Using an environmentally benign and degradable elastomer in soft robotics


This work introduces an environmentally benign and degradable elastomer, poly(glycerol sebacate) with calcium carbonate (PGS-CaCO\(_{3}\)), for use in soft robotics. Development of greener materials like PGS-CaCO\(_{3}\) contributes to robot designs that do not require retrieval and can safely degrade in the natural environment. A simplified synthesis method of PGS was used to create elastomer sheets, which were laser cut/rastered then laminated with cyanoacrylate glue into pneumatic soft actuators. The modified polymer synthesis method is accessible for roboticists and the three chemicals used are non-hazardous and inexpensive. Three accordion-style pneumatic actuators (3, 4 and 5 chambers) were characterized for free displacement and blocked force in both linear extension and curling motions, and an additional four 3-chambered actuators were also tested to leakage and failure. Material characterization of PGS-CaCO\(_{3}\) samples of all ages gave: ultimate tensile strength (UTS) from 48 to 160 kPa, elongation percent at UTS from 157 to 242%, moduli from 45 to 154 kPa, average resilience of 88% at 100 cycles, and maximum compressive force of 246 N at 50% strain. After being in an approximately 50–55 \(^\circ \)C compost pile for 7 days, the polymer visibly degraded and had an average mass loss of 20% across 12 samples. PGS’s strength, elasticity, biodegradability and chemical safety make it a desirable option for roboticists looking to leverage sustainable materials. PGS may also prove a potential green alternative for robotics applications in ubiquitous environmental and infrastructure sensing.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11


  1. Anastas, P.T., Warner, J.C.: Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice. Oxford University Press, Oxford [England], New York (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Avantor Performance Materials, Inc.: Safety Data Sheet Calcium Carbonate, Avantor Performance Materials (2014a).

  3. Bauer, S., Bauer-Gogonea, S., Graz, I., Kaltenbrunner, M., Keplinger, C.: Schwödiauer, R.:25th Anniversary article: A soft future: from robots and sensor skin to energy harvesters. Adv. Mater. 26(1), 149–162 (2014). doi:10.1002/adma.201303349

  4. Bellingham, C.M., Lillie, M.A., Gosline, J.M., Wright, G.M., Starcher, B.C., Bailey, A.J., Woodhouse, K.A., Keeley, F.W.: Recombinant human elastin polypeptides self-assemble into biomaterials with elastin-like properties. Biopolymers 70(4), 445–455 (2003). doi:10.1002/bip.10512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Breger, J.C., Yoon, C., Xiao, R., Kwag, H.R., Wang, M.O., Fisher, J.P., Nguyen, T.D., Gracias, H.: Self-folding thermo-magnetically responsive soft microgrippers. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7(5), 3398–3405 (2015). doi:10.1021/am508621s

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chambers, L.D., Winfield, J., Ieropoulos, I., Rossiter, J.: Biodegradable and edible gelatine actuators for use as artificial muscles. In: SPIE Smart Structures and Materials+ Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring (International Society for Optics and Photonics, pp. 90,560B–90,560B (2014)

  7. Chen, Q.Z., Bismarck, A., Hansen, U., Junaid, S., Tran, M.Q., Harding, S.E., Ali, N.N., Boccaccini, A.R.: Characterisation of a soft elastomer poly(glycerol sebacate) designed to match the mechanical properties of myocardial tissue. Biomaterials 29(1), 47–57 (2008doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.09.010.

  8. Chen, F.J., Dirven, S., Xu, W.L., Li, X.N.: Soft actuator mimicking human esophageal peristalsis for a swallowing robot. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 19(4), 1300–1308 (2014). doi:10.1109/TMECH.2013.2280119.

  9. Chen, G., Fu, L., Pham, M.T., Redarce, T.: Characterization and modeling of a pneumatic actuator for a soft continuum robot. In: 2013 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation (ICMA) (2013), pp. 243–248. 10.1109/ICMA.2013.6617925

  10. Chen, Q.Z., Ishii, H., Thouas, G.A., Lyon, A.R., Wright, J.S., Blaker, J.J., Chrzanowski, W., Boccaccini, A.R., Ali, N.N., Knowles, J.C., Harding, S.E.: An elastomeric patch derived from poly(glycerol sebacate) for delivery of embryonic stem cells to the heart. Biomaterials 31(14), 3885–3893 (2010). doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.108.

  11. Chou, C.P., Hannaford, B.: Measurement and modeling of McKibben pneumatic artificial muscles. IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 12(1), 90–102 (1996). doi:10.1109/70.481753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Committee on Prosthetics Research and Development.: The application of external power in prosthetics and orthotics. National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council, Washington DC, Publication 874, (1961)

  13. Davis, S., Tsagarakis, N., Canderle, J., Caldwell, D.G.: Enhanced modelling and performance in braided pneumatic muscle actuators. Int. J. Robot. Res. 22(3–4), 213–227 (2003). doi:10.1177/0278364903022003006.

  14. Dobson, R., Gray, V., Rumbold, K.: Microbial utilization of crude glycerol for the production of value-added products. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 39(2), 217–226 (2012). doi:10.1007/s10295-011-1038-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dow Corning: Fascinating Silicone \(^{\text{TM}}\): Chemistry Corner—environmental degradation—how polydimethylsiloxane degrades in the environment (2017).

  16. Flinn Scientific, Inc.: Material Safety Data Sheet Vinegar, Flinn Scientific, Inc. (2012).

  17. Fu, Y., Kao, W.J.: Drug release kinetics and transport mechanisms of non-degradable and degradable polymeric delivery systems. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 7(4), 429–444 (2010). doi:10.1517/17425241003602259.

  18. Fusco, S., Sakar, M.S., Kennedy, S., Peters, C., Bottani, R., Starsich, F., Mao, A., Sotiriou, G.A., Pané, S., Pratsinis, S.E., Mooney, D., Nelson, B.J.: An integrated microrobotic platform for on-demand. targeted therapeutic interventions. Adv. Mater. 26(6), 952–957 (2014). doi:10.1002/adma.201304098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Global Safety Management.: Safety Data Sheet Vinegar, Fisher Scientific (2014b).

  20. Glycerol MSDS, Sigma-Aldrich (2016).

  21. Guan, J., Sacks, M.S., Beckman, E.J., Wagner, W.R.: Synthesis, characterization, and cytocompatibility of elastomeric, biodegradable poly(ester-urethane)ureas based on poly(caprolactone) and putrescine. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 61(3), 493–503 (2002). doi:10.1002/jbm.10204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Han, L., Dai, J., Zhang, L., Ma, S., Deng, J., Zhang, R., Zhu, J.: Diisocyanate free and melt polycondensation preparation of bio-based unsaturated poly(ester-urethane)s and their properties as UV curable coating materials. RSC Adv. 4(90), 49471–49477 (2014). doi:10.1039/C4RA08665A.

  23. Ho, V.A., Dao, D.V., Sugiyama, S., Hirai, S.: Development and analysis of a sliding tactile soft fingertip embedded with a microforce/moment sensor. IEEE Trans. Robot. 27(3), 411–424 (2011). doi:10.1109/TRO.2010.2103470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ilievski, F., Mazzeo, A.D., Shepherd, R.F., Chen, X., Whitesides, G.M.: Soft robotics for chemists. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50(8), 1890–1895 (2011). doi:10.1002/anie.201006464.

  25. Jaafar, I.H., Ammar, M.M., Jedlicka, S.S., Pearson, R.A., Coulter, J.P.: Spectroscopic evaluation, thermal, and thermomechanical characterization of poly(glycerol-sebacate) with variations in curing temperatures and durations. J. Mater. Sci. 45(9), 2525–2529 (2010). doi:10.1007/s10853-010-4259-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Jones, J.R.: Review of bioactive glass: from Hench to hybrids. Acta Biomater. 9(1), 4457–4486 (2013). 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.08.023.

  27. Kharaziha, M., Nikkhah, M., Shin, S.R., Annabi, N., Masoumi, N., Gaharwar, A.K., Camci-Unal, G., Khademhosseini, A.: PGS:Gelatin nanofibrous scaffolds with tunable mechanical and structural properties for engineering cardiac tissues. Biomaterials 34(27), 6355–6366 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.04.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kier, W.M., Smith, K.K.: Tongues, tentacles and trunks: the biomechanics of movement in muscular-hydrostats. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 83(4), 307–324 (1985). doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.1985.tb01178.x

  29. Krishnan, V., Lakshmi, T.: Bioglass: a novel biocompatible innovation. J. Adv. Pharm. Technol. Res. 4(2), 78–83 (2013). doi:10.4103/2231-4040.111523.

  30. Laubie, B., Ohannessian, A., Desjardin, V., Germain, P.: Methodology to assess silicone (bio)degradation and its effects on microbial diversity. J. Polym. Environ.20(4), 1019–1026 (2012). doi:10.1007/s10924-012-0501-y

  31. Li, Y., Thouas, G.A., Chen, Q.Z.: Biodegradable soft elastomers: synthesis/properties of materials and fabrication of scaffolds. RSC Adv. 2(22), 8229–8242 (2012). doi:10.1039/C2RA20736B.

  32. Liang, S.L., Cook, W.D., Thouas, G.A., Chen, Q.Z.: The mechanical characteristics and in vitro biocompatibility of poly(glycerol sebacate)-Bioglass- elastomeric composites. Biomaterials 31(33), 8516–8529 (2010). doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.105.

  33. Liang, S., Cook, W.D., Chen, Q.: Physical characterization of poly(glycerol sebacate)/bioglass-composites. Polym. Int. 61(1), 17–22 (2012). doi:10.1002/pi.3165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mac Murray, B.C., An, X., Robinson, S.S., van Meerbeek, I.M., O’Brien, K.W., Zhao, H., Shepherd, R.F.: Poroelastic foams for simple fabrication of complex soft robots. Adv. Mater. 27(41), 6334–6340, (2015). doi:10.1002/adma.201503464

  35. Martinez, R.V., Branch, J.L., Fish, C.R., Jin, L., Shepherd, R.F., Nunes, R.M.D., Suo, Z., Whitesides, G.M.: Robotic tentacles with three-dimensional mobility based on flexible elastomers. Adv. Mater. 25(2), 205–212 (2013). doi:10.1002/adma.201203002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Miyashita, S., Guitron, S., Ludersdorfer, M., Sung, C., Rus, D.: An untethered miniature origami robot that self-folds, walks, swims, and degrades. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (2015), pp. 1490–1496. doi:10.1109/ICRA.2015.7139386

  37. Morin, S.A, Shevchenko, Y., Lessing, J., Kwok, S.W., Shepherd, R.F., Stokes, A.A., Whitesides, G.M.: Using click-e-bricks to make 3D elastomeric structures. Adv. Mater. 26, 5991–5999 (2014a).

  38. Morin, S.A., Kwok, S.W., Lessing, J., Ting, J., Shepherd, R.F., Stokes, A.A., Whitesides, G.M.: Elastomeric tiles for the fabrication of inflatable structures. Adv. Funct. Mater. 24, 5541–5549 (2014b)

  39. Mosadegh, B., Polygerinos, P., Keplinger, C., Wennstedt, S., Shepherd, R.F., Gupta, U., Shim, J., Bertoldi, K., Walsh, C.J., Whitesides, G.M.: Pneumatic networks for soft robotics that actuate rapidly. Ad. Funct. Mater. 24(15), 2163–2170 (2014). doi:10.1002/adfm.201303288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Mulla, D.J.: Twenty five years of remote sensing in precision agriculture: Key advances and remaining knowledge gaps. Biosyst. Eng. 114(4), 358–371 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2012.08.009.

  41. Murphy, R.R., Peschel, J., Arnett, C., Martin, D.: Projected needs for robot-assisted chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear (CBRN) incidents. In: 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Safety, Security, and Rescue Robotics (SSRR) (2012), pp. 1–4. 10.1109/SSRR.2012.6523881

  42. Muscato, G., Bonaccorso, F., Cantelli, L., Longo, D., Melita, C.D.: Volcanic environments: robots for exploration and measurement. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 19(1), 40–49 (2012). doi:10.1109/MRA.2011.2181684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Nijst, C.L.E., Bruggeman, J.P., Karp, J.M., Ferreira, L., Zumbuehl, A., Bettinger, C.J., Langer, R.: Synthesis and Characterization of Photocurable Elastomers from Poly(glycerol-co-sebacate). Biomacromolecules 8(10), 3067–3073 (2007). doi:10.1021/bm070423u.

  44. Ogunniyi, D.S.: Castor oil: a vital industrial raw material. Bioresource Technology 97(9), 1086–1091 (2006). doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2005.03.028.

  45. Oregon: Environmental toxicology section. calcium carbonate “lime, Limewater”. Health Effects Information (1998)

  46. Patel, A., Gaharwar, A.K., Iviglia, G., Zhang, H., Mukundan, S., Mihaila, S.M., Demarchi, D., Khademhosseini, A.: Highly elastomeric poly(glycerol sebacate)-co-poly(ethylene glycol) amphiphilic block copolymers. Biomaterials 34(16), 3970–3983 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.01.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Quispe, C.A.G., Coronado, C.J.R., Carvalho Jr., J.A.: Glycerol: production, consumption, prices, characterization and new trends in combustion. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 27, 475–493 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.06.017.

  48. Rai, R., Tallawi, M., Grigore, A., Boccaccini, A.R.: Topical issue on biorelated polymers. Prog. Polym. Sci. 37(8), 1051–1078 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.02.001.

  49. Ratner, B.D., Hoffman, A.S., Schoen, F.J., Lemons, J.E.: Biomaterials Science: An Introduction to Materials in Medicine. Academic Press, Boston (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Roy Olsson.: Inbound, Controlled, Air-Releasable, Unrecoverable Systems (ICARUS, DARPA) (2017).

  51. Rus, D., Tolley, M.T.: Design, fabrication and control of soft robots. Nature 521(7553), 467–475 (2015). doi:10.1038/nature14543.

  52. Saltzman, W.M.: Drug Delivery: Engineering Principles for Drug Therapy. Oxford University Press, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Saltzman, W.M.: Tissue Engineering: Engineering Principles for the Design of Replacement Organs and Tissues. Oxford University Press, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Sebacic Acid Material Safety Data Sheet, Sigma Aldrich (2015).

  55. Shankar, R., Ghosh, T.K., Spontak, R.J.: Dielectric elastomers as next-generation polymeric actuators. Soft Matter 3(9), 1116 (2007). doi:10.1039/b705737g

  56. Shepherd, R.F., Ilievski, F., Choi, W., Morin, S.A., Stokes, A.A., Mazzeo, A.D., Chen, X., Wang, M., Whitesides, G.M.: Multigait soft robot. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108(51), 20400–20403 (2011). doi:10.1073/pnas.1116564108.

  57. Shian, S., Bertoldi, K., Clarke, D.R.: Dielectric elastomer based grippers for soft robotics. Adv. Mater. 27(43), 6814–6819 (2015). doi:10.1002/adma.201503078

  58. Stoica A.: Advanced Technologies for Enhanced Quality of Life, 2009. AT-EQUAL '09. (2009), pp. 47–51. 10.1109/AT-EQUAL.2009.46

  59. Stokes, A.A., Shepherd, R.F., Morin, S.A., Ilievski, F., Whitesides, G.M.: A hybrid combining hard and soft robots. Soft Robot. 1(1), 70–74 (2014). doi:10.1089/soro.2013.0002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Sun, Z.J., Wu, L., Huang, W., Chen, C., Chen, Y., Lu, X.L., Zhang, X.L., Yang, B.F., Dong, D.L.: Glycolic acid modulates the mechanical property and degradation of poly(glycerol, sebacate, glycolic acid. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 92(1), 332–339 (2010). doi:10.1002/jbm.a.32370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Suprem, A., Mahalik, N., Kim, K.: A review on application of technology systems, standards and interfaces for agriculture and food sector. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 35(4), 355–364 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.csi.2012.09.002.

  62. The Dow Chemical Company.: Product Safety Assessment, DOW Acrylic Acid (2014).

  63. Thomas, L.V., Nair, P.D.: (Citric acidcopolycaprolactone triol) polyester. Biomatter 1(1), 81–90 (2011). doi:10.4161/biom.1.1.17301.

  64. Trimmer, B., Lin, H.T., Baryshyan, A., Leisk, G., Kaplan, D.L.: Towards a biomorphic soft robot: Design constraints and solutions In: 2012 4th IEEE RAS EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob) (2012), pp. 599–605. doi:10.1109/BioRob.2012.6290698

  65. Valdes, S., Urza, I., Pounds, P., Singh, S.: Samara: low-cost deployment for environmental sensing using passive autorotation. In: Robotics: Science and Systems Workshop on Robotics for Environmental Monitoring, Citeseer (2012).

  66. Wang, Y., Ameer, G.A., Sheppard, B.J., Langer, R.: A tough biodegradable elastomer. Nat. Biotechnol. 20(6), 602, (2002).

  67. Xu, C., Xu, C., Zheng, J.: A novel dielectric elastomer actuator based on polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel electrodes. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.2611 (2014)

  68. Yang, J., Webb, A., Ameer, G.: Novel citric acid-based biodegradable elastomers for tissue engineering. Adv. Mater. 16(6), 511–516 (2004). doi:10.1002/adma.200306264

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors thank Dr. Skip Rochefort for his guidance regarding polymer processing and chemistry, and Andrew Brickman, Dylan Thrush and John Morrow IV for equipment assistance.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephanie Walker.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No competing financial interests exist.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (pdf 14 KB)




Equipment: Regulator: Smith, for Nitrogen tank

Flow Meter: Dwyer RMA-150-SSV

Hot Plate: IKA C-MAG HS 7

PTFE-coated liner: Linden Sweden–Jonas of Sweden

Metal baking pan: Nordic Ware

Vacuum oven: VWR Scientific 1410

Thermocouple Readers: Amprobe TMD-56

Aluminum reaction block: Scilogex

Tensile testing dimensions

Tensile testing dimensions are based on the ASTM D412 Die D dimension restrictions for height 16 ± 1 mm, width 100 mm minimum, gauge length 33 ± 2 mm, and large curvature radius 16 ± 2 mm (Fig. 12). The gauge width was kept wider than the Die D dimension of 3 mm to reduce chances of excess stretching while peeling and handling the samples.

Fig. 12

Tensile and cyclic loading were performed with dumbbell shaped PGS-CaCO\(_{3}\) samples of this size. Sheet thickness of PGS-CaCO\(_{3}\) ranged from approximately 2.6–3.8 mm

Leakage and failure

Photos from leakage and failure testing are shown in Fig. 13.

Fig. 13

Failure tests for Actuators D, E, F, and G. Extension at failure ranged from 106% at 19.7 kPa to 136% at 17.2 kPa, and failure for force applied ranged from 1.84 N at 12.5 kPa to 0.064 N at 30.8 kPa due to slipping of the curved actuator

Motion capture

Motion capture markers were placed on two of the four chambers of Actuator B, two markers per chamber. The grid was drawn by hand with a permanent marker and a ruler using 0.5 cm spacing. The actuator’s pressure was increased from 0 to 6.9 kPa evenly across 22 s using a syringe controlled by hand. The motion was recorded both by a four-camera OptiTrak system and a Nikon D7000 camera looking down towards the sample. The locations of the markers in the 2D camera image were found automatically; the grid points were located manually on every 30th frame. The 2D data was aligned to the 3D data by solving for the camera location using the known 2D and 3D locations of the OptiTrak markers, and initial depth of the 2D grid by approximating the actuator’s geometry with a cylinder. The 3D data was mapped to a canonical cylinder by finding the rigid body transformation that minimized the difference between the OptiTrak points and canonical matching points on the cylinder.

Bend was calculated by taking the angle between the two markers on the bottom chamber and the two on the top; bend is the angle along the cylinder axis. Extension was calculated by taking the average between each of the points on each chamber and then taking the midpoint between the two separate chambers.

The motion capture data for Actuator B is plotted in Fig. 14. All data is plotted with respect to the pressure. The sharp slope at approximately 1.4 kPa is due to the slippage of the actuator on the table. The elongation of the actuator is slightly nonlinear with increasing pressure, but this could be due to the slipping of the actuator or uneven air flow from the pushed syringe.

Fig. 14

Motion captured data of the bend and strain vs. pressure for a four-chambered actuator. The sharp slope at approximately 1.4 kPa is due to the slippage of the actuator on the table

Compression testing

Compression testing was performed on 20 mm diameter circular samples using the Mark-10. Samples were placed on top of sandpaper slightly larger than 20 mm in diameter on top of the bottom compression plate. The top compression plate applied force at a constant rate of 3 mm/min until the center of the sample was reached and then traveled upwards at 3 mm/min to complete one cycle. The first three cycles of compression per sample are plotted.

Compression testing results are shown in the Fig 15. The three samples represent the overall spread of data. The samples overlapped and reached force values from 170 to 246 N at 50% strain.

Fig. 15

Compression testing for three samples of different processing conditions and ages. Each sample underwent three compressive cycles at 3 mm/min to 50% of the polymer height. These three samples represent the overall spread of data, and reached from 170 to 246 N

CO\(_{2}\) Calculation

Calculation of CO\(_{2}\) release should all CaCO\(_{3}\) dissociate:

Molar mass CaCO\(_{3}\) = 100.0869 g/mol

Ideal mass of CaCO\(_{3}\) going into melt = 0.476 g

0.00476 moles of CaCO\(_{3}\) in = 0.00476 moles of CO\(_{2}\) out = 0.2095 g CO\(_{2}\) out

“19.64 pounds of carbon dioxide (CO\(_{2}\)) are produced from burning a gallon of gasoline that does not contain ethanol”


19.64 lbs CO\(_{2}\)/gal burned = 8909 g CO\(_{2}\)/gal burned

Assuming your car gets 30 miles/gallon, burn 297 g/mile

297 g/mile / 5280 ft/mile = 0.05625 g/ft

0.2095 g CO\(_{2}\) from polymer/0.05625 g/ft = 3.724 ft

1000 sheets of polymer (approximately 1000 small actuators) = 3724 ft = 0.705 miles

Preparation of natural latex rubber and silicone tensile samples

Natural rubber centrifuged latex (in water) from Liquid Latex Fashions (clear) was poured into a sheet mold and left to dry for 5 days. The rubber sheet was then laser cut with the same laser settings as PGS-CaCO\(_{3}\) and in the same size dumbbells as the PGS-CaCO\(_{3}\). The rubber sheet thicknesses ranged from 1.4 to 1.7 mm.

50 wt% Part A and 50 wt% Part B of Ecoflex 00-30 were mixed at 2000 rpm for 30 s and then 2200 rpm for 30 s in a Thinky. The mixture was then poured into the same dumbbell shaped molds as the rubber samples (after mold cleaning) and intermittently vacuumed for 15 min in a vacuum chamber to remove any bubbles. The samples were then placed in a 60 \(^\circ \)C oven for 20 min. After being taken out of the oven, sandpaper was glued to the edges of each dumbbell on each side to reduce slipping during testing. The Ecoflex dumbbell thicknesses ranged from 2.3 to 2.9 mm. There was a slight lip on the outer edges of the dumbbell where the silicone met the acrylic mold, so dumbbell thickness was determined using the center of each sample.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Walker, S., Rueben, J., Volkenburg, T.V. et al. Using an environmentally benign and degradable elastomer in soft robotics. Int J Intell Robot Appl 1, 124–142 (2017).

Download citation


  • Elastomer
  • Green chemistry
  • Soft robotics
  • Actuator
  • Degradable