Affordances in nature: Australian primary school children identify learning opportunities

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Australian Curriculum. (2018). Primary curriculum. Retrieved from https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/resources/primary-curriculum. Accessed 7 June 2018.

  2. Bahou, L. (2011). Rethinking the challenges and possibilities of student voice and agency. Educate, 1, 2–14.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baroutsis, A., McGregor, G., & Mills, M. (2016). Pedagogic voice: student voice in teaching and engagement pedagogies. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 24(1), 123–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bentsen, P., & Jensen, F. S. (2012). The nature of udeskole: outdoor learning theory and practice in Danish schools. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning, 12(3), 199–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Birch, J., Parnell, R., Patsarika, M., & Šorn, M. (2017). Creativity, play and transgression: children transforming spatial design. CoDesign, 13(4), 245–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Birkett D. (2011). The school I'd like: here is what you wanted. The Guardian, UK. From http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2011/may/03/school-iwould-like. Accessed 5 April 2011.

  7. Bland, D., & Sharma-Brymer, V. (2012). Imagination in school children’s choice of their learning environment: an Australian study. International Journal of Educational Research, 56, 75–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bruner, J. (1997). Celebrating divergence: Piaget and Vygotsky. Human Development, 40, 63–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brymer, E., & Davids, K. (2014). Experiential learning as a constraints-led process: an ecological dynamics perspective. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 14(2), 103–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brymer, E., Davids, K., & Mallabon, E. (2014). Understanding the psychological health and well-being benefits of physical activity in nature: an ecological dynamics analysis. Journal of Ecopsychology, 6(3), 189–197.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Burke, C., & Grosvenor, I. (2003). The school I’d like: Children and young people’s reflections on an education for the 21st century. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Davids, K., Araujo, D., & Brymer, E. (2016). Designing affordances for physical activity: an ecological dynamics perspective. Sports Medicine, 46(7), 933–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy in education. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Doherty, L. (2005). The school I’d like. News and Features, Sydney Morning Herald, Australia.

  15. Eden, S., & Barratt, P. (2010). Outdoors versus indoors? Angling ponds, climbing walls and changing expectations of environmental leisure. Area, 42(4), 487–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fiskum, A., & Jacobsen, K. (2013). Outdoor education gives fewer demands for action regulation and an increased variability of affordances. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 13(1), 76–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Flutter, J., & Rudduck, J. (2004). Consulting pupils: What's in it for schools? London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Ghaziani, R. (2010). School design: researching children’s views. Childhoods Today, 4(1), 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gibson, J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gill, T. (2007). No fear: Growing up in a risk averse society. London: CalousteGulbenkian Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gray, P. (2013). Play as preparation for learning and life: an interview with Peter Gray. American Journal of Play, 5(3), 271–292.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jenkins, M. (2013). School design: how important are buildings to learning? The Guardian, UK. From http://www.theguardian.com/teacher-network/teacher-blog/2013/mar/22/school-design-architecture-buildings-learning-live-chat. Accessed 6 March 2015.

  23. Lloyd, A., Truong, S., & Gray, T. (2018). Place-based outdoor learning: more than a drag and drop approach. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 21(1), 45–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Morse, L., & Allensworth, D. (2015). Placing students at the centre: the whole school, whole community, whole child model. The Journal of School Health, 85, 785–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Muderrisoglu, H., & Gultekin, P. (2013). Understanding the children’s perception and preferences on nature-based outdoor landscape. Indoor and Built Environment, 24(3), 340–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rigolon, A. (2011). A space with meaning: children’s involvement in participatory design processes. Design Principles and Practices, 5(2), 151–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Robinson, K., & Azzam, A. M. (2009). Why creativity now? Educational Leadership, 67(1), 22–26.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rudduck, J., & Fielding, M. (2006). Student voice and the perils of popularity. Educational Review, 58(2), 219–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sagiv, L., & Schwartz, S. H. (2000). Value priorities and subjective wellbeing: direct and congruity effects. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 177–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sandseter, E. B. H. (2009). Affordances for risky play in preschool: the importance of features in the play environment. Early Childhood Education Journal, 36, 439–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sharma-Brymer, V., & Bland, D. (2016). Bringing nature to schools to promote children’s physical activity. Sports Medicine, 46(7), 955–962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Storli, R., & Hagen, T. L. (2010). Affordances in outdoor environments and children's physical active play in pre-school. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 18(4), 445–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Strong-Wilson, T., & Ellis, J. (2007). Children and place: Reggio Emilia's environment as third teacher. Theory Into Practice, 46(1), 40–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Thomas, H. (2010). Learning spaces, learning environments and the dis‘placement’ of learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), 502–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Thornberg, T., & Elvstrand, H. (2012). Children's experiences of democracy, participation, and trust in school. International Journal of Educational Research, 53, 44–54. 

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Vygotsky, L. (2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood. (ME Sharpe, trans.). Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 42(1), 7–97 (Original work published 1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Waite, S., & Goodenough, A. (2018). What is different about Forest School? Creating a space for an alternative pedagogy in England. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 21(1), 25–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wall, G. (2016). The impact of physical design on student outcomes. Report by the Ministry of Education, New Zealand. From http://www.educationcounts.edcentre.govt.nz. Accessed 1 July 2017.

  39. Warren, W. (2006). The dynamics of perception and action. Psychological Review, 113, 358–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Withagen, R., De Poel, H. J., Araújo, D., & Pepping, G. (2012). Affordances can invite behaviour: reconsidering the relationship between affordances and agency. New Ideas in Psychology, 30(2), 250–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vinathe Sharma-Brymer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sharma-Brymer, V., Davids, K., Brymer, E. et al. Affordances in nature: Australian primary school children identify learning opportunities. Curric Perspect 38, 175–180 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-018-0052-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Person-environment Relationship
  • Rich Landscape
  • Major Curriculum Areas
  • Sustained Student Engagement
  • Young School Students