Abstract
Molten salt reactor, with good economics and inherent reliability, is one of the six types of Generation IV candidate reactors. The Basket-Fuel-Assembly Molten Salt Reactor (BFAMSR) is a new concept design based on fuel assemblies composed of fuel pebbles made of TRISO-coated particles. Four refueling patterns, similar to the fuel management strategy for water reactors, are designed and analyzed for BFAMSR in terms of economy and security. The MCNPX is employed to calculate the parameters, such as the total duration time, cycle length, discharge burnup, total discharge quantity of 235U, total discharge quantity of 239Pu, neutron flux distribution and power distribution. The in–out loading pattern has the highest burnup and duration time, the worst neutron flux and power distribution and the lowest neutron leakage. The out–in pattern possesses the most uniform neutron flux distribution, the lowest burnup and total duration time, and the highest neutron leakage. The out–in partition alternate pattern has slightly higher burnup, longer total duration time and smaller neutron leakage than that of the out–in loading pattern at the cost of sacrificing some neutron flux distribution and power distribution. However, its alternative distribution of fuel elements cut down the refueling time. The low-leakage pattern is the second highest in burnup, and total duration time, and its neutron flux and power distributions are the second most uniform.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
DOE, A technology roadmap for Generation IV nuclear energy systems. Nuclear Energy Research Advisory Committee and the Generation IV International Forum, GIF-002-00
K. Nagy, D. Lathouwers, C.G.A. T’Joen et al., Steady-state and dynamic behavior of a moderated molten salt reactor. Ann. Nucl. Energy 64, 365–379 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.anucene.2013.08.009
H.G. MacPherson, The molten salt reactor adventure. Nucl. Sci. Eng. 90, 374–380 (1985). doi:10.13182/NSE90-374
J. Serp, M. Allibert, O. Benes et al., The molten salt reactor (MSR) in generation IV: overview and perspectives. Prog. Nucl. Energy 77, 308–319 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.pnucene.2014.02.014
E.S. Bettis, R.W. Schroeder, G.A. Cristy et al., The aircraft reactor experiment design and construction. Nucl. Sci. Eng. 2(6), 804–825 (1957)
M.W. Rosenthal, P.R. Kasten, R.B. Briggs, Molten-salt reactors-history, status, and potential. Nucl. Appl. Technol. 8, 107–117 (1970)
P. Avigni, B. Petrovic, Fuel element and full core thermal–hydraulic analysis of the AHTR for the evaluation of the LOFC transient. Ann. Nucl. Energy 64, 499–510 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.anucene.2013.05.029
V.K. Varma, D.E. Holcomb, F.J. Peretz et al., AHTR mechanical, structural, and neutronic preconceptual design. ORNL/TM-2012/320, ORNL. doi:10.2172/1054145
M. Fratoni, E. Greenspan, Neutronic feasibility assessment of liquid salt–cooled pebble bed reactors. Nucl. Sci. Eng. 168(1), 1–22 (2011). doi:10.13182/NSE10-38
M.H. Jiang, H.J. Xu, Z.M. Dai, Advanced fission energy program-TMSR nuclear energy system. Bull. Chin. Acad. Sci. 27(3), 366–374 (2012). doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-3045.2012.03.016. (in Chinese)
C. Xue, H.Q. Zhang, Z.Y. Zhu et al., Design of fuel assembly for molten-salt-cooled reactors. Nucl. Tec. 39(090602–1), 090602–090608 (2016). doi:10.11889/j.0253-3219.2016.hjs.39.090602. (in Chinese)
Z.S. Xie, Nuclear Reactor Physics Analysis (Xi’an Jiaotong University Press, Xi’An, 2004), pp.253–285. (in Chinese)
V.N. Bukanov, V.L. Demekhin, A.A. Korennoi, Use of low neutron leakage fuel loads to decrease the radiation load on a VVÉR-1000 vessel. At. Energy. 101(2), 544–548 (2006). doi:10.1007/s10512-006-0128-y
A. Talamo, W. Gudowski, Adapting the deep burn in-core fuel management strategy for the gas turbine—modular helium reactor to a uranium–thorium fuel. Ann. Nucl. Energy 32, 1750–1781 (2005). doi:10.1016/j.anucene.2005.07.002
A. Thakur, B. Singh, P.D. Krishnani, In-core fuel management for AHWR. Ann. Nucl. Energy 57, 47–58 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.anucene.2013.01.034
N.J. Hill, G.T. Parks, Pressurized water reactor in-core nuclear fuel management by tabu search. Ann. Nucl. Energy 75, 64–71 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.anucene.2014.07.051
T.J. Downar, A. Sesonske, Light water reactor fuel cycle optimization: theory versus practice. Adv. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 20(20), 71–126 (1988). doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-9925-4_2
J.S. Hendricks, G.W. Mckinney, M.L. Fensin, MCNPX 2.6.0 Extensions. LA-UR-08-2216, Los Alamos National Laboratory (2008)
K. Shibata, O. Iwamoto, T. Nakagawa et al., JENDL-4.0: a new library for nuclear science and engineering. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 48, 1–30 (2011). doi:10.1080/18811248.2011.9711675
Z.G. Ge, Z.X. Zhao, H.H. Xia et al., The updated version of Chinese evaluated nuclear data library (CENDL-3.1). J. Korean Phys. Soc. 59, 1052–1056 (2011). doi:10.3938/jkps.59.1052
K. Allen, T. Knight, S. Bays, Benchmark of advanced burner test reactor model using MCNPX 2.6.0 and ERANOS 2.1. Prog. Nucl. Energy 53, 633–644 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.pnucene.2011.01.007
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by the Strategic Priority Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (No.XDA02030200).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xue, C., Zhu, ZY., Zhang, HQ. et al. In-core fuel management strategy for the basket-fuel-assembly molten salt reactor. NUCL SCI TECH 28, 130 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-017-0286-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-017-0286-8