Advertisement

Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection

, Volume 125, Issue 2, pp 213–226 | Cite as

Suppression of soil-borne pathogens in container media amended with on-farm composted agro-bioenergy wastes and residues under glasshouse condition

  • Ugo De Corato
  • Rocco Salimbeni
  • Agostino De Pretis
Original Article

Abstract

The aim of this work was to assess the potential suppression of three on-farm green composts for controlling seven soil-borne pathogens in container media under greenhouse condition. Suppression of Pythium irregulare and Rhizoctonia solani damping-off of cucumber and bean, Phytophthora cinnamomi and Sclerotinia minor root rot of azalea and lettuce, and Fusarium oxysporum wilt of melon, tomato, and basil was studied on artificially inoculated seedlings. Three feedstocks of bioenergy wastes and agricultural residues were selected, on-farm composted, characterized, and tested for their suppressive properties by in vitro and in vivo experiments in comparison with one commercial compost from municipal solid biowaste. The composts showed differences in the suppressive properties when mixed with sterile peat at dosage of 35%. All green composts meanly suppressed P. irregulare damping-off of cucumber of 80%, R. solani damping-off of bean of 75%, P. cinnamomi root rot of azalea of 65%, and Fusarium wilt of up to 25%. The reference compost suppressed F. oxysporum wilt of melon, tomato, and basil from 60 to 70% and Pythium, Rhizoctonia, and Phytophthora diseases up to 30%. All composts suppressed S. minor root rot of lettuce of 35%. Suppression of Pythium damping-off and Phytophthora root rot was related to the sum of the bioactivities of the fungi and bacteria of compost. Suppression of Rhizoctonia damping-off and F. oxysporum wilt was associated with the specific bioactivity of a restricted number of fungi (Trichoderma, Aspergillus) and bacteria (Pseudomonas, actinomycetes) species. Suppression of Sclerotinia root rot was not related to any one variable of composts.

Keywords

Green compost suppressiveness Peat substitution Seedling disease Waste recycling 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to Luigi Patruno, Ph.D., and Dr. Nicola Avella of BIO-PLANTA Research Consortium for their useful contribution to the success of this work.

Compliance with ethical standards

Disclosure of potential conflict of interest

All authors declare that no conflict of interest exists in this research work.

References

  1. Alfano G, Lustrato G, Lima G, Vitullo D, Delfine S, Tognetti R, Ranalli G (2009) Physical-chemical, microbiological, agronomical and phytopathological aspects in the recycling of olive waste composted residues. Dyn Soil Dyn Plant 3(2):64–72Google Scholar
  2. Avilés M, Borrero C, Trillas MI (2011) Review on compost as an inducer of disease suppression in plants grown in soilless culture. Dyn Soil Dyn Plant 5(2):1–11Google Scholar
  3. Boehm MJ, Hoitink HAJ (1992) Sustenance of microbial activity in potting mixes and its impact on severity of Pythium root rot of poinsettia. Phytopathology 82:259–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonanomi G, Antignani V, Pane C, Scala F (2007) Suppression of soil-borne fungal diseases with organic amendments. J Plant Pathol 89:311–324Google Scholar
  5. Bonanomi G, Antignani V, Capodilupo M, Scala F (2010) Identifying the characteristics of organic soil amendments that suppress soil-borne plant diseases. Soil Biol Biochem 42:136–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonilla N, Gutierrez-Barranquero JA, De Vicente A, Cazorla FM (2012) Enhancing soil quality and plant health through suppressive organic amendments. Diversity 4:475–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Borrero C, Trillas MI, Ordovás J, Tello JC, Avilés M (2004) Predictive factors for the suppression of Fusarium wilt of tomato in plant growth media. Phytopathology 94:1094–1101CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bugbee WM (1990) Purification and characteristics of pectin lyase from Rhizoctonia solani. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 36:15–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen W, Hoitink HAJ, Madden LV (1988a) Microbial activity and biomass in container media for predicting suppressiveness to damping-off caused by Pythium ultimum. Phytopathology 78:1447–1450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen WD, Hoitink HAJ, Schmitthenner AF, Tuovinen OH (1988b) The role of microbial activity in suppression of damping-off caused by Pythium ultimum. Phytopathology 78:314–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chet I, Baker R (1980) Induction of suppressiveness to Rhizoctonia solani in soil. Phytopathology 70:994–998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chilosi G, Aleandri MP, Bruni N, Tomassini A, Torresi V, Muganu M, Paolocci M, Vettraino A, Vannini A (2017) Assessment of suitability and suppressiveness of on-farm green compost as a substitute of peat in the production of lavender plants. Biocontrol Sci Tech. doi: 10.1080/09583157.2017.1320353 Google Scholar
  13. Craft CM, Nelson EB (1996) Microbial properties of composts that suppress damping-off and root rot of creeping bent grass caused by Pythium graminicola. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:1550–1557PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. De Corato U, Viola E, Arcieri G, Valerio V, Zimbardi F (2016) Use of composted agro-energy co-products and agricultural residues against soil-borne pathogens in horticultural soil-less systems. Sci Hortic 210:166–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. de la Cruz JMR, Lora JM, Hidalgo-Galiego A, Dominguez F, Pintor-Toro JA, Llobell A, Benitez T (1993) Carbon source control on β-glucanases, chitobiase and chitinase from Trichoderma harzianum. Microbiology 159:316–322Google Scholar
  16. Diab HG, Hu S, Benson DM (2003) Suppression of Rhizoctonia solani on impatiens by enhanced microbial activity in swine waste-amended potting mixes. Phytopathology 93:1115–1123CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Elad Y, Chet I (1983) Improved selective media for isolation of Trichoderma spp. or Fusarium spp. Phytoparasitica 11:55–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. El-Masry MH, Khalil AI, Hassouna MS, Ibrahim HAH (2002) In situ and in vitro suppressive effect of agricultural composts and their water extracts on some phytopathogenic fungi. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 18:551–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hadar Y, Papadopoulou KK (2012) Suppressive composts: microbial ecology links between abiotic environments and healthy plants. Annu Rev Phytopathol 50:133–153CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hardy GE, Sivasithamparam K (1991) Suppression of Phytophthora root rot by a composted eucalyptus bark mix. Aust J Bot 39:153–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Inbar Y, Boehm MJ, Hoitink HAJ (1991) Hydrolysis of fluorescein diacetate in sphagnum peat container media for predicting suppressiveness to damping-off caused by Pythium ultimum. Soil Biol Biochem 23:479–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Inbar Y, Chen Y, Hoitink HAJ (1993) Properties for establishing standards for utilization of composts in container media. In: Hoitink HAJ, Keener HM (eds) Science and engineering of composting. Renaissance Publications, Worthington, pp 601–621Google Scholar
  23. Kinkel LL, Schlatter DC, Bakker MG, Arenz BE (2012) Streptomyces competition and co-evolution in relation to plant disease suppression. Resistance Microbiol 163:490–499Google Scholar
  24. Kuter GA, Nelson EB, Hoitink HAJ, Madden LV (1983) Fungal populations in container media amended with composted hardwood bark suppressive and conductive to Rhizoctonia damping-off. Phytopathology 73:1450–1456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kuter GA, Hoitink HAJ, Chen W (1988) Effects of municipal sludge compost curing time on suppression of Pythium and Rhizoctonia diseases of ornamental plants. Plant Dis 72:751–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kwok OCH, Fahy PC, Hoitink HAJ, Kuter GA (1987) Interactions between bacteria and Trichoderma hamatum in suppression of Rhizoctonia damping-off in bark compost media. Phytopathology 77:1206–1212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Larkin RP (2015) Soil health paradigms and implications for disease management. Ann Rev Phytopathol 53:199–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Malandraki I, Tjamos SE, Pantelides IS, Paplomatas EJ (2008) Thermal inactivation of compost suppressiveness implicates possible biological factors in disease management. Biol Control 44:180–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Manici LM, Caputo F, Babini V (2004) Effect of green manure on Pythium spp. population and microbial communities in intensive cropping systems. Plant Soil 263:133–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nelson EB, Hoitink HAJ (1982) Factors affecting suppression of Rhizoctonia solani in container media. Phytopathology 72:275–279Google Scholar
  31. Nelson EB, Kuter GA, Hoitink HAJ (1983) Effects of fungal antagonists and compost age on suppression of Rhizoctonia damping-off in container media amended with composted hardwood bark. Phytopathology 73:1457–1462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nguyen NV, Kim YY, Oh KT, Jung WJ, Park RD (2008) Antifungal activity of chitinases from Trichoderma aureoviride DY-59 and Rhizopus microsporus VS-9. Curr Microbiol 56:28–32CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Noble R (2011) Risks and benefits of soil amendment with composts in relation to plant pathogens. Aust Plant Pathol 40:157–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Noble R, Coventry E (2005) Suppression of soil-borne plant diseases with composts: a review. Biocontrol Sci Technol 15:3–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ocamb CM, Kommedahl T (1994) Growth of rhizosphere competent and in-competent Fusarium species from corn on carbon substrates. Phytopathology 84:508–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pane C, Spaccini R, Piccolo A, Scala F, Bonanomi G (2011) Compost amendments enhance peat suppressiveness to Pythium ultimum, Rhizoctonia solani and Sclerotinia minor. Biol Control 56:115–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pane C, Piccolo A, Spaccini R, Celano G, Villecco D, Zaccardelli M (2013) Agricultural waste-based composts exhibiting suppressivity to diseases caused by the phytopathogenic soil-borne fungi Rhizoctonia solani and Sclerotinia minor. Appl Soil Ecol 65:43–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pane C, Celano G, Piccolo A, Villecco D, Spaccini R, Palese AM, Zaccardelli M (2015) Effects of on-farm composted tomato residues on soil biological activity and yields in a tomato cropping system. Chem Biol Technol Agric. doi: 10.1186/s40538-014-0026-9 Google Scholar
  39. Russo G, Verdiani G, Anifantis AS (2016) Re-use of agricultural biomass for nurseries using proximity composting. Contemp Eng Sci 9:1151–1182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Saadi I, Laor Y, Medina S, Krassnowsky A, Raviv M (2010) Compost suppressiveness against Fusarium oxysporum was not reduced alter one-year storage under various moisture and temperature conditions. Soil Biol Biochem 42:626–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Scheuerell SJ, Sullivan DM, Mahaffee WF (2005) Suppression of seedling damping-off caused by Pythium ultimum, P. irregulare, and Rhizoctonia solani in container media amended with a diverse range of Pacific Northwest compost sources. Phytopathology 95:306–315CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Scotti R, Pane C, Spaccini R, Palese AM, Piccolo A, Celano G, Zaccardelli M (2016) On-farm compost: a useful tool to improve soil quality under intensive farming systems. Appl Soil Ecol 107:13–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Suàrez-Estrella F, Vargas-Garcìa C, Lopez MJ, Capel C, Moreno J (2007) Antagonistic activity of bacteria and fungi from horticultural compost against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. melonis. Crop Protect 26:46–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Termorshuizen AJ, Jeger MJ (2008) Strategies of soilborne plant pathogenic fungi in relation to disease suppression. Fungal Ecol 1:108–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Trillas MI, Hoitink HAJ, Madden LV (1986) Nature of suppression of Fusarium wilt of radish in a container medium amended with composted hardwood bark. Plant Dis 70:1023–1027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Trillas MI, Casanova E, Cotxarrera L, Ordovás J, Borrero C, Avilés M (2006) Composts from agricultural waste and the Trichoderma asperellum strain T-34 suppress Rhizoctonia solani in cucumber seedlings. Biol Control 39:32–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tuitert G, Szczech M, Bollen GJ (1998) Suppression of Rhizoctonia solani in potting mixtures amended with compost made from organic household waste. Phytopathology 88:764–773CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Deutsche Phytomedizinische Gesellschaft 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ugo De Corato
    • 1
  • Rocco Salimbeni
    • 2
  • Agostino De Pretis
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of Bioenergy, Biorefinery and Green ChemistryItalian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (ENEA)BariItaly
  2. 2.BIO-PLANTA Research ConsortiumBariItaly

Personalised recommendations