Advertisement

Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection

, Volume 125, Issue 3, pp 251–257 | Cite as

Evaluation of extreme resistance genes of Potato virus X (Rx1 and Rx2) in different potato genotypes

  • Hassan O. Shaikhaldein
  • Borbala Hoffmann
  • Ibrahim A. Alaraidh
  • Dalia G. Aseel
Original Article
  • 343 Downloads

Abstract

Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) is considered as one of the most important staple foods in the world. Classical breeding for resistance to pests, pathogens and viruses involves the identification of resistance sources, which are often found in different wild potato species. Potato virus X (PVX) attacks potato worldwide, causing considerable amount of yield losses, reaching 20% of productivity depending upon the virus strain. To decrease its impact, there’s serious interest to develop new varieties carrying the Rx1 and/or Rx2 genes which originally came from the wild species Solanum tuberosum ssp. andigena and Solanum acaule, respectively; these genes are able to provide extreme resistance to PVX which could be facilitated with molecular marker-assisted selection. In this study, twenty-five potato genotypes, belong to Potato Research Center, were tested to detect the presence of Rx1 and Rx2 extreme resistance genes of PVX by using 5Rx1 and 106Rx2 specific markers, respectively, to enhance breeding efficiency for the purpose of developing new varieties. The results showed that three genotypes carried the 5Rx1 marker. On the other hand, the results with the 106Rx2 marker showed that thirteen individuals (52%) of the genotypes carried the 106Rx2 marker. Sixteen genotypes (64%) are resistant to PVX and have a great potential for gene introgression, while the other nine genotypes were not carriers of the markers. Genotypes those are carrying the markers were strongly recommending to be used by breeders to develop new PVX extreme resistance potato varieties.

Keywords

Potato virus X (PVX) Extreme resistance Rx1 and Rx2 genes Potato genotypes 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the Government of Hungary and FAO together. Authors are grateful for generosity help of Hungarian Government and the FAO to accomplish the study; they also thank the Society of University of Pannonia, Georgikon Faculty for hosting.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests, and they did not receive any fund for this research.

Human and animal rights

This research did not contain any studies on human and/or animal participants performed by any of the authors.

Supplementary material

41348_2018_148_MOESM1_ESM.docx (15 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 14 kb)

References

  1. Adams WM, Aveling R, Brockington D, Elliott J, Hutton J, Roe D, Vira B, Wolmer W (2004) Biodiversity conservation and the eradication of poverty. Science 306:1146–1149CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmadvand R (2013) Analysis of resistance genes in potato with special attention to expressional approaches. PhD dissertation. http://konyvtar.unipannon.hu/doktori/2013/Rahim_Ahmadvand_theses_en.pdf
  3. Ahmadvand R, Wolf I, Gorji AM, Polgár Z, Taller Y (2013) Development of molecular tools for distinguishing between the highly similar Rx1 and Rx2 PVX extreme resistance genes in tetraploid potato. Potato Res 56:277–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barone A (2004) Molecular marker-assisted selection for potato breeding. Am J Potato Res 81:111–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bendahmane A, Kanyuka K, Baulcombe DC (1997) High-resolution genetical and physical mapping of the Rx gene for extreme resistance to potato virus X in tetraploid potato. Theor Appl Genet 95:153–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cockerham G (1955) Strains of potato virus X. In: Proceedings of the second conference of potato virus disease. Lisse-Wageningen, pp 89–92Google Scholar
  7. Cockerham G (1970) Genetical studies on resistance to potato virus X and Y. Heredity 25:309–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. DeJong W, Forsyth A, Leister D, Gebhardt C, Baulcombe DC (1997) A potato hypersensitive resistance gene against potato virus X maps to a resistance gene cluster on chromosome 5. Theor Appl Genet 95(1–2):246–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. FAO: Food and Agricultural origanization (2008) FAO, Rome, Italy. http://www.fao.org/potato2008/en/world/africa.html
  10. FAOSTAT (2011) Crops production. Rome, Italy. http://faostat.fao.org
  11. Gizaw S (2011) Abate mapping in potato (Solanum tuberosum) genome for their use in breeding, Thesis. University of Pannonia Georgikon Faculty, KeszthelyGoogle Scholar
  12. Haase NU (2008) The canon of potato science: 50. The nutritional value of potatoes. Potato Res 50:415–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huang Y (2010) Transient expression of potato virus X coat protein gene in Nicotiana benthamiana. M.Sc. thesis. Biotechnology. Suranaree University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  14. Kanyuka KB, Bendahmane DCA, van der Voort JNAMR, van der Vossen EAG (1999) Mapping of intra locus duplications and introgressed DNA: aids to map-based cloning of genes from complex genomes illustrated by physical analysis of the Rx locus in tetraploid potato. Theor Appl Genet 98(5):679–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kumar LS (1999) DNA markers in plant improvement: an overview Biotechnology. Biotechnol Adv 17(2–3):143–182CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Mackill DJ, Ni J (2000) Molecular mapping and marker assisted selection for major-gene traits in rice. In: Khush GS, Brar DS, Hardy B (eds) Proceedings of the fourth international rice genetics symposium. International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, pp 137–151Google Scholar
  17. Mohler V, Singrun C (2004) General considerations: marker-assisted selection. In: Lorz H, Wenzel G (eds) Biotechnology in agriculture and forestry: molecular marker systems, vol 55. Springer, Berlin, pp 305–317Google Scholar
  18. Molla GT (2016) Determining the type of PVY extreme resistance genes (Ryadg and/or Rysto) in genotypes used in the breeding programs of the Potato Research Centre. Int J Sci Res Publ 6(8):470–477Google Scholar
  19. Mondini L, Noorani A, Pagnotta MA (2009) Assessing plant genetic diversity by molecular tools. Diversity 1:19–35.  https://doi.org/10.3390/d101001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nadeem A, Aslam M, Khan NA, Binyamind R, Azam M (2011) Identification of resistance source in Potato Germplasm against PVX and PVY. Pak J Bot 43(6):2745–2749Google Scholar
  21. Sharma S, Umamaheshwarid R, Baswaraja R, Kumar V, Gebhardt C (2014) Identification of elite potato genotypes possessing multiple disease resistance genes through molecular approaches. Sci Hortic 179:204–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. USDA-FAS (US Department of Agriculture-Foreign Agricultural Service) (2013) 2013 Francophone West Africa Biotechnology Report. 2013 GAIN report. http://gain.fas.usda.gov/Recent%20GAIN%20Publications/Agricultural%20Biotechnology%20Annual_Dakar_Senegal_7-29-2013.pdf. Accessed 2 May 2014
  23. Walbot V, Warren C (1988) Regulation of Mu element copy number in maize lines with an active or inactive Mutator transposable element system. Mol Gen Genet 211:27–34CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. William W (1997) Effect of pH and ionic strength on the spectrophotometric assessment of nucleic acid purity. Biotechniques 22:474–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Deutsche Phytomedizinische Gesellschaft 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hassan O. Shaikhaldein
    • 1
  • Borbala Hoffmann
    • 2
  • Ibrahim A. Alaraidh
    • 1
  • Dalia G. Aseel
    • 3
  1. 1.Botany and Microbiology Department, Science CollegeKing Saud UniversityRiyadhSaudi Arabia
  2. 2.Plant Sciences and Biotechnology Department Pannonia University KeszthelyHungary
  3. 3.Plant Protection and Biomolecular Diagnosis Department, Arid Lands Cultivation Research Institute (ALCRI)City of Scientific Research and Technological ApplicationsAlexandriaEgypt

Personalised recommendations