Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Spatial justice in relation to the urban amenities distribution in Austin, Texas

  • Published:
Spatial Information Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In addition to enhancing our theoretical grasp of justice, thinking spatially about it can also reveal important new insights that broaden our practical understanding in order to advance justice and democracy. On the other hand, these opportunities won’t be as obvious if the spatial equities aren't made apparent and strong. Austin city has experienced a fast-urban growing in the past decades. As urban areas grow, the public facilities should increase. The purpose of this paper investigates Facilities in terms of public facilities. Even though we said that the concept of justice is very complex, it is possible to get an understanding of it by using a quantitative method. This paper explores the condition of urban justice and opportunities for accessibility to public facilities for all residents in Austin by using GIS data and the Fuzzy logic model. The facilities and services maps were made in GIS and after the Euclidean Distance and Reclassify function in Arc Map, the Fuzzy Logic model was used to analyze spatial justice. The result shows the facilities are distributed properly. Spatial justice is in the context of Austin and residents enjoy spatial justice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data will be available on request to the corresponding author.

Software availability

Software program (ArcGIS software) to draw the map and Euclid distance model and fuzzy logistics are used to analyze the amount of spatial distribution.

References

  1. Marcuse, P., Connolly, J., Novy, J., Olivo, I., Potter, C., & Steil, J. (2009). Searching for the just city: Debates in urban theory and practice. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Nikšič, M., & Sezer, C. (2017). Public space and urban justice. Built Environment, 43(2), 165–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dufaux, F., Gervais-Lambony, P., Lehman-Frisch, S., & Moreau, S. (2009). Birth announcement. Justice Spatial/Spatial Justice, 1, 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Soja, E. W. (2009). The city and spatial justice. Justice Spatiale/Spatial Justice, 1(1), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Meyer, N., & Auriacombe, C. (2019). Good urban governance and city resilience: An afrocentric approach to sustainable development. Sustainability, 11(19), 5514. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hosseini, A., Farhadi, E., Hussaini, F., Pourahmad, A., & Seraj, N. (2022). Analysis of spatial (in)equality of urban facilities in Tehran: An integration of spatial accessibility. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24(5), 6527–6555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01715-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dikeç, M. (2001). Justice and the spatial imagination. Environment and Planning A, 33(10), 1785–1805. https://doi.org/10.1068/a3467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Soja, E. W. (2013). Seeking spatial justice (Vol. 16). University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, A. (2014). Spatial justice: Body, lawscape, atmosphere. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Harvey, D., Merry, A. H., Royle, L., Campbell, M. P., & Rudd, P. M. (1996). Justice, nature & the geography of difference. Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hosseini, A., Pourahmad, A., & Pajoohan, M. (2015). Assessment of institutions in sustainable urban-management effects on sustainable development of Tehran: Learning from a developing country. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 142(2), 05015009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Marcuse, P. (2009). Spatial justice: Derivative but causal of social injustice. Spatial Justice, 1(4), 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Farahani, R. Z., Fallah, S., Ruiz, R., Hosseini, S., & Asgari, N. (2019). OR models in urban service facility location: A critical review of applications and future developments. European Journal of Operational Research, 276(1), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Altschuler, A., Somkin, C. P., & Adler, N. E. (2004). Local services and amenities, neighborhood social capital, and health. Social science & medicine, 59(6), 1219–1229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Steg, L., & Gifford, R. (2005). Sustainable transportation and quality of life. Journal of Transport Geography, 13(1), 59–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rahman, M. H., Ashik, F. R., & Mouli, M. J. (2022). Investigating spatial accessibility to urban facility outcome of transit-oriented development in Dhaka. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 14, 100607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Saez, E., & Zucman, G. (2016). Wealth inequality in the United States since 1913: Evidence from capitalized income tax data. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(2), 519–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Alvaredo, F. (2018). World inequality report 2018. In World Inequality Report 2018. Harvard University Press.

  19. Hewko, J., Smoyer-Tomic, K. E., & Hodgson, M. J. (2002). Measuring neighbourhood spatial accessibility to urban amenities: Does aggregation error matter? Environment and Planning A, 34(7), 1185–1206. https://doi.org/10.1068/a34171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mattila, H. (2002). Aesthetic justice and urban planning: Who ought to have the right to design cities? GeoJournal, 58(2–3), 131–138. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:GEJO.0000010832.88129.cc

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Martínez, J. (2009). The use of GIS and indicators to monitor intra-urban inequalities. A case study in Rosario, Argentina. Habitat International, 33(4), 387–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2008.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Méndez, M. L., & Otero, G. (2018). Neighbourhood conflicts, socio-spatial inequalities, and residential stigmatisation in Santiago, Chile. Cities, 74, 75–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.11.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shi, Q., & Dorling, D. (2020). Growing socio-spatial inequality in neo-liberal times? Comparing Beijing and London. Applied Geography, 115, 102139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2019.102139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. González, R. C. L. (2019). Urban justice. In A. M. Orum (Ed.), The Wiley Blackwell encyclopedia of urban and regional studies. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118568446.eurs0373

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Cho, C. M. (2003). Study on effects of resident-perceived neighborhood boundaries on public services accessibility & its relation to utilization: using Geographic Information System, focusing on the case of public parks in Austin, Texas. Doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University.

  26. Richardson, H. W. (1979). Aggregate efficiency and interregional equity. In H. Folmer & J. Oosterhaven (Eds.), Spatial inequalities and regional development. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3046-4_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Dupont, V. (2017). Do geographical agglomeration, growth and equity conflict? Papers Regional Science, 86(2), 193–213. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2007.00118.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Grabb, G. (1997). Theories of social inequality—Classical and contemporary perspectives (3rd ed.). Harcourt Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Susan, S., & F. (2014). The just city. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 18(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2013.834643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Nygren, A. (2018). Inequality and interconnectivity: Urban spaces of justice in Mexico. Geoforum, 89, 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.06.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Harvey, D. (2010). Social justice and the city (Vol. 1). University of Georgia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tsou, K. W., Hung, Y. T., & Chang, Y. L. (2005). An accessibility-based integrated measure of relative spatial equity in urban public facilities. Cities, 22(6), 424–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2005.07.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. James, A. (2017). Constructing justice for existing practice: Rawls and the status quo John Rawls (pp. 69–104). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Van Pelt, M. (2008). Fuzzy logic applied to daily life. Seattle.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Safdari Molan A., & Farhadi, E. (2019). Spatial analysis of the proximity effects of land use planning on housing prices (case study: Tehran, Iran). In International conference on computational science and its applications (pp. 642–659). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24302-9_46

  36. dos Santos, R. S., Şahin Bülbül, M., & Isadora, L. L. (2019). School inequalities and urban welfare: Going beyond socioeconomic status with data science. Acta Scientiae, Canoas, 21(6), 2–27. https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.5494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Conti, A., Moura, A. C. M., Martinez, G. A. T., Tondelli, S., & Patata, S. (2021). Applying geodesign in the City of Bologna (Italy): The case study of the Navile Region. In International conference on innovation in urban and regional planning (pp. 265–270). Springer.

  38. Safdari Molan, A., Farhadi, E., Saganeiti, L., & Murgante, B. (2021). Border tourism development strategies in Kaleybar compared to regional rivals. Sustainability, 13(20), 11400. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zanganeh Shahraki, S., Hosseini, A., Sauri, D., & Hussaini, F. (2020). Fringe more than context: Perceived quality of life in informal settlements in a developing country: The case of Kabul, Afghanistan. Sustainable Cities and Society journal, 63(12), 102494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Greer, J. R. (2002). Equity in the spatial distribution of municipal services: How to operationalize the concepts and institutionalize a program, Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Dallas, USA.

  41. Iveson, K. (2011). Social or spatial justice? Marcuse and Soja on the right to the city. City, 15(2), 250–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2011.568723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Zanganeh Shahraki, S., Ahmadifard, N., Farhadikhah, H., Fotouhi Mehrabani, B., Haydari, A., Abdali, Y., Abbasi Fallah, V., Farhadi, E., Cividino, S., Vinci, S., & Salvati, L. (2020). Spatial planning, urban governance and the economic context: The case of ‘Mehr’ housing plan Iran. Land, 9(5), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9050169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Aqbelaghi, S. A., Ghorbani, M., Farhadi, E., & Shafiee, H. (2018). Environmental approach in modelling of urban growth: Tehran City, Iran. Asian Journal of Water, Environment and Pollution, 15(2), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.3233/AJW-180017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Vignoli, F., de Luca, C., & Tondelli, S. (2021). A spatial ecosystem services assessment to support decision and policy making: The case of the city of Bologna. Sustainability, 13(5), 2787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Piroozfar, R. (2012). Fuzzy logic: A rule-based approach, in search of a justified decision-making process in urban planning. Doctoral Thesis, Technische Universität Berlin.

  46. Wu, B., Yip, T. L., Xie, L., & Wang, Y. (2018). A fuzzy-MADM based approach for site selection of offshore wind farm in busy waterways in China. Ocean Engineering, 168, 121–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors declare that they have no funding source.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Earth and Environment Science, Murray State University, Murray, KY, USA

    Fatema Hussaini

  2. Department of Geography, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

    Ebrahim Farhadi & Ahmad Pourahmad

  3. Department of Architecture, Bologna University, Bologna, Italy

    Ebrahim Farhadi & Simona Tondelli

Authors
  1. Fatema Hussaini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ebrahim Farhadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ahmad Pourahmad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Simona Tondelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

FH made contributions to the gathering of data, its analysis, and its writing. EF helped with data analysis and producing the manuscript. The model’s analysis and application were guided by the AP and ST, who also oversaw the piece.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ebrahim Farhadi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Each author attests that they are not associated with or actively involved in any group or entity that has a financial or non-financial stake in the topics or resources discussed in this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hussaini, F., Farhadi, E., Pourahmad, A. et al. Spatial justice in relation to the urban amenities distribution in Austin, Texas. Spat. Inf. Res. 31, 113–124 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-022-00484-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-022-00484-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation