Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Improving the detecting efficiency of suspected gastrointestinal tumors with dual-time-point 18F-FDG PET/CT

  • Published:
Nuclear Science and Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 221 subjects with 256 suspected gastrointestinal lesions from 2007 to 2015 to explore the detecting efficiency of dual-time-point fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and pathology examination. The abdominal delayed PET/CT was performed within 45 min of the conventional scan. The change in maximum standardized uptake value (ΔSUVmax) and morphological features of the suspected lesions between the conventional and dual-time-point PET/CT were compared. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value (NPV) of conventional PET/CT were 81.6% (84/103), 56.2% (86/153), 55.6% (84/151), and 81.9% (86/105), respectively. Those of dual-time-point PET/CT were 94.1% (97/103), 78.4% (120/153), 74.6% (97/130), and 95.2% (120/126), respectively. There was a significant difference between the conventional and dual-time-point PET/CT (P < 0.005). The SUVearly and the %ΔSUVmax could not present more information in differential diagnoses, but the rate of tumors with increased SUVdelay accounted for 79.6% (82/103) and more than that of nonneoplastic lesions (15.5%, 29/187) (x 2 = 115.5, P < 0.01). Therefore, the dual-time-point 18F-FDG PET/CT had a higher sensitivity and NPV than the conventional PET/CT to detect gastrointestinal tumors. The constant morphology and increased SUVdelay help to detect the tumors and adding delayed imaging on the locality will be an effective method when we accidentally find a suspected gastrointestinal tumor on the conventional PET/CT images.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J.H. Song, J.H. Zhao, X. Chen et al., Evaluation of the primary lesion detection in colorectal carcinoma with 18F-FDG PET-CT. Chin. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 12, 174–177 (2009). doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2009.02.027. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Czernin, M. Allen-Auerbach, H.R. Schelbert, Improvements in cancer staging with PET/CT: literature-based evidence as of September 2006. J. Nucl. Med. 48(suppl 1), 78S–88S (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Toriihara, K. Yoshida, I. Umehara et al., Normal variants of bowel FDG uptake in dual-time-point PET/CT imaging. Ann. Nucl. Med. 25, 173–178 (2011). doi:10.1007/s12149-010-0439-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. X.J. Cui, N. Fang, Y.L. Wang et al., The effect of cleaning and retention enema on the diagnosis of locally hypermetabolic lesions in colorectum using 18F-FDG PET/CT. Acta Academiae Medicinae Qingdao Universitatis 45, 49–51 (2009). doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4488.2009.01.018. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. Veit, C. Kühle, T. Beyer et al., Whole body positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) tumour staging with integrated PET/CT colonography: technical feasibility and first experiences in patients with colorectal cancer. Gut 55, 68–73 (2006). doi:10.1136/gut.2005.064170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. H.B. Wu, Z.H. Huang, Q.S. Wang et al., Several methods for eliminating physiological accumulation of 18F-FDG in the stomach and intestine. Chin. J. Nucl. Med. 22, 235–236 (2002). doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-2848.2002.04.017. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  7. L. Filippi, M. D’Arienzo, F. Scopinaro et al., Usefulness of dual-time point imaging after carbonated water for the fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission imaging of peritoneal carcinomatosis in colon cancer. Cancer Biother. Radiopharm. 28, 29–33 (2013). doi:10.1089/cbr.2012.1179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. H. Zhuang, M. Pourdehnad, E.S. Lambright et al., Dual time point 18F-FDG PET imaging for differentiating malignant from inflammatory processes. J. Nucl. Med. 42, 1412–1417 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Matthies, M. Hickeson, A. Cuchiara et al., Dual time point 18F-FDG PET for the evaluation of pulmonary nodules. J. Nucl. Med. 43, 871–875 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. Kumar, V.A. Loving, A. Chauhan et al., Potential of dual-time-point imaging to improve breast cancer diagnosis with (18)F-FDG PET. J. Nucl. Med. 46, 1819–1824 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. K.K. Miyake, Y. Nakamoto, K. Togashi, Dual-time-point 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with colorectal cancer: clinical value of early delayed scanning. Ann. Nucl. Med. 26, 492–500 (2012). doi:10.1007/s12149-012-0599-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. J. Cui, P. Zhao, Z. Ren et al., Evaluation of dual time point imaging 18F-FDG PET/CT in differentiating malignancy from benign gastric disease. Medicine 94, e1356 (2015). doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000001356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. B.R. Weston, R.B. Lyer, W. Qiao et al., Ability of integrated positron emission and computed tomography to detect significant colonic pathology: the experience of a tertiary cancer center. Cancer 116, 1454–1461 (2010). doi:10.1002/cncr.24885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. E. Shmidt, V. Nehra, V. Lowe et al., Clinical significance of incidental [18F]FDG uptake in the gastrointestinal tract on PET/CT imaging: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Gastroenterol. 16, 125 (2016). doi:10.1186/s12876-016-0545-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. A. Zade, N. Purandare, V. Rangarajan et al., Role of delayed imaging to differentiate intense physiological 18F FDG uptake from peritoneal deposits in patients presenting with intestinal obstruction. Clin. Nucl. Med. 37, 783–785 (2012). doi:10.1097/RLU.0b013e31824c5e7d

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Y.E. Huang, Y.J. Huang, M. Ko et al., Dual-time-point 18F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of solitary pulmonary lesions in a region with endemic granulomatous diseases. Ann. Nucl. Med. 30, 652–658 (2016). doi:10.1007/s12149-016-1109-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. D. Kadaria, D.S. Archie, I. SultanAli et al., Dual time point positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan in evaluation of intrathoracic lesions in an area endemic for histoplasmosis and with high prevalence of sarcoidosis. Am. J. Med. Sci. 346, 358–362 (2013). doi:10.1097/MAJ.0b013e31827b9b6d

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. D.G. Meng, X.G. Sun, G. Huang et al., Comparison of the effect of positive and negative oral contrast agents on delineation and 18F-FDG uptake of gastrointestinal tract. Chin. J. Nucl. Med. 30, 272–275 (2010). doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9780.2010.04.014. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  19. J.D. Soyka, K. Strobel, P. Veit-Haibach et al., Influence of bowel preparation before 18F-FDG PET/CT on physiologic 18F-FDG activity in the intestine. J. Nucl. Med. 51, 507–510 (2010). doi:10.2967/jnumed.109.071001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. S.B. Ahn, D.S. Han, J.H. Bae et al., The miss rate for colorectal adenoma determined by quality-adjusted, back-to-back colonoscopies. Gut Liver 6, 64–70 (2012). doi:10.5009/gnl.2012.6.1.64

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jin-Hua Zhao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Song, JH., Zhao, JH., Xie, XQ. et al. Improving the detecting efficiency of suspected gastrointestinal tumors with dual-time-point 18F-FDG PET/CT. NUCL SCI TECH 28, 138 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-017-0294-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-017-0294-8

Keywords

Navigation