğit, Empirical formula on (n,3He) reaction cross sections at 14.6 MeV neutrons. Appl. Rad. Isot. 105, 15–19 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.apradiso.2015.07.016
Y. Song, F. Zhou, M. Tian et al., Measurements of the cross section for the 182 W(n, p)182(m + g)Ta and 184(n, p)184Ta reactions in the 14 MeV energy range using the activation technique. Appl. Rad. Isot. 98, 29–33 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.apradiso.2014.11.018
A. Kaplan, M. Şekerci, V. Çapalı et al., Computations of (α, xn) reaction cross-section for 107,109Ag coated materials with possible application in accelerators and nuclear systems. J. Fusion Energy 35, 715–723 (2016). doi:10.1007/s10894-016-0096-8
A. Kaplan, H. Büyüküslu, A. Aydin et al., Excitation functions of some neutron production targets on (d, 2n) reactions. J. Fusion Energy 29, 181–187 (2010). doi:10.1007/s10894-009-9255-5
A. Kaplan, H. Özdoğan, A. Aydın et al., Deuteron-induced cross section calculations of some structural fusion materials. J. Fusion Energy 32, 97–102 (2013). doi:10.1007/s10894-012-9532-6
C.H.M. Broeders, A. Yu. Konobeyev, Yu. A. Korovin et al., FZK 7183, ALICE/ASH manual (2006). http://bibliothek.fzk.de/zb/berichte/FZKA7183.pdf
M. Blann, H.K. Vonach, Global test of modified pre-compound decay models. Phys. Rev. C 28, 1475 (1983). doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.28.1475
M. Yiğit, E. Tel, İ.H. Sarpün, Excitation function calculations for α + 93Nb nuclear reactions. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 385, 59–64 (2016). doi:10.1016/j.nimb.2016.08.019
A. Yadav, P.P. Singh, M.K. Sharma et al., Large pre-equilibrium contribution in α + natNi interactions at ≈ 8 − 40 MeV. Phys. Rev. C 78, 044606 (2008). doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.78.044606
J. Acharya, S. Mukherjee, G.F. Steyn et al., Excitation functions of heavy residues produced in the 14 N + 103 Rh reaction up to 400 MeV: analysis of the pre-equilibrium mechanism with the hybrid Monte Carlo simulation model. Phys. Rev. C 93, 024608 (2016). doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.93.024608
V.F. Weisskopf, D.H. Ewing, On the yield of nuclear reactions with heavy elements. Phys. Rev. 57, 472 (1940). doi:10.1103/PhysRev.57.472
M. Blann, Hybrid model for pre-equilibrium decay in nuclear reactions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 27, 337 (1971). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.27.337
M. Blann, ALICE-91 code, RSIC code package PSR-146 (1991)
A.J. Koning, D. Rochman, J. Kopecky et al., TENDL-2015: TALYS-based evaluated nuclear data library. http://www.talys.eu/home/
M. Yiğit, E. Tel, Cross section systematics of (d, p) reactions at 8.5 MeV. Nucl. Eng. Des 280, 37–41 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2014.09.018
I. Kumabe, K.J. Fukuda, Empirical formulas for 14 MeV (n, p) and (n, α) cross sections. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 24, 839–843 (1987). doi:10.1080/18811248.1987.9735887
M. Yiğit, Thesis, Investigations of empirical and semi-empirical cross section formulas for deuteron-induced nuclear reactions, Graduate school of natural and applied sciences, Gazi University (2014)
M. Yiğit, E. Tel, A systematic study for cross sections on (d, 2n) nuclear reactions between 11.57 and 18.91 MeV. J. Fusion Energy 35, 585–590 (2016). doi:10.1007/s10894-016-0066-1
Experimental Nuclear Reaction Data (EXFOR), (2017), http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/exfor/exfor.htm
A.T.J. Klein, F. Rosch, S.M. Qaim, Investigation of 50Cr(d, n)51Mn and natCr(p, x)51Mn processes with respect to the production of the positron emitter 51Mn. Radiochim. Acta 88, 253–264 (2000). doi:10.1524/ract.2000.88.5.253
M. Cogneau, L.J. Gilly, J. Cara, Absolute cross sections and excitation functions for deuteron induced reactions on chromium between 2 and 12MeV. Nucl. Phys. 79, 203 (1966). doi:10.1016/0029-5582(66)90403-2
P.P. Coetzee, M. Peisach, Activation cross sections for deuteron induced reactions on some elements of the first transition series up to 5.5MeV. Radiochim. Acta 17, 1 (1972). doi:10.1524/ract.1972.17.1.1
J.H. Carver, G.A. Jones, (N-Z) dependence of radiative deuteron capture cross sections. Nucl. Phys. 24, 607 (1961). doi:10.1016/0029-5582(61)90432-1
M. Cogneau, L.J. Gilly, J. Cara, Absolute cross sections and excitation functions for deuteron-induced reactions on the nickel isotopes between 2 and 12 MeV. Nucl. Phys. A 99, 686 (1967). doi:10.1016/0375-9474(67)90379-X
H.H. Bissem, R. Georgi, W. Scobel et al., Entrance and exit channel phenomena in d- and He3- induced pre-equilibrium decay. Phys. Rev. C 22, 1468 (1980). doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.22.1468
D.C. Williams, J.W. IrvineJr, Nuclear excitation functions and thick-target yields: Zn + d and Ar-40(d, α). Phys. Rev. 130, 265 (1963). doi:10.1103/PhysRev.130.265
S.J. Nassiff, H. Munzel, Cross sections for the reactions 66Zn(d, n)67 Ga, 52Cr(d, 2n)52 g-Mn and 186 W(d, 2n)186Re. Radiochim. Acta 19, 97 (1973). doi:10.1524/ract.1973.19.3.97
A. Hermanne, R.A. Rebeles, F. Tarkanyi et al., Cross sections of deuteron induced reactions on 45Sc up to 50 MeV: experiments and comparison with theoretical codes. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 270, 106 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.nimb.2011.09.002
K.L. Chen, J.M. Miller, Comparison between reactions of alpha particles with Scandium-45 and deuterons with Titanium-47. Phys. Rev. 134, B1269 (1964). doi:10.1103/PhysRev.134.B1269
H.I. West Jr., R.G. Lanier, M.G. Mustafa. Excitation functions for the nuclear reactions on titanium leading to the production of 48 V, 44Sc and 47Sc by proton, deuteron and triton irradiations at 0-35 MeV. Report: U.C. Lawrence. Rad. Lab. (Berkeley and Livermore) 3, 1 (1993)
W.H. Burgus, G.A. Cowan, J.W. Hadley et al., Cross sections for the reactions 48Ti (d, 2n) 48 V, 52Cr (d, 2n) 52Mn and 56Fe (d, 2n) 56Co. Phys. Rev. 95, 750 (1954). doi:10.1103/PhysRev.95.750
A.M. LaGamma, S.J. Nassiff, Excitation functions for deuteron-induced reactions on 89Y. Radiochim. Acta 19, 161 (1973). doi:10.1524/ract.1973.19.4.161
O. Lebeda, J. Stursa, J. Ralis, Experimental cross-sections of deuteron-induced reaction on 89Y up to 20 MeV; comparison of natTi(d, x)48 V and 27Al(d, x)24Na monitor reactions. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 360, 118 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.nimb.2015.08.036
M.S. Uddin, M. Baba, M. Hagiwara et al., Experimental determination of deuteron-induced activation cross sections of yttrium. Radiochim. Acta 95, 187 (2007). doi:10.1524/ract.2007.95.4.187
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yiğit, M., Tel, E. Theoretical determination of (d, n) and (d, 2n) excitation functions of some structural fusion materials irradiated by deuterons. NUCL SCI TECH 28, 165 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-017-0316-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-017-0316-6